Pharmacokinetics of the nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor efavirenz among HIV-infected Ugandans.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacokinetic variability of the nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor efavirenz has been documented, and high variation in trough concentrations or clearance has been found to be a risk for virological failure. Africans population exhibits greater variability in efavirenz concentrations than other ethnic groups, and so a better understanding of the pharmacokinetics of the drug is needed in this population. This study characterized efavirenz pharmacokinetics in HIV-infected Ugandans. METHODS: Efavirenz plasma concentrations were obtained for 66 HIV-infected Ugandans initiating efavirenz- based regimens, with blood samples collected at eight time-points over 24 h on day 1 of treatment, and at a further eight time-points on day 14. Noncompartmental analysis was used to describe the pharmacokinetics of efavirenz. RESULTS: The mean steady-state minimum plasma concentration (C(min) ) of efavirenz was 2.9 µg/mL, the mean area under the curve (AUC) was 278.5 h µg/mL, and mean efavirenz clearance was 7.4 L/h. Although overall mean clearance did not change over the 2 weeks, 41.9% of participants showed an average 95.8% increase in clearance. On day 14, the maximum concentration (C(max) ) of efavirenz was >4 µg/mL in 96.6% of participants, while C(min) was <1 µg/mL in only 4.5%. Overall, 69% of participants experienced adverse central nervous system (CNS) symptoms attributable to efavirenz during the 2-week period, and 95% of these participants were found to have efavirenz plasma concentrations >4 µg/mL, although only half maintained a high concentration until at least 8 h after dosing. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study show that HIV-infected patients on efavirenz may exhibit autoinduction to various extents, and this needs to be taken into consideration in the clinical management of individual patients. Efavirenz CNS toxicity during the initial phase of treatment may be related to C(max) , regardless of the sampling time.

Update on the pharmacokinetic aspects of antiretroviral agents: implications in therapeutic drug monitoring.

The observed inter-individual variation in antiretroviral pharmacokinetics (PK) that results in a wide range of drug exposures from fixed-dose regimens has led to increasing interest in the clinical use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to individualize dosing of antiretroviral therapy (ART). The focus of this review is to provide an overview of literature available to support therapeutic drug monitoring among the current classes of antiretrovirals, suggest patient populations that may benefit from TDM and bring forth some of the limitations that may exist for widespread use of TDM in a traditional clinical setting.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.

Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) are a diverse group of compounds that induce allosteric changes in the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) reverse transcriptase, thus rendering the enzyme incapable of converting viral RNA to DNA. Unlike nucleoside analogue inhibitors of reverse transcriptase, NNRTIs do not require sequential phosphorylation to elicit antiretroviral activity. There are currently 3 approved NNRTIs: nevirapine, delavirdine and efavirenz. Although possessing a common mechanism of action, these agents can be differentiated by both molecular and pharmacokinetic characteristics. Each of the NNRTIs is metabolised to some degree by the cytochrome P450 (CYP) system of enzymes, making them prone to clinically significant drug interactions. In addition, they elicit variable effects on other medications, acting as either inducers or inhibitors of drugs metabolised by CYP. These drug interactions are an important consideration in the clinical use of these agents as a part of combination antiretroviral therapy. Additional factors such as the influence of food and pH on oral absorption, and protein binding, must also be considered.

Once-a-day Concerta methylphenidate versus three-times-daily methylphenidate in laboratory and natural settings.

OBJECTIVE: Methylphenidate (MPH), the most commonly prescribed drug for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), has a short half-life, which necessitates multiple daily doses. The need for multiple doses produces problems with medication administration during school and after-school hours, and therefore with compliance. Previous long-acting stimulants and preparations have shown effects equivalent to twice-daily dosing of MPH. This study tests the efficacy and duration of action, in natural and laboratory settings, of an extended-release MPH preparation designed to last 12 hours and therefore be equivalent to 3-times-daily dosing. METHODS: Sixty-eight children with ADHD, 6 to 12 years old, participated in a within-subject, double-blind comparison of placebo, immediate-release (IR) MPH 3 times a day (tid), and Concerta, a once-daily MPH formulation. Three dosing levels of medication were used: 5 mg IR MPH tid/18 mg Concerta once a day (qd); 10 mg IR MPH tid/36 mg Concerta qd; and 15 mg IR MPH tid/54 mg Concerta qd. All children were currently medicated with MPH at enrollment, and each child's dose level was based on that child's MPH dosing before the study. The doses of Concerta were selected to be comparable to the daily doses of MPH that each child received. To achieve the ascending rate of MPH delivery determined by initial investigations to provide the necessary continuous coverage, Concerta doses were 20% higher on a daily basis than a comparable tid regimen of IR MPH. Children received each medication condition for 7 days. The investigation was conducted in the context of a background clinical behavioral intervention in both the natural environment and the laboratory setting. Parents received behavioral parent training and teachers were taught to establish a school-home daily report card (DRC). A DRC is a list of individual target behaviors that represent a child's most salient areas of impairment. Teachers set daily goals for each child's impairment targets, and parents provided rewards at home for goal attainment. Each weekday, teachers completed the DRC, and it was used as a dependent measure of individualized medication response. Teachers and parents also completed weekly standardized ratings of behavior and treatment effectiveness. To evaluate the time course of medication effects, children spent 12 hours in a laboratory setting on Saturdays and medication effects were measured using procedures and methods adapted from our summer treatment program. Measures of classroom behavior and academic productivity/accuracy were taken in a laboratory classroom setting during which children completed independent math and reading worksheets. Measures of social behavior were taken in structured, small-group board game settings and unstructured recess settings. Measures included behavior frequency counts, academic problems completed and accuracy, independent observations, teacher and counselor ratings, and individualized behavioral target goals. Reports of adverse events, sleep quality, and appetite were collected. RESULTS: On virtually all measures in all settings, both drug conditions were significantly different from placebo, and the 2 drugs were not different from each other. In children's regular school settings, both medications improved behavior as measured by teacher ratings and individualized target behaviors (the DRC); these effects were seen into the evening as measured by parent ratings. In the laboratory setting, effects of Concerta were equivalent to tid MPH and lasted at least through 12 hours after dosing. Concerta was significantly superior to tid MPH on 2 parent rating scores, and when asked, more parents preferred Concerta than preferred tid IR MPH or placebo. Side effects on children's sleep and appetite were similar for the 2 preparations. In the lab setting, both medications improved productivity and accuracy on arithmetic seatwork assignments, disruptive and on-task behavior, and classroom rule following. Both medications improved children's rule following and negative behavior in small group board games, as well as in unstructured recess settings. Individual target behaviors also showed significant improvement with medication across domains in the laboratory setting. Children's behavior across settings deteriorated across the laboratory day, and the primary effect of medication was to prevent this deterioration as the day wore on. Results support the use of background behavioral treatment in clinical trials of stimulant medication, and illustrate the utility of a measure of individualized daily target goals (ie, the DRC) as an objective measure of medication response in both the laboratory and natural school settings. CONCLUSION: This investigation clearly supports the efficacy of the Concerta long-acting formulation of MPH for parents who desire to have medication benefits for their child throughout the day and early evening. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

Glucose disorders associated with HIV and its drug therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To review the impact that factors such as HIV infection, antiretrovirals, and other commonly used drug therapies have on glucose metabolism in HIV-infected patients. DATA SOURCES: Pertinent literature was identified via a MEDLINE search from 1980 to April 2000 and through secondary sources (abstracts presented at recent scientific meetings, manufacturers' package inserts). The key words used were antiretroviral therapy, HIV infection, insulin resistance, and metabolic abnormalities. All information deemed relevant to evaluate the impact that HIV infection and drug therapy have on glucose metabolism in HIV-infected patients was included. DATA SYNTHESIS: The viral burden and stress that are present in HIV-infected patients elicit a complex hormonal and immunologic response that may alter various biochemical pathways, including glucose metabolism. Although rare before the era of potent antiretroviral therapy, insulin resistance has now been described as an important component of the lipodystrophy syndrome. The complex and multifactorial nature of glucose metabolism dysregulation makes management of hyperglycemia or diabetes mellitus challenging in HIV-infected patients. In such a context, a set of recommendations was developed to guide practitioners in assessing, treating, and monitoring hyperglycemia or diabetes mellitus in HIV-infected patients. CONCLUSIONS: Alterations of glucose metabolism observed in HIV-infected patients are more frequent since the introduction of potent antiretroviral therapy. Although the etiology of such abnormalities remains unknown, protease inhibitors and, to a lesser extent, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors are believed to participate in their pathogenic mechanisms. Because of similarities to the pathogenesis of diabetes mellitus, management of antiretroviral-induced hyperglycemia could follow that the recommendations of the American Diabetes Association, with special considerations for monitoring patients with HIV infection. Future studies of altered glucose metabolism in HIV-infected patients should focus on understanding the precise mechanism or causes of this complication so that preventive and therapeutic guidelines can be further evaluated.

