Promoting durable well-being among healthcare professionals via an interactive, online, wellness initiative.

Burnout is recognized as a negative contributor to well-being within healthcare. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether participation in the Peace Education Program (PEP), a 10-week wellness course, promoted durable improvement of burnout and wellness in a large academic medical center. We deployed PEP virtually through a series of free, interactive, online wellness sessions focusing on 10 domains: peace, appreciation, inner strength, self-awareness, clarity, understanding, dignity, choice, hope, and contentment. Two weeks before and six months following the sessions, we distributed de-identified surveys based upon the validated Schwartz Outcome Scale-10 (SOS-10) with Likert scale scores 0-6 to assess participant wellness. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyze statistical differences between post- and pre-course data. Sixty-nine faculty, trainees, and staff registered to participate, 21 participants completed the pre-course survey and 10 completed the post-course survey. The pre-course mean + standard error (SE) SOS-10 score was 43.2 ± 0.8, which improved to 51.0 ± 0.7 post-course (P < 0.001). Overall, all 10 domains demonstrated improved mean scores over time, with the five domains of "inner strength" (P = 0.008), "understanding" (P = 0.030), "peace" (P = 0.048), "choice" (P = 0.026), and "hope" (P = 0.020) demonstrating statistically significant score improvements six months after course completion. Participants completing ≥7 sessions benefited more than their counterparts and achieved statistically significant improvement in SOS-10 wellness scores (8.77 points) six months after course completion. Our findings demonstrate improved wellness in participants following peace education course completion. This free, interactive, online course may be utilized at other medical centers to improve wellness.

Evaluating the atherosclerosis cardiovascular disease risk score in patients with brain metastases: Associations with overall survival and high-value care outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Brain metastases (BM) constitute the most common intracranial tumor in adults. Prior literature indicates the 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk score is associated with increased risk of cancer, potentially attributable to shared risk factors. Understanding the role of ASCVD risk scores in BM may help optimize their care and inform clinical decision-making. Our aim was to explore associations between ASCVD risk score in BM patients and their overall survival, hospital charges, and non-routine discharge disposition. METHODS: Electronic medical records were reviewed to collect clinical data for BM patients undergoing surgery at a single institution (2017-2021). Regression analyses were performed accordingly and maximally selected rank statistics were employed to identify an optimal cutoff for ASCVD risk scores. The random survival forest (RSF) machine learning technique identified the most important variable associated with survival outcomes in BM patients. RESULTS: A total of 139 patients were included with average age 62.93±9.29 years, 48.2 % male, 25.2 % with high hospital charges, and 23.7 % experiencing non-routine discharge. Among these patients, 32.3 % had prior history of an ASCVD event, while 67.7 % did not. Overall, this cohort had an average 10-year ASCVD risk score of 12.51±12.98, indicating intermediate risk of ASCVD among all BM patients. On multivariate logistic regression, prior history of ASCVD was associated with higher odds of high hospital charges (OR=3.670, p=0.018), and higher ASCVD risk scores were associated with greater odds of non-routine discharge (OR=1.059, p=0.012). On the multivariate Cox regression model, higher ASCVD risk scores correlated with worse overall survival (HR=1.031, p=0.014). A threshold of 25.1 was identified for high-risk ASCVD scores. Patients with ASCVD scores >25.1 exhibited reduced overall survival in Kaplan-Meier analysis (p=0.015) and multivariate Cox regression (HR: 2.811, p=0.016). Notably, ASCVD risk scores were found to be the most important variable in predicting worse survival outcomes in BM patients compared to other established frailty indices. CONCLUSION: This study indicates higher ASCVD risk scores in BM patients are associated with worse overall survival. Integrating ASCVD assessment into clinical workflow may facilitate more informed risk-based decision-making.

Hospital frailty risk score predicts high-value care outcomes following brain metastasis resection.

OBJECTIVE: Brain metastases (BM) are the most common adult intracranial tumors, representing a significant source of morbidity in patients with systemic malignancy. Frailty indices, including 11- and 5-factor modified frailty indices (mFI-11 and mFI-5), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), have recently demonstrated an important role in predicting high-value care outcomes in neurosurgery. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of the newly developed Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS) on postoperative outcomes in BM patients. METHODS: Adult patients with BM treated surgically at a single institution were identified (2017-2019). HFRS was calculated using ICD-10 codes, and patients were subsequently separated into low (<5), intermediate (5-15), and high (>15) HFRS cohorts. Multivariate logistic regressions were utilized to identify associations between HFRS and complications, length of stay (LOS), hospital charges, and discharge disposition. Model discrimination was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: A total of 356 patients (mean age: 61.81±11.63 years; 50.6 % female) were included. The mean±SD for HFRS, mFI-11, mFI-5, ASA, and CCI were 6.46±5.73, 1.31±1.24, 0.95±0.86, 2.94±0.48, and 8.69±2.07, respectively. On multivariate analysis, higher HFRS was significantly associated with greater complication rate (OR=1.10, p<0.001), extended LOS (OR=1.13, p<0.001), high hospital charges (OR=1.14, p<0.001), and nonroutine discharge disposition (OR=1.12, p<0.001), and comparing the ROC curves of mFI-11, mFI-5, ASA,and CCI, the predictive accuracy of HFRS was the most superior for all four outcomes assessed. CONCLUSION: The predictive ability of HFRS on BM resection outcomes may be superior than other frailty indices, offering a new avenue for routine preoperative frailty assessment and for managing postoperative expectations.

Outcomes After Definitive Surgery for Spinal and Sacral Chordoma in 101 Patients Over 20 Years.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Spinal chordomas are primary bone tumors where surgery remains the primary treatment. However, their low incidence, lack of evidence, and late disease presentation make them challenging to manage. Here, we report the postoperative outcomes of a large cohort of patients after surgical resection, investigate predictors for overall survival (OS) and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) times, and trend functional outcomes over multiple time periods. METHODS: Retrospective review of all patients followed for spinal chordoma at a quaternary spinal oncology center from 2003 to 2023 was included. Data were collected regarding demographics, preoperative and perioperative management, and follow-up since initial definitive surgery. Primary outcomes were OS and LRFS, whereas secondary outcomes were functional deficits. RESULTS: One hundred one patients had an average follow-up of 6.0 ± 4.2 years. At the time of census, 25/101 (24.8%) had experienced a recurrence and 10/101 (9.9%) had died. After surgery, patients experienced a significant decrease in pain over time, but rates of sensory deficits, weakness, and bowel/bladder dysfunction remained static. Tumors ≥100 cm3 (hazard ratio (HR) = 5.89, 95% CI 1.72-20.18, P = .005) and mobile spine chordomas (HR = 7.73, 95% CI 2.09-28.59, P = .002) are related to worse LRFS, whereas having neoadjuvant radiotherapy is associated with improved LRFS (HR = 0.09, 95% CI 0.01-0.88, P = .038). On the other hand, being age ≥65 years was associated with decreased OS (HR = 16.70, 95% CI 1.54-181.28, P = .021). CONCLUSION: Surgeons must often weigh the pros and cons of en bloc resection and sacrificing important but affected native tissues. Our findings can provide a benchmark for counseling patients with spinal chordoma. Tumors ≥100 cm3 appear to have a 5.89-times higher risk of recurrence, mobile spine chordomas have a 7.73 times higher risk, and neoadjuvant radiotherapy confers an 11.1 times lower risk for local recurrence. Patients age ≥65 years at surgery have a 16.70 times higher risk of mortality than those <65 years.

Activity Measure for Post-Acute care (AM-PAC) scores predict Short and Long-Term outcomes following glioblastoma resection.

BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma patients may develop functional deficits post-operatively that affect activities of daily living and result in worse outcomes. The Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) instrument assigns patients basic mobility and daily activity scores, but it is unknown if these scores correlate with post-operative outcomes in glioblastoma patients. METHODS: Adult (≥18 years) glioblastoma patients evaluated by physical/occupational therapy after resection at a single instution (June 2008-December 2020) were identified. Patient demographics, post-operative AM-PAC scores, and clinical outcomes were collected. Multivariate regression identified associations between AM-PAC scores and post-operative outcomes. RESULTS: 600 patients were included (mean age 59.3 years, 59.2 % male); 151 (25.3 %) and 246 (43.8 %) patients had low mobility (<42.9) and activity (<39.4) scores, respectively. 103 (17.2 %) and 177 (29.5 %) patients experienced extended lengths of stay (LOS) in the ICU (≥2 days) and overall (≥7 days), respectively. 154 (25.7 %) patients had non-home discharges. The 30-day readmission rate was 13.7 %. In multivariate analysis, low mobility scores correlated with increased odds of extended overall (p < 0.0001) and ICU (p = 0.0004) LOS, non-home discharge (p < 0.0001), and 30-day readmission (p = 0.0405). Low activity scores correlated with extended overall LOS (<0.0001) and non-home discharge (p < 0.0001). In log-rank analysis, median survival time was shorter for patients with low mobility (9.5 vs. 14.7 months, p < 0.0001) and activity (10.6 vs. 16.3 months, p < 0.0001) scores than for high-scoring patients. CONCLUSION: AM-PAC basic mobility and daily activity scores are associated with outcomes after glioblastoma resection. These easily obtainable scores may be useful for prognosticating and guiding decision making in post-operative glioblastoma patients.

Surgical resection of glioblastoma in the very elderly: An analysis of survival outcomes using the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database.

OBJECTIVE: Patients with glioblastoma (GBM) often undergo surgery to prolong survival. However, the use of surgery, and more specifically achieving gross total resection (GTR), in patients >80 years old has yet to be fully assessed. Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, we aim to assess the efficacy of surgical resection, radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy (CT) on overall survival (OS) in very elderly GBM patients compared to elderly counterparts (age 65-79 years). METHODS: The SEER database was queried for all patients >65 years old with GBM (2000-2020). Patients not undergoing surgery or biopsy were excluded. Patients were stratified by age, and demographic relationships were assessed with chi-squared testing for categorical variables. Bivariable models were created using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates. All significant variables from bivariable analysis were included on multivariable Cox survival regression models to determine independent associations between clinical variables and OS. RESULTS: A total of 27,090 operative GBM patients were identified; 1868 patients (15.92 %) were very elderly and 10,092 patients (84.38 %) were elderly. Very elderly patients were less likely to undergo GTR (28 % vs 35 %, p<0.001), RT (59 % vs 78 %, p<0.001) and CT (40 % vs 66 %, p<0.001). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, very elderly patients who achieved GTR (HR=.696, p<0.001), received RT (HR=0.583, p<0.001) and underwent CT (HR=0.4197, p<0.001) had significantly improved OS compared to very elderly patients that did not undergo these treatment options. CONCLUSION: Currently, very elderly GBM patients undergo lower rates of aggressive surgery, RT and CT. However, very elderly patients that undergo surgery, RT and CT may have a survival advantage. These treatments should be considered as potential options for this patient population.

Clinical Predictors of Overall Survival in Very Elderly Patients With Glioblastoma: A National Cancer Database Multivariable Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Surgery for the very elderly is a progressively important paradigm as life expectancy continues to rise. Patients with glioblastoma multiforme often undergo surgery, radiotherapy (RT), and chemotherapy (CT) to prolong overall survival (OS). However, the efficacy of these treatment modalities in patients aged 80 years and older has yet to be fully assessed in the literature. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was used to retrospectively identify patients aged 65 years and older with glioblastoma multiforme (1989-2016). All available patient demographic characteristics, disease characteristics, and clinical outcomes were collected. To study OS, bivariable survival models were created using Kaplan-Meier estimates. A Cox proportional-hazards model was used for final adjusted analyses. RESULTS: A total of 578 very elderly patients (aged 80 years and older) and 2836 elderly patients (aged 65-79 years) were identified. Compared with elderly patients, very elderly patients were more likely to have Medicare (odds ratio [OR] 1.899 [95% CI: 1.417-2.544], P < .001) while less likely to have private insurance status (OR 0.544 [95% CI: 0.401-0.739], P < .001). In addition, very elderly patients were more likely to travel the least distance for treatment and have multiple tumors (P < .001). When controlling for demographic and disease characteristics, very elderly patients were less likely to receive gross total resection (GTR) (OR 0.822 [95% CI: 0.681-0.991], P < .041), RT (OR 0.385 [95% CI: 0.319-0.466], P < .001), or postoperative CT (OR 0.298 [95% CI: 0.219-0.359], P < .001) relative to elderly counterparts. Within very elderly patients, GTR, RT, and CT all independently and significantly predicted improved OS (P < .001 for all). These predictive models were deployed in an online calculator (https://spine.shinyapps.io/GBM_elderly). CONCLUSION: Very elderly patients are less likely to receive GTR, RT, or CT when compared with elderly counterparts despite use of these therapies conferring improved OS. Selected very elderly patients may benefit from more aggressive attempts at surgical and adjuvant treatment.

