INCIDENTAL PARATHYROIDECTOMY DURING THYROID SURGERY - RISK, PREVENTION AND CONTROVERSIES; AN EVIDENCE-BASED REVIEW.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative hypocalcemia after thyroid surgery has a high prevalence ( 16-55% in different series). Incidental parathyroidectomy (IP) is a less discussed complication of thyroidectomy with consequences not properly defined. The aim of our study was to find incidence, risk factors and how to prevent IP. METHODS: Extensive search of English literature publications via PubMed was performed and 73 papers from 1980 to 2017 were analysed using the GRADE system/classification, quality of evidence was classified as "strong" when the result is highly unlikely to change existing recommendation and "weak" when opposite. RESULTS: Incidence of IP is 3.7-24.9%, while prevalence of permanent hypoparathyroidism is less frequent 6-12%. Direct relation between IP and hypoparathyroidism/hypocalcemia remains controversial. Female patients, ectopic parathyroids, small thyroids, Graves', malignancy, redo surgeries and total thyroidectomy favour IP. Routine visualization of parathyroids, new hemostatic devices, magnifying instruments and fluorescence can prevent incidental removal of parathyroids. Incidence of IP during videoassisted or robotic thyroidectomies was similar to open procedures. High volume, experienced and younger surgeons have lower complication rates (including hypoparathyroidism). CONCLUSIONS: Incidental parathyroidectomy is more frequent than we might have expected. It should be avoided and parathyroid glands should be kept in situ. Majority of studies are retrospective (low degree of evidence according to previous mentioned GRADE classification) and further meta-analysis or randomized control studies are welcome in order to define the impact of incidental removal of parathyroids on postoperative outcome.

Anatomical variations of the obturator veins and their surgical implications.

PURPOSE OF INVESTIGATION: The obturator veins and their network contribute to major bleeding complications during gynaecologic surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The anatomical variations of the obturator veins were studied on 106 patients in which a thorough bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed. RESULTS: Symmetrical drainage on right and left sides was found in 75 cases: only in internal iliac vein in 32 cases, both in external iliac vein and internal in 41 cases, and only in external in two cases (so called "pubic vein"). In 31 procedures, asymmetric drainage was found between the two sides: one side in internal, the other side both in internal and external in 25 patients; in three patients, in external on one side and in both internal and external on the other; and in external on one side and in internal on the other side in one patient. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomical variations of the obturator veins appear quite often.

The mandatory role of groin lymphadenectomy in clinical Stages IB and II vulvar cancer.

PURPOSE OF INVESTIGATION: To analyze the prevalence of inguinofemoral lymph nodes metastases in clinical Stages IB-II vulva cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two patients with FIGO Stages IB-II FIGO vulva cancer with no clinically and imagistic evidence of nodes metastases were treated in the present clinic. The surgical procedures consisted in radical vulvectomy plus inguinofemoral lym- phadenectomy. RESULTS: The final pathological result was squamous carcinoma in 20 patients, vulva melanoma in one, and carcinosar- coma in one. The prevalence of positive lymph nodes was 45.4%. The median number of harvested lymph nodes was 14.0 per groin (between four and 27). Twelve patients (54.5%) developed some wound complications, but all were resolved. At the present time, 20 patients are alive, but the follow-up period is short for many of them; two patients died of disease. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of groin metastases in Stages IB-II vulvar cancer is high. A thorough inguino-femoral dissection seems necessary, despite the high incidence of wound complications.

A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE INITIAL EAST EUROPEAN CENTER EXPERIENCE WITH A WESTERN HIGH-VOLUME CENTER FOR OPEN MINIMALLY INVASIVE PARATHYROIDECTOMY (OMIP) AS TREATMENT OF PRIMARY HYPERPARATHYROIDISM.

OBJECTIVE: To compare results of treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) in two teaching hospitals (eastern and western Europe) and to establish conclusions regarding quality of surgery for PHPT in Romania. METHODS: We reviewed two prospectively collected databases of patients submitted to open minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (OMIP) for symptomatic PHPT in two centers from Romania and the United Kingdom (UK). We included patients with biochemically proven PHPT and positive pre-operative localization studies. We excluded patients with negative localization studies, suspected multiglandular disease, concomitant thyroid disorders and chronic renal failure. RESULTS: 60 patients were included, 27 in group A (Romanian cohort) and 33 in group B (UK cohort). We noted significant differences between groups in pre-operative serum calcium and phosphorus levels (p<0.5). There were no differences between groups regarding the presence of symptoms; in group A we had significantly more patients with renal calculi history (p=0.02), digestive symptoms (p=0.006) and osteitis fibrosa cystica (p=0.01). Two patients from the UK group had lithium associated hyperparathyroidism and 2 patients had genetic disease. Intraoperative parathyroid hormone measurement (ioPTH) was available only for group B and frozen sections were selectively used in both groups. Both the adenoma size and weights were significantly higher in group A. The median operative time was significantly longer in Romanian group (p=0.001); in this group we noted the single conversion to traditional cervicotomy (3.7%) from all studied patients. In group A we noted two patients (7.4%) with failed parathyroidectomy and persistent PHPT; the cure rate was 92.5% for Romanian group and 97% for the UK group. CONCLUSIONS: OMIP can be performed safe with a high cure rate in "small" volume endocrine centres with results comparable to western experienced endocrine centres. Romanian patients presented with more severe PHPT with more frequent end-organ damage, due probably to late diagnosis.

Transthoracic versus Transhiatal esophagectomy: a permanent dilemma. our 15-year experience.

OBJECTIVE: Controversy still exists regarding the optimal surgical management of esophageal cancer. This study was performed to determine and compare early and late morbidity,mortality and overall survival after transthoracic (TTE) and transhiatal esophagectomies (THE). METHODS: Between 1997-2011, 100 patients underwent TTE or THE for squamous esophageal carcinoma (90 patients)and adenocarcinoma (10 patients). Assessed parameters included patient demographics, operative data, pathology results, postoperative morbidity and mortality and 1-3 year survival. RESULTS: Thoracic approach was preferred in cases of more advanced tumors, located in the upper and mid-third of the esophagus, in patients with a better cardiopulmonary status. Perioperative blood loss was significantly higher after transthoracic resections (p=0.0004) and these surgeries took significantly longer than transhiatal esophagectomies(p=0.02). We identified complications in 70.7% patients who under went TTE and in 59.3% patients with transhiatal approach. Respiratory complications were statistically significant in the TTE- group (p-0.0003). The 30-day mortality rates were 12.2% for patients in TTE group and 10.1% in THE patients group, respectively. The mortality ratefor the entire period of the study has been calculated at 84.4%.We have identified a survival rate after 1 year of 62.2%, after 2 years of 39.3% and after 3 years - 15.1%. CONCLUSIONS: According to the results of this study, both procedures appear to be acceptable depending on surgeon preference and appropriate patient selection.

Minilaparotomy as surgical approach for aortoiliac occlusive disease -- single center initial experience.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to emphasize the benefits and indications of performing minilaparotomy as surgical approach for occlusive aortoiliac disease. MATERIAL AND METHOD: From January 2011 to July 2012, a total of 23 patients (19 men and 4 women), with a median age of 60 years (range 49-75) diagnosed with aortoiliac occlusive disease(n=22) or abdominal aneurysm (n=1), were included in a retrospective non-randomized clinical study. Among these patients 11 underwent aortic bypass procedure by minila parotomy approach (ML group) and 12 patients by standard laparotomy(SL group). Demographic and clinical data, operative data, postoperative recovery data and complications were analysed according to these two groups of patients. Follow-up consisted of clinical examination and duplex scanning at 1, 3,6 and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the minilaparotomy and standard laparotomy control groups concerning clinical and demographical data. Two surgical conversions to standard laparotomy were necessary (18.18%) in the ML group due to technical difficulties. The mean operative time was shorter in the ML group (124 ± 22 minutes) and the mean aortic clamping time was similar between the two groups.Major differences between the two lots were observed postoperatively;mean blood loss was more important in the SL group (550 ml) than in the ML group (350 ml) (statistical significance p=0.001, Student test). Patients who have undergone standard laparotomy required more fluids (10000 Â+-2000 ml) in comparison to the other group (6000 ± 1000 ml) p value=0.0001, while the duration of nasogastric suction and period before resuming a liquid diet was both shorter in the ML group (1.1 ± 0.5 days) than those from the SL group (2.5 ± 0.6 days) p value=0.001. The period spent in the ICU was significantly shorter for the ML lot of patients and the median hospitalization time was 5.6 days for patients in ML group,whereas in the SL group the median hospitalization time was 8.9 days (Student test - p value 0.01). We had no 30-day mortality in any of the groups included in the study. One patient from the ML group was readmitted in postoperative day 43 and re-operated on for a prosthetic limb graft thrombosis.Two patients were lost to follow-up and the mean follow-up was 9 ± 1.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: Minilaparotomy as surgical approach for aortic diseases is a feasible, safe procedure on selected patients.