Current US prevalence of myocardial injury patterns and clinical outcomes among hospitalised patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia: insight from the National Inpatient Sample-a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) increases propensity for premature atherosclerotic disease. Knowledge of inpatient outcomes among patients with FH admitted with acute myocardial injury (AMI) is limited. OBJECTIVES: Our study aimed to identify myocardial injury types, including type 1 myocardial infarction (MI), type 2 MI and takotsubo cardiomyopathy, assess lesion severity and study adverse short-term inpatient outcomes among patients with FH admitted with AMI. SETTING: Our study retrospectively queried the US National Inpatient Sample from 2018 to 2020. POPULATION: Adults admitted with AMI and dichotomised based on the presence of FH. STUDY OUTCOMES: We evaluated myocardial injury types and complexity of coronary revascularisation. Primary outcome of all-cause mortality and other clinical secondary outcomes were studied. RESULTS: There were 3 711 765 admissions with AMI including 2360 (0.06%) with FH. FH was associated with higher odds of ST-elevation MI (STEMI) (adjusted OR (aOR): 1.62, p<0.001) and non-ST-elevation MI (NSTEMI) (aOR: 1.29, p<0.001) but lower type 2 MI (aOR: 0.39, p<0.001) and takotsubo cardiomyopathy (aOR: 0.36, p=0.004). FH was associated with higher multistent percutaneous coronary interventions (aOR: 2.36, p<0.001), multivessel coronary artery bypass (aOR: 2.65, p<0.001), higher odds of intracardiac thrombus (aOR: 3.28, p=0.038) and mechanical circulatory support (aOR: 1.79, p<0.001). There was 50% reduction in odds of all-cause mortality (aOR: 0.50, p=0.006) and lower odds of mechanical ventilation (aOR: 0.37, p<0.001). There was no difference in rate of ventricular tachycardia, cardioversion, new implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation, cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest. CONCLUSION: Among patients hospitalised with AMI, FH was associated with higher STEMI and NSTEMI, lower type 2 MI and takotsubo cardiomyopathy, higher number of multiple stents and coronary bypasses, and mechanical circulatory support device but was associated with lower all-cause mortality and rate of mechanical ventilation.

Review of the Association Between Long-Term and Current Systemic Steroid Use With Electromechanical Complications and Inpatient Mortality After ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Background The impact of long-term systemic steroid use on electrical and mechanical complications following ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has not been extensively studied. Methods In a retrospective cohort study of the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 2018 to 2020, adults admitted with STEMI were dichotomized based on the presence of long-term (current) systemic steroid (LTCSS) use. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included a composite of mechanical complications, electrical, hemodynamic, and thrombotic complications, as well as revascularization complexity, length of stay (LOS), and total charge. Multivariate linear and logistic regressions were used to adjust for confounders. Results Out of 608,210 admissions for STEMI, 5,310 (0.9%) had LTCSS use. There was no significant difference in the odds of all-cause mortality (aOR: 0.89, 95%CI: 0.74-1.08, p-value: 0.245) and the composite of mechanical complications (aOR: 0.74, 95%CI: 0.25-2.30, p-value: 0.599). LTCSS use was associated with lower odds of ventricular tachycardia, atrioventricular blocks, new permanent-pacemaker insertion, cardiogenic shock, the need for mechanical circulatory support, mechanical ventilation, cardioversion, a reduced LOS by 1 day, and a reduced total charge by 34,512 USD (all p-values: <0.05). There were no significant differences in the revascularization strategy (coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) vs. percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI)) or in the incidence of composite thrombotic events. Conclusion LTCSS use among patients admitted with STEMI was associated with lower odds of electrical dysfunction and hemodynamic instability but no difference in the odds of mechanical complications, CABG rate, all-cause mortality, cardiac arrest, or thrombotic complications. Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate these findings further.