Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
3.
Am J Vet Res ; 74(12): 1530-5, 2013 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24274891

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate effects of quaternary benzo(c)phenanthridine alkaloids (QBAs) against Salmonella spp and determine effects on growth performance, organism shedding, and gastrointestinal tract integrity in pigs inoculated with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. SAMPLE: 36 Salmonella isolates and twenty 5-week-old pigs. PROCEDURES: Minimum inhibitory concentration of QBAs against the Salmonella isolates was determined. Pigs were allocated to 4 groups and inoculated with Salmonella organisms. Pigs received diets supplemented with 1.5 g of QBAs/1,000 kg of feed, 0.75 g of QBAs/1,000 kg of feed, or 59.4 g of chlortetracycline/1,000 kg of feed or a nonsupplemented (control) diet. Pigs were weighed on day 0 and then weekly for 40 days. Fecal samples were collected to quantify Salmonella organisms. Gastrointestinal tract integrity was evaluated by measuring transepithelial resistance. RESULTS: In vitro, 9 of 36 (25%) Salmonella isolates were inhibited at 90 µg of QBAs/mL; all 36 were inhibited at 179 µg of QBAs/mL. Diets containing QBAs significantly decreased Salmonella spp shedding; shedding was lower 40 days after inoculation for pigs fed diets containing QBAs or chlortetracycline than for pigs fed the control diet. Growth performance was similar for pigs fed diets containing QBA or chlortetracycline. Gastrointestinal tract integrity was improved in pigs fed the diet containing 1.5 g of QBAs/1,000 kg of feed. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: QBAs and chlortetracycline decreased Salmonella spp shedding but did not differ with regard to growth performance. Gastrointestinal tract integrity was better, albeit not significantly, in pigs fed diets containing QBAs. Further investigation into the role of QBAs and their mechanism as an immunomodulator is necessary.


Asunto(s)
Benzofenantridinas/farmacología , Resistencia a Múltiples Medicamentos , Tracto Gastrointestinal/efectos de los fármacos , Crecimiento y Desarrollo/efectos de los fármacos , Salmonelosis Animal/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/microbiología , Animales , Derrame de Bacterias/efectos de los fármacos , Clortetraciclina/farmacología , Heces/microbiología , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Porcinos
4.
Foodborne Pathog Dis ; 10(1): 80-6, 2013 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23320426

RESUMEN

Yersinia enterocolitica is an important foodborne pathogen, and pigs are recognized as a major reservoir and potential source of pathogenic strains to humans. A total of 172 Y. enterocolitica recovered from conventional and antimicrobial-free pig production systems from different geographic regions (North Carolina, Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Iowa) were investigated to determine their pathogenic significance to humans. Phenotypic and genotypic diversity of the isolates was assessed using antibiogram, serogrouping, and amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP). Carriage of chromosomal and plasmid-borne virulence genes were investigated using polymerase chain reaction. A total of 12 antimicrobial resistance patterns were identified. More than two-thirds (67.4%) of Y. enterocolitica were pan-susceptible, and 27.9% were resistant against ß-lactams. The most predominant serogroup was O:3 (43%), followed by O:5 (25.6%) and O:9 (4.1%). Twenty-two of 172 (12.8%) isolates were found to carry Yersinia adhesion A (yadA), a virulence gene encoded on the Yersinia virulence plasmid. Sixty-nine (40.1%) isolates were found to carry ail gene. The ystA and ystB genes were detected in 77% and 26.2% of the strains, respectively. AFLP genotyping of isolates showed wide genotypic diversity and were grouped into nine clades with an overall genotypic similarity of 66.8-99.3%. AFLP analysis revealed that isolates from the same production system showed clonal relatedness, while more than one genotype of Y. enterocolitica circulates within a farm.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Transmitidas por los Alimentos/microbiología , Variación Genética , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/microbiología , Factores de Virulencia/genética , Yersiniosis/microbiología , Yersinia enterocolitica/genética , Análisis del Polimorfismo de Longitud de Fragmentos Amplificados , Animales , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Cromosomas Bacterianos/genética , Análisis por Conglomerados , ADN Bacteriano/genética , Reservorios de Enfermedades , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Heces/microbiología , Genotipo , Humanos , Medio Oeste de Estados Unidos , North Carolina , Fenotipo , Plásmidos/genética , Serotipificación , Porcinos , Yersiniosis/transmisión , Yersinia enterocolitica/aislamiento & purificación , Yersinia enterocolitica/patogenicidad , Zoonosis , beta-Lactamasas/genética
5.
Appl Environ Microbiol ; 76(21): 7188-93, 2010 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20851969