Concentration-targeted phase I trials of atevirdine mesylate in patients with HIV infection: dosage requirements and pharmacokinetic studies. The ACTG 187 and 199 study teams.

RATIONALE: To determine the dosage requirements and pharmacokinetics of atevirdine, a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor and its N-dealkylated metabolite (N-ATV) during phase I studies in patients receiving atevirdine alone or in combination with zidovudine. DESIGN: Two open label, phase I studies conducted by the adult AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) in which atevirdine was administered every 8 h with weekly dosage adjustments to attain targeted trough plasma atevirdine concentrations. SETTING: Five Adult AIDS Clinical Trials Units. PATIENTS: Fifty patients (ACTG 199; n = 20 and ACTG 187; n = 30) with HIV-1 infection and < or =500 CD4+ lymphocytes/mm3. INTERVENTION: ACTG 199; 12 weeks of therapy with atevirdine (dose-adjusted to achieve plasma trough atevirdine concentrations of 5-10 microM) and zidovudine (200 mg every 8 h). ACTG 187: 12 weeks of atevirdine monotherapy with atevirdine doses adjusted to achieve escalating, targeted trough plasma concentration ranges (5-13, 14-22, and 23-31 microM). MEASUREMENTS: ACTG 199: atevirdine, N-ATV and zidovudine trough determinations weekly (all patients) and intensive pharmacokinetics (selected patients) prior to and at 6 and 12 weeks during combination therapy. ACTG 187: atevirdine and N-ATV trough concentrations over a 12 week period. Intensive pharmacokinetic studies were conducted prior to and at 4 and/or 8 weeks during atevirdine monotherapy in female patients. RESULTS: Atevirdine plasma concentrations demonstrated considerable interpatient variability which was minimized by the adjustment of maintenance doses (range: 600-3900 mg/day) to achieve the desired trough concentrations. In ACTG 187, the mean number of weeks to attain the target value, and the percentage of patients who attained the target, was group I (5-11 microM): 2.7+/-2.4 weeks (92%); group II (12-21 microM): 2.6+/-1.8 (64%); and group III (22-31 microM): 7.0+/-5.6 weeks (27%). In ACTG 199 it was 3.2+/-5.2 weeks (95%) to achieve a 5-10 microM trough. Atevirdine demonstrated a mono- or bi-exponential decline among most of the patients studied after the first dose. During multiple-dosing a number of patterns of atevirdine disposition were observed including; rapid absorption with Cmax at 0.5-1 h, delayed absorption with Cmax at 3-4 h; minimal Cmax to Cmin fluctuation and Cmax to Cmin ratios of > 4. N-ATV (an inactive metabolite) patterns were characterized on day one by rapid appearance of the metabolite which peaked at 2-3 h after the dose and declined in a mono- or bi-exponential manner. At steady-state N-ATV patterns demonstrated minimal Cmax to Cmin fluctuations with some of the patients having more stable plasma N-ATV concentrations, while others had greater fluctuations week to week. CONCLUSIONS: Considerable interpatient variability was noted in the pharmacokinetics of atevirdine. The variation in drug disposition was reflected in the range of daily doses required to attain the targeted trough concentrations. Atevirdine metabolism did not appear to reach saturation during chronic dosing in many of our patients, as reflected by the pattern of N-ATV/ATV ratios in plasma and saturation was not an explanation for the variation in dosing requirements. No apparent differences were noted between males and females, and atevirdine did not appear to influence zidovudine disposition.

Comparison of a neural network approach with five traditional methods for predicting creatinine clearance in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the results of an artificial neural network approach with those of five published creatinine clearance (Cl(cr)) prediction equations and with the measured (true) Cl(cr) in patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). DESIGN: Six-month prospective study. SETTINGS: Two university medical centers. PATIENTS: Sixty-five HIV-infected patients: 18 relatively healthy outpatients and 47 inpatients. INTERVENTIONS: All subjects had urine collected for 24 hours to determine Cl(cr). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The 16 input variables were age, ideal body weight, actual body weight, body surface area, height, and the following blood chemistries: sodium, potassium, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, red blood cell count, platelet count, white blood cell count, glucose, serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, and albumin. The only output variable was Cl(cr). A training set of 55 subjects was used to develop the relationship between input variables and the output variable. The trained neural network was then used to predict Cl(cr) of a validation set of 10 subjects. Mean differences between predicted Cl(cr) and actual Cl(cr) (bias) were 4.1, 28.7, 29.4, 26.0, 31.8, and 55.8 ml/min/1.73 m2 for the artificial neural network, Cockcroft and Gault, Jelliffe 1, Jelliffe 2, Mawer et al, and Hull et al methods, respectively. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of predicting Cl(cr) in subjects with HIV infection by the artificial neural network is superior to that of the five equations that are currently used in clinical settings.

Accuracy of measured vancomycin serum concentrations in patients with end-stage renal disease.

OBJECTIVE: To review information related to the accuracy of vancomycin serum drug concentrations in patients with end-stage renal disease, focusing on available assays and mechanisms of cross-reactivity. DATA SOURCES: Primary and review articles identified from a MEDLINE search (January 1980-June 1999) and through secondary sources. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All articles identified were evaluated, and all relevant information was included in this review. DATA SYNTHESIS: Falsely elevated vancomycin serum concentrations may occur in patients with renal dysfunction. The underlying mechanism is due to the formation and accumulation of a pseudo-metabolite, the vancomycin crystalline degradation product (CDP). Vancomycin is converted to CDP when exposed to heat, including normal body temperature. Because the molecular structures of CDP and vancomycin are similar, both molecules are detected by polyclonal immunoassay systems used in clinical laboratories. This cross-reactivity leads to falsely elevated serum vancomycin concentrations in excess of 50-70%. Such large assay inaccuracies may result in improper dosage adjustments and therapeutic failures. A monoclonal immunoassay system has been developed that does not significantly cross-react with CDP. CONCLUSIONS: To appropriately interpret laboratory results, it is essential for clinicians to be aware of the vancomycin-CDP cross-reactivity problem and to be familiar with the specific assay used to measure vancomycin concentrations in patients with renal dysfunction.

Previous infection with Helicobacter pylori is the primary determinant of spontaneous gastric hypoacidity in human immunodeficiency virus-infected outpatients.

To investigate the incidence and demographics of gastric hypoacidity among persons infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), 146 asymptomatic subjects were evaluated with use of a radiotelemetry device (Heidelberg capsule). Gastric hypoacidity (minimum gastric pH of > or = 3) occurred in 24 subjects (17%). Demographic characteristics, CD4 cell counts, and Helicobacter pylori serological status were evaluated for an association with gastric pH. Subjects with hypoacidity were more likely to have positive H. pylori serology than were subjects without hypoacidity (15 of 24 vs. 23 of 74, respectively; P = .004). Multivariate analysis indicated that a positive H. pylori serology was the most significant predictor of hypoacidity, accounting for an increase in gastric pH of 39%. A history of injection drug use, heterosexual transmission of HIV, and male gender were also associated with an elevated gastric pH. CD4 cell counts did not contribute to predictions of gastric pH. A history of H. pylori infection is relatively common in HIV-positive black and Hispanic populations and is a predictor of gastric pH.

Relationship between didanosine exposure and surrogate marker response in human immunodeficiency virus-infected outpatients.

We used information available from routine clinic visits to characterize the pharmacokinetics of didanosine in 82 human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. A total of 271 blood samples were collected for the measurement of didanosine concentrations in plasma (mean +/- standard deviation [SD], 3.30 +/- 2.21 samples/patient). Bayesian estimates of didanosine oral clearance (CL[oral]) were obtained for these patients by the POSTHOC option within the NONMEM software package. Population priors from a previous NONMEM analysis of didanosine pharmacokinetics were used. The mean +/- SD CL(oral) was 132 +/- 27.7 liters/h, which agrees reasonably well with estimates obtained from previous pharmacokinetic studies of didanosine. Estimates of individual didanosine exposure were then used to consider potential relationships between drug exposure and surrogate marker response over a 6-month period. No correlations were found between the didanosine area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 6 months and the absolute CD4 cell count (r = 0.305; 0.1 < P < 0.2), weight response (r = 0.0857; P > 0.4), or percentage of CD4 lymphocytes (r = 0.0559; P > 0.4). Future efforts to characterize didanosine exposure in outpatients by random sampling methods should involve more directed efforts to limit residual variability in the data.

Zalcitabine population pharmacokinetics: application of radioimmunoassay.

Zalcitabine population pharmacokinetics were evaluated in 44 human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients (39 males and 5 females) in our immunodeficiency clinic. Eighty-one blood samples were collected during routine clinic visits for the measurement of plasma zalcitabine concentrations by radioimmunoassay (1.84+/-1.24 samples/patient; range, 1 to 6 samples/patient). These data, along with dosing information, age (38.6+/-7.13 years), sex, weight (79.1+/-15.0 kg), and estimated creatinine clearance (89.1+/-21.5 ml/min), were entered into NONMEM to obtain population estimates for zalcitabine pharmacokinetic parameters. The standard curve of the radioimmunoassay ranged from 0.5 to 50.0 ng/ml. The observed concentrations of zalcitabine in plasma ranged from 2.01 to 8.57 ng/ml following the administration of doses of either 0.375 or 0.75 mg. A one-compartment model best fit the data. The addition of patient covariates did not improve the basic fit of the model to the data. Oral clearance was determined to be 14.8 liters/h (0.19 liter/h/kg; coefficient of variation [CV] = 23.8%), while the volume of distribution was estimated to be 87.6 liters (1.18 liters/kg; CV = 54.0%). We were also able to obtain individual estimates of oral clearance (range, 8.05 to 19.8 liters/h; 0.11 to 0.30 liter/h/kg) and volume of distribution (range, 49.2 to 161 liters; 0.43 to 1.92 liters/kg) of zalcitabine in these patients with the POSTHOC option in NONMEM. Our value for oral clearance agrees well with other estimates of oral clearance from traditional pharmacokinetic studies of zalcitabine and suggests that population methods may be a reasonable alternative to these traditional approaches for obtaining information on the disposition of zalcitabine.

Effects of spontaneous gastric hypoacidity on the pharmacokinetics of zidovudine and didanosine.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of spontaneous gastric hypoacidity on the pharmacokinetics of zidovudine and didanosine in subjects infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). DESIGN: Controlled, open-label, single-dose, pharmacokinetic study. SUBJECTS: Thirty-two asymptomatic HIV-infected subjects. INTERVENTIONS: Gastric pH studies were conducted in all 32 subjects, and 20 of these subjects (8 women, 12 men) were enrolled into the pharmacokinetic study. They were stratified into two groups according to fasting gastric pH: those without and with gastric hypoacidity (minimum gastric pH < 3 and > or = 3, respectively). Gastric pH was measured using the Heidelberg pH monitoring system in all subjects before and during pharmacokinetic analysis of zidovudine 100 mg or didanosine 200 mg (given as two 100-mg tablets dissolved in 6 oz water). Plasma samples were collected over 8 hours after dosing. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Six (20%) of 30 subjects had a minimum gastric pH of 3 or above on at least two occasions, and the remaining 2 had variable gastric pH. Although gastric pH was unchanged during the administration of zidovudine, it increased to greater than 9 in 11 of 12 subjects with didanosine, regardless of baseline value. For both drugs, there were no statistically significant differences in peak plasma concentration (Cmax), time to reach peak plasma concentration (Tmax), elimination rate constant (ke), and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC0-infinity) between subjects with and without gastric hypoacidity despite sufficient statistical power to detect a 56% difference in clearance for either drug (alpha 0.05, beta 0.1). CONCLUSION: Gastric hypoacidity occurs in approximately 20% of HIV-infected patients and does not appear to influence zidovudine or didanosine pharmacokinetics.

Radioimmunoassay of zidovudine: extended use and potential application.

When first approved, the dosing regimens for zidovudine were 1,200-1,500 mg/day; however, because toxicity developed, the daily dose had to be reduced to 500-600 mg/day. At these lower doses, plasma concentrations for a considerable segment of the dosing interval are often below the assay sensitivity for the high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method. Although commonly used, the zidovudine radioimmunoassay has had minimal documentation for the quantitative analysis of clinical samples, especially at current doses. The authors' findings indicate that plasma, urine treated with phosphate buffer, and cerebrospinal fluid samples may be assayed using a commercially available radioimmunoassay. A good correlation was found for clinical samples measured by radioimmunoassay and HPLC (R2 = 0.85). The greater assay sensitivity, ability to process multiple specimens, and the relatively rapid turnaround time suggest that the zidovudine radioimmunoassay may have an important role in clinical trials evaluating zidovudine pharmacokinetics. This report summarizes the authors' experience with the zidovudine radioimmunoassay and focuses on its potential use in studying the role of therapeutic drug monitoring for zidovudine.

Single-dose pharmacokinetics of delavirdine mesylate and didanosine in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection.

Delavirdine is a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor with in vitro activity against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) that is currently being evaluated in combination regimens with various nucleoside analogs, including didanosine. Due to the pH-dependent solubility of delavirdine, the buffering agents in didanosine formulations may reduce delavirdine absorption. To evaluate the potential interaction between these agents, 12 HIV-infected patients (mean [+/- standard deviation] CD4+ cell count, 304 +/- 213/mm3) were enrolled in a three-way crossover single-dose study. Didanosine (125 to 200 mg given as buffered tablets) and delavirdine mesylate (400 mg) pharmacokinetics were evaluated when each drug was given alone (treatments A and B, respectively), when the two drugs were given concurrently (treatment C), and when didanosine was given 1 h after delavirdine (treatment D). Delavirdine exposure was reduced by concurrent administration of didanosine. The maximum drug concentration in serum (Cmax) was reduced from 7.22 +/- 4.0 to 3.51 +/- 1.9 microM, and the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 h to infinity (AUC0-->infinity) was reduced from 22.5 +/- 14 to 14 +/- 5.7 microM.h. The extent of N-dealkylation, as indicated by the ratio of the N-dealkylated delavirdine AUC0-->infinity to the delavirdine AUC0-->infinity, was unchanged across study treatments (P = 0.708). Reductions in didanosine exposure were observed during concurrent administration with delavirdine with a Cmax reduction from 4.65 +/- 2.0 to 3.22 +/- 0.59 microM and an AUC0-->infinity reduction from 7.93 +/- 3.9 to 6.54 +/- 2.3 microM.h. Thus, concurrent administration of delavirdine and didanosine may reduce the AUC0-->infinity of both drugs, although the clinical significance of this reduction is unknown. Administration of delavirdine 1 h before didanosine avoided the interaction. Due to the single-dose nature of this study, these findings require further evaluation at steady state.

In vitro protein-binding characteristics of delavirdine and its N-dealkylated metabolite.

