A Multicenter Training and Interrater Reliability Study of the BASED Score for Infantile Epileptic Spasms Syndrome.

PURPOSE: The best possible outcomes in infantile epileptic spasms syndrome require electroclinical remission; however, determining electrographic remission is not straightforward. Although the determination of hypsarrhythmia has inadequate interrater reliability (IRR), the Burden of AmplitudeS and Epileptiform Discharges (BASED) score has shown promise for the reliable interictal assessment of infantile epileptic spasms syndrome. Our aim was to develop a BASED training program and assess the IRR among learners. We hypothesized moderate or better IRR for the final BASED score and the presence or absence of epileptic encephalopathy (+/-EE). METHODS: Using a web-based application, 31 learners assessed 12 unmarked EEGs (length 1-6 hours) from children with infantile epileptic spasms syndrome. RESULTS: For all readers, the IRR was good for the final BASED score (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.86) and +/-EE (Marginal Multirater Kappa 0.63). For all readers, the IRR was fair to good for all individual BASED score elements. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the use of our training program to quickly learn the BASED scoring method. The BASED score may be a valuable clinical and research tool. Given that the IRR for the determination of epileptic encephalopathy is not perfect, clinical acumen remains paramount. Additional experience with the BASED scoring technique among learners and advances in collaborative EEG evaluation platforms may improve IRR.

EEG biomarkers for the diagnosis and treatment of infantile spasms.

Early diagnosis and treatment are critical for young children with infantile spasms (IS), as this maximizes the possibility of the best possible child-specific outcome. However, there are major barriers to achieving this, including high rates of misdiagnosis or failure to recognize the seizures, medication failure, and relapse. There are currently no validated tools to aid clinicians in assessing objective diagnostic criteria, predicting or measuring medication response, or predicting the likelihood of relapse. However, the pivotal role of EEG in the clinical management of IS has prompted many recent studies of potential EEG biomarkers of the disease. These include both visual EEG biomarkers based on human visual interpretation of the EEG and computational EEG biomarkers in which computers calculate quantitative features of the EEG. Here, we review the literature on both types of biomarkers, organized based on the application (diagnosis, treatment response, prediction, etc.). Visual biomarkers include the assessment of hypsarrhythmia, epileptiform discharges, fast oscillations, and the Burden of AmplitudeS and Epileptiform Discharges (BASED) score. Computational markers include EEG amplitude and power spectrum, entropy, functional connectivity, high frequency oscillations (HFOs), long-range temporal correlations, and phase-amplitude coupling. We also introduce each of the computational measures and provide representative examples. Finally, we highlight remaining gaps in the literature, describe practical guidelines for future biomarker discovery and validation studies, and discuss remaining roadblocks to clinical implementation, with the goal of facilitating future work in this critical area.

Association of Time to Clinical Remission With Sustained Resolution in Children With New-Onset Infantile Spasms.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Standard therapies (adrenocorticotropic hormone [ACTH], oral steroids, or vigabatrin) fail to control infantile spasms in almost half of children. Early identification of nonresponders could enable rapid initiation of sequential therapy. We aimed to determine the time to clinical remission after appropriate infantile spasms treatment initiation and identify predictors of the time to infantile spasms treatment response. METHODS: The National Infantile Spasms Consortium prospectively followed children aged 2-24 months with new-onset infantile spasms at 23 US centers (2012-2018). We included children treated with standard therapy (ACTH, oral steroids, or vigabatrin). Sustained treatment response was defined as having the last clinically recognized infantile spasms on or before treatment day 14, absence of hypsarrhythmia on EEG 2-4 weeks after treatment, and persistence of remission to day 30. We analyzed the time to treatment response and assessed clinical characteristics to predict sustained treatment response. RESULTS: Among 395 infants, clinical infantile spasms remission occurred in 43% (n = 171) within the first 2 weeks of treatment, of which 81% (138/171) responded within the first week of treatment. There was no difference in the median time to response across standard therapies (ACTH: median 4 days, interquartile range [IQR] 3-7; oral steroids: median 3 days, IQR 2-5; vigabatrin: median 3 days, IQR 1-6). Individuals without hypsarrhythmia on the pretreatment EEG (i.e., abnormal but not hypsarrhythmia) were more likely to have early treatment response than infants with hypsarrhythmia at infantile spasms onset (hazard ratio 2.23, 95% CI 1.39-3.57). No other clinical factors predicted early responders to therapy. DISCUSSION: Remission after first infantile spasms treatment can be identified by treatment day 7 in most children. Given the importance of early and effective treatment, these data suggest that children who do not respond to standard infantile spasms therapy within 1 week should be reassessed immediately for additional standard treatment. This approach could optimize outcomes by facilitating early sequential therapy for children with infantile spasms.