Fractionated radiotherapy after gross-total resection of spinal chordoma: a systematic review of survival outcomes using individualized patient data.

OBJECTIVE: Spinal chordoma treatment guidelines recommend resection. However, in patients in whom gross-total resection (GTR) is achieved, the benefits of radiation therapy (RT) are unclear. Therefore, the authors performed a systematic review to determine if RT is associated with postoperative progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) after achieving GTR of spinal chordoma. METHODS: The PubMed database was searched for studies including individualized data of patients undergoing GTR with or without RT for spinal chordoma. Patients < 18 years of age or those who underwent stereotactic body RT were excluded. Qualitative assessment was performed using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale guidelines. Log-rank tests for time-to-event data and a Cox proportional-hazards model were generated for a multivariable statistical model. RESULTS: Complete data of 132 patients were retrieved, with 37 (28%) patients receiving adjuvant RT and 95 (72%) not receiving adjuvant RT. The mean follow-up was not statistically significantly different between those undergoing RT and not undergoing RT (54.02 months and 65.43 months, respectively). Patients were more likely not to undergo RT if their disease was located in the sacrum versus the mobile spine (p < 0.001). When controlling for age ≥ 65 years, male sex, disease location, and treatment year ≥ 2010, patients undergoing RT had similar PFS and OS when compared with those not undergoing RT on multivariable survival analysis (HR 0.935 [95% CI 0.703-2.340], p = 0.844 and HR 2.078 [95% CI 0.848-5.090], p = 0.110, respectively). However, age ≥ 65 years was associated with poorer OS in adjusted analyses (HR 2.761 [95% CI 1.185-6.432], p = 0.018) relative to patients < 65 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: After achieving GTR of spinal chordoma, the utility of RT on PFS and OS remains unclear. Age ≥ 65 years appears to be associated with OS in spinal chordoma patients. Additional multicenter prospective studies are needed to determine the utility of RT in this patient population.

Quality of life in chordoma survivors: results from the Chordoma Foundation Survivorship Survey.

OBJECTIVE: Chordomas are rare malignant bone tumors whose location in the skull base or spine, invasive surgical treatment, and accompanying adjuvant radiotherapy may all lead patients to experience poor quality of life (QOL). Limited research has been conducted on specific demographic and clinical factors associated with decreased QOL in chordoma survivors. Thus, the aim of the present study was to investigate several potential variables and their impact on specific QOL domains in these patients as well the frequencies of specific QOL challenges within these domains. METHODS: The Chordoma Foundation (CF) Survivorship Survey was electronically distributed to chordoma survivors subscribed to the CF Chordoma Connections forum. Survey questions assessed QOL in three domains: physical, emotional/cognitive, and social. The degree of impairment was assessed by grouping the participants into high- and low-challenge groups designated by having ≥ 5 or < 5 symptoms or challenges within a given QOL domain. Bivariate analysis of demographic and clinical characteristics between these groups was conducted using Fisher's exact test and the Mann-Whitney U-test. RESULTS: A total of 665 chordoma survivors at least partially completed the survey. On bivariate analysis, female sex was significantly associated with increased odds of significant emotional (p = 0.001) and social (p = 0.019) QOL burden. Younger survivors (age < 65 years) were significantly more likely to experience significant physical (p < 0.0001), emotional (p < 0.0001), and social (p < 0.0001) QOL burden. Skull base chordoma survivors had significantly higher emotional/cognitive QOL burden than spinal chordoma survivors (p = 0.022), while the converse was true for social QOL challenges (p = 0.0048). Survivors currently in treatment were significantly more likely to experience significant physical QOL challenges compared with survivors who completed their treatment > 10 years ago (p = 0.0074). Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) was the most commonly reported emotional/cognitive QOL challenge (49.6%). Only 41% of the participants reported having their needs met for their physical QOL challenges as well as 25% for emotional/cognitive and 18% for social. CONCLUSIONS: The authors' findings suggest that younger survivors, female survivors, and survivors currently undergoing treatment for chordoma are at high risk for adverse QOL outcomes. Additionally, although nearly half of the participants reported a FCR, very few reported having adequate emotional/cognitive care. These findings may be useful in identifying specific groups of chordoma survivors vulnerable to QOL challenges and bring to light the need to expand care to meet the QOL needs for these patients.

