From office tools to community supports: The need for infrastructure to address the social determinants of health in paediatric practice.

Previous research has highlighted the importance of addressing the social determinants of health to improve child health outcomes. However, significant barriers exist that limit the paediatrician's ability to properly address these issues. Barriers include a lack of clinical time, resources, training and education with regard to the social determinants of health; awareness of community resources; and case-management capacity. General practice recommendations to help the health care provider link patients to the community are insufficient. The objective of the current article was to present options for improving the link between the office and the community, using screening questions incorporating physician-based tools that link community resources. Simple interventions, such as routine referral to early-year centres and selected referral to public health home-visiting programs, may help to address populations with the greatest needs.

Des recherches antérieures ont fait ressortir l'importance de tenir compte des déterminants sociaux de la santé pour améliorer la santé des enfants. Cependant, des obstacles importants empêchent les pédiatres de bien se pencher sur la question, incluant le manque de temps clinique, de ressources, de formation et d'enseignement sur les déterminants de la santé, la connaissance des ressources communautaires et la capacité de gestion des cas. Les recommandations faites en pratique générale pour aider le dispensateur de soins à orienter les patients vers des ressources communautaires ne suffisent pas. Le présent article vise à présenter des moyens de faire de meilleurs liens entre le cabinet et la communauté, à l'aide de questions de dépistage intégrant des outils médicaux qui dirigent les patients vers des ressources communautaires. Des interventions simples, telles que l'orientation systématique vers des centres de la petite enfance et l'orientation sélective vers des programmes de visite à domicile par la santé publique, peuvent contribuer à servir les populations qui ont les besoins les plus criants.

Do patients with classic bladder exstrophy have fecal incontinence? A web-based study.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the occurrence of fecal incontinence in patients with classic bladder exstrophy (CBE) by administering a web-based pilot study. METHODS: A questionnaire assessing fecal continence status was devised. Questions included demographics, age to achieve toilet training for bowels, and the patient perception of the degree of fecal soiling during day and night, if present. The CBE contact list of our institution's social worker was addressed (324 patients) and directed to fill the survey posted at the website http://www.SurveyMonkey.com. RESULTS: There were 94 responders (29%) to the survey. They were analyzed as 2 groups: pediatric (age up to 18 years, n = 69, 9 excluded for not achieving toilet training) and adult (age >18 years, n = 25). In the pediatric group, fecal incontinence was reported in 57% of patients during the day and 32% during night. In the adult group, fecal incontinence was reported in 44% of patients during the day and 40% during night. Seven patients reported having undergone ureterosigmoidostomy (US) diversion. Stratifying patients based on US diversion showed fecal incontinence of 100% vs 22% during the day (P <.001), and 86% vs 22% during the night (P <.01), for the US vs non-US subgroups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary survey suggests that fecal incontinence in CBE may be a significant overlooked issue that may persist into adulthood of CBE patients. With the potential functional and psychological burden, clinical awareness and management of this issue is crucial. Further exploration of this issue, with detailed attention to surgical procedure(s) involved and degree of quality of life impairment, needs to be initiated.

Wearing masks in a pediatric hospital: developing practical guidelines.

During the outbreak of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) in the spring of 2003, strict infection control measures were implemented in Toronto and surrounding hospitals. These measures included extreme restrictions on those who would normally accompany patients to the hospital, screening for SARS, and protective attire for hospital staff, including masks, face shields, goggles, gloves and gowns. At Toronto's Hospital for Sick Children (HSC), patients could only be accompanied or visited by one person, often only in patients' rooms. For the first four weeks, patients and their designated parent had to wear masks in almost all areas of the hospital. Staff wore masks (and other appropriate protective clothing) whenever in contact with patients and in many patient care areas. Although these barriers were an important part of containing SARS, their use created significant challenges for patients and staff. This article focusses on the use of infection control masks in routine pediatric healthcare and the tools developed by HSC staff to reduce the negative psychosocial impact on children and families.