RESUMEN

The purpose of this study was to determine the occurrence and genotypic relatedness of Salmonella enterica isolates recovered from feed and fecal samples in commercial swine production units. Of 275 feed samples, Salmonella was detected in 10 feed samples that originated from 8 of 36 (22.2%) barns, with a prevalence of 3.6% (10/275 samples). In fecal samples, a prevalence of 17.2% was found at the early finishing stage (1,180/6,880 samples), with a significant reduction in prevalence (7.4%) when pigs reached market age (392/5,321 samples). Of the 280 Salmonella isolates systematically selected for further characterization, 50% of the feed isolates and 55.3% of the isolates of fecal origin showed similar phenotypes based on antimicrobial resistance patterns and serogrouping. About 44% of the isolates were multidrug resistant. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) genotyping grouped the 46 representative isolates into five genotypic clusters, of which four of the clusters consisted of genotypically related isolates recovered from feed and fecal samples. The occurrence of genotypically related and, in some cases, clonal strains, including multidrug-resistant isolates in commercially processed feed and fecal samples, suggests the high significance of commercial feed as a potential vehicle of Salmonella transmission.


Asunto(s)
Alimentación Animal/microbiología , Heces/microbiología , Salmonella enterica/genética , Porcinos/microbiología , Crianza de Animales Domésticos , Animales , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado , Genotipo , Vivienda para Animales , Fenotipo , Salmonelosis Animal/microbiología , Salmonella enterica/aislamiento & purificación , Salmonella enterica/metabolismo
6.
J Agromedicine ; 15(3): 226-35, 2010 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20665308

RESUMEN

Numerous hazards may occur on farms raising livestock. Animal contact is often ranked as the first or second leading cause of injuries on the farm. In addition to direct trauma from the animal, other injuries may occur from injection of medications, chemical splashes from cleaning the facility, and repetitive motion injuries. Exposures to toxic gases from decomposition of animal waste such as in manure pits and exposure to animal allergens may cause adverse health effects in humans. One additional consideration is the risk of developing various zoonotic infections. Human injuries happen more often when people are handling animals than during any other activity performed in pork production. The National Pork Board of the United States, in response to a request from pork producers, has developed a program designed to improve worker safety, pig welfare, and pork quality when pigs are moved for whatever reason. The objective of the Transport Quality Assurance (TQA) program is to help all those who transport, produce, or handle swine to do so in a way that is optimal for the pigs' well-being, the health of the handler, and to improve the quality of the pork produced. Understanding basic pig behavior, proper handling practices, and using proper handling equipment will help animal handling be a safe activity. This paper was prepared for the Agricultural Safety and Health Council of America/National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health Conference, "Be Safe, Be Profitable: Protecting Workers in Agriculture," January 27-28, 2010, Dallas/Fort Worth, Texas.


Asunto(s)
Accidentes de Trabajo/prevención & control , Enfermedades de los Trabajadores Agrícolas/prevención & control , Agricultura , Administración de la Seguridad/métodos , Accidentes de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades de los Trabajadores Agrícolas/epidemiología , Animales , Humanos , Ganado , Factores de Riesgo , Sociedades , Porcinos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Zoonosis/transmisión
7.
J Food Prot ; 72(1): 142-6, 2009 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19205475

RESUMEN

The main goal of this study was to assess the efficacy of Swiffer wipes in comparison to conventional drag swabs for the recovery of Salmonella. A total of 800 samples (400 Swiffer wipes and 400 drag swabs) were aseptically collected from randomly selected swine barns before disinfection with specific biocides and within 2 h after disinfection. From each barn, 10 samples of each swab type and negative controls were collected. Salmonellae were isolated from 43 (10.8%) of 400 drag swabs and 34 (8.5%) of 400 Swiffer wipes. There was a significant reduction in Salmonella postdisinfection as identified with both sampling procedures irrespective of the type of biocide used (P < 0.05). With the drag swabs, salmonellae were detected in 15% of the samples before disinfection versus 6.5% after disinfection, whereas with the Swiffer wipes, 13 and 4% of the samples were positive pre- and postdisinfection, respectively. Of the total 720 fecal samples collected from pigs placed in the disinfected barns, 132 (18.3%) were Salmonella positive. About 65 and 98% of the Salmonella isolates from swine barns and fecal samples, respectively, were resistant to one or more of the antimicrobials tested. Multidrug resistance was found in 35.7% of the isolates from barn swabs and 56.4% of the isolates from fecal samples. Results of this study suggest that the conventional drag swab method results in better recovery of Salmonella than does the Swiffer wipe method and thus could be a useful sampling method in monitoring Salmonella. Pentaresistant Salmonella (mainly R-type ACSSuT) was more common in fecal samples than in environmental samples.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/veterinaria , Heces/microbiología , Higiene , Salmonella/aislamiento & purificación , Porcinos/microbiología , Animales , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/instrumentación , Técnicas Bacteriológicas/métodos , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Pisos y Cubiertas de Piso , Vivienda para Animales , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Salmonella/efectos de los fármacos
8.
Appl Environ Microbiol ; 72(8): 5666-9, 2006 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16885327

RESUMEN

Multilocus sequence typing of 151 Campylobacter coli isolates from swine reared in conventional (n = 74) and antimicrobial-free (n = 77) production systems revealed high genotypic diversity. Sequence type (ST) 1413 was predominant and observed among ciprofloxacin-resistant strains. We identified a C. coli ST 828 clonal complex consisting of isolates from both production systems.


Asunto(s)
Campylobacter coli/clasificación , Campylobacter coli/aislamiento & purificación , Epidemiología Molecular , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN/métodos , Porcinos/microbiología , Mataderos , Crianza de Animales Domésticos/métodos , Animales , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Técnicas de Tipificación Bacteriana , Campylobacter coli/genética , Ciprofloxacina/farmacología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Genotipo
9.
J Food Prot ; 69(4): 743-8, 2006 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16629014

RESUMEN

Conventional swine production evolved to routinely use antimicrobials, and common occurrence of antimicrobial-resistant Salmonella has been reported. There is a paucity of information on the antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella in swine production in the absence of antimicrobial selective pressure. Therefore, we compared the prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Salmonella isolated from antimicrobial-free and conventional production systems. A total of 889 pigs and 743 carcasses were sampled in the study. Salmonella prevalence was significantly higher among the antimicrobial-free systems (15.2%) than the conventional systems (4.2%) (odds ratio [OR] = 4.23; P < 0.05). Antimicrobial resistance was detected against 10 of the 12 antimicrobials tested. The highest frequency of resistance was found against tetracycline (80%), followed by streptomycin (43.4%) and sulfamethoxazole (36%). Frequency of resistance to most classes of antimicrobials (except tetracycline) was significantly higher among conventional farms than antimicrobial-free farms, with ORs ranging from 2.84 for chloramphenicol to 23.22 for kanamycin at the on-farm level. A total of 28 antimicrobial resistance patterns were detected. A resistance pattern with streptomycin, sulfamethoxazole, and tetracycline (n = 130) was the most common multidrug resistance pattern. There was no significant difference in the proportion of isolates with this pattern between the conventional (19.5%) and the antimicrobial-free systems (18%) (OR = 1.8; P > 0.05). A pentaresistance pattern with ampicillin, chloramphenicol, streptomycin, sulfamethoxazole, and tetracycline was strongly associated with antimicrobial-free groups (OR = 5.4; P = 0.01). While showing the higher likelihood of finding antimicrobial resistance among conventional herds, this study also implies that specific multidrug-resistant strains may occur on antimicrobial-free farms. A longitudinal study with a representative sample size is needed to reach more conclusive results of the associations detected in this study.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Salmonelosis Animal/epidemiología , Salmonella enterica , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/epidemiología , Crianza de Animales Domésticos/métodos , Animales , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Prevalencia , Salmonelosis Animal/tratamiento farmacológico , Salmonella enterica/clasificación , Salmonella enterica/efectos de los fármacos , Salmonella enterica/crecimiento & desarrollo , Porcinos , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/tratamiento farmacológico
10.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 56(4): 765-8, 2005 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16120624

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter species in swine reared in the intensive and extensive antimicrobial-free (ABF) production systems at farm and slaughter. In the ABF system, antimicrobials are neither used for growth promotion nor therapeutic purposes. METHODS: Swine faecal and carcass swabs were collected from 10 groups of pigs (five each from intensive and extensive ABF farms) at the finishing farm and the slaughter plant. A total of 292 pigs at farm (extensive 118; intensive 174) and 254 carcass swabs (extensive 134; intensive 120) were collected during the study. Campylobacter species were isolated under microaerobic conditions and confirmed by biochemical testing. Up to three presumptive Campylobacter colonies per positive pig/carcass were further characterized. Speciation was done by PCR, targeting ceuE and hipO genes for Campylobacter coli and Campylobacter jejuni, respectively. The isolates were tested for their antimicrobial resistance profile using the agar dilution method against six antimicrobials. RESULTS: A total of 526 Campylobacter isolates were cultured from 292 pigs and 254 carcasses sampled. All the isolates were found to be C. coli. Overall prevalence of C. coli was 55.8% on farm (55% extensive and 56.3% intensive) and 26% at slaughter (32.8% extensive and 18.3% intensive). There was no significant difference in C. coli between the intensive and extensive systems on the finishing farms (P = 0.83). At post-chill stage, C. coli were isolated only from the extensively reared ABF pigs. Antimicrobial resistance against ciprofloxacin (MIC > 4 mg/L) was found at the farm level in both the intensive- and extensive-reared groups. The erythromycin/nalidixic acid/tetracycline resistance pattern (3%) was the most common pattern in multidrug-resistant C. coli. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the high prevalence of diverse and antimicrobial-resistant C. coli in the ABF production systems of swine. This is the first study reporting the isolation of ciprofloxacin-resistant strains from ABF pigs in the USA and warrants concern.


Asunto(s)
Crianza de Animales Domésticos , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Infecciones por Campylobacter/veterinaria , Campylobacter coli/efectos de los fármacos , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Porcinos/microbiología , Mataderos , Animales , Infecciones por Campylobacter/microbiología , Campylobacter coli/aislamiento & purificación , Campylobacter coli/fisiología , Portador Sano/microbiología , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/microbiología
11.
J Am Vet Med Assoc ; 220(4): 497-502, 2002 Feb 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11862982

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether withholding feed from pigs prior to slaughter had any effects on meat quality, percentage of pigs with Salmonella spp in cecal contents during slaughter, or percentage of pigs with lacerations of the gastrointestinal tract during slaughter. DESIGN: Split-plot design. ANIMALS: 873 pigs. PROCEDURES: At the finishing barn, pigs were assigned to 30 pens. Feed withdrawal times were assigned to pens at random, and pigs in each pen were marketed in 3 groups. The first marketing group consisted of the 10 heaviest pigs in each pen, the second consisted of the next 10 heaviest pigs, and the third consisted of all remaining pigs. RESULTS: Withdrawing feed improved the redness score assigned to the meat but did not have any other significant effects on carcass composition or meat quality. The percentage of pigs with Salmonella spp in the cecal contents decreased from the first (73%) to the second (64%) to the third (52%) marketing group. However, isolation of Salmonella spp from cecal contents was not associated with feed withdrawal time or with pen prevalence of Salmonella shedding during the 2 months prior to slaughter. Feed withdrawal time and marketing group did not have any significant effects on overall prevalence of gastrointestinal tract lacerations. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results suggest that withdrawal of feed from pigs prior to slaughter does not increase the prevalence of Salmonella colonization or the risk of carcass contamination associated with gastrointestinal tract lacerations during slaughter but only slightly enhances meat quality.


Asunto(s)
Contaminación de Alimentos/prevención & control , Privación de Alimentos/fisiología , Carne/normas , Salmonelosis Animal/epidemiología , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/epidemiología , Animales , Composición Corporal , Ciego/microbiología , Color , Microbiología de Alimentos , Masculino , Carne/microbiología , Prevalencia , Distribución Aleatoria , Salmonella/aislamiento & purificación , Salmonelosis Animal/prevención & control , Porcinos , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/prevención & control
12.
J Am Vet Med Assoc ; 220(4): 503-6, 2002 Feb 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11862983

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether withdrawing feed from pigs prior to slaughter had any effects on prevalence or severity of gastric ulcers. DESIGN: Split-plot design. ANIMALS: 873 pigs. PROCEDURES: At the finishing barn, pigs were assigned to 30 pens. Feed withdrawal times (0, 12, or 24 hours) were assigned to pens at random, and pigs in each pen were marketed in 3 groups over a period of 4 weeks. The first marketing group consisted of the 10 heaviest pigs in each pen, the second consisted of the next 10 heaviest, and the third consisted of all remaining pigs. Feed was withheld from all pigs in each pen prior to removal of each marketing group. Thus, feed was withheld once, twice, or 3 times for pigs in the first, second, and third marketing groups, respectively. RESULTS: Feed withdrawal time was not significantly associated with ulcer score at the time of slaughter. Ulcer scores and prevalence of chronic damage were higher in the third marketing group, regardless of feed withdrawal time. Prevalence of severe damage, prevalence of chronic damage, and prevalence of esophageal constriction increased as carcass weight decreased. No pigs died of gastric ulceration. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Results suggest that withdrawal of feed from pigs prior to slaughter does not increase damage to the stomach and that repeated feed withdrawal does not result in fatal gastric ulceration.


Asunto(s)
Privación de Alimentos/fisiología , Úlcera Gástrica/veterinaria , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/epidemiología , Animales , Masculino , Prevalencia , Distribución Aleatoria , Úlcera Gástrica/epidemiología , Úlcera Gástrica/etiología , Porcinos , Enfermedades de los Porcinos/etiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA