RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Observational studies have documented lower risks of coronary heart disease and diabetes among moderate alcohol consumers relative to abstainers, but only a randomized clinical trial can provide conclusive evidence for or against these associations. AIM: The purpose of this study was to describe the rationale and design of the Moderate Alcohol and Cardiovascular Health Trial, aimed to assess the cardiometabolic effects of one alcoholic drink daily over an average of six years among adults 50 years or older. METHODS: This multicenter, parallel-arm randomized trial was designed to compare the effects of one standard serving (â¼11-15 g) daily of a preferred alcoholic beverage to abstention. The trial aimed to enroll 7800 people at high risk of cardiovascular disease. The primary composite endpoint comprised time to the first occurrence of non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal ischemic stroke, hospitalized angina, coronary/carotid revascularization, or total mortality. The trial was designed to provide >80% power to detect a 15% reduction in the risk of the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included diabetes. Adverse effects of special interest included injuries, congestive heart failure, alcohol use disorders, and cancer. RESULTS: We describe the design, governance, masking issues, and data handling. In three months of field center activity until termination by the funder, the trial randomized 32 participants, successfully screened another 70, and identified â¼400 additional interested individuals. CONCLUSIONS: We describe a feasible design for a long-term randomized trial of moderate alcohol consumption. Such a study will provide the highest level of evidence for the effects of moderate alcohol consumption on cardiovascular disease and diabetes, and will directly inform clinical and public health guidelines.
Asunto(s)
Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Síndrome Metabólico/epidemiología , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Salud Global , Humanos , Masculino , Síndrome Metabólico/etiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Morbilidad , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
Adolescence is a time of dramatic changes in brain structure and function, and the adolescent brain is highly susceptible to being altered by experiences like substance use. However, there is much we have yet to learn about how these experiences influence brain development, how they promote or interfere with later health outcomes, or even what healthy brain development looks like. A large longitudinal study beginning in early adolescence could help us understand the normal variability in adolescent brain and cognitive development and tease apart the many factors that influence it. Recent advances in neuroimaging, informatics, and genetics technologies have made it feasible to conduct a study of sufficient size and scope to answer many outstanding questions. At the same time, several Institutes across the NIH recognized the value of collaborating in such a project because of its ability to address the role of biological, environmental, and behavioral factors like gender, pubertal hormones, sports participation, and social/economic disparities on brain development as well as their association with the emergence and progression of substance use and mental illness including suicide risk. Thus, the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study was created to answer the most pressing public health questions of our day.
Asunto(s)
Desarrollo del Adolescente/fisiología , Encéfalo/crecimiento & desarrollo , Cognición/fisiología , National Institutes of Health (U.S.)/normas , Neuroimagen/métodos , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/patología , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Drinking within recommended limits is highly prevalent in much of the world, and strong epidemiological associations exist between moderate alcohol consumption and risk of several major chronic diseases, including coronary heart disease, diabetes, and breast cancer. In many cases, plausible biological mediators for these associations have been identified in randomized trials, but gold standard evidence that moderate drinking causes or prevents any chronic disease remains elusive and important concerns about available evidence have been raised. Although long-term randomized trials to test the observed associations have been termed impossible, clinical investigators have now successfully completed randomized trials of complex nutritional interventions in a variety of settings, along with trials of alcohol consumption itself of up to 2 years duration. The successful completion of these trials suggests that objections to the execution of a full-scale, long-term clinical trial of moderate drinking on chronic disease are increasingly untenable. We present potential lessons learned for such a trial and discuss key features to maximize its feasibility and value.
Asunto(s)
Consumo de Bebidas Alcohólicas , Enfermedad Crónica , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
The review article summarizes the mission of the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA) with focus on the NIAAA's current and future research version for alcoholic liver disease and alcoholic pancreatitis.
Asunto(s)
Alcoholismo/complicaciones , Alcoholismo/prevención & control , Salud Global , Hepatopatías Alcohólicas/etiología , Hepatopatías Alcohólicas/prevención & control , Pancreatitis Alcohólica/etiología , Pancreatitis Alcohólica/prevención & control , Investigación Biomédica Traslacional/tendencias , Alcoholismo/epidemiología , Animales , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/etiología , Susceptibilidad a Enfermedades , Femenino , Humanos , Hepatopatías Alcohólicas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/etiología , Masculino , Metabolómica/tendencias , National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (U.S.) , Pancreatitis Alcohólica/epidemiología , Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: BRCA1-mutant breast tumors are typically estrogen receptor alpha (ER alpha) negative, whereas most sporadic tumors express wild-type BRCA1 and are ER alpha positive. We examined a possible mechanism for the observed ER alpha-negative phenotype of BRCA1-mutant tumors. METHODS: We used a breast cancer disease-specific microarray to identify transcripts that were differentially expressed between paraffin-embedded samples of 17 BRCA1-mutant and 14 sporadic breast tumors. We measured the mRNA levels of estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) (the gene encoding ER alpha), which was differentially expressed in the tumor samples, by quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Regulation of ESR1 mRNA and ER alpha protein expression was assessed in human breast cancer HCC1937 cells that were stably reconstituted with wild-type BRCA1 expression construct and in human breast cancer T47D and MCF-7 cells transiently transfected with BRCA1-specific short-interfering RNA (siRNA). Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays were performed to determine if BRCA1 binds the ESR1 promoter and to identify other interacting proteins. Sensitivity to the antiestrogen drug fulvestrant was examined in T47D and MCF-7 cells transfected with BRCA1-specific siRNA. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Mean ESR1 gene expression was 5.4-fold lower in BRCA1-mutant tumors than in sporadic tumors (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.6-fold to 40.1-fold, P = .0019). The transcription factor Oct-1 recruited BRCA1 to the ESR1 promoter, and both BRCA1 and Oct-1 were required for ER alpha expression. BRCA1-depleted breast cancer cells expressing exogenous ER alpha were more sensitive to fulvestrant than BRCA1-depleted cells transfected with empty vector (T47D cells, the mean concentration of fulvestrant that inhibited the growth of 40% of the cells [IC40] for empty vector versus ER alpha: >10(-5) versus 8.0 x 10(-9) M [95% CI = 3.1 x 10(-10) to 3.2 x 10(-6) M]; MCF-7 cells, mean IC40 for empty vector versus ER alpha: >10(-5) versus 4.9 x 10(-8) M [95% CI = 2.0 x 10(-9) to 3.9 x 10(-6) M]). CONCLUSIONS: BRCA1 alters the response of breast cancer cells to antiestrogen therapy by directly modulating ER alpha expression.