Utility of Weekly Laboratory Monitoring in the Expectant Management of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy.

Our retrospective cohort study evaluates the diagnostic yield of weekly laboratory surveillance in outpatient management of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) based on patient clinical status at the time of laboratory testing. The study included 459 patients and 1,082 laboratory episodes: 356 (32.9%) episodes were performed in the setting of concerning clinical findings and 726 (67.1%) when the patient was asymptomatic. Overall, the diagnostic yield for abnormal laboratory values (n=11) was 1.0% (95% CI 0.4-1.6%) of all assessments performed and 2.4% (95% CI 1.0-3.8%) among all patients in the cohort. The prevalence of abnormal test results was higher in patients with clinical findings (2.8%, 95% CI 1.1-4.5%) compared with those who were asymptomatic (0.1%, 95% CI 0-0.2%) ( P <.01). Clinical findings suggestive of worsening disease had a 91% sensitivity (95% CI 59-100%) and a 99% (95% CI 99-100%) negative predictive value for abnormal laboratory values. Directed screening based on signs and symptoms, rather than universal weekly screening, may be a potential strategy to lower costs and reduce multiple blood draws for patients with HDP, because there is a low diagnostic yield for this practice.

Masked pregnancy-associated hypertension as a predictor of adverse outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Masked hypertension has been described in nonpregnant populations as elevated blood pressure in the home setting that is not reproduced on clinical assessment. Patients with masked hypertension have a greater risk of cardiovascular morbidity than patients who have blood pressures within normal range or those with white coat hypertension. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether masked pregnancy-associated hypertension detected on Connected Maternity Online Monitoring, a remote home blood pressure monitoring system, is associated with higher rates of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy during delivery admission and maternal and neonatal morbidities. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients on Connected Maternity Online Monitoring who delivered at 6 hospitals in a single healthcare system between October 2016 and December 2020. Patients were classified as having either normal blood pressure or masked pregnancy-associated hypertension. Masked pregnancy-associated hypertension was defined as remotely detected systolic blood pressure of ≥140 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure of ≥90 mm Hg after 20 weeks of gestation on 2 occasions before diagnosis in a clinical setting. The chi-square test and Student t test were used for demographic and outcomes comparisons. Logistic regression was used to adjust outcomes by race, insurance, and body mass index. RESULTS: A total of 2430 deliveries were included in our analysis, including 165 deliveries that met the criteria for masked pregnancy-associated hypertension. Clinically established pregnancy-associated hypertension, defined at the time of delivery, was more common in the masked pregnancy-associated hypertension group than in the normotensive group (66% vs 10%; adjusted odds ratio, 17.2; 95% confidence interval, 11.91-24.81). Patients with masked pregnancy-associated hypertension had higher rates of preeclampsia with severe features on delivery admission than normotensive patients (28% vs 2%; adjusted odds ratio, 23.35; 95% confidence interval, 14.25-38.26). Preterm delivery (16% vs 7%; adjusted odds ratio, 2.47; 95% confidence interval, 1.55-3.94), cesarean delivery(38% vs 26%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-2.23), small for gestational age (11% vs 5%; adjusted odds ratio, 2.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-3.94), and neonatal intensive care unit admission (8% vs 4%; adjusted odds ratio, 2.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-4.09) were more common among patients with masked pregnancy-associated hypertension than among normotensive patients. CONCLUSION: With more outcomes research, remote blood pressure monitoring may prove to be an important tool in identifying pregnancies at risk of complications related to masked hypertension.

