Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Low-Dose Triple Single-Pill Combination Compared With Placebo for Initial Treatment of Hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Single-pill combinations of 3 or more low-dose blood pressure (BP)-lowering drugs hold promise for initial or early treatment of hypertension. OBJECTIVES: We conducted a placebo-controlled trial of a new single-pill combination containing low doses of telmisartan, amlodipine, and indapamide in 2 dose options to assess efficacy and safety. METHODS: This international, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial enrolled adults with hypertension receiving 0 to 1 BP-lowering drugs. After a 2-week placebo run-in during which any BP-lowering medication was stopped, participants were eligible if home systolic BP (SBP) was 130 to 154 mm Hg. Participants were randomized in a 2:2:1 ratio to GMRx2 » dose (telmisartan 10 mg/amlodipine 1.25 mg/indapamide 0.625 mg), GMRx2 ½ dose (telmisartan 20 mg/amlodipine 2.5 mg/indapamide 1.25 mg), or placebo. The primary efficacy outcome was difference in change in home SBP from randomization to week 4, and primary safety outcome was treatment discontinuation due to an adverse event. RESULTS: From June 14, 2021 to October 18, 2023, a total of 295 participants (mean age: 51 years; 56% female) were randomized and 96% completed the trial. Baseline mean home BP was 139/86 mm Hg and clinic BP was 138/86 mm Hg after placebo run-in. The placebo-corrected least square mean differences in home SBP at Week 4 were -7.3 mm Hg (95% CI: -4.5 to -10.2) for GMRx2 » dose and -8.2 mm Hg (95% CI: -5.2 to -11.3) for GMRx2 ½ dose; reductions for clinic BP were 8.0/4.0 and 9.5/4.9 mm Hg. At Week 4, clinic BP control (<140/90 mm Hg) was 37%, 65%, and 70% for placebo, GMRx2 » dose, and GMRx2 ½ dose, respectively (both doses P < 0.001 vs placebo). Placebo, GMRx2-triple », and GMRx2 ½ treatment discontinuation due to an adverse event occurred in 1 (1.6%), 0, and 6 (5.1%), respectively; out of normal range serum sodium or potassium was observed in 4 (6.3%), 12 (10.6%), and 12 (10.1%), respectively, but no participant had a serum sodium <130/>150 mmol/L or potassium <3.0/>6.0 mmol/L. Serious adverse events were reported by 2 participants in the placebo and GMRx2 ½ groups and none in the GMRx2 » group. CONCLUSIONS: In a population with mild-to-moderate BP elevation, both dose versions of the novel low-dose triple single-pill combination showed good tolerability and clinically relevant BP reductions compared with placebo. (Efficacy and Safety of GRMx2 Compared to Placebo for the Treatment of Hypertension: NCT04518306).

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on blood pressure control in patients with treated hypertension-results of the European Society of Hypertension Study (ESH ABPM COVID-19 Study).

BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the influence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on blood pressure (BP) control assessed by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). METHODS: Office BP and ABPM data from two visits conducted within a 9-15 months interval were collected from patients treated for hypertension. In the prepandemic group, both visits took place before, while in the pandemic group, Visit-1 was done before and Visit-2 during the pandemic period. RESULTS: Of 1811 collected patients 191 were excluded because they did not meet the required ABPM time frames. Thus, the study comprised 704 patients from the pandemic and 916 from the prepandemic group. Groups did not differ in sex, age, duration of hypertension, frequency of first line antihypertensive drug use and mean 24 h BP on Visit-1. The prevalence of sustained uncontrolled hypertension was similar in both groups. On Visit-2 mean 24 h BP, daytime and nighttime systolic BP and diastolic BP were higher in the pandemic compared to the prepandemic group ( P  < 0.034). The prevalence of sustained uncontrolled hypertension on Visit-2 was higher in the pandemic than in the prepandemic group [0.29 (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.26-0.33) vs. 0.25 (95% CI: 0.22-0.28), P  < 0.037]. In multivariable adjusted analyses a significant difference in BP visit-to-visit change was observed, with a more profound decline in BP between visits in the prepandemic group. CONCLUSIONS: This study using ABPM indicates a negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on BP control. It emphasizes the need of developing strategies to maintain BP control during a pandemic such as the one induced by COVID-19.