Machine Learning Identifies Variation in Timing of Palliative Care Consultations Among Traumatic Brain Injury Patients.

Background and Objective Timely palliative care involvement offers demonstrable benefits for traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients; however, palliative care consultations (PCCs) are used inconsistently during TBI management. This study aimed to employ advanced machine learning techniques to elucidate the primary drivers of PCC timing variability for TBI patients. Methods Data on admission, hospital course, and outcomes were collected for a cohort of 232 TBI patients who received both PCCs and neurosurgical consultations during the same hospitalization. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and K-means clustering were used to identify patient phenotypes, which were then compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis. An extreme gradient boosting model (XGBoost) was employed to determine drivers of PCC timing, with model interpretation performed using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Results Cluster A (n = 86) consisted mainly of older (median [IQR] = 87 [78, 94] years), White females with mild TBIs and demonstrated the shortest time-to-PCC (2.5 [1.0, 7.0] days). Cluster B (n = 108) also sustained mild TBIs but comprised moderately younger (81 [75, 86] years) married White males with later PCC (5.0 [3.0, 10.8] days). Cluster C (n = 38) represented much younger (46.5 [29.5, 59.8] years), more severely injured, non-White patients with the latest PCC initiation (9.0 [4.2, 17.0] days). The clusters did not differ by discharge disposition (p = 0.4) or frequency inpatient mortality (p > 0.9); however, Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significant difference in the time from admission to PCC (p < 0.001), despite no differences in time from admission to mortality (p = 0.18). SHAP analysis of the XGBoost model identified age, sex, and race as the most influential drivers of PCC timing. Conclusions This study highlights crucial disparities in PCC timing for TBI patients and underscores the need for targeted strategies to ensure timely and equitable palliative care integration for this vulnerable population.

Evaluation of the Glasgow Coma Scale-Pupils score for predicting inpatient mortality among patients with traumatic subdural hematoma at United States trauma centers.

OBJECTIVE: The Glasgow Coma Scale-Pupils (GCS-P) score has been suggested to better predict patient outcomes compared with GCS alone, while avoiding the need for more complex clinical models. This study aimed to compare the prognostic ability of GCS-P versus GCS in a national cohort of traumatic subdural hematoma (SDH) patients. METHODS: Patient data were obtained from the National Trauma Data Bank (2017-2019). Inclusion criteria were traumatic SDH diagnosis with available data on presenting GCS score, pupillary reactivity, and discharge disposition. Patients with severe polytrauma or nonsurvivable head injury at presentation were excluded. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of GCS-P versus GCS scores for inpatient mortality prediction were evaluated across the entire cohort, as well as in subgroups based on age and traumatic brain injury (TBI) type (blunt vs penetrating). Calibration curves were plotted based on predicted probabilities and actual outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 196,747 traumatic SDH patients met the study inclusion criteria. Sensitivity (0.707 vs 0.702), specificity (0.821 vs 0.823), and AUC (0.825 vs 0.814, p < 0.001) of GCS-P versus GCS scores for prediction of inpatient mortality were similar. Calibration curve analysis revealed that GCS scores slightly underestimated inpatient mortality risk, whereas GCS-P scores did not. In patients > 65 years of age with blunt TBI (51.9%, n = 102,148), both GCS-P and GCS scores underestimated inpatient mortality risk. In patients with penetrating TBI (2.4%, n = 4,710), the AUC of the GCS-P score was significantly higher (0.902 vs 0.851, p < 0.001). In this subgroup, both GCS-P and GCS scores underestimated inpatient mortality risk among patients with lower rates of observed mortality and overestimated risk among patients with higher rates of observed mortality. This effect was more pronounced in the GCS-P calibration curve. CONCLUSIONS: The GCS-P score provides better short-term prognostication compared with the GCS score alone among traumatic SDH patients with penetrating TBI. The GCS-P score overestimates inpatient mortality risk among penetrating TBI patients with higher rates of observed mortality. For penetrating TBI patients, which comprised 2.4% of our SDH cohort, a low GCS-P score should not justify clinical nihilism or forgoing aggressive treatment.

