The Cost of After-Hour Electroencephalography.

Background and Objectives: High costs associated with after-hour electroencephalography (EEG) constitute a barrier for financially constrained hospitals to provide this neurodiagnostic procedure outside regular working hours. Our study aims to deepen our understanding of the cost elements involved in delivering EEG services during after-hours. Methods: We accessed publicly available data sets and created a cost model depending on 3 most commonly seen staffing scenarios: (1) technologist on-site, (2) technologist on-call from home, and (3) a hybrid of the two. Results: Cost of EEG depends on the volume of testing and the staffing plan. Within the various cost elements, labor cost of EEG technologists is the predominant expenditure, which varies across geographic regions and urban areas. Discussion: We provide a model to explain why access to EEGs during after-hours has a substantial expense. This model provides a cost calculator tool (made available as part of this publication in eAppendix 1, links.lww.com/CPJ/A513) to estimate the cost of EEG platform based on site-specific staffing scenarios and annual volume.

Electroencephalography, electrocorticography, and cortical stimulation techniques.

Electroencephalography (EEG) and electrocorticography (ECoG) are two important neurophysiologic techniques used in the operating room for monitoring and mapping electrical brain activity. In this chapter, we detail their principle, recording methodology, and address specifics of their interpretation in the intraoperative setting (e.g., effect of anesthetics), as well as their clinical applications in epilepsy and non-epilepsy surgeries. In addition, we address differences between scalp, surface, and deep cortical recordings that will help towards a more reliable interpretation of the significance of electrophysiologic parameters such as amplitude and morphology as well as in differentiation between abnormal and normal patterns of electrical brain activity. Electrical stimulation is used for intraoperative mapping of different cortical functions such as language, parietal, and motor. Stimulation paradigms used in clinical practice vary with regard to stimulation frequencies and probes being used. Parameters, such as the number of phases per pulse, pulse/phase duration, pulse frequency, organization, and polarity, define their characteristics, including their safety, propensity to trigger seizures, efficiency and reliability of stimulation, and the mapping thresholds. Specifically, in this chapter, we will address differences between monopolar and bipolar stimulation; anodal and cathodal polarity; monophasic and biphasic pulses; constant voltage, and constant current paradigms.

Neurophysiology during epilepsy surgery.

Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) complements modern presurgical investigations by providing information about the epileptic focus as well as real-time identification of critical functional tissue and assessment of ongoing neural integrity during resective epilepsy surgery. This chapter summarizes current IONM methods for mapping the epileptic focus and for mapping and monitoring functionally important structures with direct brain stimulation and evoked potentials. These techniques include electrocorticography, computerized high-frequency oscillation mapping, single-pulse electric stimulation, cortical and subcortical motor evoked potentials, somatosensory evoked potentials, visual evoked potentials, and cortico-cortical evoked potentials. They may help to maximize epileptic tissue resection while avoiding permanent postoperative neurologic deficits.

Monitoring scoliosis and other spinal deformity surgeries.

Surgery to correct a spinal deformity incurs a risk of injury to the spinal cord and roots. Injuries include postoperative paraplegia. Surgery for cervical myelopathy also incurs risk for postoperative motor deficits, as well as nerve injury most commonly at the C5 root. Risks can be mitigated by monitoring the nervous system during surgery. Ideally, monitoring detects an impending injury in time to intervene and correct the impairment before it becomes permanent. Monitoring includes several modalities of testing. Somatosensory evoked potentials measure axonal conduction in the spinal cord posterior columns. This can be checked almost continuously during surgery. Motor evoked potentials measure conduction along the lateral corticospinal tracts. Because motor pathway stimulation often produces a patient movement on the table, these often are tested periodically rather than continuously. Electromyography observes for spontaneous discharges accompanying injuries, and is useful to assess misplacement of pedicle screws. Literature demonstrates the usefulness of these techniques, their association with reducing motor adverse outcomes, and the relative value of the techniques. Neurophysiologic monitoring for scoliosis, kyphosis, and cervical myelopathy surgery are addressed, along with background information about those conditions.

Overview of intraoperative neuromonitoring.

Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) is used widely to reduce neurologic adverse postoperative outcomes. A variety of techniques are used. Initial techniques were used as far back as the 1930s, and the variety of methods expanded greatly since the 1980s. Many methods monitor baseline findings over time. Other methods test for neurologic function to identify nerves or eloquent cortex. Physicians trained in neurophysiology are key for interpretation of findings, supervision of staff, and making medical recommendations to the surgeon or anesthesiologist. Some neurophysiologists provide the services personally, and in other circumstances well-trained technologist staff help with the techniques. Much IONM is provided by the neurophysiology physician in the operating room, whereas in other cases, the physician may be on-line in real time from a remote site. When monitoring identifies changes, the IONM team must give a clear, timely, and compelling message to the surgeon and anesthesiologist.

Epidural electrical stimulation of the cervical spinal cord opposes opioid-induced respiratory depression.

