[Extracorporeal Support Strategies in Liver Failure - Focus on Albumin Dialysis and Therapeutic Plasma Exchange]. / Extrakorporale Unterstützungsstrategien beim Leberversagen.

Combining albumin dialysis for the removal of hydrophobic substances with classical haemodialysis in the treatment of acute liver failure (ALF) and acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) has a strong theoretical rational and clinical data showed a positive effect on laboratory and partly clinical characteristics of ALF and ACLF. However, neither the MARS nor the Prometheus System has so far been able to demonstrate a mortality benefit in ALF or ACLF patients. To date, only the use of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) has demonstrated significant removal of pathogen-associated (PAMPs), damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and pro-inflammatory cytokines. In addition, TPE also acts simultaneously by replacing protective but depleted mediators, thus improving multiple key pathophysiological principles of both ALF and ACLF. In ALF, both high-volume and standard-volume TPE showed a significant improvement in survival. The data on the use of TPE in ACLF is still sparse, with only two Chinese monocentric studies in patients with exclusively hepatitis B-associated ACLF suggesting potentially improved survival with TPE. The currently recruiting APACHE study will include patients with the modern EASL-CLIF definition of ACLF.

Cancer and Relationship Dissolution: Perspective of Partners of Cancer Patients.

PURPOSE: Cancer can be a burden on the relationship and even lead to relationship dissolution. Previous studies about the impact of cancer on close relationships almost exclusively involve cancer patients. So far, little is known about the views of spouses. Therefore, this study focuses on partners or ex-partners of cancer patients. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, N = 265 partners or ex-partners of cancer patients are examined regarding a possible separation, the reasons for separation and the influence of the cancer on the relationship. In addition, predictors of separation and the positive or negative perception of the impact of cancer on the relationship were investigated. RESULTS: The separation rate (23.4%) was marginally lower than in the general population in Germany (35.79%). The most frequent reason for separation was the death of the cancer patient (59.6%), followed by relationship problems (26.9%), and the cancer disease itself (9.6%). Among those who were separated, 57.4% reported that cancer contributed to the separation. On average, the influence of cancer on relationship dissolution is indicated with 82.9%. Also, for those who stayed together, 83.7% reported an impact of the cancer on the relationship, of which 55.9% reported a negative impact. Logistic regressions indicated that higher levels of depression were associated with greater odds of a more negative perception of the influence of cancer on the relationship, whereas a more satisfied relationship tended to be associated with a more positive perception. Those who had no psychological treatment in the past, lower anxiety levels and lower relationship satisfaction had an increased risk of separation. Overall, relationship satisfaction was significantly lower than in the general population in Germany. CONCLUSION: In particular, psychological factors such as depression and anxiety as well as relationship satisfaction appear to be factors influencing separation and the perception of the influence of cancer on the relationship as positive or negative. Therefore, it seems to be reasonable to consider these aspects in the psychosocial support and also to include the partners in order to achieve a stable and satisfied relationship which has a positive effect on health and psychological well-being.