Prioritizing Hormone Therapy Over Vigabatrin as the First Treatment for Infantile Spasms: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Infantile spasms (IS) are early childhood seizures with potentially devastating consequences. Standard therapies (adrenocorticotropic hormone [ACTH], high-dose prednisolone, and vigabatrin) are strongly recommended as the first treatment for IS. Although this recommendation comes without preference for one standard therapy over another, early remission rates are higher with hormone therapy (ACTH and high-dose prednisolone) when compared with vigabatrin. Using quality improvement (QI) methodology that included hormone therapy as the first treatment, we sought to increase the percentage of children with new-onset nontuberous sclerosis complex (TSC)-associated IS achieving 3-month electroclinical remission from a mean of 53.8% to ≥70%. METHODS: This was an observational consecutive sample cohort study at a single academic tertiary care hospital that compared a prospective intervention cohort (May 2019-January 2022, N = 57) with a retrospective baseline cohort (November 2015-April 2019, N = 67). Our initiative addressed key drivers such as the routine use of vigabatrin over hormone therapy as first treatment and the common initiation of a second treatment after 14 days for initial nonresponders. We included consecutive children without TSC presenting with new-onset IS diagnosed and treated between ages 2 and 24 months. We displayed our primary outcome and process measures as control charts in which the centerline is the quarterly (previous 3 months) mean based on statistical process control methodology. RESULTS: QI interventions that included the standardization of hormone therapy as the first treatment resulted in higher rates of 3-month remission, rising from 53.8% (baseline cohort) to 75.9% (intervention cohort). Process measure results included an increased rate of children receiving hormone therapy as first treatment (mean, 44.6%-100%) and a decreased number of days to both clinical follow-up after first treatment (mean, of 16.3-12.6 days) and starting a second treatment within 14 days for initial nonresponders (mean, 36.3-17.2 days). DISCUSSION: For children with IS, improved rates of 3-month electroclinical remission can be achieved with QI methodology. Implementation of similar QI initiatives at other centers may likewise improve local remission rates.

Inequities in Therapy for Infantile Spasms: A Call to Action.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether selection of treatment for children with infantile spasms (IS) varies by race/ethnicity. METHODS: The prospective US National Infantile Spasms Consortium database includes children with IS treated from 2012 to 2018. We examined the relationship between race/ethnicity and receipt of standard IS therapy (prednisolone, adrenocorticotropic hormone, vigabatrin), adjusting for demographic and clinical variables using logistic regression. Our primary outcome was treatment course, which considered therapy prescribed for the first and, when needed, the second IS treatment together. RESULTS: Of 555 children, 324 (58%) were non-Hispanic white, 55 (10%) non-Hispanic Black, 24 (4%) non-Hispanic Asian, 80 (14%) Hispanic, and 72 (13%) other/unknown. Most (398, 72%) received a standard treatment course. Insurance type, geographic location, history of prematurity, prior seizures, developmental delay or regression, abnormal head circumference, hypsarrhythmia, and IS etiologies were associated with standard therapy. In adjusted models, non-Hispanic Black children had lower odds of receiving a standard treatment course compared with non-Hispanic white children (odds ratio [OR], 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20-0.89; p = 0.02). Adjusted models also showed that children with public (vs. private) insurance had lower odds of receiving standard therapy for treatment 1 (OR, 0.42; CI, 0.21-0.84; p = 0.01). INTERPRETATION: Non-Hispanic Black children were more often treated with non-standard IS therapies than non-Hispanic white children. Likewise, children with public (vs. private) insurance were less likely to receive standard therapies. Investigating drivers of inequities, and understanding the impact of racism on treatment decisions, are critical next steps to improve care for patients with IS. ANN NEUROL 2022;92:32-44.

Comparison of Cosyntropin, Vigabatrin, and Combination Therapy in New-Onset Infantile Spasms in a Prospective Randomized Trial.

Objective: In a randomized trial, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of cosyntropin injectable suspension, 1 mg/mL, compared to vigabatrin for infantile spasms syndrome. An additional arm was included to assess the efficacy of combination therapy (cosyntropin and vigabatrin) compared with cosyntropin monotherapy. Methods: Children (2 months to 2 years) with new-onset infantile spasms syndrome and hypsarhythmia were randomized into 3 arms: cosyntropin, vigabatrin, and cosyntropin and vigabatrin combined. Daily seizures and adverse events were recorded, and EEG was repeated at day 14 to assess for resolution of hypsarhythmia. The primary outcome measure was the composite of resolution of hypsarhythmia and absence of clinical spasms at day 14. Fisher exact test was used to compare outcomes. Results: 37 children were enrolled and 34 were included in the final efficacy analysis (1 withdrew prior to treatment and 2 did not return seizure diaries). Resolution of both hypsarhythmia and clinical spasms was achieved in in 9 of 12 participants (75%) treated with cosyntropin, 1/9 (11%) vigabatrin, and 5/13 (38%) cosyntropin and vigabatrin combined. The primary comparison of cosyntropin versus vigabatrin was significant (64% [95% confidence interval 21, 82], P < .01). Adverse events were reported in all 3 treatment arms: 31 (86%) had an adverse event, 7 (19%) had a serious adverse event, and 15 (42%) had an adverse event of special interest with no difference between treatment arms. Significance: This randomized trial was underpowered because of incomplete enrollment, yet it demonstrated that cosyntropin was more effective for short-term outcomes than vigabatrin as initial treatment for infantile spasms.

Comparative Effectiveness of Initial Treatment for Infantile Spasms in a Contemporary US Cohort.

OBJECTIVE: Compare the effectiveness of initial treatment for infantile spasms. METHODS: The National Infantile Spasms Consortium prospectively followed children with new onset infantile spasms that began at age 2-24 months at 23 US centers (2012-2018). Freedom from treatment failure at 60 days required no second treatment for infantile spasms and no clinical spasms after 30 days of treatment initiation. We managed treatment selection bias with propensity score weighting and within-center correlation with generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: Freedom from treatment failure rates were: ACTH 88/190 (46%), oral steroids 42/95 (44%), vigabatrin 32/87 (37%), and non-standard therapy 4/51 (8%). Changing from oral steroids to ACTH was not estimated to affect response (observed 44% estimated to change to 44% [95% CI 34-54]). Changing from non-standard therapy to ACTH would improve response from 8% to 39 [17-67]%, and to oral steroids from 8% to 38 [15-68]%. There were large but not statistically significant estimated effects of changing from vigabatrin to ACTH (29% to 42 [15-75]%), vigabatrin to oral steroids (29% to 42 [28-57]%), and non-standard therapy to vigabatrin (8% to 20 [6-50]%). Among children treated with vigabatrin, those with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) responded more often than others (62% vs 29%; p<0.05) CONCLUSION: Compared to non-standard therapy, ACTH and oral steroids are superior for initial treatment of infantile spasms. The estimated effectiveness of vigabatrin is between ACTH / oral steroids and non-standard therapy, though the sample was underpowered for statistical confidence. When used, vigabatrin worked best for TSC. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that for children with new onset infantile spasms, ACTH or oral steroids were superior to non-standard therapies.

Definitions and Diagnostic Criteria for Infantile Spasms and West Syndrome - Historical Perspectives and Practical Considerations.

The term infantile spasms has been used inconsistently within the medical literature for decades. We are also without formal consensus on the diagnostic criteria for West syndrome. Author-specific definitions for these terms will determine the populations studied within research studies and thus impact the relevance of the data acquired. In addition, how one defines these terms may have serious consequences for children presenting with infantile spasms such as the inappropriate withholding of standard therapy in those who fail to meet criteria for West syndrome. The overreliance on the term hypsarhythmia is particularly problematic given that many children presenting with infantile spasms will not have this classic pattern and because the determination of hypsarhythmia has poor inter-rater reliability. Herein I review historical perspectives, relying heavily on published monographs and consensus statements, and promote practical definitions and diagnostic criteria for infantile spasms and West syndrome. In an effort to encourage best clinical practice and research methodology, I include guidance for the diagnosis of infantile spasms (a seizure type) and West syndrome (an epilepsy syndrome).

A reliable interictal EEG grading scale for children with infantile spasms - The 2021 BASED score.

OBJECTIVE: To develop an improved interictal electroencephalogram (EEG) grading scale for children with infantile spasms founded on elements with adequate inter-rater reliability (IRR) to justify its further study for clinical and research purposes. METHODS: Three blinded reviewers assessed five-minute sleep epochs in 93 EEGs from 62 children (31 consecutive controls, 31 consecutive infantile spasms [pretreatment and posttreatment studies]) using a longitudinal bipolar montage. We determined the IRR of background amplitude, epileptiform discharges, >3 spike foci (including <50 % or >50 %), grouped multifocal spikes, paroxysmal voltage attenuations, and symmetry of sleep spindles. Data were used to finalize the 2021 BASED (Burden of AmplitudeS and Epileptiform Discharges) score. RESULTS: All elements included in the 2021 BASED score had moderate to near perfect IRR. Among controls, >200 µv background waves occurred commonly in the bilateral posterior temporal (T3-T5, T4-T6) and midline (Fz-Cz, Cz-Pz) regions. Excluding midline and occipital channels (which have normal high amplitude background waves), we designated abnormal high amplitude background waves as >200 µv for most channels, but >300 µv for T3-T5 and T4-T6. The IRR was moderate to near perfect for <50 % >3 spike foci, >50 % >3 spike foci, paroxysmal voltage attenuations, grouped multifocal spikes (GMFS), and symmetric sleep spindles. Paroxysmal voltage attenuations, GMFS, and >50 % >3 spike foci all significantly distinguished pretreatment from posttreatment studies whereas symmetric sleep spindles did not (as planned, the latter was not included in the 2021 BASED score). When the 2021 BASED score was applied to the 22 children with infantile spasms achieving clinical remission with treatment, 19 met criteria for electroclinical remission and three did not. SIGNIFICANCE: The 2021 BASED score includes elements with high levels of IRR and correlates well with the presence or absence of infantile spasms.

Care Delivery for Children With Epilepsy During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An International Survey of Clinicians.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on global access to care and practice patterns for children with epilepsy. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional, online survey of pediatric neurologists across the world affiliated with the International Child Neurology Association, the Chinese Child Neurology Society, the Child Neurology Society, and the Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium. Results were analyzed in relation to regional burden of COVID-19 disease. RESULTS: From April 10 to 24, 2020, a sample of 212 respondents from 49 countries indicated that the COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically changed many aspects of pediatric epilepsy care, with 91.5% reporting changes to outpatient care, 90.6% with reduced access to electroencephalography (EEG), 37.4% with altered management of infantile spasms, 92.3% with restrictions in ketogenic diet initiation, 93.4% with closed or severely limited epilepsy monitoring units, and 91.3% with canceled or limited epilepsy surgery. Telehealth use had increased, with 24.7% seeing patients exclusively via telehealth. Changes in practice were related both to COVID-19 burden and location. CONCLUSIONS: In response to COVID-19, pediatric epilepsy programs have implemented crisis standards of care that include increased telemedicine, decreased EEG use, changes in treatments of infantile spasms, and cessation of epilepsy surgery. The long-term impact of these abrupt changes merit careful study.

Management of Infantile Spasms During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic have mandated a change to standard management of infantile spasms. On April 6, 2020, the Child Neurology Society issued an online statement of immediate recommendations to streamline diagnosis and treatment of infantile spasms with utilization of telemedicine, outpatient studies, and selection of first-line oral therapies as initial treatment. The rationale for the recommendations and specific guidance including follow-up assessment are provided in this manuscript. These recommendations are indicated as enduring if intended to outlast the pandemic, and limited if intended only for the pandemic health care crisis but may be applicable to future disruptions of health care delivery.

Compliance With Standard Therapies and Remission Rates After Implementation of an Infantile Spasms Management Guideline.

BACKGROUND: We implemented an infantile spasms management guideline recommending standard therapies and, early start of next treatment. After six years, we determined (1) our compliance with standard therapies, (2) time to next treatment, and (3) rate of initial and three-month electroclinical remission with first, second, and third treatments. METHODS: This is a retrospective record review of newly diagnosed spasms from September 2012 to September 2018, with the onset age of two months to two years. RESULTS: Standard therapies (hormone or vigabatrin) were the first treatments in 114 of 115 consecutive patients. The second and third treatments were started within 14 days of failed treatment in only 21% and 24%, respectively. Remission with the first and second treatments was similar (41% and 40%). Remission was lower for the third treatment (15%), although higher if standard therapy was used (36%). Initial and three-month remission by the first treatment was significantly higher for adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH, 66% and 79%, respectively) and prednisolone (53% and 83%, respectively) than for vigabatrin (19% and 40%, respectively). There were no significant differences in patient characteristics or rates of remission between ACTH and prednisolone. CONCLUSIONS: Although we achieved excellent compliance with standard therapies as initial treatment, a next treatment often started after two weeks. Given the superiority of hormone therapies over vigabatrin and standard therapies over nonstandard therapies, as well as the potentially negative impact of delays in effective treatment, future interventions need to focus on increasing the use of hormone over vigabatrin (for patients without tuberous sclerosis complex), use of standard therapies as second and third treatments, and reducing delays to next treatment.