Amoxicillin-clavulanate Breakpoints Against Enterobacterales: Rationale for Revision by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.

Amoxicillin-clavulanate (AMC) is among the most frequently prescribed antibiotics globally. It has broad antibacterial activity against gram-positive, gram-negative, and anaerobic bacteria, and has been utilized to treat infections caused by a broad range of pathogens. AMC breakpoints against Enterobacterales were initially set in the 1980s but since then increases in antibiotic resistance, advances in pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) analyses, and publication of additional clinical data prompted a reassessment by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Subcommittee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Based on this contemporary reappraisal, the CLSI retained the Enterobacterales breakpoints but revised comments regarding dosing associated with use of the AMC breakpoints in the 2022 supplement of M100. This viewpoint provides insight into the CLSI breakpoint reevaluation process and summarizes the data and rationale used to support these revisions to the AMC Enterobacterales breakpoint.

Sulbactam-durlobactam: a ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination targeting Acinetobacter baumannii.

Sulbactam-durlobactam is a pathogen-targeted ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination that has been approved by the US FDA for the treatment of hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia caused by susceptible isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus complex (ABC) in patients 18 years of age and older. Sulbactam is a penicillin derivative with antibacterial activity against Acinetobacter but is prone to hydrolysis by ß-lactamases encoded by contemporary isolates. Durlobactam is a diazabicyclooctane ß-lactamase inhibitor with activity against Ambler classes A, C and D serine ß-lactamases that restores sulbactam activity both in vitro and in vivo against multidrug-resistant ABC. Sulbactam-durlobactam is a promising alternative therapy for the treatment of serious Acinetobacter infections, which can have high rates of mortality.

Sulbactam­durlobactam: a drug for treating lung infectionsAcinetobacter is a type of bacteria. One type, called CRAB, causes serious infections and can be fatal. CRAB is very hard to treat because most drugs no longer work. Sulbactam­durlobactam (SUL-DUR) is a drug that can kill CRAB. The US FDA approved SUL-DUR in May of 2023 for treating lung infections (pneumonia) caused by CRAB. This article explains how SUL-DUR works. Use of SUL-DUR and other drugs to treat these types of infections are discussed. In conclusion, SUL-DUR is a promising therapy for serious infections caused by CRAB.

Simplified urine-based method to detect rifampin underexposure in adults with tuberculosis: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study.

Variable pharmacokinetics of rifampin in tuberculosis (TB) treatment can lead to poor outcomes. Urine spectrophotometry is simpler and more accessible than recommended serum-based drug monitoring, but its optimal efficacy in predicting serum rifampin underexposure in adults with TB remains uncertain. Adult TB patients in New Jersey and Virginia receiving rifampin-containing regimens were enrolled. Serum and urine samples were collected over 24 h. Rifampin serum concentrations were measured using validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, and total exposure (area under the concentration-time curve) over 24 h (AUC0-24) was determined through noncompartmental analysis. The Sunahara method was used to extract total rifamycins, and rifampin urine excretion was measured by spectrophotometry. An analysis of 58 eligible participants, including 15 (26%) with type 2 diabetes mellitus, demonstrated that urine spectrophotometry accurately identified subtarget rifampin AUC0-24 at 0-4, 0-8, and 0-24 h. The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC ROC) values were 0.80 (95% CI 0.67-0.90), 0.84 (95% CI 0.72-0.94), and 0.83 (95% CI 0.72-0.93), respectively. These values were comparable to the AUC ROC of 2 h serum concentrations commonly used for therapeutic monitoring (0.82 [95% CI 0.71-0.92], P = 0.6). Diabetes status did not significantly affect the AUC ROCs for urine in predicting subtarget rifampin serum exposure (P = 0.67-0.92). Spectrophotometric measurement of urine rifampin excretion within the first 4 or 8 h after dosing is a simple and cost-effective test that accurately predicts rifampin underexposure. This test provides critical information for optimizing tuberculosis treatment outcomes by facilitating appropriate dose adjustments.

Principles and Practice of Antimicrobial Stewardship Program Resource Allocation.

Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASP) improve individual patient outcomes and clinical care processes while reducing antimicrobial-associated adverse events, optimizing operational priorities, and providing institutional cost savings. ASP composition, resources required, and priority focuses are influenced by myriad factors. Despite robust evidence and broad national support, individual ASPs still face challenges in obtaining appropriate resources. Though understanding the current landscape of ASP resource allocation, factors influencing staffing needs, and strategies required to obtain desired resources is important, acceptance of recommended staffing levels and appropriate ASP resource allocation are much needed to facilitate ASP sustainability and growth across the complex and diverse health care continuum.

Utility of triazole antifungal therapeutic drug monitoring: Insights from the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists: Endorsed by the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium.

Triazole antifungals (i.e., fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, and isavuconazole) are commonly used in clinical practice to prevent or treat invasive fungal infections. Most triazole antifungals require therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) due to highly variable pharmacokinetics, known drug interactions, and established relationships between exposure and response. On behalf of the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists (SIDP), this insight describes the pharmacokinetic principles and pharmacodynamic targets of commonly used triazole antifungals and provides the rationale for utility of TDM within each agent.

Challenges and Opportunities in Antimicrobial Stewardship among Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant and Oncology Patients.

Antimicrobial stewardship programs play a critical role in optimizing the use of antimicrobials against pathogens in the era of growing multi-drug resistance. However, implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs among the hematopoietic stem cell transplant and oncology populations has posed challenges due to multiple risk factors in the host populations and the infections that affect them. The consideration of underlying immunosuppression and a higher risk for poor outcomes have shaped therapeutic decisions for these patients. In this multidisciplinary perspective piece, we provide a summary of the current landscape of antimicrobial stewardship, unique challenges, and opportunities for unmet needs in these patient populations.

Impact of phenotypic rapid diagnostic assay on duration of empiric antibiotics for gram-negative bacteremia.

Objective: Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) are increasingly being implemented as antimicrobial stewardship tools to facilitate antibiotic modification and reduce complications related to their overutilization. We measured the clinical impact of a phenotypic RDT with antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) in the setting of gram-negative bacteremia. Setting and participants: In this single-center retrospective cohort study, we evaluated adult patients with gram-negative bacteremia who received at least 72 hours of an antibiotic. Methods: The primary outcome was the duration of empiric antibiotic therapy for gram-negative bacteremia. Secondary outcomes included time-to-directed therapy, proportion of modifications, hospital length of stay (LOS), and subsequent infection with a multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) or C. difficile infection (CDI). Results: The duration of empiric antibiotics decreased in the RDT+AMS group (4 days vs 2 days; P < .01). Time to directed therapy decreased from 75.0 to 27.9 hours (P < .01). Conclusions: The clinical outcomes of LOS, MDRO, and CDI were reduced. The phenotypic RDT demonstrated an improvement in stewardship measures and clinical outcomes.

Pharmacogenetic variability and the probability of site of action target attainment during tuberculosis meningitis treatment: A physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling and simulations study.

OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: Our objective was to investigate the role of patient pharmacogenetic variability in determining site of action target attainment during tuberculous meningitis (TBM) treatment. Rifampin and isoniazid PBPK model that included SLCO1B1 and NAT2 effects on exposures respectively were obtained from literature, modified, and validated using available cerebrospinal-fluid (CSF) concentrations. Population simulations of isoniazid and rifampin concentrations in brain interstitial fluid and probability of target attainment according to genotypes and M. tuberculosis MIC levels, under standard and intensified dosing, were conducted. RESULTS: The rifampin and isoniazid model predicted steady-state drug concentration within brain interstitial fluid matched with the observed CSF concentrations. At MIC level of 0.25 mg/L, 57% and 23% of the patients with wild type and heterozygous SLCO1B1 genotype respectively attained the target in CNS with rifampin standard dosing, improving to 98% and 91% respectively with 35 mg/kg dosing. At MIC level of 0.25 mg/L, 33% of fast acetylators attained the target in CNS with isoniazid standard dosing, improving to 90% with 7.5 mg/kg dosing. CONCLUSION: In this study, the combined effects of pharmacogenetic and M. tuberculosis MIC variability were potent determinants of target attainment in CNS. The potential for genotype-guided dosing during TBM treatment should be further explored in prospective clinical studies.

