Complete mesocolic excision versus standard resection for colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative safety and an evaluation of the use of a robotic approach.

PURPOSE: Complete mesocolic excision (CME) has been associated with improved oncological outcomes in treatment of colon cancer. However, widespread adoption is limited partly because of the technical complexity and perceived risks of the approach. The aim of out study was to evaluate the safety of CME compared to standard resection and to compare robotic versus laparoscopic approaches. METHODS: Two parallel searches were undertaken in MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science databases 12 December 2021. The first was to evaluate IDEAL stage 3 evidence to compare complication rates as a surrogate marker of perioperative safety between CME and standard resection. The second independent search compared lymph node yield and survival outcomes between minimally invasive approaches. RESULTS: There were four randomized control trials (n = 1422) comparing CME to standard resection, and three studies comparing laparoscopic (n = 164) to robotic (n = 161) approaches. Compared to standard resection, CME was associated with a reduction in Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or higher complication rates (3.56% vs. 7.24%, p = 0.002), reduced blood loss (113.1 ml vs. 137.6 ml, p < 0.0001) and greater mean lymph node harvest (25.6 vs. 20.9 nodes, p = 0.001). Between the robotic and laparoscopic groups, there were no significant differences in complication rates, blood loss, lymph node yield, 5-year disease-free survival (OR 1.05, p = 0.87) and overall survival (OR 0.83, p = 0.54). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated improved safety with CME. There was no difference in safety or survival outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic CME. The advantage of a robotic approach may lie in the reduced learning curve and an increased penetration of minimally invasive approach to CME. Further studies are required to explore this. PROSPERO ID: CRD42021287065.

Fallibility of tattooing colonic neoplasia ahead of laparoscopic resection: a retrospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Precise geographical localisation of colonic neoplasia is a prerequisite for proper laparoscopic oncological resection. Preoperative endoscopic peri-tumoural tattoo practice is routinely recommended but seldom scrutinised. METHODS: A retrospective review of recent consecutive patients with preoperative endoscopic lesional tattoo who underwent laparoscopic colonic resection as identified from our prospectively maintained cancer database with supplementary clinical chart and radiological, histological, endoscopic and theatre database/logbook interrogation. RESULTS: Some 210 patients with 'tattooed' colonic neoplasia were identified, of whom 169 underwent laparoscopic surgery (mean age 68 years, median BMI 27.8kg/m2, male-to-female ratio 95:74). The majority of tumours were malignant (149; 88%), symptomatic (133; 79%) and proximal to the splenic flexure (92; 54%). Inaccurate colonoscopist localisation judgement occurred in 12% of cases, 60% of which were corrected by preoperative staging computed tomography scan. A useful lesional tattoo was absent in 11/169 cases (6.5%) being specifically stated as present in 104 operation notes (61%) and absent in 10 (5.9%). Tumours missing overt peritumoral tattoos intraoperatively were more likely to be smaller, earlier stage and injected longer preoperatively (p=0.006), although half had histological ink staining. Eight lesions missing tattoos were radiologically occult. Four (44%) of these patients had on-table colonoscopy, and five (55%) needed laparotomy (conversion rate 55% vs 23% overall, p<0.005) with one needing a second operation to resect the initially missed target lesion. Mean (range) operative duration and postoperative length of stay of those missing tattoos compared with those with tattoos was 200 (78-300) versus 188 (50-597) min and 15.5 (4-22) versus 12(4-70) days (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Tattoo in advance of attempting laparoscopic resection is vital for precision cancer surgery especially for radiologically unseen tumours to avoid adverse clinical consequence.

Preoperative assessment and optimisation for pelvic exenteration in locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer: A review.

The pre-operative phase in planning a pelvic exenteration or extended resections is critical to optimising patient outcomes. This review summarises the key components of preoperative assessment and planning in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and locally recurrent rectal cancer (LLRC) being considered for potential curative resection. The preoperative period can be considered in 5 key phases: 1) Multidisciplinary meeting (MDT) review and recommendation for neoadjuvant therapy and surgery, 2) Anaesthetic preoperative assessment of fitness for surgery and quantification of risk, 3) Shared decision making with the patient and the process of informed consent, 4) Prehabilitation and physiological optimisation 5) Technical aspects of surgical planning. This review will focus on patients who have been recommended for surgery by the MDT and have completed neoadjuvant therapy. Other important considerations beyond the scope of this review are the various neoadjuvant strategies employed which in this patient group include Total Neo-adjuvant Therapy and reirradiation. Critical to improving perioperative outcomes is the dual aim of achieving a negative resection margin in a patient fit enough for extended surgery. Advanced, realistic communication is required pre-operatively and should be maintained throughout recovery. Optimising patient's physiological and psychological reserve with a preoperative prehabilitation programme is important, with physiotherapy, psychological and nutritional input. From a surgical perspective, image based technical preoperative planning is important to identify risk points and ensure correct surgical strategy. Careful attention to the entire patient journey through these 5 preoperative phases can optimise outcomes with the accumulation of marginal gains at multiple timepoints.