An outcome-driven threshold for pulse pressure amplification.

Pulse pressure amplification (PPA) is the brachial-to-aortic pulse pressure ratio and decreases with age and cardiovascular risk factors. This individual-participant meta-analysis of population studies aimed to define an outcome-driven threshold for PPA. Incidence rates and standardized multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of cardiovascular and coronary endpoints associated with PPA, as assessed by the SphygmoCor software, were evaluated in the International Database of Central Arterial Properties for Risk Stratification (n = 5608). Model refinement was assessed by the integrated discrimination (IDI) and net reclassification (NRI) improvement. Age ranged from 30 to 96 years (median 53.6). Over 4.1 years (median), 255 and 109 participants experienced a cardiovascular or coronary endpoint. In a randomly defined discovery subset of 3945 individuals, the rounded risk-carrying PPA thresholds converged at 1.3. The HRs for cardiovascular and coronary endpoints contrasting PPA < 1.3 vs ≥1.3 were 1.54 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00-2.36) and 2.45 (CI: 1.20-5.01), respectively. Models were well calibrated, findings were replicated in the remaining 1663 individuals analyzed as test dataset, and NRI was significant for both endpoints. The HRs associating cardiovascular and coronary endpoints per PPA threshold in individuals <60 vs ≥60 years were 3.86 vs 1.19 and 6.21 vs 1.77, respectively. The proportion of high-risk women (PPA < 1.3) was higher at younger age (<60 vs ≥60 years: 67.7% vs 61.5%; P < 0.001). In conclusion, over and beyond common risk factors, a brachial-to-central PP ratio of <1.3 is a forerunner of cardiovascular coronary complications and is an underestimated risk factor in women aged 30-60 years. Our study supports pulse wave analysis for risk stratification.

Assessing Machine Learning for Diagnostic Classification of Hypertension Types Identified by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.

Background: Inaccurate blood pressure (BP) classification results in inappropriate treatment. We tested whether machine learning (ML), using routine clinical data, can serve as a reliable alternative to ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) in classifying BP status. Methods: This study employed a multicentre approach involving 3 derivation cohorts from Glasgow, Gdansk, and Birmingham, and a fourth independent evaluation cohort. ML models were trained using office BP, ABPM, and clinical, laboratory, and demographic data, collected from patients referred for hypertension assessment. Seven ML algorithms were trained to classify patients into 5 groups, named as follows: Normal/Target; Hypertension-Masked; Normal/Target-White-Coat (WC); Hypertension-WC; and Hypertension. The 10-year cardiovascular outcomes and 27-year all-cause mortality risks were calculated for the ML-derived groups using the Cox proportional hazards model. Results: Overall, extreme gradient boosting (using XGBoost open source software) showed the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.85-0.88 across derivation cohorts, Glasgow (n = 923; 43% female; age 50.7 ± 16.3 years), Gdansk (n = 709; 46% female; age 54.4 ± 13 years), and Birmingham (n = 1222; 56% female; age 55.7 ± 14 years). But accuracy (0.57-0.72) and F1 (harmonic mean of precision and recall) scores (0.57-0.69) were low across the 3 patient cohorts. The evaluation cohort (n = 6213; 51% female; age 51.2 ± 10.8 years) indicated elevated 10-year risks of composite cardiovascular events in the Normal/Target-WC and the Hypertension-WC groups, with heightened 27-year all-cause mortality observed in all groups, except the Hypertension-Masked group, compared to the Normal/Target group. Conclusions: ML has limited potential in accurate BP classification when ABPM is unavailable. Larger studies including diverse patient groups and different resource settings are warranted.

Contexte: Les erreurs dans la classification des valeurs de la pression artérielle (PA) entraînent une inadéquation du traitement. Nous avons tâché de déterminer si l'apprentissage machine, à l'aide de données cliniques routinières, constituait une solution de rechange fiable à la surveillance ambulatoire de la PA pour définir le statut de la PA. Méthodologie: Cette étude a utilisé une approche multicentrique incluant trois cohortes de dérivation de Glasgow, Gdansk et Birmingham, et une quatrième cohorte d'évaluation indépendante. Les modèles d'apprentissage machine ont été développés en analysant les données démographiques, les valeurs de la PA mesurée au cabinet, les données relatives à la surveillance ambulatoire de la PA et aux épreuves de laboratoire recueillies auprès de patients adressés pour une évaluation de l'hypertension. Sept algorithmes d'apprentissage machine ont été appliqués pour classer les patients en cinq groupes : Normale/Cible; Hypertension-Masquée; Normal/Cible-Blouse blanche; Hypertension-Blouse blanche; Hypertension. Les événements cardiovasculaires sur 10 ans et le risque de mortalité toutes causes confondues sur 27 ans ont été calculés dans les groupes dérivés de l'apprentissage machine à l'aide d'un modèle de risques proportionnels de Cox. Résultats: D'une manière générale, l'amplification de gradient extrême (à l'aide du logiciel ouvert XGBoost) a mis en évidence l'aire sous la courbe de la fonction d'efficacité du récepteur (courbe ROC pour Receiver Operating Characteristic) la plus haute, soit 0,85 à 0,88, pour toutes les cohortes de dérivation : Glasgow (n = 923; 43 % de femmes; âge : 50,7 ± 16,3 ans); Gdansk (n = 709; 46 % de femmes; âge : 54,4 ± 13 ans); Birmingham (n = 1 222; 56 % de femmes; âge : 55,7 ± 14 ans). La précision (0,57 ­ 0,72) et le score F1 (moyenne harmonique de la précision et du rappel) (0,57 ­ 0,69) ont été faibles dans les trois cohortes de patients. La cohorte d'évaluation (n = 6 213; 51 % de femmes; âge : 51,2 ± 10,8 ans) a indiqué un risque d'événements cardiovasculaires composites sur 10 ans élevé dans les groupes Normale/Cible-Blouse blanche et Hypertension-Blouse blanche, tandis qu'une hausse de la mortalité toutes causes confondues sur 27 ans a été observée dans tous les groupes, sauf dans le groupe Hypertension-Masquée, comparativement au groupe Normale/Cible. Conclusions: Le potentiel d'exactitude de la classification de la PA à l'aide de l'apprentissage machine lorsque la surveillance ambulatoire de la PA n'est pas possible est limité. Des études de plus grande envergure portant sur des groupes de patients et des niveaux de ressources diversifiés s'imposent.

Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the effect of allopurinol on the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with high and very high cardiovascular risk, including the presence of long-COVID-19 syndrome: the ALL-VASCOR study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Numerous studies, but not all, have suggested a positive effect of allopurinol on the cardiovascular system. The randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study evaluating the effect of allopurinol on the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with high and very high cardiovascular risk, including the presence of long-COVID-19 syndrome (ALL-VASCOR) study aims to evaluate the efficacy of allopurinol therapy for improving cardiovascular outcomes in patients at high and very high cardiovascular risk excluding ischaemic heart disease. This is particularly important due to the high cost of cardiovascular disease treatment and its status as one of the leading causes of mortality. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The ALL-VASCOR study is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial that examines the effect of allopurinol therapy (200-500 mg of allopurinol daily) versus an equivalent dose of placebo on the risk of cardiovascular events in 1116 patients aged 40-70 with serum uric acid levels above 5 mg/dL at high and very high risk of cardiovascular disease. The ALL-VASCOR study will also assess the occurrence of long-COVID-19 syndrome. The study will measure primary and secondary as well as additional endpoints and the planned intervention will end on 31 July 2028 unless advised otherwise by the Safe Monitoring Board or other applicable authorities. Participant recruitment is planned to begin in March 2024 in Poland. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was ethically approved by the Bioethics Committee of Poznan University of Medical Sciences (No 03/23, 12 January 2023). The results are expected after 2028 and will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and at international conferences. PROTOCOL VERSION NUMBER: 01-15 November 2022. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EudraCT: 2022-003573-32, 27 October 2022, ClinicalTrials: NCT05943821, 13 July 2023.

Mechanisms of Vascular Inflammation and Potential Therapeutic Targets: A Position Paper From the ESH Working Group on Small Arteries.