Opioid overdose suppresses brainstem respiratory circuits, causes apnoea and may result in death. Epidural electrical stimulation (EES) at the cervical spinal cord facilitated motor activity in rodents and humans, and we hypothesized that EES of the cervical spinal cord could antagonize opioid-induced respiratory depression in humans. Eighteen patients requiring surgical access to the dorsal surface of the spinal cord between C2 and C7 received EES or sham stimulation for up to 90 s at 5 or 30 Hz during complete (OFF-State) or partial suppression (ON-State) of respiration induced by remifentanil. During the ON-State, 30 Hz EES at C4 and 5 Hz EES at C3/4 increased tidal volume and decreased the end-tidal carbon dioxide level compared to pre-stimulation control levels. EES of 5 Hz at C5 and C7 increased respiratory frequency compared to pre-stimulation control levels. In the OFF-State, 30 Hz cervical EES at C3/4 terminated apnoea and induced rhythmic breathing. In cadaveric tissue obtained from a brain bank, more neurons expressed both the neurokinin 1 receptor (NK1R) and somatostatin (SST) in the cervical spinal levels responsive to EES (C3/4, C6 and C7) compared to a region non-responsive to EES (C2). Thus, the capacity of cervical EES to oppose opioid depression of respiration may be mediated by NK1R+/SST+ neurons in the dorsal cervical spinal cord. This study provides proof of principle that cervical EES may provide a novel therapeutic approach to augment respiratory activity when the neural function of the central respiratory circuits is compromised by opioids or other pathological conditions. KEY POINTS: Epidural electrical stimulation (EES) using an implanted spinal cord stimulator (SCS) is an FDA-approved method to manage chronic pain. We tested the hypothesis that cervical EES facilitates respiration during administration of opioids in 18 human subjects who were treated with low-dose remifentanil that suppressed respiration (ON-State) or high-dose remifentanil that completely inhibited breathing (OFF-State) during the course of cervical surgery. Dorsal cervical EES of the spinal cord augmented the respiratory tidal volume or increased the respiratory frequency, and the response to EES varied as a function of the stimulation frequency (5 or 30 Hz) and the cervical level stimulated (C2-C7). Short, continuous cervical EES restored a cyclic breathing pattern (eupnoea) in the OFF-State, suggesting that cervical EES reversed the opioid-induced respiratory depression. These findings add to our understanding of respiratory pattern modulation and suggest a novel mechanism to oppose the respiratory depression caused by opioids.

Clinical Neurophysiology Fellowship Program Directors Survey on a Standardized Fellowship Match Process: A Call for Action.

PURPOSE: To survey US Clinical Neurophysiology (CNP) fellowship program directors on the nature of CNP and related training programs, current recruitment cycle, and views for a standardized process. METHODS: A 23-question electronic survey was sent to all 93 US Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited CNP fellowship program directors from December 2020 to January 2021. RESULTS: The response rate was 60%. There was great variability in the number of CNP positions and CNP tracks offered. The following tracks were identified: 48% EEG dominant, 26% EMG dominant, 22% split equally between EEG and EMG, and 2% and 1% were neurophysiologic intraoperative monitoring and autonomic dominant, respectively. Of the responding institutions, 43% offered a second year of training options to CNP fellows, mainly in conjunction with Epilepsy fellowship, which was pursued by 25% of CNP fellows. Many programs indicated flexibility in their design between different CNP tracks or between CNP and other related training programs based on the available candidates. The median percentage of CNP fellowship positions filled over the last 5 years was 80%, and there was great variation in the recruitment timeline across institutions. Overall, 86% of program directors favored a universal timeline and 71% favored a formal match for CNP. The respondents were split between an independent CNP match (39%) and joining the initiatives of affiliate societies on a standardized process (61%). CONCLUSIONS: There is significant heterogeneity in the makeup of the CNP fellowship programs and the recruitment process. The majority of CNP program directors are in favor of standardization of the recruitment process.

Spinal cord monitoring.

Spinal cord surgery carries the risk of spinal cord or nerve root injury. Neurophysiologic monitoring decreases risk of injury by continuous assessment of spinal cord and nerve root function throughout surgery. Techniques include somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs), transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials (MEPs), and electromyography (EMG). Baseline neurophysiologic data are obtained prior to incision. Real-time signal changes are identified in time to correct compromised neural function. Such monitoring improves postoperative neurologic functional outcomes. Challenges in neurophysiologic intraoperative monitoring (NIOM) include effects of anesthetics, neuromuscular blockade, hypotension, hypothermia, and preexisting neurological conditions, e.g., neuropathy or myelopathy. Technical factors causing poor quality data must be overcome in the electrically noisy operating room environment. Experienced monitoring teams understand tactics to obtain quality recordings and consider confounding variables before raising alarms when change occurs. Once an alert is raised, surgeons and anesthesiologists respond with a variety of actions, such as raising blood pressure or adjusting retractors. In experienced hands, NIOM significantly reduces postoperative neurological deficits, e.g., 60% reduction in risk of paraplegia and paraparesis. A technologist in the operating room sets up the NIOM procedure. An experienced clinical neurophysiologist supervises the case, either in the operating room or remotely on-line continuously in real time.

Neurocritical Care Coding for Neurologists.

Coding specifies the work performed when providing patient care. Critical care services mostly use code 99291, and other codes specify additional time and procedures. Current Procedural Terminology defines critically ill as "a high probability of imminent or life-threatening deterioration in the patient's condition," a condition necessary for use of the critical care code. A patient may be critically ill for neurologic reasons even when stable from a cardiorespiratory status. Rules govern who can use these codes, whether they can be used by more than one physician, the locations where the code may be used, and what services are included and excluded. Physicians need to document the medical necessity of visits and nature of critical illness or high-risk medical decision making because auditors may not understand the nature of serious neurologic illness.