RESUMEN
Purpose: Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare and aggressive tumor. ACC male patients under adjuvant mitotane therapy (AMT) frequently develop hypogonadism, however sexual function has never been assessed in this setting. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate in AMT treated ACC patients the changes in Luteinizing hormone (LH), Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG), total testosterone (TT) and calculated free testosterone (cFT), the prevalence and type of hypogonadism and sexual function, the latter before and after androgen replacement therapy (ART). Methods: LH, SHBG, TT and cFT were assessed in ten ACC patients at baseline (T0) and six (T1), twelve (T2), and eighteen (T3) months after AMT. At T3, ART was initiated in eight hypogonadal patients, and LH, SHBG, TT and cFT levels were evaluated after six months (T4). In six patients, sexual function was evaluated before (T3) and after (T4) ART using the International Index of Erectile Function-15 (IIEF-15) questionnaire. Results: Under AMT we observed higher SHBG and LH and lower cFT levels at T1-T3 compared to T0 (all p<0.05). At T3, hypergonadotropic hypogonadism and erectile dysfunction (ED) were detected in 80% and 83.3% of cases. At T4, we observed a significant cFT increase in men treated with T gel, and a significant improvement in IIEF-15 total and subdomains scores and ED prevalence (16.7%) in men under ART. Conclusion: AMT was associated with hypergonatropic hypogonadism and ED, while ART led to a significant improvement of cFT levels and sexual function in the hypogonadal ACC patients. Therefore, we suggest to evaluate LH, SHBG, TT and cFT and sexual function during AMT, and start ART in the hypogonadal ACC patients with sexual dysfunction.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Corteza Suprarrenal , Carcinoma Corticosuprarrenal , Disfunción Eréctil , Hipogonadismo , Humanos , Masculino , Mitotano/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Testosterona , Hormona Luteinizante , Hipogonadismo/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
AIM: The aim of the present network meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy and safety across different long and short-acting analogs for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. METHODS: A PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases search (20th May, 2020) for all trials with a duration ≥24 weeks comparing an analogue with another or human insulin was performed. Indirect comparisons were performed by NMA choosing glargine U100 and human regular insulin, as the reference for long- and short-acting analogues, respectively. Primary endpoints were HbA1c at 24, 52, and 104 weeks. The weighted difference in means (WDM) and Mantel-Haenzel Odds Ratio [MH-OR] with 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) were calculated for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. RESULTS: Fifty trials (n = 43) and 7 for basal and prandial analogues, respectively, enrolling 25,554 and 3184 patients with type 2 and 1 diabetes, respectively, were included. At NMA, detemir was less effective than glargine U-100 at 52 weeks. A significant reduction of 24-week HbA1c (WMD [IC]: -0.10 [-0.17, -0.03]%); and risk of total (MH-OR [IC]: 0.80 [0.70, 0.91]), and nocturnal hypoglycemia (MH-OR [IC]: 0.57 [0.45, 0.73]) was observed for basal analogues versus NPH insulin. At NMA, glargine U300 and degludec were associated with a significant reduction in the risk of nocturnal hypoglycemia. No significant differences across different short-acting insulin were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This paper supports the use of long-acting analogues, rather than NPH insulin, as basal insulin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, without any preferences for any individual long-acting analogue over the others. The evidence on short acting analogues is limited.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/efectos adversos , Insulina/efectos adversos , Insulina de Acción Prolongada/efectos adversos , Metaanálisis en Red , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
AIM: Aim of the present network meta-analysis (NMA) is the comparison across glucose-lowering drugs (GLA) concerning their effects on glucose control, body weight, hypoglycemia, gastrointestinal adverse events, and quality of life. DATA SYNTHESIS: This NMA includes randomized clinical trials comparing different head-to-head comparison trials with EMA-approved GLA in type 2 diabetes, with a duration of ≥52 weeks. All drugs have to be administered at the maximal approved dose. Primary endpoints were HbA1c at 12, 52, and 104+ weeks. Secondary endpoints were body weight, quality of life, hypoglycemia, and gastrointestinal disorders. Indirect comparisons of different GLA were performed by NMA choosing metformin as reference. The standardized difference in means (SDM) and Mantel-Haenzel Odds Ratio [MH-OR] (using random-effect models) with 95% Confidence Intervals were calculated for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. We included 68 trials fulfilling all inclusion criteria. At 12 weeks, when considering indirect comparisons, insulin secretagogues (IS) were associated with a significantly greater reduction in comparison with metformin (SDM, -0.3 [-0.4;-0.2]%); a significantly lower efficacy was observed for pioglitazone. At 52 weeks, IS were no longer associated with a greater reduction of HbA1c; whereas a significant decrease in HbA1c was observed for GLP-1 RA (SDM, -0.2 [-0.1;-0.3]%). At 104+ weeks, only SGLT-2 inhibitors showed a significantly greater HbA1c reduction (SDM, -0.2 [-0.1;-0.3]%), whereas sulfonylureas and insulin showed a significantly lower efficacy (SDM, 0.1 [0.0; 0.2]%), and 0.4 [0.3; 0.5]%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this meta-analysis should be considered together with evidence on long-term outcomes for selecting the most appropriate drugs for individual patients.
Asunto(s)
Glucemia/efectos de los fármacos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Biomarcadores/sangre , Glucemia/metabolismo , Peso Corporal/efectos de los fármacos , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Femenino , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/inducido químicamente , Humanos , Hipoglucemia/inducido químicamente , Hipoglucemiantes/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metaanálisis en Red , Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) exert their therapeutic effect by modulating the immune system and potentiating antitumor immunity. ICI have been associated with several immune-related adverse events, such as diabetes. However, no formal metaanalysis with this respect has been conducted so far. Aim of the present metaanalysis of randomized trials is to assess the effects of ICI on incident diabetes and hyperglycemia. METHODS: A MEDLINE, Scopus, ISI-WOS, and Cochrane database search was performed to identify trials, enrolling patients with any form of cancer, up to April 23rd, 2019 in which ICI have been compared either with placebo or active comparators. Data were extracted from published reports or, if not available, from clinicaltrials.gov. The principal endpoints were the incidence of diabetes and cases of hyperglycemia, reported as adverse events. Mantel-Haenszel Odds Ratio with 95% Confidence Interval (MH-OR) was calculated for all outcomes. The study has been registered on PROSPERO website (CDR133927). FINDINGS: Out of 42 trials retrieved, 40 reported information on incident diabetes or hyperglycemia. No association of ICI with incident diabetes (MH-OR 1.27 [0.66, 2.43], p = 0.47) was observed; whereas there was a trend toward an increased risk of hyperglycemia (MH-OR 1.45 [0.99, 2.13], p = 0.060), which reached statistical significance in sensitivity analyses and when analyzing separately placebo-controlled trials (MH-OR 1.95 [1.10, 3.49], p = 0.020). I2 statistics did not suggest any relevant heterogeneity for all the principal analyses performed. INTERPRETATION: ICI treatment is associated with an increased risk of hyperglycemia, and an increase in the risk of diabetes cannot be excluded.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Hiperglucemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/farmacología , Humanos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Adrenal cortex autoantibodies (ACAs) and/or 21-hydroxylase (21OHAb) are markers of autoimmune Addison's disease (AAD) and progression to overt AAD. The reported cumulative risk of developing AAD varies from 0 to 90% in different studies. AIM: To assess the predictive value of different parameters in the progression toward AAD in patients with ACA and/or 21OHAb-positive patients with autoimmune polyendocrine syndromes (APS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with APS-1 and 114 patients with APS-2 or APS-4 were followed up for a median of 10 years (range 6 months to 33 years) and were assessed using ACTH test. The risk of AAD was estimated according to age, gender, stage of adrenal dysfunction, associated diseases and antibody titer. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The cumulative risk (CR) of developing AAD was higher in APS-1 patients (94.2%) than in patients with APS-2/APS-4 (38.7%). The CR was high in both male and female APS-1 patients, while in patients with APS-2/APS-4 it was high only in males. Stage 1 (increased plasma renin) for patients with APS-1 and Stage 2 (no response of cortisol to ACTH test) for patients with APS-2/APS-4 were established as the points of no return in the progression to AAD. Adjusted hazard ratio analyses by multivariate Cox model for AAD showed that gender, diseases and adrenal function were independent risk factors for developing clinical AAD. The risk of developing clinical AAD appears to subside after 19 years of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: A model for estimating the probability to survive free of AAD has been developed and should be a useful tool in designing appropriate follow-up intervals and future therapeutic strategies.