Inflammatory responses in small vessels play an important role in the development of cardiovascular diseases, including hypertension, stroke, and small vessel disease. This involves various complex molecular processes including oxidative stress, inflammasome activation, immune-mediated responses, and protein misfolding, which together contribute to microvascular damage. In addition, epigenetic factors, including DNA methylation, histone modifications, and microRNAs influence vascular inflammation and injury. These phenomena may be acquired during the aging process or due to environmental factors. Activation of proinflammatory signaling pathways and molecular events induce low-grade and chronic inflammation with consequent cardiovascular damage. Identifying mechanism-specific targets might provide opportunities in the development of novel therapeutic approaches. Monoclonal antibodies targeting inflammatory cytokines and epigenetic drugs, show promise in reducing microvascular inflammation and associated cardiovascular diseases. In this article, we provide a comprehensive discussion of the complex mechanisms underlying microvascular inflammation and offer insights into innovative therapeutic strategies that may ameliorate vascular injury in cardiovascular disease.

Rationale for a New Low-Dose Triple Single Pill Combination for the Treatment of Hypertension.

Two recent large trials showed the potential of single pill combinations (SPCs) with ≥3 low-dose components among people with hypertension who were untreated or receiving monotherapy. In both trials, these 'hypertension polypills' were superior to usual care, achieving >80% BP control without increasing withdrawal due to side effects. However, there are no such products available for prescribers. To address this unmet need, George Medicines developed GMRx2 with telmisartan/amlodipine/indapamide in three strengths (mg): 10/1.25/0.625, 20/2.5/1.25; 40/5/2.5. Two pivotal trials are ongoing to support FDA submission for the treatment of hypertension, including initial treatment. These assess efficacy and safety of GMRx2 compared to: placebo, and each of the three possible dual combinations. Regulatory submissions are planned for 2024, with the aim of providing access to GMRx2 in developed and developing regions. Wider implementation of GMRx2-based treatment strategies will be guided by further research to inform access and appropriate scale up.

Aortic Stiffness Is Independently Associated with Intracranial Carotid Artery Calcification in Patients with Ischemic Stroke.

INTRODUCTION: Intracranial carotid artery calcification (ICAC), as a strong contributor to the occurrence of ischemic stroke, might be present in the medial or intimal arterial layer. Traditional cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs) are associated with ICAC; however, its association with new markers of vascular function is less understood. The paper aimed to evaluate the relationship between carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (CF-PWV) and ICAC subtypes. METHODS: We enrolled 65 patients with ischemic stroke. CF-PWV, systolic, diastolic, mean blood pressure, and pulse pressure were measured within 6 ± 2 days after stroke onset, and CT was performed within 24 h. ICAC on the stroke site was classified by two methods: volume and score based. Tertiles of ICAC volume were determined, and low-grade ICAC (T1) was regarded as a reference. According to the score-based method, (dominant) medial and (dominant) intimal ICAC subtypes were determined. Data were analyzed with multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Medial and intimal ICAC subtypes were found in 34 (52%) and 24 (37%) patients, respectively. In 11% of patients, no ICAC calcifications were found. CF-PWV was higher in patients with high-grade ICAC (OR = 1.56, 95% CI = 1.03-2.35, p = 0.035). CF-PWV was higher in patients with the medial ICAC subtype (OR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.00-2.55, p = 0.049) after adjustment for traditional CVRFs. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that among patients with ischemic stroke, aortic stiffness is independently associated with ICAC and that medial ICAC, compared with intimal ICAC, is accompanied by more advanced aortic stiffness.

The Hypertension Excellence Centre programme of the European Society of Hypertension - current status, activities and reshaping for the future.

PURPOSE: To describe the history of the Excellence Centre (EC) programme of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) since the beginning in 2006, its achievements, and its future developments. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We list the number of ECs per country, the research projects performed so far, and the organisational steps needed to reshape the EC programme for the future. RESULTS: In August 2023, the ESH EC programme includes 118 registered ECs in 21 European and 7 non-European countries. Updates about the formal steps for application, re-application, transfer of EC and retirement of EC heads are given. CONCLUSIONS: The EC programme of the ESH has been a success from the beginning. Further refinements will make it fit for the next decades.

Differentiating patients with obstructive sleep apnea from healthy controls based on heart rate-blood pressure coupling quantified by entropy-based indices.

We introduce an entropy-based classification method for pairs of sequences (ECPS) for quantifying mutual dependencies in heart rate and beat-to-beat blood pressure recordings. The purpose of the method is to build a classifier for data in which each item consists of two intertwined data series taken for each subject. The method is based on ordinal patterns and uses entropy-like indices. Machine learning is used to select a subset of indices most suitable for our classification problem in order to build an optimal yet simple model for distinguishing between patients suffering from obstructive sleep apnea and a control group.

How to optimize the use of diuretics in patients with heart failure?

Considering the pathophysiology and clinical presentation of heart failure, using diuretics or drugs with diuretic properties is indispensable for adequate management of heart failure patients. However, in clinical practice, fluid expansion is often undiagnosed, and diuretic therapy is not always adequately titrated. Today, several drug classes with diuretic properties are available in addition to classical thiazides, thiazide-like, and loop diuretics. The purpose of this short review is to discuss different ways to optimize diuretic therapy using currently available drugs. Several approaches are considered, including a combination of diuretics to obtain a sequential nephron blockade, use of a drug combining a blocker of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and an inhibitor of the metabolism of natriuretic peptides (ARNI), prescription of potassium binders to maintain and up-titrate RAS blockers and mineralocorticoid antagonists, and finally use of inhibitors of renal reabsorption of glucose through the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 system. Optimal use of these various drug classes should improve the quality of life and reduce the need for hospital admissions and mortality in heart failure patients.

Hypertension and Dyslipidemia: the Two Partners in Endothelium-Related Crime.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The goal of this article is to characterize the endothelium's role in the development of hypertension and dyslipidemia and to point out promising therapeutic directions. RECENT FINDINGS: Dyslipidemia may facilitate the development of hypertension, whereas the collaboration of these two silent killers potentiates the risk of atherosclerosis. The common pathophysiological denominator for hypertension and dyslipidemia is endothelial cell dysfunction, which manifests as dysregulation of homeostasis, redox balance, vascular tone, inflammation, and thrombosis. Treatment focused on mediators acting in these processes might be groundbreaking. Metabolomic research on hypertension and dyslipidemia has revealed new therapeutic targets. State-of-the-art solutions integrating interview, clinical examination, innovative imaging, and omics profiles along with artificial intelligence have been already shown to improve patients' risk stratification and treatment. Pathomechanisms underlying hypertension and dyslipidemia take place in the endothelium. Novel approaches involving endothelial biomarkers and bioinformatics advances could open new perspectives in patient management.

Novel approaches: targeting sympathetic outflow in the carotid sinus.

Uncontrolled hypertension drives the global burden of increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) morbidity and mortality. Although high blood pressure (BP) is treatable and preventable, only half of the patients with hypertension undergoing treatment have their BP controlled. The failure of polypharmacy to attain adequate BP control may be due to a lack of physiological response, however, medication non-adherence and clinician inertia to increase treatment intensity are critical factors associated with poor hypertension management. The long-time medication titration, lifelong drug therapy, and often multi-drug treatment strategy are frustrating when the BP goal is not achieved, leading to increased CVD risk and a substantial burden on the healthcare system. Growing evidence indicates that neurohumoral activation is critical in initiating and maintaining elevated BP and its adverse consequences. Over the past decades, device-based therapies targeting the mechanisms underlying hypertension pathophysiology have been extensively studied. Among these, robust clinical experience for hypertension management exists for renal denervation (RDN) and baroreflex activation therapy (BAT), carotid body denervation (CBD), central arteriovenous anastomosis, and to a lesser extent, deep brain stimulation. Future studies are warranted to define the role of device-based approaches as an alternative or adjunctive treatment option to treat hypertension.

Systemic hypertension is a growing contributor to global disease burden and premature cause of death worldwide.The percentage of patients achieving target BP levels remains largely inadequate.Hypertension is characterised by activation of the sympathetic nervous system, with the magnitude depending on age and the disease severity.Device-based interventions have been extensively studied to directly target the relevant sympathetic neural pathophysiological mechanisms involved in BP control.Modulation of the chronic sympathetic outflow with CBD or BAT shows promise for the treatment of poorly controlled hypertension in addition to antihypertensive medicines.The BP response to device-based therapies appears variable and cannot be predicted before the procedure.Until more robust evidence related to patient selection, procedural and technical aspects is available, chemoreflex and baroreflex neuromodulation therapy should be restricted to randomised sham-controlled trials performed in experienced centres.