Interval cancers after skin cancer screening: incidence, tumour characteristics and risk factors for cutaneous melanoma.

BACKGROUND: The rate of interval cancers is an established indicator for the performance of a cancer-screening programme. METHODS: We examined the incidence, tumour characteristics and risk factors of melanoma interval cancers that occurred in participants of the SCREEN project, which was carried out 2003/2004 in Schleswig-Holstein, Germany. Data from 350 306 SCREEN participants, who had been screened negative for melanoma, were linked to data of the state cancer registry. Melanoma interval cancers were defined as melanomas diagnosed within 4-24 months after SCREEN examination. Results were compared with melanomas of the pre-SCREEN era (1999-2002), extracted from the cancer registry. RESULTS: The overall relative incidence of melanoma interval cancers in terms of observed/expected ratio was 0.93 (95% CI: 0.82-1.05; in situ: 1.61 (1.32-1.95), invasive: 0.71 (0.60-0.84)). Compared with melanomas of the pre-SCREEN era, the interval melanomas were thinner and had a slightly greater proportion of lentigo maligna melanomas whereas nodular melanomas were less frequent. INTERPRETATION: The results indicate a moderate performance of the SCREEN intervention with an excess of in situ melanomas. In part, the findings might be due to specifics of the SCREEN project, in particular a short-term follow-up of patients at high risk for melanoma.

Conclusions for mammography screening after 25-year follow-up of the Canadian National Breast Cancer Screening Study (CNBSS).

UNLABELLED: Twenty-five-year follow-up data of the Canadian National Breast Cancer Screening Study (CNBSS) indicated no mortality reduction. What conclusions should be drawn? After conducting a systematic literature search and narrative analysis, we wish to recapitulate important details of this study, which may have been neglected: Sixty-eight percent of all included cancers were palpable, a situation that does not allow testing the value of early detection. Randomisation was performed at the sites after palpation, while blinding was not guaranteed. In the first round, this "randomisation" assigned 19/24 late stage cancers to the mammography group and only five to the control group, supporting the suspicion of severe errors in the randomisation process. The responsible physicist rated mammography quality as "far below state of the art of that time". Radiological advisors resigned during the study due to unacceptable image quality, training, and medical quality assurance. Each described problem may strongly influence the results between study and control groups. Twenty-five years of follow-up cannot heal these fundamental problems. This study is inappropriate for evidence-based conclusions. The technology and quality assurance of the diagnostic chain is shown to be contrary to today's screening programmes, and the results of the CNBSS are not applicable to them. KEY POINTS: • The evidence base of the Canadian study (CNBSS) has to be questioned.• Severe flaws in the randomization process and test methods occurred. • Problems were criticized during and after conclusion of the trial by experts.• The results are not applicable to quality-assured screening programs. • The evidence base of this study must be re-analyzed.

[Screening for colorectal, skin, breast and prostate cancer. Essential knowledge for counseling]. / Screening auf Kolorektal-, Haut-, Brust- und Prostatakrebs. Basiswissen für die Beratung.

The major goal of cancer screening programs is the reduction of disease-specific mortality by detecting malignant tumors in an early and still curable stage. Sensitive screening tests are used in apparently healthy people and conspicuous findings are referred for further investigations. Taking the personal disease risk into account, persons considering participation in a screening program should be informed about the methods, benefits and disadvantages of the screening program. This information, together with personal preferences, is the basis for a well-informed decision for or against participation in a screening program. This article imparts essential knowledge that is needed for individual medical counseling on screening for colorectal, skin, breast and prostate cancer.

Alterations in pulmonary function in inflammatory bowel disease are frequent and persist during remission.

OBJECTIVES: Information on the occurrence and frequency of pulmonary involvement in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is inconsistent. The aim of this prospective study was to determine the frequency and type of pulmonary dysfunction in patients with IBD. METHODS: Sixty-six patients with IBD (35 with Crohn's disease [CD] and 31 with ulcerative colitis [UC]) and 30 control patients were investigated with respect to the following pulmonary function tests: forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), inspiratory vital capacity (IVC), Tiffeneau value (FEV1/IVC), and lung CO transfer capacity (D(LCO)). Disease activity in IBD patients was assessed by the CD activity index for CD and the Truelove index for UC, respectively. Smoking habits and medication were documented in every patient. RESULTS: Fourteen of 36 CD patients (39%) and 14 of 31 UC patients (45%) but only one of the controls exhibited at least one pathological (<80% of predicted value) pulmonary function test. In both CD and UC lung function tests were significantly decreased in comparison to the control group. This could be shown for FEV1 (-14% of predicted value in CD and -17% in UC, p < 0.01), IVC (-10% in CD and -12% in UC, p < 0.05), and DLCO (-20% in CD and -31% in UC, p < 0.01) without significant differences between both disease entities. The impairment of pulmonary function tests was more pronounced in patients with active disease than in those with inactive disease (FEV1, 81.4% vs 93.4% predicted, p < 0.02; IVC, 84.4% vs 93.7%, p < 0.05; DLCO, 80.4% vs 95.8%, ns). CONCLUSIONS: IBD patients show significantly decreased lung function tests in comparison to healthy controls. The impairment in active disease exceeded that during remission.

Minimal renal dysfunction in inflammatory bowel disease is related to disease activity but not to 5-ASA use.

BACKGROUND: Conflicting data exist about proteinuria in inflammatory bowel diseases. It is still unclear whether the occurrence of proteinuria in inflammatory bowel disease patients is an extra-intestinal manifestation of disease or the result of adverse effects to medication, especially to aminosalicylates (ASA). METHODS: A total of 95 patients (51 with Crohn's disease and 44 with ulcerative colitis) were enrolled in the study. Disease activity was assessed by Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) or the Truelove index, respectively. Urine was collected over 24 h and protein excretion of specific marker proteins for tubular (alpha 1-microglobulin-alpha 1-MG) and glomerular (albumin-Alb, Immunoglobulin G-IgG) dysfunction was measured using a highly sensitive immunoluminometric assay. RESULTS: Out of 51 Crohn's disease patients, 20 showed elevated urinary alpha 1-MG. The amount of alpha 1-MGuria was strongly correlated to the CDAI (r=0.6, P < 0.001). Only four Crohn's disease patients showed slightly elevated values for glomerular proteins in urine. Similar results were obtained for ulcerative colitis: whereas only two ulcerative colitis patients showed albuminuria, tubular proteinuria was detected in 28 out of 44 ulcerative colitis patients. Proteinuria was strongly dependent on disease activity (P < 0.01) but was not related to ASA treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Proteinuria of tubular marker proteins occurs in the majority of inflammatory bowel disease patients and is related to disease activity rather than to ASA treatment. Tubular proteinuria seems to reflect a renal extra-intestinal manifestation of inflammatory bowel disease and may serve as a new relevant marker of disease activity.