Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
World J Surg ; 47(6): 1457-1463, 2023 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36859569

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In penetrating abdominal trauma, computed tomography (CT) is routinely performed to evaluate stable patients for selective non-operative management (SNOM). Triple-contrast CT (oral, rectal, and IV) has traditionally been used. However, due to its disadvantages, most trauma centres, including our unit at the Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital (CMJAH), now perform single-contrast intravenous-only CT scans. We performed a retrospective review to determine the accuracy of single-contrast CT scans for detecting hollow viscus injuries (HVI) in penetrating abdominal trauma. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients who presented to CMJAH with penetrating abdominal injuries was performed between 01 August 2017 and 31 August 2019 and were evaluated for SNOM with CT (IV contrast only). Patient records were reviewed to determine pertinent demographics, mechanism, and site of injury, as well as metabolic parameters. CT findings were compared to findings at laparotomy. RESULTS: A total of 437 patients met the inclusion criteria. The majority were male (92.7%), with a mean age of 31.5 yrs (SD 8.7). Injuries were predominantly due to stab wounds (72,5%, n = 317). CT scan was negative in 342 patients, of which 314 completed SNOM successfully. A total of 93 patients proceeded to laparotomy. CT had a sensitivity of 95.1%, specificity of 44.2%, positive predictive value of 57.4%, and negative predictive value of 92%. CONCLUSION: Single-contrast CT in penetrating abdominal trauma is a valuable investigative tool in identifying patients for SNOM. Features of HVI on single-contrast CT are not very specific and should be interpreted along with other clinical factors including wound trajectory and serial abdominal examinations. Other associated injuries such as diaphragmatic and solid organ injuries should be considered in the final management plan.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Heridas Penetrantes , Heridas Punzantes , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Sudáfrica , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Heridas Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagen , Heridas Penetrantes/cirugía , Heridas Punzantes/cirugía , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Laparotomía
2.
World J Surg ; 47(7): 1657-1661, 2023 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36995401

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Trauma is a major disease burden in low and middle-income countries like South Africa. Abdominal trauma is one of the leading reasons for emergency surgery. The standard of care for these patients is a laparotomy. In selected trauma patients, laparoscopy has both diagnostic and therapeutic usage. The trauma burden and the number of cases seen in a busy trauma unit make laparoscopy challenging. AIM: We wanted to describe our journey with laparoscopy in the management of abdominal trauma in a busy urban trauma unit in Johannesburg, South Africa. METHODS: We reviewed all trauma patients who underwent diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) or therapeutic laparoscopy (TL) between 01 January 2017 and 31 October 2020 for blunt and penetrating abdominal trauma. The demographic data, indications for laparoscopy, injuries identified, procedures performed, intraoperative laparoscopic complications, conversion to laparotomy, morbidity, and mortality were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 54 patients who had laparoscopy were included in the study. The median age was 29 years (IQR 25-25). Most injuries were penetrating 85.2% (n = 46/54) and 14.8% blunt trauma. Most patients were males, 94.4% (n = 51/54). Indications for laparoscopy included diaphragm evaluation (40.7%), pneumoperitoneum for evaluation of potential bowel injury (16.7%), free fluid with no evidence of solid organ injury (12.9%) and colostomy (5.5%). There were 8 (14.8%) cases converted to laparotomy. There were no missed injuries or mortality in the study group. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopy in selected trauma patients is safe even in a busy trauma unit. It is associated with less morbidity and shortened hospital length of stay.


Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Abdominales , Laparoscopía , Heridas Penetrantes , Masculino , Humanos , Adulto , Femenino , Centros Traumatológicos , Heridas Penetrantes/diagnóstico , Heridas Penetrantes/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sudáfrica/epidemiología , Laparoscopía/métodos , Traumatismos Abdominales/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Abdominales/cirugía , Laparotomía
3.
World J Surg ; 47(4): 863-869, 2023 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36581690

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Gunshot wounds to the heart are regarded as one of the most lethal penetrating injuries. There has been an increase in gunshot wounds to the chest in our institution in recent years. Injuries to the heart caused by gunshot wounds can be challenging, with patients arriving in hospital in different physiological states. We report our trauma unit's experience with civilian gunshot wounds to the heart. METHODS: A retrospective review from January 2005 till December 2018 of those 18 years of age and above who presented to our hospital with penetrating cardiac injuries over eight years was done. Those who presented with a carotid pulse and a cardiac rhythm were included in the study. Blood pressure of less than 90 mmHg was considered as haemodynamic instability. Demographics, physiological parameters, injuries sustained, preferred surgical access to the chest, and type of surgery were analysed. The complications during their hospital stay and outpatient clinic were documented. The incidences of in-hospital mortality were also noted. Descriptive statistics with STATA version 15 were conducted. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 37 patients were enroled in the study; four were excluded for incomplete data. All presented directly from the scene, with a median age of 30 (IQR 24-36). Haemodynamic instability was in 64% of the cases. The most common injured chamber was the right ventricle (75.7%). There were only two complications recorded; local wound sepsis and empyema. All survivors received a post-surgical echocardiogram. The overall survival rate was 18.9% (n = 7). Of the ten that required emergency room thoracotomy, only one survived to discharge. CONCLUSION: Gunshot wounds to the heart have a mortality rate greater than 80% in those arriving alive. Only one in ten of those who meet the strict criteria for emergency room thoracotomy survive hospitalisation. The local complication rate was low.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Cardíacas , Traumatismos Torácicos , Heridas por Arma de Fuego , Heridas Penetrantes , Heridas Punzantes , Humanos , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/epidemiología , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/cirugía , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/complicaciones , Heridas Punzantes/cirugía , Sudáfrica/epidemiología , Lesiones Cardíacas/epidemiología , Lesiones Cardíacas/cirugía , Heridas Penetrantes/cirugía , Traumatismos Torácicos/epidemiología , Toracotomía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros Traumatológicos
4.
Trauma Case Rep ; 33: 100465, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33869718

RESUMEN

Subclavian artery injuries are complex and challenging due to anatomy and exposure during surgery. The surgical management depends on the mechanism of injury, the patient's haemodynamic stability and other injuries sustained. If control of bleeding is lost during surgery, it results in immediate exsanguination, with high mortality and morbidity rates. New techniques with endovascular surgery have changed the approach and outcome of these injuries. In this case report, an incidental finding of coarctation of the aorta in a 32-year-old man after sustaining a gunshot to the chest, with a subsequent subclavian artery injury is reported.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA