Novel strategies to treat alcohol dependence with sodium oxybate according to clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE: The treatment of alcohol dependence (AD) with sodium oxybate (SMO) was introduced in Italy and Austria more than 20 years and 15 years ago respectively, and it is now widely employed. In addition to the data obtained from clinical trials, little information is available on specific clinical practices. Thus, the aim of this study was to present and discuss the results of a consensus meeting held after twenty years of using SMO in clinical practice in Italy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A validated questionnaire study was conducted to investigate the modalities of treatment of AD with SMO currently used in Italy. A group of four referees first drew up the questionnaire which was distributed to fifty experts in the field of alcohol use disorders. The questionnaire consisted of 125 items with five different modalities of response and two or three answer possibilities. RESULTS: The results of this survey showed a broad consensus on some issues regarding, for example, the duration of treatment, and the dose regimen of the drug; however, some aspects of the treatment of AD with SMO still remain controversial. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first consensus study investigating the use of SMO for the treatment of AD through the opinions gained in over twenty years of clinical practice provided by fifty Italian expert clinicians. A consensus on good practice for the correct administration of SMO has clearly emerged; these opinions, along with those derived from previous clinical investigations, will help physicians to use SMO in a better way. However, some issues remain controversial, and others remain unresolved.

Short-term methadone administration reduces alcohol consumption in non-alcoholic heroin addicts.

- Methadone, a synthetic opioid agonist, is commonly used for the treatment of heroin dependence. Depending on how alcohol addiction is defined, rates of alcoholism vary among those attending methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) programmes. Most of the current literature has shown that alcohol consumption increases during medium- or long-term MMT. However, up to now, no data have been reported on changes in alcohol intake among a population of heroin addicts with no alcohol-dependence diagnosis after short-term methadone administration. Thus, the aim of our study was to investigate alcohol consumption changes in a population of non-alcoholic heroin addicts during the first 4 weeks of a treatment programme (TP). The TP consisted of either MMT or non-methadone maintenance treatment (N-MMT) with a minimum duration of 1 year. A total of 359 heroin-addicted out-patients [274 males (76.3%)], all of whom met DSM-IV criteria, were enrolled in the study, over a period of 4 months. Out of these 359 patients, 32 subjects (8.9%) dropped out, whereas 327 subjects (91.1%; 249 males) continued the TP [105 (32.1%; 78 males) in the MMT group and 222 (67.9%; 171 males) in the N-MMT group]. A significant reduction in daily alcohol intake was observed in the MMT group, but not in the N-MMT group after the first 4 weeks of the TP. The results of the present study suggest a possible effect of short-term methadone administration in reducing alcohol consumption in a population of non-alcoholic heroin-addicted patients.

Simultaneous inhibition by pirenzepine of the GH responses to GnRH and TRH in insulin-dependent diabetics and in patients with major depression.

The present study was undertaken in order to establish whether muscarinic cholinergic receptors are involved in the anomalous GH response to GnRH in men with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and in male patients with major depression. For this purpose, 16 male diabetics, 18 depressed men and 9 normal controls were tested with GnRH (25 micrograms iv) with and without previous treatment with the muscarinic cholinergic receptor blocker pirenzepine (40 mg iv 10 min before GnRH). Additional experiments with TRH (200 micrograms iv 10 min after pirenzepine) were performed in the same subjects and used for comparison between responders to TRH and GnRH. The administration of GnRH stimulated GH release in 12 out of the 16 diabetics and in 8 out of the 18 depressed patients, but not in the normal controls. Control and diabetic non-responders to GnRH did not respond to TRH. In contrast, all diabetic responders to GnRH, except 2, showed paradoxical GH responses to TRH. All depressed responders to GnRH and 3 of the non-responders, were responsive to TRH. The pattern and magnitude of the secretory responses to TRH and GnRH were similar in depressed and diabetic patients. When the effects of GnRH and TRH were restudied in the presence of pirenzepine, neither GnRH nor TRH enhanced the serum concentrations of GH in any patient. These data indicate that a muscarinic cholinergic mechanism is involved in the anomalous responses of GH to GnRH and TRH in diabetic men and in male patients affected by major depression.

Pirenzepine inhibits growth hormone, but not thyrotropin response to thyrotropin-releasing hormone in patients with endogenous depression.

In order to evaluate whether in endogenous depression the anomalous growth hormone (GH) response to thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) is mediated by muscarinic cholinergic receptors, 12 patients were tested with TRH (200 micrograms iv) with and without previous treatment with the muscarinic cholinergic receptor blocker pirenzepine (40 mg iv 10 min before TRH). Control tests with normal saline also were performed. Administration of normal saline did not alter serum GH levels. In contrast, TRH injections significantly increased serum GH concentrations by about three-fold. This response was inhibited by pretreatment with pirenzepine. Another neuroendocrine marker of endogenous depression, the low TSH increase in response to TRH (delta less than or equal to 7 microU/ml), was observed in our patients. Pretreatment with pirenzepine did not modify this response. These data indicate that in patients with endogenous depression a muscarinic cholinergic mechanism is involved in the GH response but not in the TSH response to TRH.