Rivaroxaban for the treatment of noncirrhotic splanchnic vein thrombosis: an interventional prospective cohort study.

Heparins and vitamin K antagonists are the mainstay of treatment of splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT). Rivaroxaban is a potential alternative, but data to support its use are limited. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban for the treatment of acute SVT. In an international, single-arm clinical trial, adult patients with a first episode of noncirrhotic, symptomatic, objectively diagnosed SVT received rivaroxaban 15 mg twice daily for 3 weeks, followed by 20 mg daily for an intended duration of 3 months. Patients with Budd-Chiari syndrome and those receiving full-dose anticoagulation for >7 days prior to enrollment were excluded. Primary outcome was major bleeding; secondary outcomes included death, recurrent SVT, and complete vein recanalization within 3 months. Patients were followed for a total of 6 months. A total of 103 patients were enrolled; 100 were eligible for the analysis. Mean age was 54.4 years; 64% were men. SVT risk factors included abdominal inflammation/infection (28%), solid cancer (9%), myeloproliferative neoplasms (9%), and hormonal therapy (9%); 43% of cases were unprovoked. JAK2 V617F mutation was detected in 26% of 50 tested patients. At 3 months, 2 patients (2.1%; 95% confidence interval, 0.6-7.2) had major bleeding events (both gastrointestinal). One (1.0%) patient died due to a non-SVT-related cause, 2 had recurrent SVT (2.1%). Complete recanalization was documented in 47.3% of patients. One additional major bleeding event and 1 recurrent SVT occurred at 6 months. Rivaroxaban appears as a potential alternative to standard anticoagulation for the treatment of SVT in non-cirrhotic patients. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02627053 and at eudract.ema.europa.eu as #2014-005162-29-36.

Anticoncepción hormonal y COVID-19 / Hormonal contraception and COVID-19

La enfermedad producida por el nuevo coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 se identificó por primera vez en diciembre de 2019 en la ciudad de Wuhan, en la República Popular China, y en pocos meses se convirtió en una pandemia. Desde el comienzo ha sido un desafío mundial, que amenazó la salud pública y obligó a tomar medidas estrictas de aislamiento social. Como consecuencia de la emergencia sanitaria se ha producido una reducción importante de la actividad asistencial, que puso en riesgo el acceso y la continuidad de los métodos anticonceptivos, exponiendo a mujeres a embarazos no intencionales. Los derechos sexuales y reproductivos resultan esenciales y deben garantizarse siempre. (AU)

The disease caused by the new coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 was identified for the first time in December 2019 in the city of Wuhan, in the People's Republic of China, and within a few months it became a pandemic. From the beginning, it has been a global challenge, threatening public health, having to take strict measures of social isolation. As a consequence of the health emergency, there has been a significant reduction in healthcare activity, putting access and continuity of contraceptive methods at risk, exposing women to unintended pregnancies. Sexual and reproductive rights are essential and must always be guaranteed. (AU)

Tratamiento de los síntomas vasomotores en pacientes con cáncer demama: Revisión narrativa

Las mujeres con antecedentes de cáncer de mama suelen experimentar síntomas vasomotores más severos y frecuentes que la población general. Numerosos trabajos han demostrado que los síntomas vasomotores (SVM) son los efectos adversos más frecuentes de la terapia adyuvante, y que hasta 20% de las pacientes con cáncer de mama considera discontinuar el tratamiento debido a estos síntomas, a pesar de su beneficio en la reducción de la recurrencia. Mientras que la terapia sustitutiva hormonal (THM) es usada regularmente en mujeres sanas para tratamiento de los SVM, está contraindicada en pacientes con antecedente de cáncer de mama. Existen muy pocos datos clínicos sobre las intervenciones no farmacológicas, y el papel de las terapias alternativas y complementarias sigue siendo controvertido. La revisión de la literatura da cuenta de que estos agentes farmacológicos, los inhibidores de la recaptación de serotonina-norepinefrina (IRNSs), los inhibidores selectivos de la recaptación de serotonina (IRSs), los antihipertensivos y los anticonvulsivos, disminuyen la intensidad y frecuencia de los SVM, demostrando una mejoría clínicamente significativa. Sin embargo, algunos IRSSs e IRSNs son potentes inhibidores del citocromo P450 2D6 (CYP 2D6), lo que impacta en la concentración de endoxifeno, debiendo ser evitados en pacientes tratadas con tamoxifeno. Son una opción el citalopram y la venlafaxina, si bien su consecuencia sobre la recurrencia y supervivencia del cáncer de mama es controvertida. La eficacia en el tratamiento de los SVM con antidepresivos es menor que con estrógenos y hay pocas publicaciones comparando ambos tratamientos. Faltan datos sobre el lapso de la indicación. Dos fármacos antiepilépticos también han demostrado efectividad, la gabapentina y la pregabalina. Algunas investigaciones comparativas están en curso, y habrá que esperar sus resultados para individualizar cuál es el óptimo en el manejo de los síntomas menopáusicos en mujeres que han padecido cáncer de mama.

Women with a history of breast cancer tend to have more severe and frequent vasomotor symptoms than the general population. Numerous studies have shown that vasomotor symptoms (VMS) are the most frequent adverse event of adjuvant therapy, and that up to 20% of breast cancer patients consider discontinuing treatment because of these symptoms, despite their benefit in the reduction of recurrence. While hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is regularly used in healthy women to treat VMS, it is contraindicated in patients with history of breast cancer. There are few clinical data on non-pharmacological interventions, and the role of alternative and complementary therapies remains controversial. The review of the literature reveals that these pharmacological agents, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (IRSs), antihypertensives and anticonvulsants, decrease the intensity and frequency of VMS, demonstrating a clinically significant improvement. However, some IRSSs and SSRIs are potent inhibitors of cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP 2D6), which impacts on the concentration of endoxifen and should be avoided in patients treated with tamoxifen. In this case, citalopram and venlafaxine are a better therapeutic option, although there is some controversy regarding its consequences on recurrence and survival of breast cancer. The efficacy in the treatment of VMS with antidepressants is lower than that achieved with estrogens and there are few publications comparing both treatments. Neither is clear the optimal treatment duration. Two antiepileptic drugs have also shown to be effective, gabapentin and pregabalin. Some comparative studies are in progress and it is probably necessary to wait for their results to identify the optimal option in the management of menopausal symptoms in women who have had breast cancer.

Long-term Clinical Outcomes of Splanchnic Vein Thrombosis: Results of an International Registry.

IMPORTANCE: Little information is available on the long-term clinical outcome of patients with splanchnic vein thrombosis (SVT). OBJECTIVE: To assess the incidence rates of bleeding, thrombotic events, and mortality in a large international cohort of patients with SVT. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A prospective cohort study was conducted beginning May 2, 2008, and completed January 30, 2014, at hospital-based centers specialized in the management of thromboembolic disorders; a 2-year follow-up period was completed January 30, 2014, and data analysis was conducted from July 1, 2014, to February 28, 2015. Participants included 604 consecutive patients with objectively diagnosed SVT; there were no exclusion critieria. Information was gathered on baseline characteristics, risk factors, and antithrombotic treatment. Clinical outcomes during the follow-up period were documented and reviewed by a central adjudication committee. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Major bleeding, defined according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis; bleeding requiring hospitalization; thrombotic events, including venous and arterial thrombosis; and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Of the 604 patients (median age, 54 years; 62.6% males), 21 (3.5%) did not complete follow-up. The most common risk factors for SVT were liver cirrhosis (167 of 600 patients [27.8%]) and solid cancer (136 of 600 [22.7%]); the most common sites of thrombosis were the portal vein (465 of 604 [77.0%]) and the mesenteric veins (266 of 604 [44.0%]). Anticoagulation was administered to 465 patients in the entire cohort (77.0%) with a mean duration of 13.9 months; 175 of the anticoagulant group (37.6%) received parenteral treatment only, and 290 patients (62.4%) were receiving vitamin K antagonists. The incidence rates (reported with 95% CIs) were 3.8 per 100 patient-years (2.7-5.2) for major bleeding, 7.3 per 100 patient-years (5.8-9.3) for thrombotic events, and 10.3 per 100 patient-years (8.5-12.5) for all-cause mortality. During anticoagulant treatment, these rates were 3.9 per 100 patient-years (2.6-6.0) for major bleeding and 5.6 per 100 patient-years (3.9-8.0) for thrombotic events. After treatment discontinuation, rates were 1.0 per 100 patient-years (0.3-4.2) and 10.5 per 100 patient-years (6.8-16.3), respectively. The highest rates of major bleeding and thrombotic events during the whole study period were observed in patients with cirrhosis (10.0 per 100 patient-years [6.6-15.1] and 11.3 per 100 patient-years [7.7-16.8], respectively); the lowest rates were in patients with SVT secondary to transient risk factors (0.5 per 100 patient-years [0.1-3.7] and 3.2 per 100 patient-years [1.4-7.0], respectively). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Most patients with SVT have a substantial long-term risk of thrombotic events. In patients with cirrhosis, this risk must be balanced against a similarly high risk of major bleeding. Anticoagulant treatment appears to be safe and effective in most patients with SVT.

