Outcomes of Intravascular Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

PURPOSE: Vascular calcification is an important risk factor for endovascular treatment failure and complications in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is a pulsatile balloon-based device that has emerged as a tool in the treatment of calcified vessels. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IVL in the treatment of peripheral calcified lesions in CLTI patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed within a single institution. Thirty-six CLTI patients treated with IVL for peripheral calcified lesions from 2018 to 2022 were identified. Data on pre- and post-IVL luminal stenosis measured by digital subtraction angiography, lesion location, adjunctive therapies, ankle-brachial index (ABI), and intra-procedural complications were obtained. A total of 41 target lesions in twenty-eight patients were included, with ABI data available in 20 treated lower extremities. RESULTS: Across all 41 target lesions, IVL produced clinically significant luminal gain of 75.5% ± 23.0. Luminal gain by vessel location was 87.3% ± 15.8, 57% ± 25.7, and 78.5% ± 20.6 in the aortoiliac (n = 8), common femoral (n = 9), and femoropopliteal (n = 24) segments, respectively. Lesions treated with IVL alone yielded a luminal gain of 71.4% ± 25.6 (n = 10), while IVL alongside adjunctive therapy produced a luminal gain of 76.8% ± 22.4. In 20 treated lower extremities, ABI improvement of 0.20 ± 0.26 (p = 0.002) was recorded. Intra-procedural complications occurred in 1/36 patients, which was one instance of thrombus occurring prior to IVL. CONCLUSION: IVL may be an effective option for creating safe luminal gain and vessel preparation in patients with CLTI. Level of Evidence 2: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Stent Graft Outcomes in Dialysis Circuits: A Review of Clinical Trials and Literature.

End-stage renal disease is a prevalent medical condition causing significant problems as the majority of patients are being treated with dialysis. While dialysis provides a means to compensate for the renal impairment, arteriovenous grafts and fistulas are often complicated by neointimal hyperplasia, loss of primary patency, and graft failure. Over the last decade, stent grafts have emerged as an alternative to balloon angioplasty and bare metal stents for revascularization in the event of arteriovenous graft occlusion or stenosis. Several randomized controlled trials have investigated the efficacy of stent grafts compared with balloon angioplasty for improving the function and durability of dialysis circuits. In this review, we present a comprehensive review of clinical trials. Stent grafts appear to offer increased primary patency over balloon angioplasty in the treatment of dialysis circuit stenosis. However, there is generally no significant difference between the two treatment modalities on other clinically relevant measures like complication rates and overall survival.

Hepatic vein embolization after portal vein embolization to induce additional liver hypertrophy in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of salvage hepatic vein embolization (HVE) on the volume of the future liver remnant (FLR) for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and inadequate hypertrophy following initial portal vein embolization (PVE). METHODS: From April 2011 to October 2018, 9 patients with mCRC underwent HVE following PVE. The right or middle hepatic vein was embolized with coils and/or vascular plugs. Liver volumes were calculated at baseline, following PVE, and following HVE, in order to assess the hypertrophic effect of PVE and HVE on the FLR. RESULTS: Nine patients underwent HVE (n = 3, right HVE; n = 6, middle HVE) because of inadequate FLR hypertrophy following PVE. The standardized FLR increased from 0.16 (median, range 0.08-0.24) at baseline to 0.22 (median, range 0.13-0.29) following PVE (p = 0.0005) to 0.26 (median, range 0.19-0.37) following HVE (p = 0.0050). HVE was performed 40 days (median, range 19-128 days) following PVE, and assessment of FLR hypertrophy was performed 41 days (median, range 19-92 days) following HVE. Four of nine patients underwent hepatectomy; 5 patients failed to undergo hepatectomy (n = 3, inadequate hypertrophy; n = 1, disease progression; n = 1, portal hypertension). One patient required repeat HVE due to a patent accessory vein. CONCLUSIONS: Salvage HVE is an effective technique to induce additional FLR hypertrophy in patients with mCRC and inadequate FLR after initial PVE. KEY POINTS: • Hepatic vein embolization is effective to induce additional liver hypertrophy in surgical patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma and inadequate hypertrophy after portal vein embolization. • Increases in future liver remnant volume are feasible in patients who receive hepatotoxic neoadjuvant systemic therapy for metastatic colorectal carcinoma. • Sequential portal vein embolization and hepatic vein embolization can be a viable technique to induce liver hypertrophy in patients with small baseline future liver remnant volumes (< 20%).

Development of a predictive model for 6 month survival in patients with venous thromboembolism and solid malignancy requiring IVC filter placement.

PURPOSE: Our purpose was to develop a predictive model for short-term survival (i.e. <6 months) following inferior vena cava filter placement in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) and solid malignancy. METHODS: Clinical and laboratory parameters were retrospectively reviewed for patients with solid malignancy who received a filter between January 2009 and December 2011 at a tertiary care cancer center. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to assess variables associated with 6 month survival following filter placement in patients with VTE and solid malignancy. Significant variables were used to generate a predictive model. RESULTS: 397 patients with solid malignancy received a filter during the study period. Three variables were associated with 6 month survival: (1) serum albumin [hazard ratio (HR) 0.496, P < 0.0001], (2) recent or planned surgery (<30 days) (HR 0.409, P < 0.0001), (3) TNM staging (stage 1 or 2 vs. stage 4, HR 0.177, P = 0.0001; stage 3 vs. stage 4, HR 0.367, P = 0.0002). These variables were used to develop a predictive model to estimate 6 month survival with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.815, sensitivity of 0.782, and specificity of 0.715. CONCLUSIONS: Six month survival in patients with VTE and solid malignancy requiring filter placement can be predicted from three patient variables. Our predictive model could be used to help physicians decide whether a permanent or retrievable filter may be more appropriate as well as to assess the risks and benefits for filter retrieval within the context of survival longevity in patients with cancer.

Comprehensive Complication Index Predicts Cancer-specific Survival After Resection of Colorectal Metastases Independent of RAS Mutational Status.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate prognostic impact of postoperative complications for colorectal liver metastases (CLM) in the era of RAS mutation analysis. BACKGROUND: Postoperative complications have been associated with cancer-specific outcomes in multiple malignancies. METHODS: We identified 575 patients with known RAS mutation status who underwent hepatic resection for CLM during 2008 to 2014. Postoperative complications were scored with the comprehensive complication index (CCI), and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was used as an indicator of systemic inflammation before and after surgery. Survival after resection of CLM was stratified by CCI (high, ≥26.2; low, <26.2). RESULTS: Eighty-eight patients had high and 487 low CCI. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) after hepatic resection were worse in patients with high CCI than in patients with low CCI (RFS at 3 yrs 26% vs. 41%, P = 0.003; CSS at 5 yrs 46% vs. 64%, P = 0.003). High CCI (odds ratio 3.99, P <0.001) was associated with high NLR (>5) 3 months after hepatic resection. Five factors were associated with worse CSS: high CCI [hazard ratio (HR) 1.61, P = 0.022], primary positive node (HR 1.70, P = 0.003), multiple CLM (HR 1.72, P = 0.001), CLM ≥3 cm (HR 1.73, P <0.001), and mutant RAS (HR 2.04, P <0.001). Receiver operating characteristic and area under receiver operating characteristic curves revealed CCI to be a more sensitive, specific, and accurate predictor of RFS and CSS than NLR. CONCLUSIONS: High CCI is a potent predictor of worse RFS and CSS after resection of CLM. The ramifications of postsurgical complications extend beyond direct influence on patient outcomes to impact cancer-related survival.