Individualized homeopathic medicines in preventing the progression from pre-diabetes to diabetes: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-arm trial.

CONTEXT: Pre-diabetes is a significant public health problem worldwide. India has a very high rate of progression from pre-diabetes to diabetes, 75-78 per thousand persons per year. OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy of individualized homeopathic medicinal products (HMPs) against placebos in preventing the progression from pre-diabetes to diabetes. DESIGN: Six-month, double-blind, randomized (1:1), two parallel arms, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Outpatient departments of D. N. De Homoeopathic Medical College and Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. PATIENTS: Sixty participants with pre-diabetes. INTERVENTIONS: Verum: HMPs plus yoga therapy (YT; n = 30); control: identical-looking placebos plus YT (n = 30). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of participants progressing from pre-diabetes to diabetes, measured after three and six months. Secondary outcomes comprised of fasting blood glucose (FBS), oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), glycated hemoglobin percentage (HbA1c%), lipid profile, liver enzymes (alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase), urea and creatinine, and Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile version 2 (MYMOP-2); all measured after 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: The proportion of participants converted from pre-diabetics to diabetics (n/N; n = diabetics, N = prediabetics) was significantly less in the verum group than control: HbA1C% (month 3: verum - 2/30 versus control - 11/30, p = 0.003; month 6: 3/30 vs. 2/30, p = 0.008), OGTT (month 3: 0/30 vs. 8/30, p = 0.015; month 6: 0/30 vs. 1/30, p = 0.008), but not according to FBS (month 3: 1/30 vs. 1/30, p = 0.779; month 6: 1/30 vs. 3/30, p = 0.469). Several secondary outcomes also revealed significant improvements in the verum group than in placebo: HbA1C% (p < 0.001), OGTT (p = 0.001), serum ALT (p = 0.031), creatinine (p = 0.012), and MYMOP-2 profile scores (p < 0.001). Sulphur, Bryonia alba, and Thuja occidentalis were the most frequently indicated medicines. Thus, HMPs outperformed placebos by successfully preventing the progression of pre-diabetes to diabetes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials Registry - India CTRI/2022/04/042,026; UTN: U1111-1277-0021.

The Socioeconomic Distressed Communities Index Predicts 90-Day Mortality Among Intracranial Tumor Patients.

BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic status (SES) is a major determinant of quality of life and outcomes. However, SES remains difficult to measure comprehensively. Distress communities index (DCI), a composite of 7 socioeconomic factors, has been increasingly recognized for its correlation with poor outcomes. As a result, the objective of the present study is to determine the predictive value of the DCI on outcomes following intracranial tumor surgery. METHODS: A single institution, retrospective review was conducted to identify adult intracranial tumor patients undergoing resection (2016-2021). Patient ZIP codes were matched to DCI and stratified by DCI quartiles (low:0-24.9, low-intermediate:25-49.9, intermediate-high:50-74.9, high:75-100). Univariate followed by multivariate regressions assessed the effects of DCI on postoperative outcomes. Receiver operating curves were generated for significant outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 2389 patients were included: 1015 patients (42.5%) resided in low distress communities, 689 (28.8%) in low-intermediate distress communities, 445 (18.6%) in intermediate-high distress communities, and 240 (10.0%) in high distress communities. On multivariate analysis, risk of fracture (adjusted odds ratio = 1.60, 95% confidence interval 1.26-2.05, P < 0.001) and 90-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio = 1.58, 95% confidence interval 1.21-2.06, P < 0.001) increased with increasing DCI quartile. Good predictive accuracy was observed for both models, with receiver operating curves of 0.746 (95% CI 0.720-0.766) for fracture and 0.743 (95% CI 0.714-0.772) for 90-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Intracranial tumor patients from distressed communities are at increased risk for adverse events and death in the postoperative period. DCI may be a useful, holistic measure of SES that can help risk stratifying patients and should be considered when building healthcare pathways.

