Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Cancer ; 13(10): 3073-3083, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36046656

RESUMEN

Background: The association between the effectiveness of capecitabine and the concomitant administration of gastric acid suppressants remains controversial. We aimed to clarify whether the effectiveness of capecitabine is affected by the co-administration of histamine H2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) in early-stage colorectal cancer (CRC) patients using real-world data. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective, observational study included consecutive patients with stage II-III CRC who received either capecitabine monotherapy or the CapeOX regimen (capecitabine and oxaliplatin) as adjuvant therapy between January 2009 and December 2014 in Japan. Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Additionally, multivariable Cox proportional hazards model, propensity score adjustment, and inverse probability of treatment weighting analyses were performed. Results: In total, 552 patients were included in this study, of which 30 were co-administered H2RAs. RFS at five years was 76.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 57.2-88.1%) and 79.8% (95% CI: 76.0-83.0%) in the H2RA and non-H2RA groups, respectively. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model and propensity score-adjusted analyses showed that the co-administration of H2RAs was associated with a poor RFS among those receiving capecitabine monotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 2.01; 95% CI: 0.86-4.70 and HR, 1.81; 95% CI: 0.77-4.22, respectively). In contrast, these results were inconsistent with the group receiving the CapeOX regimen. Conclusions: The study findings suggest that the co-administration of H2RAs may not reduce the effectiveness of capecitabine therapy in patients with early-stage CRC. To confirm this relationship, a prospective study with a pharmacokinetic approach is needed.

2.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 6561, 2022 04 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35449143

RESUMEN

The association between capecitabine efficacy and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is controversial. Here, we determined whether co-administration of PPIs affects the real-world effectiveness of capecitabine. This retrospective observational study included consecutive patients with stage II-III colorectal cancer (CRC) who received adjuvant capecitabine monotherapy or CapeOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin) between January 2009 and December 2014 at nine participating institutions. The primary endpoint was the difference in relapse-free survival (RFS) between patients who received PPIs and those who did not and was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Overall survival (OS) was the secondary endpoint. Multivariable analysis of RFS and OS was performed using a Cox proportional hazards model, propensity score adjustment, and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analyses. Data from 606 patients were evaluated, 54 of whom had received a PPI. PPI-treated patients tended to have poorer RFS and OS than patients treated without PPIs. The hazard ratio for RFS with capecitabine monotherapy was 2.48 (95% confidence interval: 1.22-5.07). These results were consistent with sensitivity analyses performed using propensity score adjustment and IPTW methods. Co-administration of PPIs may reduce the effectiveness of capecitabine and negatively impact patients with stage II-III CRC.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Capecitabina/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
Gan To Kagaku Ryoho ; 42(5): 609-11, 2015 May.
Artículo en Japonés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25981656

RESUMEN

A 64-year-old man with central nervous system metastases from systemic non-Hodgkin lymphoma was treated with high- dose intravenous methotrexate(MTX 3.5 g/m2). The patient subsequently developed oliguric acute renal failure 12 hours after MTX initiation, and his serum MTX level was 163 mM at 26 hours. Hemodialysis filtration(HDF)combined with direct hemoperfusion(DHP)was initiated at 45hours. Seven sessions of combined HDF and DHP and 2 courses of HDF alone were performed, and the mean MTX extraction rates were 68.2% and 74.3%, respectively. The patient experienced severe respiratory failure, febrile neutropenia, myelosuppression, and oral mucositis. However, his urine output began to improve on day 7 after MTX initiation, and his renal function gradually recovered. His serum MTX level declined to 0.04 mM on day 23 after MTX initiation. In the present case, we immediately initiated HDF and DHP and successfully treated the patient for MTX-induced renal failure.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda/terapia , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Linfoma no Hodgkin/tratamiento farmacológico , Metotrexato/efectos adversos , Lesión Renal Aguda/inducido químicamente , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Hemoperfusión , Humanos , Masculino , Metotrexato/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Diálisis Renal
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA