Comparative Analysis of Posiphen Pharmacokinetics across Different Species-Similar Absorption and Metabolism in Mouse, Rat, Dog and Human.

Posiphen is a small molecule that exhibits neuroprotective properties by targeting multiple neurotoxic proteins involved in axonal transport, synaptic transmission, neuroinflammation, and cell death. Its broad-spectrum effects make it a promising candidate for treating neurodegenerative conditions, including Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases. Despite extensive investigation with animal models and human subjects, a comprehensive comparative analysis of Posiphen's pharmacokinetics across studies remains elusive. Here, we address this gap by examining the metabolic profiles of Posiphen and its breakdown into two primary metabolites-N1 and N8-across species by measuring their concentrations in plasma, brain, and CSF using the LC-MS/MS method. While all three compounds effectively inhibit neurotoxic proteins, the N1 metabolite is associated with adverse effects. Our findings reveal the species-specific behavior of Posiphen, with both Posiphen and N8 being predominant in various species, while N1 remains a minor constituent, supporting the drug's safety. Moreover, in plasma, Posiphen consistently showed fast clearance of all metabolites within 8 h in animal models and in human subjects, whereas in CSF or brain, the compound has an extended half-life of over 12 h. Combining all our human data and analyzing them by population pharmacokinetics showed that there are no differences between healthy volunteers, Alzheimer's, and Parkinson's patients. It also showed that Posiphen is absorbed and metabolized in a similar fashion across all animal species and human groups tested. These observations have critical implications for understanding the drug's safety, therapeutic effect, and clinical translation.

Development of a Weight-Band Dosing Approach for Vosoritide in Children with Achondroplasia Using a Population Pharmacokinetic Model.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Vosoritide is a recently approved therapy for achondroplasia, the most common form of disproportionate short stature, that has been shown to be well tolerated and effective in increasing linear growth. This study aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model to characterize pharmacokinetics (PK) of vosoritide and establish a weight-band dosing regimen. METHODS: A PPK model was developed using data from five clinical trials in children with achondroplasia (aged 0.95-15 years) who received daily per-kg doses of vosoritide. The model was used to simulate expected exposures in children with a refined weight-band dosing regimen. Simulated exposure was compared with the observed exposure from the pivotal clinical trial to evaluate appropriateness of the weight-band dosing regimen. RESULTS: A one-compartment model with a change-point first-order absorption and first-order elimination accurately described PK of vosoritide in children with achondroplasia. Body weight was found to be a predictor of vosoritide's clearance and volume of distribution. Additionally, it was observed that dosing solution concentration and duration of treatment influenced bioavailability. The weight-band dosing regimen resulted in simulated exposures that were within the range demonstrated to be well tolerated and effective in the pivotal clinical trial and showed improved consistency in drug exposure across the achondroplasia population. CONCLUSIONS: The weight-band dosing regimen reduced the number of recommended dose levels by body weight and is expected to simplify dosing for children with achondroplasia and their caregivers. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02055157, NCT02724228, NCT03197766, NCT03424018, and NCT03583697.

"Getting the Dose Right"-Revisiting the Topic With Focus on Biologic Agents.

Nearly two decades after the Peck and Cross article '"Getting the dose right: facts, a blueprint, and encouragements" was published, a review of dose recommendations for biologics shows that the success in getting the dose right appears to have improved given the relatively low incidence of drug withdrawals and dosing/label changes. However, the clinical experience with monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) following approval has been less than perfect. In inflammatory diseases, the disease burden changes with time and high treatment failure rates have been reported. In addition, the use of concomitant steroids and immunosuppressant drugs with MAbs is common. These concomitant agents have their own safety issues and many immunosuppressant agents are not well-tolerated although they have been shown to reduce the incidence of anti-drug antibodies (ADA). This same complexity is seen in MAbs used in oncology as well, although with these agents the doses appear to be higher than needed, which results in high treatment costs and incidence of adverse events. Given the complexity of MAb pharmacokinetics, which makes providing a detailed description of dose options difficult, product labeling should include the options for alternative dose strategies and potentially include the use of therapeutic drug monitoring with dose individualization which have been shown to improve clinical response and reduce the incidence of ADA. So, while the recommended dosing for biologics seems improved over the issues noted 17 years ago, we still have some work to do.