Pregnancy Outcomes in Patients After Completion of the mRNA Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Vaccination Series Compared With Unvaccinated Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To compare frequency of perinatal death between pregnant patients who completed the mRNA coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination series and unvaccinated patients. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included 15,865 pregnant patients who delivered 16,132 newborns after 20 weeks of gestation within a large regional health system between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2021. Patients who received two doses of mRNA vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech [BNT162b2] or Moderna [mRNA-1273]) were included in the vaccinated group and were compared with unvaccinated patients. Exclusions included partial vaccination, viral-vector vaccine, major congenital anomalies, and higher-order multiple gestation. Our primary outcome was perinatal death, including stillbirth and neonatal death, which was evaluated by logistic regression. Unadjusted odds ratios and adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were reported, controlling for age, body mass index (BMI), diabetes, hypertension, smoking, twin gestation, and insurance status. Propensity score matching was also performed. RESULTS: A total of 15,865 patients were included in the final analysis: 2,069 in the vaccination group and 13,796 in the control group. Only 13.0% of the cohort was included in the vaccination group; however, the vaccination rate increased over the course of the study period as the vaccine became more widely available and accepted. Vaccinated patients were older, with higher rates of people of non-Black racial non-Hispanic ethnic backgrounds, people with private insurance, and those with higher BMIs. Vaccination was associated with a lower incidence of perinatal death (0.5% vaccinated group vs 0.8% unvaccinated group, aOR 0.20 0.05-0.88). Vaccination against COVID-19 was also associated with lower rates of preterm delivery (aOR 0.63, 0.48-0.82), neonates with very low birth weight (aOR 0.35, 0.15-0.84), and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission (aOR 0.66, 0.52-0.85). The association between vaccination and lower rates of perinatal death was no longer significant after propensity score matching. CONCLUSION: In a large retrospective cohort study, receipt of the primary mRNA COVID-19 vaccination series was associated with a lower rate of several adverse pregnancy outcomes, including perinatal death, preterm delivery, neonates with very low birth weight, and NICU admission. Although the decreased rates of perinatal death did not remain significant after propensity score matching, there was evidence of directional benefit for vaccinated patients.

Maternal early warning criteria predict postpartum severe maternal morbidity and mortality after delivery hospitalization discharge: a case-control study.

BACKGROUND: The predictors of postpartum severe maternal morbidity and mortality have not been well-described using patient-level data. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the application of maternal early warning criteria in the postpartum period and generate a preliminary predictive model for severe maternal morbidity and mortality occurring after delivery hospitalization discharge until 42 days postpartum. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective case-control study was conducted from January 2013 to September 2020. Cases were identified from electronic medical records using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes for Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-defined severe maternal morbidity. Patients meeting the criteria for severe maternal morbidity and mortality from delivery hospitalization discharge until 42 days postpartum were matched for delivery hospital and year with the controls in an approximate 1:2 fashion. The objective was to identify the demographic and clinical risk factors during the antepartum through postpartum periods for postpartum severe maternal morbidity and mortality. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to estimate the risks, and a receiver operating characteristic curve was derived to evaluate the model. RESULTS: Ninety cases of postpartum severe maternal morbidity and mortality that occurred following delivery hospitalization discharge were identified. These were matched with 175 controls. Women with postpartum severe maternal morbidity and mortality had more postpartum assessments (mean: 1.7 vs 1.4, P=.005) and a higher frequency of maternal early warning criteria (58% [52/90] vs 2% [3/175]; P<.001) preceding the diagnosis of severe maternal morbidity and mortality than controls. Black women had higher odds of postpartum severe maternal morbidity and mortality than White women (odds ratio, 1.93; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-3.27). Women with maternal early warning criteria during postpartum assessments were more likely to experience subsequent postpartum severe maternal morbidity and mortality (odds ratio, 67.2; 95% confidence interval, 21.3-211.6) than women with no maternal early warning criteria. Although the point estimate was different in Black women (odds ratio, 161.8; 95% confidence interval, 8.9 to >999) than White women (odds ratio, 47.9; 95% confidence interval, 13.8-167.1), the effect modification between the maternal early warning criteria and race was not statistically significant (P=.93). In a multivariable model, race, body mass index, cesarean delivery, and maternal early warning criteria at postpartum assessments were associated with subsequent severe maternal morbidity and mortality, with an area under the curve of 0.905 (95% confidence interval, 0.864-0.946). CONCLUSION: Maternal early warning criteria are associated with increased odds of postpartum severe maternal morbidity and mortality. A straightforward model that includes race, body mass index, cesarean delivery, and presence of maternal early warning criteria appears to be a promising tool to identify those at risk for postpartum severe maternal morbidity and mortality following delivery hospitalization discharge. This is an important first step in improving the ability to recognize and respond to conditions preceding postpartum severe maternal morbidity. These findings should be validated in a prospective cohort.

Association of Skin Incision Type With Postoperative Cesarean Delivery Complications in Morbidly Obese Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether Pfannenstiel skin incision compared with vertical skin incision was associated with postcesarean delivery wound complications in morbidly obese women. METHODS: We assembled a retrospective cohort of patients with body mass index (BMI) of 40 or higher who delivered by cesarean between July 2012 and May 2019. The primary outcome was a composite wound morbidity (until 42 days postpartum) including wound separation, infection, and dehiscence. Secondary outcomes included individual composite components plus select maternal and neonatal outcomes. Comparisons of demographics and outcomes were made by χ2 and t test. Logistic regression was performed. Subgroup analysis was performed according to location of vertical skin incision in relation to the umbilicus. RESULTS: A total of 3,901 patients were included. To account for imbalances in demographics between exposure groups, vertical and Pfannenstiel skin incision patients were matched in a 1:4 fashion for age, BMI, smoking status, and diabetes. The frequency of wound morbidity was 13.2% overall. There was no difference in the primary outcome when comparing Pfannenstiel with vertical skin incision (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.5, 95% CI 0.8-2.8). Patients with a vertical skin incision were more likely to undergo vertical hysterotomy (aOR 138.7, 95% CI 46.9-410) and transfusion (aOR 5.4, 95% CI 1.8-16.5). When vertical skin incision was classified into supraumbilical and infraumbilical, and compared with Pfannenstiel skin incision, infraumbilical vertical skin incision was associated with increased wound morbidity (odds ratio [OR] 2.46, 95% CI 1.4-4.5) and wound infection (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.4-4.6) compared with Pfannenstiel. Both types of vertical skin incision were associated with increased odds of vertical hysterotomy and transfusion when compared with Pfannenstiel. CONCLUSION: In morbidly obese women who underwent cesarean delivery, the frequency of postoperative wound morbidity was similar after Pfannenstiel and vertical skin incisions.

Perinatal maternal antibiotic exposure augments lung injury in offspring in experimental bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

During the newborn period, intestinal commensal bacteria influence pulmonary mucosal immunology via the gut-lung axis. Epidemiological studies have linked perinatal antibiotic exposure in human newborns to an increased risk for bronchopulmonary dysplasia, but whether this effect is mediated by the gut-lung axis is unknown. To explore antibiotic disruption of the newborn gut-lung axis, we studied how perinatal maternal antibiotic exposure influenced lung injury in a hyperoxia-based mouse model of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. We report that disruption of intestinal commensal colonization during the perinatal period promotes a more severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia phenotype characterized by increased mortality and pulmonary fibrosis. Mechanistically, metagenomic shifts were associated with decreased IL-22 expression in bronchoalveolar lavage and were independent of hyperoxia-induced inflammasome activation. Collectively, these results demonstrate a previously unrecognized influence of the gut-lung axis during the development of neonatal lung injury, which could be leveraged to ameliorate the most severe and persistent pulmonary complication of preterm birth.

Ovarian Stimulation in Poor Responders: Have We Made Progress?

BACKGROUND: Poor ovarian responders (POR) pose a challenge to a physicians' ability to choose a stimulation protocol that maximizes the number of oocytes harvested and their chances of conception with multiple protocols aimed at improving pregnancy rates in this poor prognosis population. The Bologna criteria standardized the diagnosis of POR and allows for a more homogenous patient population in clinical trials. METHODS: A structured review of the literature, which encompasses research on Bologna-defined POR, identified several proposed protocols to optimize pregnancy rates in poor responders. In addition, we reviewed the utility of utilizing oocyte quality enhancers such as luteal pre-treatment, coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10), dihydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), and growth hormone (GH). CONCLUSION: Controlled ovarian stimulation strategies with adjuvant aromatase inhibitors and clomiphene citrate have shown similar pregnancy outcomes to higher dose gonadotropin in GnRH antagonist protocols. While the standardization of Bologna defined POR has allowed for more comparable patient populations to study the effectiveness of different protocols for ovarian stimulation, there is currently no convincing data that has determined the ideal protocol for controlled ovarian stimulation in this patient population. Further research is needed to identify optimal treatment strategies.