RESUMEN
Myelin improves axonal conduction velocity and is essential for nerve development and regeneration. In peripheral nerves, Schwann cells depend on bidirectional mechanical and biochemical signaling to form the myelin sheath but the mechanism underlying this process is not understood. Rho GTPases are integrators of "outside-in" signaling that link cytoskeletal dynamics with cellular architecture to regulate morphology and adhesion. Using Schwann cell-specific gene inactivation in the mouse, we discovered that RhoA promotes the initiation of myelination, and is required to both drive and terminate myelin growth at different stages of peripheral myelination, suggesting developmentally-specific modes of action. In Schwann cells, RhoA targets actin filament turnover, via Cofilin 1, actomyosin contractility and cortical actin-membrane attachments. This mechanism couples actin cortex mechanics with the molecular organization of the cell boundary to target specific signaling networks that regulate axon-Schwann cell interaction/adhesion and myelin growth. This work shows that RhoA is a key component of a biomechanical response required to control Schwann cell state transitions for proper myelination of peripheral nerves.
Asunto(s)
Actinas , Células de Schwann , Ratones , Animales , Vaina de Mielina/fisiología , Nervios Periféricos/fisiología , AxonesRESUMEN
Therapeutic strategies aimed at overcoming the loss of myelin sheath in central nervous system demyelinating diseases are often unsuccessful due to nescience underlying the mechanisms of remyelination failure. The environment surrounding a demyelination lesion is seen as a hostile terrain, characterized by factors that can inhibit myelin production by oligodendrocytes (OLs). The formation of a glial scar containing reactive astrocytes producing high amounts of altered matrix proteins can compromise OL remyelination. Allied to glial scar, mechanical properties of the tissue are altered. The paradigms in the remyelination failure are changing. We point mechanobiology as a missing key towards unravelling the nature of (de)myelination. Mechanical cues as stiffness, axonal tension or physical constraints are emerging as dictators of tissue homeostasis and pathology. Here we delve into an in-depth characterization of the preeminent models to study mechanobiology events of (de)myelination and remyelination. Alternatives to in vivo systems are provided, either through the exploration of simpler animal models, creation of in vitro models using tissue engineered approaches or through in silico tools. We discuss how bioengineering is being explored to generate relevant models to dissect new mechanobiology mechanisms and identify novel therapeutic targets, being expected to profoundly impact the treatment of demyelinating diseases.