Use of group a thawed plasma in emergency transfusions at a pediatric quaternary care center.

BACKGROUND: Balanced plasma/red blood cell transfusions have shown survival benefit in emergency scenarios. To improve plasma availability, we implemented 5-day group A thawed plasma at our pediatric hospital in February 2021. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We maintain thawed group A plasma units (5-day shelf-life) ready for immediate issue in the blood bank (since February 2021) and trauma code room (since August 2022). Group A plasma (un-titered) is issued for patients with unknown blood type during emergencies. We retrospectively reviewed records and laboratory results of recipients to assess safety and identify possible adverse events related to incompatible plasma. RESULTS: Between February 2021 and December 2023, 173 emergency plasma requests occurred for 161 patients. Ninety-one occurred with massive transfusion protocol activations. Thirty-six patients (22.4%) were blood group B or AB, and 23 received incompatible plasma (age 0-21.3 years, weight 0.74-149.8 kg, incompatible plasma dose 4.0-428.4 mL/kg). These patients did not have any differences in survival outcomes or hospital lengths of stay (LOS) compared with compatible plasma recipients, mirroring the adult experience. None experienced adverse events related to group A plasma. No transfusion reactions were reported. No increase in wastage/outdate occurred upon thawed plasma implementation (2020 versus 2021 to 2023, 7.73% [133/1721] vs. 8.58% [497/5792], p = .284). CONCLUSIONS: We implemented 5-day group A thawed plasma. Units are rapidly available from the blood bank and trauma code room without increased wastage. We did not identify any transfusion-associated adverse events in pediatric recipients of incompatible group A plasma.

Radiofrequency identification tracking system (RFID) significantly improves blood bank inventory management and decreases staff work effort.

BACKGROUND: Before implementation of the radio frequency identification (RFID) system, there was a high loss rate of 4.0%-4.3% of red blood cell (RBC) units every year expiring on the shelf in our transfusion service laboratory. We introduced RFID technology to improve inventory management and the burden of work on the staff. The goal of this study was to evaluate the impact of RFID technology on the inventory management of RBC units and the staff workload in a transfusion service laboratory. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Using an RFID system involves encoding RBC units with an RFID tag capturing information such as donor identification number, product code, blood type, expiration date, product volume, and negative antigen(s). Tag information is collected through retrofitted storage shelves linked to the RFID server. The study analyzed RBC usage by unit and by volume (mL) and staff work effort to carry out inventory management tasks before and after the implementation of the RFID system. RESULTS: Implementation of the RFID technology reduced the loss, or discard, of RBC units to less than 1% annually (a statistically significant change, p < .001). The RFID computer dashboard provides a constant visual update of the inventory, allowing technologists to have accurate product counts and reducing their work burden. DISCUSSION: Implementation of RFID technology substantially reduced RBC product loss, improved inventory management, and lessened staff work burden.

Screening for new red blood cell alloantibodies after transfusion in patients with sickle cell disease.

BACKGROUND: Patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) are frequent recipients of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions and are at risk for RBC alloimmunization. RBC alloimmunization is diagnosed by identifying RBC alloantibodies as part of pre-transfusion testing, but this testing fails to detect alloantibodies that have evanesced. It may be beneficial to screen for new RBC alloantibody development after transfusion before possible antibody evanescence. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Our institution started a new initiative for episodically transfused patients with SCD to obtain at least one antibody screen 2-6 months after transfusion as part of their clinical care. A database was created to prospectively track all transfused patients for 1 year and their post-transfusion antibody screen results. Patients received prophylactically CEK-matched RBC units. RESULTS: During the study year, 138 patients with SCD received a total of 242 RBC transfusions. Patients with a history of an RBC alloantibody (n = 13, 9.4%) had previously received more RBC units than non alloimmunized patients (median 11 vs. 2 RBC units, p = .0002). A total of 337 post-transfusion antibody screens were obtained in 127 patients (92.0%) with 110 patients (79.7%) having at least one antibody screen 2-6 months post-transfusion. With this prospective testing, two new RBC alloantibodies (anti-C and -M) were identified in two patients. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to test for new RBC alloantibody development in most episodically transfused patients with SCD as part of their routine care. The yield of this screening appears low with CEK matching, but it could still provide important information for individual patients.

Transfusion in Pediatric Patients: Review of Evidence-Based Guidelines.

Children require transfusion of blood components for a vast array of medical conditions, including acute hemorrhage, hematologic and nonhematologic malignancies, hemoglobinopathy, and allogeneic and autologous stem cell transplant. Evidence-based literature on pediatric transfusion practices is limited, particularly for non-red blood cell products, and many recommendations are extrapolated from studies in adult populations. Recognition of these knowledge gaps has led to increasing numbers of clinical trials focusing on children and establishment of pediatric transfusion working groups in recent years. This article reviews existing literature on pediatric transfusion therapy within the larger context of analogous data in adult populations.

New Approaches and Trials in Pediatric Transfusion Medicine.

Blood transfusions are frequently lifesaving, but there is growing awareness of their associated infectious and noninfectious adverse events. Patient blood management advocates for judicious use of transfusions and considerations of alternatives to correct anemia or achieve hemostasis. Several transfusion practices, either already implemented or under investigation, aim to further improve the safety of transfusions. An enduring challenge in pediatric and neonatal transfusion practice is that studies typically focus on adults, and findings are extrapolated to younger patients. This article aims to summarize some of the newer developments in transfusion medicine with a focus on the neonatal and pediatric population.

Anti-D from alloimmunization versus RhIG: detective work in the blood bank and transfusion medicine services.

BACKGROUND: The blood bank and transfusion medicine services (BBTMS) engages with electronic health records (EHRs), clinicians, and outside hospitals (OHs) to obtain comprehensive patient history to optimize care. Detection of anti-D in a pregnant patient underscores this work. Differentiating passive anti-D due to RhIG administration versus alloanti-D affects clinical decision making. The objectives of this study were to identify the required steps, barriers, and outcomes of anti-D investigations in obstetric patients. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This retrospective case series reviewed nine pregnant patients over 24 months, for whom anti-D was identified with no reported RhIG history. Six steps were performed to ascertain anti-D history: 1) review the on-site EHR; 2) contact the on-site obstetrician, 3) review history from the automatic health information exchange (HIE) with OHs using the same EHR platform, 4) request information from OHs with a shared EHR platform and without automatic HIE, 5) contact the OH BBTMS, and 6) communicate with the outside ambulatory practice (OAP). RESULTS: The investigations revealed that eight of nine patients received RhIG before their presentation. Five patients received RhIG at an OH's emergency department and three at an OAP. One patient's history remained unknown after initial investigations; however, a subsequent sample unveiled a confounding alloantibody. CONCLUSION: In the absence of a national HIE, continuity of care suffers through omission of critical information. Strategies to avoid confusing passive anti-D and alloanti-D include expanding HIE capabilities and use of patient identification cards with critical BBTMS information to include RhIG administration dates.