Availability and utilization of molecular testing for primary central nervous system tumors among US hospitals.

Advanced molecular testing has increasingly become an integral component for accurate diagnosis of central nervous system (CNS) tumors. We sought to establish the current state of molecular testing availability and approaches for the diagnosis of CNS tumors in US hospitals that conduct high volumes of CNS tumor resections. We distributed a 16-item survey inquiring about molecular testing approaches for CNS tumors to 115 neuropathologists at US hospitals with neurosurgery residency programs. Thirty-five neuropathologists (30.4%) responded to the survey, all of whom indicated their institutions perform molecular testing on CNS tumor tissue. The most commonly offered tests were MGMT methylation profiling and next-generation sequencing. Fourteen respondents (40%) indicated that their institution is able to test for and report all of the molecular alterations included in our survey. Nine (25.7%) respondents indicated that molecular testing is performed as standard of care for all patients with resected CNS tumors. Our results suggest that even in academic hospitals with a high volume of CNS tumor resections, molecular testing for these tumors is limited. Continued initiatives are necessary to expand the availability of molecular testing for CNS tumors to ensure diagnostic accuracy and guide targeted therapy.

Exploring the impact of primary care utilization and health information exchange upon treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of glioblastoma patients.

PURPOSE: There is limited literature describing care coordination for patients with glioblastoma (GBM). We aimed to investigate the impact of primary care and electronic health information exchange (HIE) between neurosurgeons, oncologists, and primary care providers (PCP) on GBM treatment patterns, postoperative outcomes, and survival. METHODS: We identified adult GBM patients undergoing primary resection at our institution (2007-2020). HIE was defined as shared electronic medical information between PCPs, oncologists, and neurosurgeons. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine the effect of PCPs and HIE upon initiation and completion of adjuvant therapy. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression models were used to evaluate overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Among 374 patients (mean age ± SD: 57.7 ± 13.5, 39.0% female), 81.0% had a PCP and 62.4% had electronic HIE. In multivariate analyses, having a PCP was associated with initiation (OR: 7.9, P < 0.001) and completion (OR: 4.4, P < 0.001) of 6 weeks of concomitant chemoradiation, as well as initiation (OR: 4.0, P < 0.001) and completion (OR: 3.0, P = 0.007) of 6 cycles of maintenance temozolomide thereafter. Having a PCP (median OS [95%CI]: 14.6[13.1-16.1] vs. 10.8[8.2-13.3] months, P = 0.005) and HIE (15.40[12.82-17.98] vs. 13.80[12.51-15.09] months, P = 0.029) were associated with improved OS relative to counterparts in Kaplan-Meier analysis and in multivariate Cox regression analysis (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.7, [95% CI] 0.5-1.0, P = 0.048). In multivariate analyses, chemoradiation (HR = 0.34, [95% CI] 0.2-0.7, P = 0.002) and maintenance temozolomide (HR = 0.5, 95%CI 0.3-0.8, P = 0.002) were associated with improved OS relative to counterparts. CONCLUSION: Effective care coordination between neurosurgeons, oncologists, and PCPs may offer a modifiable avenue to improve GBM outcomes.

Exploring disparities in surgical recommendations for patients with primary intramedullary spinal cord tumors: an analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2000 to 2019.