Trends and outcomes of non-traumatic major lower extremity amputations in an Irish tertiary referral hospital.

OBJECTIVES: Data on vascular patients following amputation in Ireland is lacking, limiting capability to plan services. This paper seeks to benchmark survival and rehabilitation outcomes among vascular patients in Ireland following lower extremity amputation (LEA), and compare subgroups of those undergoing transfemoral (TFA) or transtibial amputation (TTA). METHODS: A review was conducted of all patients who underwent non-traumatic TFA or TTA from 2000 to 2009 in a tertiary vascular surgery centre. Demographics, surgical data, perioperative outcomes, medium-term functional outcomes, and survival were assessed. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-two patients (2:1 male: female) underwent 192 non-traumatic LEAs. Median age for TFA was 75 years and TTA 67 (p = 0.002). A percentage of 36.5% had undergone prior attempts at surgical revascularization, 25% had undergone prior distal amputation or debridement. Thirty-three (17%) required stump revision. Twenty-three (13.2%) died in hospital. Median survival for those who died in hospital was 17 days (0-367), versus 17 months (2-106) for those who survived to discharge. CONCLUSION: LEA for vascular pathology has significant morbidity and mortality, with long in-patient stays and short median survival; there is need to focus on improving quality of life in postoperative pathways.

Simulation in surgical training: Prospective cohort study of access, attitudes and experiences of surgical trainees in the UK and Ireland.

BACKGROUND: Surgical training is evolving, and simulation is becoming more important as a way to expedite the early learning curve and augment surgical techniques. With novel technology, and innovation, major changes are possible in how surgeons are trained. The integration of these concepts into the surgical curriculum may drive up educational standards and enhance patient safety. This survey sought to determine surgical trainees views on the current place of simulation in surgical training and explore their vision for the future. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a prospective, questionnaire-based cross-sectional study by *** and the ***, England. Surgical trainees were surveyed about their experiences of simulation during their training through an electronic questionnaire distributed in the UK and Republic of Ireland through mailing lists of RCS and ***. Quantitative and qualitative research methodology was used. RESULTS: Of 462 surveys submitted, a total of 323 were fully completed and included in the analysis. Core Surgical Trainees represented 28.4% of respondents. The vast majority of respondents (98.9%) considered that simulation training was important, however 55.0% felt it was delivered inadequately. 86.2% wanted greater access to simulation training: Less than half of respondents had access to simulation training at their current place of work or had simulation incorporated into their formal teaching programme (42.4% and 41.6% respectively). CONCLUSION: This study highlights the importance of simulation to trainees. Delivery and accessibility of simulation training varies widely. We highlight areas for improvement and best practice. In a culture of accountability, where patient safety is our highest priority, a "see one, do one, teach one" approach to training is no longer appropriate; instead we must utilise available simulation tools to augment learning.

Prospective cohort study of surgical trainee experience of access to gastrointestinal endoscopy training in the UK and Ireland.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical trainees are reporting barriers to training in gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy. This snapshot survey aimed to gather data on variation in access to quality GI endoscopy training for Colorectal and Upper Gastrointestinal (GI) surgical trainees across the UK and Ireland. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An online 20-point survey was designed and distributed nationally to surgical trainee members of the Association of Surgeons in Training (ASiT), Dukes and The Roux Group (formerly Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland Trainees). The survey was designed in collaboration with The Roux Group for Upper GI trainees and the Dukes' Club for Colorectal trainees. RESULTS: 218 responses were received, most with a Colorectal or Upper GI sub-specialty interest (colorectal 56.0%; upper GI surgery 25.7%). Only 28.6% of trainees attended a dedicated training endoscopy list at least once a week with 28.1% not attending any at all. Less than half of trainees reported having endoscopy formally timetabled on rotas (36.9%). Most trainees (88.0%) encountered difficulties in gaining endoscopy training including lack of available lists (77.2%), conflicting operative commitments (59.4%), preferential allocation of lists to gastroenterology trainees (57.9%) and resistance from endoscopy departmental leads (38.6%). Regarding JAG accreditation, 77.1% respondents felt it should be mandatory prior to CCT with 80.3% believing this would lead to better access to dedicated endoscopy training equivalent to gastroenterology trainees. 93.1% trainees felt that attaining JAG accreditation by surgical trainees was important to patient care. DISCUSSION: This study demonstrates significant barriers in accessing GI endoscopy training for general surgical trainees which urgently needs to be improved. In order to meet JAG training requirements for surgical trainees, a multifaceted collaborative approach from surgical and gastroenterology training bodies, local JAG trainers and the General Surgery SAC and JCST is required. This is to ensure that endoscopy is promoted and a robust model of training is successfully designed and delivered to general surgery trainees.

Stoma rods in abdominal surgery: a systematic review and metaanalyses.

BACKGROUND: Stoma rods are used traditionally to prevent retraction of loop stomas into the abdominal cavity. However, there is very little evidence to support or refute their use. The aim of the present systematic review and metaanalysis was to assess the current data on stoma rods in loop stomas. The primary outcomes were stoma necrosis and stoma retraction. METHODS: A systematic review and metaanalyses were conducted using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and metaanalysis guidelines (PRISMA). The study protocol was registered prospectively on PROSPERO. An electronic search was performed by two reviewers independently using predefined search strategy and Medline. Bibliographies of selected studies were screened for additional references. RevMan was used to generate forest plots and calculate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: In total, five studies were identified that met inclusion criteria, including four randomized controlled trials. Three studies examined only ileostomies, while one included both colostomies and ileostomies, and one only examined colostomies. In total, 561 patients underwent a stoma with a rod compared to 443 without. There was a higher rate of dermatitis (rod 29.86% vs no rod 16% OR 2.65; 95% CI 1.79-3.93) and stoma necrosis (rod 7% vs no rod 1.15% OR 5.58; 95% CI 1.85-16.84) in the rod group, but there was no significant difference in stoma retraction (rod 2.28% vs no rod 3.45%; OR 0.7; 95% CI 0.32-1.54). CONCLUSIONS: Stoma rods do not reduce the incidence of stoma retraction and instead lead to increased rates of dermatitis and stoma necrosis.

Nurturing Excellence: Association of Surgeons in Training Annual Conference 2018 Edinburgh.

The Association of Surgeons in Training (ASiT)'s motto is the pursuit of excellence in surgical training. The Association provides support to surgical trainees throughout the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland. Originally founded in 1976, ASiT is independent of the National Health Service (NHS), Surgical Royal Colleges, and specialty associations. The 2018 Annual Conference in Edinburgh hosted over 800 delegates for a packed educational weekend. The conference theme was #nurturingexcellence and focused on helping trainees achieve their potential and improve surgical care. The importance of support for diversity in surgery was emphasised. An inclusive approach was fostered with a baby feeding room and a clear message that babies were welcome at the conference. Debates on the role of simulation in surgical training, sessions on reflective practice and the improving surgical training programme and a question and answer session with the presidents of the Royal colleges of surgeons made for lively and at times heated discussions. The weekend started with pre-conference courses covering a diverse range of topics including core laparoscopic, vascular, orthopaedics, neurosurgical skills, leadership, NOTSS and global surgery. Over 1000 abstract submissions were received and there were over 30 prize winning submissions. ASiT continues to grow and we look forward to an even larger and more successful international conference next year in Belfast 22nd-24th March, with an exciting parallel Hackathon to foster cross specialty cooperation to solve surgical problems.

Perceptions of the Annual Review of Competence Progression (ARCP) in surgical training in the UK and Ireland: A prospective cross sectional questionnaire study.

