Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop ; 150(2): 290-4, 2016 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27476362

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: In this clinical trial, we evaluated and compared bond failure rates of light-cured composite resin vs chemical-cured composite resin for 12 months. METHODS: Twenty-two subjects (356 stainless steel brackets) were included in this study, and a split-mouth design was used to randomly allocate diagonally opposite quadrants to either chemical-cured (178 brackets) or light-cured (178 brackets) composite resin; the brackets came from the same manufacturer. The survival and failure rates of the brackets were evaluated by the mode of polymerization. The overall bracket survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product limit estimate. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the bond failure rates between the chemical-cured and the light-cured composites (P = 0.52). Bond failures were greater in posterior teeth (6.7%) than in anterior teeth (1.2%). The highest failure rate was observed in the second premolars (7.7%). CONCLUSIONS: The overall failure rate of brackets with the 2 bonding systems was 2.8%, which is acceptable for clinical use. The polymerization mode did not influence the bracket survival rate significantly.


Asunto(s)
Resinas Compuestas/química , Recubrimiento Dental Adhesivo , Maloclusión/terapia , Soportes Ortodóncicos , Ortodoncia Correctiva/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Análisis del Estrés Dental , Falla de Equipo , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Curación por Luz de Adhesivos Dentales , Masculino , Ensayo de Materiales , Polimerizacion , Estudios Prospectivos , Acero Inoxidable , Propiedades de Superficie
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA