Intraoperative CT Scan Verification of Pedicle Screw Placement in AIS to Prevent Malpositioned Screws: Safety Benefit and Cost.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective database review. OBJECTIVES: Determine if use of intraoperative 3D imaging of pedicle screw position provides clinical and cost benefit. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND: Injury or reoperation from malpositioned pedicle screws in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery occurs but is increasingly considered to be a never-event. To avoid complications, intraoperative 3D imaging of screw position may be obtained. METHODS: A prospective, consecutive AIS database at a high-volume pediatric spine center was examined three years before and after implementation of an intraoperative low-dose computed tomographic (CT) scan protocol. All screws were placed via freehand technique and corrected if found to be outside optimal trajectory on the postplacement CT scan. Demographic and outcome data were compared between cohorts, along with number, location, and reason for screw change. Cost analysis was based on the average cost of revision surgery for screw malposition versus intraoperative CT use. RESULTS: There were 153 patients in the pre-CT and 153 in the post-CT cohorts with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Two reoperations were needed for revision of improper screw placement in the pre-CT group and none in the post-CT group. Number of patients needed to harm was 76 (absolute risk increase = 1.31% [-0.49%, 3.11%]). Of those who had intraoperative CT scans, 80 (52.3%) needed on average 1.75 screw trajectories/lengths changed. Forty-three percent were medial breaches; of these, 39% were in the concavity. There were no differences between patients who did and did not need screw repositioning with regard to body mass index (BMI), age, curve size, surgeon/trainee side, screw density, or preoperative and one-year postoperative Scoliosis Research Society-22 patient questionnaire (SRS-22) scores. The average cost of reoperation for malposition was $4,900, whereas the cost of a single intraoperative CT was $232. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative CT is an effective tool to prevent reoperation in AIS surgery for incorrect screw placement. Despite high volume, experience, and specialty training, incorrect trajectories occur and systems should be in place for preventable error. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Are We Prescribing Our Patients Too Much Pain Medication? Best Predictors of Narcotic Usage After Spinal Surgery for Scoliosis.

BACKGROUND: Physicians play a role in the current prescription drug-abuse epidemic. Surgeons often prescribe more postoperative narcotic pain medication than patients routinely need. Although narcotics are effective for severe, acute, postoperative pain, few evidence-based guidelines exist regarding the routinely required amount and duration of use post-hospital discharge. METHODS: Patients in a prospective cohort undergoing posterior spinal fusion for idiopathic scoliosis were asked preoperatively to rate their pain level, the level of pain expected each week postoperatively, and their pain tolerance. Post-discharge pain scores and narcotic use were reported at weekly intervals for 4 weeks postoperatively. Demographic data, preoperative Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 scores, operative details, perioperative data, and self-reported pain levels were analyzed with respect to their association with total medication use and refills received. Disposal plans were also assessed. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were enrolled, and 85% completed the surveys. The mean patient age was 14.9 years; 69% of the patients were female. The cohort was divided into 3 groups on the basis of total medication usage. The mean number of pills used in the middle (average-use) group was 49 pills. In postoperative week 4, narcotic usage was minimal (a mean of 2.9 pills by the highest-use group). Also by this time point, pain scores had, on average, returned to preoperative levels. Older age, male sex, a higher body mass index, and a higher preoperative pain score were associated with increased narcotic use. Sixty-seven percent of the patients planned to dispose of their unused medication, although only 59% of those patients planned on doing so in a manner recommended by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative narcotic dosing may be improved by considering patient age, weight, sex, and preoperative pain score. The precise estimation of individual narcotic needs is complex. Patient and family education on the importance and proper method of narcotic disposal is an essential component of minimizing the availability of unused postoperative medication. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Ponte Osteotomies With Pedicle Screw Instrumentation in the Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Review of prospective database. OBJECTIVES: To report the results of Ponte osteotomy with pedicle screw instrumentation for major thoracic adolescent idiopathic (AIS) curves. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Ponte osteotomy for achieving coronal and sagittal correction of major thoracic curves in AIS with pedicle screw instrumentation is a widespread technique, but results have not been well described. METHODS: Review of 87 consecutive AIS patients with Lenke 1-4 curves who underwent Ponte osteotomies and pedicle screw instrumentation by 2 surgeons at a single institution. Surgical details, blood loss, and complications were recorded. We evaluated coronal and sagittal radiological measurements and Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22) questionnaire scores over 2-year follow-up. RESULTS: The mean preoperative thoracic coronal Cobb angle was 57° ± 9.7°, fulcrum flexibility was 47.2%, and lateral Cobb angle was 17.8° ± 4°. The mean estimated blood loss (EBL), expressed as percent estimated blood volume, was 35.8 ± 20.5 mL. There was significant improvement in coronal thoracic Cobb angle, percent correction, and apical vertebral translation over 2-year follow-up (p < .05). In hypokyphotic curves, there was a significant increase in lateral thoracic T5-T12 kyphosis from 8.1° to 18.3° (p < .001). In hyperkyphotic curves, mean lateral thoracic T5-T12 kyphosis improved from 45° to 26° (p < .001). Median SRS-22 domains were higher after treatment (p < .05). Complications included significant hypotension (1), EBL greater than 75% estimated blood volume (2), and wound infection needing drainage (2). There were neuromonitoring signal changes in 7 patients but no significant neurological complications. CONCLUSIONS: In this case series of major thoracic AIS curves treated with segmental pedicle screw instrumentation and Ponte osteotomies, there was an improvement in the coronal and sagittal radiological parameters. A prospective controlled study is needed to determine whether pedicle screw instrumentation and Ponte osteotomies influence outcomes and complications.

The association of backpack use and back pain in adolescents.

STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional study comprising the first phase of an ongoing, longitudinal prospective study was conducted. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relation between backpack use and back pain in adolescents. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The prevalence of nonspecific back pain increases dramatically during adolescence from less than 10% in the pre-teen-age years up to 50% in 15- to 16-year-olds. There is widespread concern that heavy backpacks carried by adolescents contribute to the development of back pain. METHODS: A total of 1126 children, ages 12 to 18 years, participated by completing a questionnaire about their health, activities, and backpack use. Each child's body weight, height, and backpack weight were measured. A child was classified as having back pain if one or more of the following were reported during the preceding month: neck or back pain that had interfered with school or leisure, neck or back pain with a severity rating of 2 or more on a scale 0 to 10, a visit to a physician or therapist for neck or back pain, or exemption from physical education or sports because of neck or back pain. RESULTS: Of 1122 backpack users, 74.4% were classified as having back pain, validated by significantly poorer general health, more limited physical functioning, and more bodily pain. As compared with no or low use of backpacks at school, heavy use (odds ratio, 1.98; P < 0.0001) was independently associated with back pain. Female gender and larger body mass index also were significantly associated with back pain. As compared with adolescents who had no back pain, adolescents with back pain carried significantly heavier backpacks that represented a significantly greater percentage of their body weights. CONCLUSION: The use of backpacks during the school day and backpack weights are independently associated with back pain.