This study was performed to determine delavirdine protein-binding characteristics as well as those of its N-dealkylated metabolite (N-DLV). Initial studies of 36 microM delavirdine and 30 microM N-DLV in solutions of plasma, albumin 4 g%, alpha-1-acid glycoprotein (AAG) 100 mg% or immune globulin (IVIG) 5 g% were conducted. Delavirdine (12, 36 and 73 microM) and N-DLV (10, 30 and 60 microM) were then studied alone and in combination in plasma and various concentrations of albumin. Studies were done in triplicate using equilibrium dialysis. The mean delavirdine fraction unbound (fu) in plasma, albumin, IVIG and AAG was 0.013, 0.033, 0.752 and 0.912 while the mean fu of N-DLV in these same protein solutions was 0.139, 0.195, 0.329 and 0.359. In plasma and albumin, a greater fu was observed at higher delavirdine concentrations and no significant changes in fu were noted with the addition of N-DLV. An increase in delavirdine fu was noted as the albumin concentrations decreased. The fu of N-DLV increased significantly as the concentration of albumin decreased as well as with decreasing N-DLV concentration. The potential implications of extensive delavirdine binding to plasma proteins, primarily albumin, are discussed.

Didanosine measurement by radioimmunoassay.

Didanosine is commonly prescribed as monotherapy or as part of a combination regimen for patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. The use of lower doses, either as part of a combination regimen or as a result of dose reduction secondary to clinical intolerance, requires that a sensitive assay method be available for either traditional or population-based pharmacokinetic evaluations. We evaluated a radioimmunoassay technique with a standard curve range of 0 to 100 ng/ml in human plasma, urine, and cerebrospinal fluid and assessed its accuracy and precision for use in pharmacokinetic studies.

Comparison of measured and estimated creatinine clearance in patients with advanced HIV disease.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of five creatinine clearance equations in predicting measured creatinine clearance in hospitalized patients with human immunodeficiency viral (HIV) infection. DESIGN: Prospective evaluation over a 6-month period. SETTING: Erie County Medical Center, a 550-bed teaching institution. PATIENTS: Forty-seven HIV-positive patients (39 men, 8 women) who were admitted for a variety of HIV-related illnesses and judged clinically to have stable renal function. Of the 47 original patients, 44 were evaluable based on exclusion criteria. INTERVENTIONS: Serum creatinine and 24-hour measured creatinine clearance were performed in each patient. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The estimated creatinine clearance from each of the equations (Cockcroft-Gault, two Jeliffe equations, Mawer et al, and Hull et al) was compared with the measured creatinine clearance. Statistical analysis of these comparisons was performed and all of the equations were found to overestimate the measured creatinine clearance (mean error 34-45%). CONCLUSIONS: Many HIV-infected patients have a decreased creatinine clearance despite a serum creatinine concentration within the normal range. Each of the equations overestimated the measured creatinine clearance.

Didanosine reduces atevirdine absorption in subjects with human immunodeficiency virus infections.

Atevirdine is a nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor with in vitro activity against human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and is currently in phase II clinical trials. Atevirdine is most soluble at a pH of < 2, and therefore, normal gastric acidity is most likely necessary for optimal bioavailability. Because of the rapid development of resistance in vitro, atevirdine is being evaluated in combination with didanosine and/or zidovudine in both two- and three-drug combination regimens. To examine the influence of concurrent didanosine (buffered tablet formulation) on the disposition of atevirdine, 12 human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected subjects (mean CD4+ cell count, 199 cells per mm3; range, 13 to 447 cells/mm3) participated in a three-way, partially randomized, crossover, single-dose study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of didanosine and atevirdine when each drug was given alone (treatments A and B, respectively) versus concurrently (treatment C). Concurrent administration of didanosine and atevirdine significantly reduced the maximum concentration of atevirdine in serum from 3.45 +/- 2.8 to 0.854 +/- 0.33 microM (P = 0.004). Likewise, the mean atevirdine area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h after administration of the combination was reduced to 6.47 +/- 2.2 microM.h (P = 0.004) relative to a value of 11.3 +/- 4.8 microM.h for atevirdine alone. Atevirdine had no statistically significant effect on the pharmacokinetic parameters of didanosine. Concurrent administration of single doses of atevirdine and didanosine resulted in a markedly lower maximum concentration of atevirdine in serum and area under the concentration-time curve, with a minimal effect on the disposition of didanosine. It is unknown whether an interaction of similar magnitude would occur under steady-state conditions; thus, combination regimens which include both atevirdine and didanosine should be designed so that their administration times are separated. Since the duration of the buffering effect of didanosine formulations is unknown, atevirdine should be given prior to didanosine.