BACKGROUND: Surgical trainees in the UK and Ireland undergo rigorous formative and summative assessments throughout each placement, and appraisal at an Annual Review of Competence Progression (ARCP). The ARCP evaluates performance during each training year and determines progression to the next year of training. It is critical that the ARCP is a robust and fair process. The Association of Surgeons in Training (ASiT) sought to evaluate surgical trainees' experiences of the ARCP process in order to identify areas for improvement. METHODS: An electronic survey was developed and distributed electronically to the trainee membership of ASiT in the UK and Republic of Ireland. A 57 point survey examined the specifics of one ARCP cycle as well as attitudes to the process in general. Quantitative analysis was performed, along with thematic analysis on the free-text comments. RESULTS: 600 trainees from all deaneries, grades and specialities participated. The survey demonstrated difficulties in preparing for ARCP: insufficient notice (24%), inadequate communication (22%) and lack of engagement of seniors (30-39%). 47% considered the process and standards inconsistent. 82% of trainees considered a face-to-face ARCP advantageous. Such a meeting provided a means of raising concerns regarding training posts (29%), bullying (18%) and patient safety (17%) that would not otherwise have been reported in writing. During qualitative analysis, the following themes emerged: The conflict between potential value and real experience; concerns regarding the quality of assessment and the need for improvement (in process, individual performance and surgical training.) CONCLUSION: This survey demonstrates that trainees appreciate the potential educational value of the ARCP process. However, there is a gap between this potential and trainees experience. Particular concerns include inconsistency, the timing of decision-making and the need to retain a face-to-face meeting. This feedback from trainees can be used to improve the assessment process in relation to procedural developments at the national level and engagement of supervisors and trainers locally. These changes will ensure that the ARCP becomes a higher quality assessment and more constructive for training in future.

Effects of CDX2 on prognosis and chemotherapy responsiveness in mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Caudal-related homeobox transcription factor 2 (CDX2) is an intestine-specific transcription factor implicated in tumour differentiation, proliferation, cell adhesion and migration. Negative CDX2 status (CDX2-) is associated with worse prognosis in colorectal cancer and may identify high-risk stage II disease that benefits from adjuvant chemotherapy. This observational study investigated whether CDX2- is associated with prognosis or response to chemotherapy in the mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) phenotype of colorectal cancer. METHODS: Patients with resectable dMMR colorectal cancer were eligible for inclusion. The prognostic and predictive value of CDX2 expression on the presence of lymph node metastasis (LNM) and survival was investigated. CDX2 status was determined via immunohistochemistry using the Leica Bond™ CDX2 (clone EP25) ready-to-use primary antibody. RESULTS: Some 235 of 238 consecutive dMMR tumours were assessed for CDX2 status. CDX2- was observed in 15·7 per cent of colorectal cancer. Interobserver agreement was excellent (κ = 0·863; P < 0·001). CDX2- was significantly associated with female sex, increased size, advanced stage, worse conventional and poorly differentiated cluster (PDC) grade, mucinous morphology, perineural and lymphovascular invasion, and pN status (all P ≤ 0·038). CDX2- was not associated with LNM or survival in multivariable analysis. Independent predictors of LNM were PDC grade (odds ratio (OR) 4·12, 95 per cent c.i. 1·76 to 9·63; P = 0·001) and extramural venous invasion (OR 3·79, 1·62 to 8·85; P = 0·002). Budding (hazard ratio (HR) 2·79, 95 per cent c.i. 1·60 to 4·87; P < 0·001), pT status (HR 3·59, 1·29 to 10·01; P = 0·015) and adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 2·07, 1·15 to 3·74; P = 0·016) were independently associated with worse disease-free survival. CONCLUSION: CDX2- does not confer a worse prognosis in the dMMR phenotype of colorectal cancer. The MMR status of patients with colorectal cancer should be determined before assessing CDX2 status.

Supporting doctors as healthcare quality and safety advocates: Recommendations from the Association of Surgeons in Training (ASiT).

BACKGROUND: As front-line healthcare staff, doctors in surgical training occupy a unique organisational space rotating through hospitals and services in which they witness first hand both good and bad practice. This puts trainees in a clear position to identify and raise patient safety issues, and to contribute to discussions regarding quality and safety improvement. However, there are a number of real and perceived barriers to trainees doing so. These include concerns about the impact on training assessments and career progression, and uncertainty about the appropriate route. METHODS: Paper-based survey of delegates attending the Association of Surgeons in Training (ASiT) conference (response rate 73%; 479/652). RESULTS: 288 (60%) of trainees reported previous concerns over practices and behaviour of colleagues that might pose risks to patient care including concerns over poor performance (n = 243; 84%), bullying (n = 45; 16%), alcohol and drug abuse (n = 15; 5%) and mental health problems (n = 8; 3%). However, 53% (n = 153) did not escalate these concerns. 178 (37%) of trainees also reported concerns over hospital policies, protocols or systems that might pose a risk to patient care, with 46% (n = 82) not escalating such concerns. Respondents highlighted fear of personal vilification or reprisal (n = 224; 47%), fear of impact on career (n = 206; 43%) and a lack of confidence in the process (n = 170; 36%) as barriers to whistleblowing. More senior trainees were significantly more likely to raise concerns than more junior grades (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: These results highlight worrying issues around reporting concerns, with trainees often "silent witnesses" to poor performance in healthcare. Adverse events must provide opportunities for learning to improve future outcomes. Herein, ASiT proposes 14 recommendations to improve protection for trainees in raising patient safety concerns. These include the creation of a positive workplace culture, promoting the active involvement of trainees in quality improvement discussions, with clear mechanisms for trainees to raise concerns.

Attributes of excellent surgical trainers: An analysis of outstanding trainers.

Excellent surgical trainers play a key role in teaching, mentoring and inspiring the next generation of trainee surgeons. Although there are differences in approach, personality and technique among trainers, common themes exist for those that truly shine as examples of good training. The good surgical trainer has long been the "unsung hero" of patient safety, inspiring and imparting wisdom and skill in trainee surgeons, and instilling a sense of confidence and compassion. In order to recognise exceptional trainers, the Association of Surgeons in Training (ASiT) introduced the Silver Scalpel Award in 2000. The award acknowledges talented trainers who go the "extra mile" for their trainees, and the selection process includes both written nominations and structured interviews with the nominees. We wished to identify what makes the best trainers excellent, to see if these attributes could be used to develop recommendations on how to train and how to support trainers. Here we present an outline of key attributes of an excellent surgical trainer, based on qualitative synthesis of the interview sheets from Silver Scalpel interviews. These results clearly highlight that good trainers are first and foremost good doctors, and that good training goes hand-in-hand with excellent patient care. This symbiotic relationship between training and patient outcomes should be acknowledged, and trainers should be supported by their employers to empower them to carry out their dual roles of training and patient care to the best of their ability. Trainers are key role models to inspire the next generation of surgeons and exceptional trainers should be celebrated.

Association of Surgeons in Training conference: Bournemouth 2017.

The Association of Surgeons in Training (ASiT) is a professional body and registered charity working to promote excellence in surgical training for the benefit of junior doctors and patients alike. The Association provides support at both regional and national levels throughout the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland. Originally founded in 1976, ASiT is independent of the National Health Service (NHS), Surgical Royal Colleges, and specialty associations. The 2017 Annual Conference in Bournemouth brought together over 700 delegates for a diverse educational weekend with numerous expert guest speakers. With a theme of '#AdvancesIn,' we looked to celebrate cutting edge progress in training, clinical management, medical technology, leadership and entrepreneurialism. These updates were complimented by debates on current training in surgery and an array of focussed parallel sessions. For the first time, delegates were also able to interact with the conference digitally, with the debut of our conference smartphone App. The weekend started with 9 pre-conference courses covering a diverse range of topics including core laparoscopic, vascular, orthopaedics, neurosurgical skills, leadership and global surgery. Over 1000 abstract submissions were received and those successful competed for over 30 awards, representing nearly £4000 in trainee prizes and bursaries. As the only national surgical trainee meeting for all specialties, ASiT continues to grow and we look forward to an even larger and more successful international conference next year in Edinburgh 6-8th April 2018 with the theme of #nurturingexcellence.

The current value of determining the mismatch repair status of colorectal cancer: A rationale for routine testing.

Colorectal Cancer (CRC) is the third most prevalent cancer in men and women. Up to 15% of CRCs display microsatellite instability (MSI). MSI is reflective of a deficient mismatch repair (MMR) system and is most commonly caused by hypermethylation of the MLH1 promoter. However, it may also be due to autosomal dominant constitutional mutations in DNA MMR, termed Lynch Syndrome. MSI may be diagnosed via polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or alternatively, immunohistochemistry (IHC) can identify MMR deficiency (dMMR). Many institutions now advocate universal tumor screening of CRC via either PCR for MSI or IHC for dMMR to guide Lynch Syndrome testing. The association of sporadic MSI with methylation of the MLH1 promoter and an activating BRAF mutation may offer further exclusion criteria for genetic testing. Aside from screening for Lynch syndrome, MMR testing is important because of its prognostic and therapeutic implications. Several studies have shown MSI CRCs exhibit different clinicopathological features and prognosis compared to microsatellite-stable (MSS) CRCs. For example, response to conventional chemotherapy has been reported to be less in MSI tumours. More recently, MSI tumours have been shown to be responsive to immune-checkpoint inhibition providing a novel therapeutic strategy. This provides a rationale for routine testing for MSI or dMMR in CRC.

The lymph node ratio does not provide additional prognostic information compared with the N1/N2 classification in Stage III colon cancer.

AIM: The ratio of positive nodes to total nodes, the lymph node ratio (LNR), is a proposed alternative to the current N1/N2 classification of nodal disease. The true clinical benefit of adopting the LNR, however, has not been definitively demonstrated. This study compared the LNR with the current N1/N2 classification of Stage III colon cancer. METHOD: Patients with Stage III colon cancer were identified from a prospectively maintained database (1996-2012). The specificity and sensitivity of the N1/N2 classification in the prediction of overall survival were determined using R. A cut-off point for the LNR was determined by setting the specificity the same as for the N1/N2 classification. The sensitivity of the two methods was then compared, and bootstrapping 1000-fold was performed. This was then repeated for disease-specific survival. RESULTS: The specificity and sensitivity of the N1/N2 classification in predicting 3-year overall survival in this cohort (n = 402) was 62.2% and 52.1%, respectively. The cut-off point for the LNR was determined to be 0.27 for these data. On comparing LNR with the N1/N2 classification showed that for a given specificity, the LNR did not provide a statistically significant improvement in sensitivity (52.8% vs 52.1%, P = 0.31). For disease-specific death at 3 years, the specificity and sensitivity were 60.8% and 54.6%, respectively. The LNR did not provide a statistically significant improvement (55.4% vs 54.6%, P = 0.44). CONCLUSION: Both the N1/N2 system and the LNR predict survival in colon cancer, but both have low specificity and sensitivity. The LNR does not provide additional prognostic value to current staging for overall or disease-specific survival for a given cut-off point.

Microsatellite instability is associated with reduced disease specific survival in stage III colon cancer.

BACKGROUND: Up to 15% of colorectal cancers exhibit microsatellite instability (MSI), where errors in replication go unchecked due to defects in the mismatch repair system. This study aimed to determine survival in a large single-centre series of 1250 consecutive colorectal cancers subjected to universal MSI testing. METHODS: Clinical and pathological features of patients with colorectal cancer identified on prospectively maintained colorectal and pathology databases at St. Vincent's University Hospital from 2004 to May 2012 were examined. Mismatch repair (MMR) status was determined by immunohistochemistry. Kaplan-Meier curves, the log-rank test and Cox regression were used to associate survival with clinical and pathological characteristics. RESULTS: Of the 1250 colorectal cancers in the study period, 11% exhibited MSI (n = 138). Patients with MSI tumours had significantly lower rates of lymph node and distant metastases (MSI N+ rate: 24.8% compared with MSS N+ rate: 46.2%, p < 0.001). For Stage I and II disease MSI was associated with improved disease free survival (DSS) compared with MSS colon cancer. However, patients with Stage III MSI colon cancers had a worse DSS than those with MSS tumours. Stage III MSI tumours exhibited higher rates of lymphovascular invasion and perineural invasion than Stage I/II MSI tumours. CONCLUSION: MSI is associated with a reduced risk of nodal and distant metastases, with an improved DSS in Stage I/II colon cancer. However, when MSI tumours progress to Stage III these patients had worse outcomes and pathological features. New strategies for this cohort of patients may be required to improve outcomes.

Restructuring an evolving Irish trauma system: What can we learn from Europe and Australia?

AIM: Major trauma is a leading cause of mortality and disability. Internationally, major trauma centres and comprehensive trauma networks are associated with improved outcomes. This study aimed to examine selected international trauma systems in Europe and Australia to identify common themes that may aid reconfiguration of the Irish trauma service. METHODS: An electronic search strategy was utilised using Medline, and a search of the grey literature using Google and Google Scholar. Search terms included "trauma systems", "trauma care", "major trauma centre" and "trauma network". Relevant articles were reviewed and data summarised in a narrative format. RESULTS: Republic of Ireland currently lacks designated major trauma centres and surrounding trauma networks. Lessons from international models and data from the on-going national trauma audit may guide reconfiguration. Well-functioning trauma systems internationally bear striking similarities, and involve a hub and spoke model. This model has a central major trauma centre, surrounded by a co-ordinated trauma network with trauma units. Concentration of major trauma into high volume centres is key, but these centres must be adequately resourced to deliver a high quality service. Investment in and co-ordination of prehospital care is essential to overcome geographical impediments to centralising trauma care. Funding of rehabilitation infrastructure and resources is also an integral part of a well-functioning trauma system. Trauma outcome data is key to informing trauma system design, with dissemination of this data and public engagement critical for change. CONCLUSION: International models of trauma care provide valuable lessons for countries currently in process of reconfiguring trauma services.