OBJECTIVE: Factors that may drive recommendations for operative intervention for patients with intramedullary spinal cord tumors (ISCTs) have yet to be extensively studied. The authors investigated racial and socioeconomic disparities in the management of patients with primary spinal cord ependymomas and nonependymal gliomas, with the aim of determining the associations between socioeconomic patient characteristics, survival, and recommendations for the resection of primary ISCTs. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry was queried to identify all patients > 18 years of age with ISCTs diagnosed between 2000 and 2019. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to calculate odds ratios for variables associated with receiving a surgical recommendation. Log-rank tests and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS). RESULTS: The authors identified 2325 patients (mean age 49 [SD 16] years; 48.8% female; 67.4% non-Hispanic White, 7.8% non-Hispanic Black, 16.2% Hispanic, 6.5% Asian/Pacific Islander, 0.6% Native American; 56.7% married; 64.4% with household income < $75,000; 73.8% with spinal ependymoma; and 26.2% with nonependymal spinal glioma). Eighty-seven percent of patients received a surgical recommendation. In multivariable models, marriage was associated with higher odds of receiving a surgical recommendation for ependymomas (OR 1.80, p = 0.005). In multivariable models for nonependymal spinal gliomas, older age (OR 0.98, p = 0.001) and increased number of tumors (OR 0.62, p = 0.015) were associated with decreased odds of receiving surgical recommendations. Among ependymomas, marriage (HR 0.59, p = 0.001), younger age (HR 0.93, p < 0.001), female sex (HR 0.43, p = 0.006), and decreased number of tumors (HR 0.56, p < 0.001) were associated with improved OS. Among nonependymal spinal gliomas, median household income ≥ $75,000 (HR 0.69, p = 0.020) and younger age (HR 0.98, p < 0.001) were associated with improved DSS, while Black race (HR 4.65, p = 0.027) and older age (HR 1.05, p < 0.001) were associated with worse OS. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with spinal ependymomas and nonependymal spinal gliomas, recommendations for surgery appear to be unaffected by patient sex, race, or income. Survival disparities appear to exist among unmarried, male, Black, and lower-income cohorts. Continued initiatives to identify drivers of disparities while improving health equity in this patient population are needed.

Preoperative patient-reported physical health-related quality of life predicts short-term postoperative outcomes in brain tumor patients.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly used to assess patients' perioperative health. The PROM Information System 29 (PROMIS-29) is a well-validated global health assessment instrument for patient physical health, though its utility in cranial neurosurgery is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the utility of preoperative PROMIS-29 physical health (PH) summary scores in predicting postoperative outcomes in brain tumor patients. METHODS: Adult brain tumor patients undergoing resection at a single institution (January 2018-December 2021) were identified and prospectively received PROMIS-29 surveys during pre-operative visits. PH summary scores were constructed and optimum prediction thresholds for length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition (DD), and 30-day readmission were approximated by finding the Youden index of the associated receiver operating characteristic curves. Bivariate analyses were used to study the distribution of low (z-score≤-1) versus high (z-score>-1) PH scores according to baseline characteristics. Logistic regression models quantified the association between preoperative PH summary scores and post-operative outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 157 brain tumor patients were identified (mean age 55.4±15.4 years; 58.0% female; mean PH score 45.5+10.5). Outcomes included prolonged LOS (24.8%), non-routine discharge disposition (37.6%), and 30-day readmission (19.1%). On bivariate analysis, patients with low PH scores were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with a high-grade tumor (69.6% vs 38.85%, p=0.010) and less likely to have elective surgery (34.8% vs 70.9%, p=0.002). Low PH score was associated with prolonged LOS (26.1% vs 22%, p<0.001), nonroutine discharge (73.9% vs 31.3%, p<0.001) and 30-day readmission (43.5% vs 14.9%, p=0.003). In multivariate analysis, low PH scores predicted greater LOS (odds ratio [OR]=6.09, p=0.003), nonroutine discharge (OR=4.25, p=0.020), and 30-day readmission (OR=3.93, p=0.020). CONCLUSION: The PROMIS-29 PH summary score predicts short-term postoperative outcomes in brain tumor patients and may be incorporated into prospective clinical workflows.

Operative Corridors in Endoscopic Skull Base Tumor Surgery.

Advances in technology, instrumentation, and reconstruction have paved the way for extended endoscopic approaches to skull base tumors. In the sagittal plane, the endonasal approach may safely access pathologies from the frontal sinus to the craniocervical junction in the sagittal plane, the petrous apex in the coronal plane, and extend posteriorly to the clivus and posterior cranial fossa. This review article describes these modular extended endoscopic approaches, along with crucial anatomic considerations, illustrative cases, and practical operative pearls.