RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The first international consensus criteria for optic neuritis (ICON) were published in 2022. We applied these criteria to a prospective, global observational study of acute optic neuritis (ON). METHODS: We included 160 patients with a first-ever acute ON suggestive of a demyelinating CNS disease from the Acute Optic Neuritis Network (ACON). We applied the 2022 ICON to all participants and subsequently adjusted the ICON by replacing a missing relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD) or dyschromatopsia if magnetic resonance imaging pathology of the optical nerve plus optical coherence tomography abnormalities or certain biomarkers are present. RESULTS: According to the 2022 ICON, 80 (50%) patients were classified as definite ON, 12 (7%) patients were classified as possible ON, and 68 (43%) as not ON (NON). The main reasons for classification as NON were absent RAPD (52 patients, 76%) or dyschromatopsia (49 patients, 72%). Distribution of underlying ON etiologies was as follows: 78 (49%) patients had a single isolated ON, 41 (26%) patients were diagnosed with multiple sclerosis, 25 (16%) patients with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease, and 15 (9%) with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder. The application of the adjusted ON criteria yielded a higher proportion of patients classified as ON (126 patients, 79%). INTERPRETATION: According to the 2022 ICON, almost half of the included patients in ACON did not fulfill the requirements for classification of definite or possible ON, particularly due to missing RAPD and dyschromatopsia. Thorough RAPD examination and formal color vision testing are critical to the application of the 2022 ICON.
RESUMEN
Optic neuritis (ON) often occurs at the presentation of multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD), and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibody-associated disease (MOGAD). The recommended treatment of high-dose corticosteroids for ON is based on a North American study population, which did not address treatment timing or antibody serostatus. The Acute Optic Neuritis Network (ACON) presents a global, prospective, observational study protocol primarily designed to investigate the effect of time to high-dose corticosteroid treatment on 6-month visual outcomes in ON. Patients presenting within 30 days of the inaugural ON will be enrolled. For the primary analysis, patients will subsequently be assigned into the MS-ON group, the aquapotin-4-IgG positive ON (AQP4-IgG+ON) group or the MOG-IgG positive ON (MOG-IgG+ON) group and then further sub-stratified according to the number of days from the onset of visual loss to high-dose corticosteroids (days-to-Rx). The primary outcome measure will be high-contrast best-corrected visual acuity (HC-BCVA) at 6 months. In addition, multimodal data will be collected in subjects with any ON (CIS-ON, MS-ON, AQP4-IgG+ON or MOG-IgG+ON, and seronegative non-MS-ON), excluding infectious and granulomatous ON. Secondary outcomes include low-contrast best-corrected visual acuity (LC-BCVA), optical coherence tomography (OCT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements, serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers (AQP4-IgG and MOG-IgG levels, neurofilament, and glial fibrillary protein), and patient reported outcome measures (headache, visual function in daily routine, depression, and quality of life questionnaires) at presentation at 6-month and 12-month follow-up visits. Data will be collected from 28 academic hospitals from Africa, Asia, the Middle East, Europe, North America, South America, and Australia. Planned recruitment consists of 100 MS-ON, 50 AQP4-IgG+ON, and 50 MOG-IgG+ON. This prospective, multimodal data collection will assess the potential value of early high-dose corticosteroid treatment, investigate the interrelations between functional impairments and structural changes, and evaluate the diagnostic yield of laboratory biomarkers. This analysis has the ability to substantially improve treatment strategies and the accuracy of diagnostic stratification in acute demyelinating ON. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT05605951.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The growing burden of Parkinson's disease (PD) in Africa necessitates the identification of available therapies and services to improve patient care. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the availability, affordability, frequency of usage, and insurance coverage of PD therapies (pharmacological, surgical, physical, and speech therapies) and services including specialized clinics, specialists, and nurses across Africa. METHODS: A comprehensive web-based survey was constructed and distributed to neurologists/physicians with a special interest in PD across Africa. The survey instrument includes components that address availability, affordability, frequency of use, and insurance coverage of different therapies and services. RESULTS: Responses were received from 28 (of 43 contacted) countries. Levodopa-based oral preparations were always available in 13 countries (46.4%) with variable affordability and "partial or no" insurance coverage in 60% of countries. Bromocriptine was the most available (50%) and affordable ergot dopamine agonists (DA), whereas non-ergot DA was always available in only six countries (21.4%). Trihexyphenidyl was the most available and affordable anticholinergic drug (46.4%). Tricyclic antidepressants and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors were available in most countries (89.3% and 85.7% respectively), with variable affordability. Quetiapine and clozapine were less available. Specialized clinics and nurses were available in 25% and 7.1% of countries surveyed, respectively. Other services were largely unavailable in the countries surveyed. CONCLUSION: PD-specific therapies and services are largely unavailable and unaffordable in most African countries. The data provide a platform for organizing strategies to initiate or scale up existing services and drive policies aimed at improving access to care and tailoring education programs in Africa. © 2021 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Parkinson , África , Agonistas de Dopamina , Humanos , Levodopa , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad de Parkinson/epidemiología , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the commonest sustained cardiac arrhythmia associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Notwithstanding the scale of the problem, there are sparse data on the characteristics and outcomes of both valvular and non-valvular AF patients in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). OBJECTIVE: This study aimed at describing the clinical features and outcome of AF patients at a tertiary hospital in Botswana. METHODS: This prospective study was carried out in the Princess Marina Hospital in Gaborone, Botswana between August 2016 and July 2018. We consecutively enrolled 138 (97.8% black Africans) adult patients with electrocardiographically documented AF. Their baseline clinical and biomedical data were documented, and each patient was followed up for 12 months. The primary study outcome was 12-month all-cause mortality. RESULTS: The mean [standard deviation (SD) ] age of enrolled patients was 66.7 (17.2) years, and 63.8% were females. Common co-morbidities were hypertension (59.4%), rheumatic heart disease (37.7%) and heart failure (35.5%). Stroke/transient ischaemic attack (TIA) (21.7%) and obesity (34.8%) were also prevalent. Compared to patients with non-valvular AF, those with valvular AF were more likely to be female (82 vs 55%, p = 0.003), younger (60 vs 75 years, p < 0.001), on anticoagulation (88.6 vs 66% p = 0.005), or have a dilated left atrium (5.3 vs 4.5 cm, p < 0.001). They were also less likely to present with hypertension (33 vs 72%, p < 0.001), stroke/TIA (nine vs 27%, p < 0.017), chronic kidney disease (five vs 20%, p < 0.02), or history of cigarette smoking (two vs 13%, p = 0.049) than non-valvular AF patients. The mean (SD) CHA2DS2-VASc score in non-valvular AF patients was 3.6 (1.5), and the median HAS-BLED score was 2.0 [interquartile range (IQR) 1.0-3.0]. During the 12-month follow up, 20 (14.5%) patients died. Despite differences in baseline characteristics, there was no difference in mortality rate in patients with valvular compared to those with non-valvular AF (13.8 vs 15.9%; p = 0.746). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, hypertension, rheumatic heart disease and heart failure were the most prevalent co-morbidities. AF presented in young people and conferred high mortality rates in both valvular and non-valvular AF patients. Prevention and optimal management of AF and associated co-morbidities are of critical importance.