Safety and Effectiveness of High-Dose Cefazolin in Patients With High Body Weight: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background: Cefazolin is a commonly used antibiotic for the treatment of mild to severe infections. Despite the use of higher dose of cefazolin (3 g/dose) for surgical prophylaxis in patients with obesity, there is currently a paucity of data identifying the optimal dose to treat infections in this specific patient population. Methods: This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of patients who received cefazolin at weight-based (up to 9 g/day) or standard doses (up to 6 g/day) for the treatment of bacteremia or skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI). Study groups were stratified by body weight and cefazolin dose received. Primary outcome was the composite of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and secondary outcome was treatment failure rate. Results: A total of 208 patients were included for study analysis. Fifty-nine patients had body weight >120 kg. Of these, 33 received high-dose cefazolin while 26 received standard doses. The remaining 149 patients had body weight of ≤120 kg and received standard doses. The occurrence of TEAEs did not differ across the 3 groups. The study also did not find any difference between the rate of treatment failure between groups. Conclusions: High-dose cefazolin (9 g/day) for the treatment of bacteremia or SSTIs in patients with high body weight was safe and well tolerated. Larger studies are needed to further explore the benefit of high-dose cefazolin in improving clinical outcomes.

Montelukast in hospitalized patients diagnosed with COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: Several therapeutic agents have been assessed for the treatment of COVID-19, but few approaches have been proven efficacious. Because leukotriene receptor antagonists, such as montelukast have been shown to reduce both cytokine release and lung inflammation in preclinical models of viral influenza and acute respiratory distress syndrome, we hypothesized that therapy with montelukast could be used to treat COVID-19. The objective of this study was to determine if montelukast treatment would reduce the rate of clinical deterioration as measured by the COVID-19 Ordinal Scale. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of COVID-19 confirmed hospitalized patients treated with or without montelukast. We used "clinical deterioration" as the primary endpoint, a binary outcome defined as any increase in the Ordinal Scale value from Day 1 to Day 3 of the hospital stay, as these data were uniformly available for all admitted patients before hospital discharge. Rates of clinical deterioration between the montelukast and non-montelukast groups were compared using the Fisher's exact test. Univariate logistic regression was also used to assess the association between montelukast use and clinical deterioration. A total of 92 patients were analyzed, 30 who received montelukast at the discretion of the treating physician and 62 patients who did not receive montelukast. RESULTS: Patients receiving montelukast experienced significantly fewer events of clinical deterioration compared with patients not receiving montelukast (10% vs 32%, p = 0.022). Our findings suggest that montelukast associates with a reduction in clinical deterioration for COVID-19 confirmed patients as measured on the COVID-19 Ordinal Scale. CONCLUSIONS: Hospitalized COVID-19 patients treated with montelukast had fewer events of clinical deterioration, indicating that this treatment may have clinical activity. While this retrospective study highlights a potential pathway for COVID-19 treatment, this hypothesis requires further study by prospective studies.

Effectiveness of an Electronic Automated Antibiotic Time Out Alert in the Setting of Gram-Negative Bacteremia.

To minimize complications associated with over-utilization of antibiotics, many antimicrobial stewardship programs have incorporated an antibiotic time out (ATO); however, limited data are available to support its effectiveness. This was a single-center retrospective cohort study assessing the impact of the automated electronic ATO in the setting of Gram-negative bacteremia. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who received a modification of therapy within 24 h of final culture results. Secondary outcomes included modification at any point in therapy, time to modification of therapy, time to de-escalation, and days of therapy of broad-spectrum antibiotics. There was a total of 222 patients who met inclusion criteria, 97 patients pre-ATO and 125 patients post-ATO. The primary outcome of modification of therapy within 24 h of final culture results was not significantly different (24% vs. 30%, p = 0.33). The secondary outcome of modification of therapy at any point in therapy was not significantly different between the two groups (65% vs. 67%, p = 0.73). All other secondary outcomes were not significantly different. The ATO alert was not associated with a higher rate of antibiotic modification within 24 h of culture results in patients with GNB. Further efforts are needed to optimize the ATO strategy and antibiotic prescribing practices.