Quality of diabetes care predicts the development of cardiovascular events: results of the QuED study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: In the context of the QuED Study we assessed whether a quality of care summary score was able to predict the development of cardiovascular (CV) events in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS AND RESULTS: The score was calculated using process and intermediate outcome indicators (HbA1c), blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, microalbuminuria) and ranged from 0 to 40. Overall, 3235 patients were enrolled, of whom 492 developed a CV event after a median follow-up of 5 years. The incidence rate (per 1000 person-years) of CV events was 62.4 in patients with a score < or =10, 54.8 in those with a score between 15 and 20, and 39.8 in those with a score >20. In adjusted multilevel regression models, the risk to develop a CV event was 89% greater in patients with a score of < or =10 (rate ratio [RR]=1.89; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.43-2.50) and 43% higher in those with a score between 10 and 20 (RR=1.43; 95% CI 1.14-1.79), as compared to those with a score >20. A difference between centers of 5 points in the mean quality score was associated with a difference of 16% in CV event risk (RR=0.84; 95% CI 0.72-0.98). CONCLUSION: Our study documented for the first time a close relationship between a score of quality of diabetes care and long-term outcomes.

Clinical and psychological predictors of incidence of self-reported erectile dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the predictors of the incidence of erectile dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and identified subgroups of patients in whom the interaction between clinical and psychological characteristics determined an increase in the risk of erectile dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was based on 670 individuals. The presence of erectile dysfunction and the severity of depressive symptoms were investigated with a questionnaire filled in every 6 months for 3 years. Poisson regression was used to calculate incidence rates. To evaluate interactions among the different variables and identify distinct and homogeneous subgroups in terms of incidence of erectile dysfunction, RECursive Partitioning and AMalgamation method was used. RESULTS: Overall erectile dysfunction developed in 192 men with type 2 diabetes, with an incidence rate of 166.3 per 1,000 person-years. Age, insulin treatment, hemoglobin A1c greater than 8.0%, total cholesterol greater than 3.88 mmol/l and severity of depressive symptoms represented independent predictors of erectile dysfunction. RECursive Partitioning and AMalgamation analysis identified 5 classes with a marked variation in the risk of erectile dysfunction. Patients with low levels of depressive symptoms and hemoglobin A1c 8.0% or less showed the lowest risk of erectile dysfunction. Compared with this subgroup patients with higher levels of depressive symptoms and treated with insulin had a 3-fold risk of erectile dysfunction. Age, smoking, high cholesterol levels and neuropathy were globally predictive variables associated with an increased risk of erectile dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of erectile dysfunction is predicted by modifiable risk factors. Even in diabetes, psychological problems can contribute to the pathogenesis of erectile dysfunction, in addition to organic causes.

Are Type 2 diabetic patients offered adequate foot care? The role of physician and patient characteristics.

In the context of a nationwide outcomes research program on Type 2 diabetes, we investigated physician and patient practices related to foot care. Patients filled in a questionnaire investigating whether they had received information about foot care, how often they had had their feet examined in the last year, and how often they usually checked their feet. Analyses were adjusted for patient case-mix and physician-level clustering. Overall, 3564 patients were recruited by 125 diabetes outpatient clinics (DOCs) and 103 general practitioners (GPs), of whom 6.8% suffered form lower limb complications. The presence of foot complications was correlated with insulin treatment, cigarette smoking, low levels of school education, and the presence of other diabetic complications. More than 50% of the patients reported that they had not had their feet examined by their physician and 28% referred that they had not received foot education. Patients with lower levels of school education and income, as well as overweight individuals, were less likely to receive foot education. Physicians tended to perform foot examination more often in males, low-income patients, those with foot complications, and those treated with insulin, but not in patients with the highest risk of foot complications, that is, those with diabetic neuropathy or peripheral vascular disease (PVD). GPs tended to perform foot examination less frequently than diabetologists do. Foot self-examination was not performed by 33% of the patients. Those individuals who had received foot education or had had their feet examined were more likely to check their feet regularly. A substantial proportion of Type 2 diabetic patients is not offered adequate foot care, even in the presence of major risk factors for lower limb complications. Patient knowledge and practices are strongly related to physicians' attitudes.

Longitudinal assessment of quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes and self-reported erectile dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE: In the context of the QuED (Quality of Care and Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes) project, we evaluated the longitudinal changes over 3 years in quality of life (QoL) in patients with type 2 diabetes according to the presence or the development of erectile dysfunction (ED). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients were requested to fill in a questionnaire investigating the presence of ED and QoL (SF-36 Health Survey, depression symptoms [Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression], and quality of sexual life) every 6 months for 3 years. The analyses were based on multilevel models, adjusted for patient clinical and sociodemographic characteristics. RESULTS: The study involved 1,456 patients, of whom 34% reported frequent erectile problems at baseline; 192 developed ED during the follow-up. No changes in QoL measures were detected in patients without ED; in those with ED at baseline, a worsening in all SF-36 scales was observed, reaching statistical significance for physical functioning (P = 0.03). Among patients who developed ED during the study, a deterioration in all SF-36 dimensions and a worsening in depressive symptoms preceded the development of ED. The onset of ED was associated with a further marked worsening in physical functioning (P = 0.0008), general health perception (P = 0.02), and social functioning (P = 0.04) on SF-36 subscales, as well as in the summary physical and mental components scores (P = 0.04 and P = 0.07, respectively). The development of ED was also associated with a highly significant increase in depressive symptoms (P = 0.001) and a marked decrease in quality of sexual life (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This longitudinal study documents for the first time the impact of ED onset on several aspects of QoL in patients with type 2 diabetes. The study also shows that QoL tended to further decrease during 3 years in patients with ED at baseline but not in those without this condition.

Impact of physicians' beliefs and practices on cholesterol levels in patients with type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal assessment.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials demonstrate significant benefit from cholesterol management for patients with type 2 diabetes. The aim of this work was to explore the correlates of lipid management in patients with type 2 diabetes, including the subjective beliefs of physicians, setting of care, and patient-related factors. METHODS: This longitudinal outcomes research study involved 2359 patients with type 2 diabetes recruited by 111 general practitioners and 214 physicians practicing in diabetes clinics. Physicians' beliefs were assessed through a questionnaire administered when the study started in 1998. Main outcome measures were total cholesterol (TC) and LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) levels over 3 years and the proportion of patients treated with lipid-lowering drugs (LLDs). RESULTS: Less than one-third of the physicians (27%) stated that they routinely started pharmacologic therapy for TC values > or =200 mg/dL (more aggressive), whereas 46% considered a TC level > or =240 mg/dL as the threshold for the initiation of treatment (less aggressive). During 3 years of observation, mean TC and LDL-C levels decreased from 215 +/- 40 mg/dL to 203 +/- 37 mg/dL and from 135 +/- 36 mg/dL to 126 +/- 35 mg/dL respectively, while the proportion of patients treated with LLDs increased from 13.2% to 24.6%; in particular, among individuals cared for by the more aggressive physicians, 30.0% were taking LLDs after 3 years, while only 17.7% of those followed by the less aggressive physicians and 18.1% of those followed by >1 physician were being treated with LLDs. Multilevel analysis showed that physicians' beliefs were an independent predictor of TC levels over the 3-year period. In patients treated with LLDs, TC levels decreased on average by 14%, and LDL-C levels decreased by 20%. CONCLUSION: Our data show that physicians' beliefs in more aggressive management strategies will result in better mean TC values over a 3-year period.

Correlates of satisfaction for the relationship with their physician in type 2 diabetic patients.

In the context of an Italian nation-wide outcomes research program on type 2 diabetes, we investigated the contribution of both patient and setting-related factors to patient satisfaction with their relationship with their physicians. The level of patient satisfaction was measured using the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) 14 patient satisfaction questionnaire. The main results were obtained using multilevel analysis, a statistical technique that takes into account the clustered nature of our data. Overall, 3563 patients were recruited by 101 diabetologists and 103 general practitioners (GPs). Information on patients' satisfaction was available for 2515 patients (71% of the whole sample). Patients' satisfaction was related to patient characteristics and attitudes, but not with physician's sex, age, speciality, and setting of care. In particular, patients who were less likely to delegate to physicians responsibility for diabetes management and those perceiving a lower degree of involvement in disease management showed lower levels of satisfaction. Lower satisfaction scores were also related to lower levels of school education, more severe clinical conditions, and lower psychological adaptation to diabetes. However, patients reporting higher levels of diabetes related worries and more frequent encounters with health care providers showed higher levels of satisfaction. In conclusion, patient satisfaction with physicians' humanness and communication skills is strongly related to personal characteristics, attitudes, expectations, and perceived health. In deciding the best decision-making approach to adopt in individual patients, it is of primary importance to measure how the patient perceives and engages in relationships.

Quality of care and outcomes in type 2 diabetic patients: a comparison between general practice and diabetes clinics.

OBJECTIVE: The role of general practice and diabetes clinics in the management of diabetes is still a matter of debate. Methodological flaws in previous studies may have led to inaccurate conclusions when comparing the care provided in these different settings. We compared the care provided to type 2 diabetic patients attending diabetes outpatient clinics (DOCs) or being treated by a general practitioner (GP) using appropriate statistical methods to adjust for patient case mix and physician-level clustering. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We prospectively evaluated the process and intermediate outcome measures over 2 years in a sample of 3,437 patients recruited by 212 physicians with different specialties practicing in 125 DOCs and 103 general practice offices. Process measures included frequency of HbA(1c), lipids, microalbuminuria, and serum creatinine measurements and frequency of foot and eye examinations. Outcome measures included HbA(1c), blood pressure, and total and LDL cholesterol levels. RESULTS: Differences for most process measures were statistically significantly in favor of DOCs. The differences were more marked for patients who were always treated by the same physician within a DOC and if that physician had a specialty in diabetology. Less consistent differences in process measures were detected when patients followed by GPs were compared with those followed by physicians with a specialty other than diabetology. As for the outcomes considered, patients attending DOCs attained better total cholesterol levels, whereas no major differences emerged in terms of metabolic control and blood pressure levels between DOCs and GPs. Physicians' specialties were not independently related to patient outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Being followed always by the same physician in a DOC, particularly if the physician had a specialty in diabetes, ensured better quality of care in terms of process measures. In the short term, care provided by DOCs was also associated with better intermediate outcome measures, such as total cholesterol levels.

Identifying patients with type 2 diabetes with a higher likelihood of erectile dysfunction: the role of the interaction between clinical and psychological factors.

PURPOSE: We estimated the prevalence of erectile dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes and identified subgroups of patients in which the interaction among clinical, psychological and sociodemographic characteristics determined an increased likelihood of erectile dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The presence of erectile dysfunction was based on patient self-reporting. Clinical information was collected by participating physicians. The severity of depressive symptoms was investigated using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale. To evaluate interactions among the variables investigated and identify distinct, homogeneous subgroups of patients with different odds ratios for erectile dysfunction a tree growing technique was used. RESULTS: In the 1,460 patients studied the prevalence of severe and mild-moderate erectile dysfunction was 34% and 24%, respectively. While severe erectile dysfunction was mainly related to the severity of diabetes, mild-moderate dysfunction was independent of clinical variables and only associated with the severity of depressive symptoms. The tree growing technique led to the identification of 6 classes characterized by a marked difference in the prevalence of severe erectile dysfunction of between 19% and 65%. Patients on diet alone showed the lowest prevalence of erectile dysfunction and were considered the reference category, while patients treated with insulin who had neuropathy represented the subgroup with the highest likelihood of erectile dysfunction (OR = 7.2, 95% CI 3.9 to 13.2). In patients treated with oral agents the odds ratio for erectile dysfunction was 2.7 (95% CI 1.8 to 3.9) for those with severe depressive symptoms and 1.9 (95% CI 1.3 to 2.7) for current/former smokers with low depressive symptoms. Patient age, retinopathy and cardiac-cerebrovascular disease were globally predictive variables associated with an increased likelihood of erectile dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Our data illustrate the interplay of clinical and psychological factors in determining the risk of erectile dysfunction in type 2 diabetes and can help identify those for whom much greater attention is needed to detect erectile problems.

Role of organizational factors in poor blood pressure control in patients with type 2 diabetes: the QuED Study Group--quality of care and outcomes in type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: A large body of evidence supports the need for reducing the cardiovascular burden of diabetes. Only indirect and occasional data describe the adequacy of routine management of hypertension in patients with diabetes. The aim of this study was to explore the interplay of some potential key determinants of quality of antihypertensive care, including the settings, physicians' beliefs about blood pressure (BP) control, and patient-related factors. METHODS: We evaluated physicians' beliefs about BP control using questionnaire responses at study entry. A sample of 3449 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, of whom 1782 (52%) were considered to have hypertension, was recruited by 212 physicians practicing in 125 diabetes outpatients clinics (DOCs) and 106 general practitioners (GPs). We evaluated the type and number of antihypertensive agents used and the BP values at study entry and after 1 year of follow-up. We used multilevel analysis to investigate correlates of poor BP control (> or =160/90 mm Hg). RESULTS: Only 16% of GPs and 14% of DOC physicians targeted BP values of less than 130/85 mm Hg. At study entry, 6% of the patients had values below 130/85 mm Hg, whereas 52% showed values of 160/90 mm Hg or greater. Only 12% of subjects were treated with more than 2 drugs at study entry, compared with 16% at the 1-year follow-up (P =.001). Multilevel analysis showed that patients attending DOCs had a more than 2-fold increased risk for inadequate BP control, compared with those treated by GPs. The risk for poor BP control was 2 times higher for patients treated by male physicians compared with those treated by female physicians, and it was halved when the physician responsible for the diabetes care specialized in diabetology or endocrinology. CONCLUSION: In a model situation of comorbidity, the overall quality of care depends on structural and organizational factors, which are likely to be more influential than existing guidelines.

Erectile dysfunction and quality of life in type 2 diabetic patients: a serious problem too often overlooked.

OBJECTIVE: Within the context of a large, nationwide outcomes research program in type 2 diabetes, we assess the prevalence of self-reported erectile dysfunction and evaluate its impact on quality of life. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The study involved 1,460 patients enrolled by 114 diabetes outpatient clinics and 112 general practitioners. Patients were asked to complete a questionnaire investigating their ability to achieve and maintain an erection. Various aspects of quality of life were also assessed depressive using the following instruments: SF-36 Health Survey, diabetes health distress, psychological adaptation to diabetes, depressive symptoms (CES-D scale), and quality of sexual life. RESULTS: Overall, 34% of the patients reported frequent erectile problems, 24% reported occasional problems, and 42% reported no erectile problems. After adjusting for patient characteristics, erectile dysfunction was associated with higher levels of diabetes-specific health distress and worse psychological adaptation to diabetes, which were, in turn, related to worse metabolic control. Erectile problems were also associated with a dramatic increase in the prevalence of severe depressive symptoms, lower scores in the mental components of the SF-36, and a less satisfactory sexual life. A total of 63% of the patients reported that their physicians had never investigated their sexual problems. CONCLUSIONS: Erectile dysfunction is extremely common among type 2 diabetic patients and is associated with poorer quality of life, as measured with generic and diabetes-specific instruments. Despite their relevance, sexual problems are seldom investigated by general practitioners and specialists.