Comparing mortality in patients with carbapenemase-producing carbapenem resistant Enterobacterales and non-carbapenemase-producing carbapenem resistant Enterobacterales bacteremia.

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are classified as either carbapenemase-producing CRE (CP-CRE) or non-carbapenemase-producing CRE (non-CP-CRE) based on their mechanism of carbapenem resistance. Few studies have compared outcomes associated with each type of infection. We attempted to determine if either CRE subset is associated with increased mortality. We performed a retrospective observational study to collect demographic, clinical and outcomes data to compare patients with CP-CRE and non-CP-CRE bacteremia. Of 146 cases analyzed, 88/146 (60%) were CP-CRE and 58/146 (40%) were non-CP-CRE. Patients with CP-CRE bacteremia were less likely to receive active empiric or targeted antibiotic therapy. Non-CP-CRE bacteremia was associated with a 2.4 times higher hazard of death at 30 days after bacteremia onset compared to CP-CRE (HR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.2, 4.6). Patients with non-CP-CRE bacteremia had a higher hazard of death at 30 days after bacteremia onset compared to those with CP-CRE bacteremia.

Pharmacists' Perceptions and Drivers of Immunization Practices for COVID-19 Vaccines: Results of a Nationwide Survey Prior to COVID-19 Vaccine Emergency Use Authorization.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacists play a vital role in recommending and providing vaccines to improve public health and are on the front line of mass immunization efforts. AIM: The objective of this study is to evaluate pharmacists' perceptions on COVID-19 vaccines prior to emergency use authorization (EUA) amid a global pandemic. METHODS: A voluntary, anonymous, cross-sectional survey was conducted between September and November 2020. Survey respondents included a convenience sample of licensed pharmacists in the United States. The primary outcomes were pharmacists' willingness to receive and recommend hypothetical COVID-19 vaccines. Covariates assessed in the survey included COVID-19 exposure or personal experience, primary pharmacy practice setting, background in training, geographic region, and prioritization of clinical data. The data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. RESULTS: This study surveyed 763 pharmacists and results from 632 participants were included in final analysis. Overall, 67.1% of the pharmacists were willing to receive a COVID-19 vaccine and 63.4% of the pharmacists were willing to recommend a COVID-19 vaccine at ≤1 year from the time of vaccine approval. At >1 year after vaccine approval, 78% of the pharmacists were willing to receive a COVID-19 vaccine and 81.2% of the pharmacists were willing to recommend a COVID-19 vaccine. CONCLUSIONS: Survey findings suggest that, while a majority of pharmacists surveyed indicate acceptance of hypothetical COVID-19 vaccines, there remains to be hesitancy among pharmacists to receive or recommend vaccination.

Relationship Between Multidrug-Resistant Enterobacterales and Obesity in Older Adults.

PURPOSE: The objective of our study was to determine if obesity is associated with the presence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria among Enterobacterales. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This two-center cohort study included adult hospitalized patients with at least one specimen sampled from any site for bacterial culture yielding an Enterobacterales bacterial species from November 2016 to May 2017. Study groups were stratified by obesity status based on body mass index <30 kg/m2 (non-obese) and ≥30 kg/m2 (obese). The primary outcome was the presence of gram-negative MDR bacteria defined as presumptive extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales (ceftriaxone resistance) or carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE). A multivariable logistic regression model was fit to estimate the adjusted odds ratio while controlling for potential confounders. RESULTS: A total of 366 patients, 238 non-obese and 128 obese, were included. The most common gram-negative bacterial species identified was Escherichia coli (64.2%). There was a higher proportion of gram-negative MDR bacteria in obese versus non-obese patients (18.8 versus 11.3%, P=0.057). Obesity was independently associated with gram-negative MDR bacteria after controlling for confounders (adjusted odds ratio, 1.92; 95% CI 1.03-3.60). The association did not significantly vary by diabetes status (interaction term P=0.792). CONCLUSION: Among older adult hospitalized patients, obesity was independently associated with the presence of a gram-negative MDR bacteria (presumptive ESBL or CRE) in a culture.

Prevention of infection and optimizing vaccination in the solid organ transplant candidate and recipient.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Infections can result in serious complications in solid organ transplant (SOT) patients. The need to remain up to date on recommendations on screening, vaccinations, and chemoprophylaxis is paramount in the management of SOT patients. The goal of this review is to provide an overview of current recommendations for the prevention of infections and optimization of vaccinations from the pretransplant through posttransplant periods. RECENT FINDINGS: There is an emphasis on thorough pretransplant evaluation to guide clinicians and pretransplant testing based on epidemiological and endemic risk factors. Additionally, recent studies on vaccine safety and efficacy of newer vaccine formulations in SOT recipients are addressed. SUMMARY: This review provides insight on updated recommendations for pretransplant screening, new data on vaccine optimization in SOT recipients and posttransplant prophylaxis. Further research is needed in order to improve preventive measures including screening tests, vaccines, and chemoprophylaxis.

Characterization of predictors of ESBL-producing enterobacteriaceae in urine cultures of emergency department patients.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: With increasing prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing enterobacteriaceae (ESBLE), more reliable identification of predictors for ESBLE urinary tract infection (UTI) in the emergency department (ED) is needed. Our objective was to evaluate risk factors and their predictive ability for ED patients with ESBLE UTI. METHODS: This was a retrospective case-control study at an urban academic medical center. Microbiology reports identified adult ED patients with positive urine cultures from 2015-2018. Inclusion criteria were diagnosis of UTI with monomicrobial enterobacteriaceae culture growth. Exclusions were cultures with carbapenemase-resistant enterobacteriaceae or urinary colonization. Collected variables included demographics, comorbidities, and recent medical history. Patient disposition, urine culture susceptibilities, presence of ESBLE, empiric antibiotics, and therapy modifications were collected. Patients were stratified based on ESBLE status and analyzed via descriptive statistics. The data were divided into 2 parts: the first used to identify possible predictors of ESBLE UTI and the second used to validate an additive scoring system. RESULTS: Of 466 patients, 16.3% had ESBLE urine culture growth and 83.7% did not; 39.5% of ESBLE patients required antibiotic therapy modification, as compared to 6.4% of ESBLE negative patients (odds ratio [OR] 9.5; confidence interval [CI] 8.9-10.1). Independent predictors of ESBLE UTI were IV antibiotics within 1 year (OR 5.4; CI 2.1-12.8), surgery within 90 days (OR 6.4; CI 1.5-27.8), and current refractory UTI (OR 8.5; CI 2.0-36.6). CONCLUSION: Independent predictors of ESBLE UTI in emergency department patients included IV antibiotics within 1 year, surgery within 90 days, and current refractory UTI.

Risk Factors and Outcomes of Hospitalized Patients With Severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and Secondary Bloodstream Infections: A Multicenter Case-Control Study.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become a global pandemic. Clinical characteristics regarding secondary infections in patients with COVID-19 have been reported, but detailed microbiology, risk factors, and outcomes of secondary bloodstream infections (sBSIs) in patients with severe COVID-19 have not been well described. METHODS: We performed a multicenter case-control study including all hospitalized patients diagnosed with severe COVID-19 and blood cultures drawn from 1 March 2020 to 7 May 2020 at 3 academic medical centers in New Jersey. Data collection included demographics, clinical and microbiologic variables, and patient outcomes. Risk factors and outcomes were compared between cases (sBSI) and controls (no sBSI). RESULTS: A total of 375 hospitalized patients were included. There were 128 sBSIs during the hospitalization. For the first set of positive blood cultures, 117 (91.4%) were bacterial and 7 (5.5%) were fungal. Those with sBSI were more likely to have altered mental status, lower mean percentage oxygen saturation on room air, have septic shock, and be admitted to the intensive care unit compared with controls. In-hospital mortality was higher in those with an sBSI versus controls (53.1% vs 32.8%, P = .0001). CONCLUSIONS: We observed that hospitalized adult patients with severe COVID-19 and sBSI had a more severe initial presentation, prolonged hospital course, and worse clinical outcomes. To maintain antimicrobial stewardship principles, further prospective studies are necessary to better characterize risk factors and prediction modeling to better understand when to suspect and empirically treat for sBSIs in severe COVID-19.