Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
1.
PLoS One ; 13(4): e0192205, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29652882

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus is a chronic disease with a high prevalence across the world as well as in South Korea. Most cases of diabetes can be adequately managed at physician offices, but many diabetes patients receive outpatient care at hospitals. This study examines the relationship between supplementary private health insurance (SPHI) ownership and the use of hospitals among diabetes outpatients within the universal public health insurance scheme. METHODS: Data from the 2011 Korea Health Panel, a nationally representative sample of Korean individuals, was used. For the study, 6,379 visits for diabetes care were selected while controlling for clustered errors. Multiple logistic regression models were used to examine determinants of hospital outpatient services. RESULTS: This study demonstrated that the variables of self-rated health status, comorbidity, unmet need, and alcohol consumption significantly correlated with the choice to use a hospital services. Patients with SPHI were more likely to use medical services at hospitals by 1.71 times (95% CI 1.068-2.740, P = 0.026) compared to patients without SPHI. CONCLUSIONS: It was confirmed that diabetic patients insured by SPHI had more use of hospital services than those who were not insured. People insured by SPHI seem to be more likely to use hospital services because SPHI lightens the economic burden of care.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Diabetes Mellitus/economía , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Consultorios Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Sector Privado
2.
Geriatr Gerontol Int ; 17(5): 737-743, 2017 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27215376

RESUMEN

AIM: To determine whether age, proximity to death and long-term care insurance certification are related to receiving hospital inpatient care; the number of hospital bed days (HBD) among older Japanese adults in the last year of life; and to estimate the total number of HBD. METHODS: Using health insurance claims and death certificate data, the present retrospective cohort study examined the HBD of city residents aged ≥65 years who died between September 2006 and October 2009 in Soma City, Japan. Using a two-part model, factors associated with receiving hospital inpatient care and the total number of HBD in each quarter in the last year of life were examined. RESULTS: The total number of HBD in the last year of life varied widely; 13% had no admission, and 27% stayed ≥90 days. Younger age, approaching death and having long-term care insurance certification were significantly associated with being more likely to receive hospital inpatient care during each quarterly period in the last year of life. In contrast, having long-term care insurance certification and the last 3-month period before death, compared with the first 3-month period, were significantly associated with a fewer number of HBD. CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed that older age was associated with being less likely to receive hospital inpatient care. The findings regarding the risk of inpatient care and total number of HBD in the last year of life help to understand resource use among older dying adults, and to develop evidence-based healthcare policies within aging societies. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2017; 17: 737-743.


Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Recursos en Salud/economía , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Pacientes Internos/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Cuidados a Largo Plazo/tendencias , Cuidado Terminal , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Certificado de Defunción , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Japón , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Población Urbana
3.
Osong Public Health Res Perspect ; 4(6): 329-41, 2013 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24524022

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The study objective was to identify the factors that influence the length of stay (LOS) in hospital for stroke patients and to provide data for managing hospital costs by managing the LOS. METHODS: This study used data from the Discharge Injury Survey of the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which included 17,364 cases from 2005 to 2008. RESULT: The LOS for stroke, cerebral infarction, intracerebral hemorrhage, and subarachnoid hemorrhage was 18.6, 15.0, 28.9, and 25.3 days, respectively. Patients who underwent surgery had longer LOS. When patients were divided based on whether they had surgery, there was a 2.4-time difference in the LOS for patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, 2.0-time difference for patients with cerebral infarction, and 1.4-time difference for patients with intracerebral hemorrhage. The emergency route of admission and other diagnosis increased LOS, whereas hypertension and diabetic mellitus reduced LOS. CONCLUSION: In the present rapidly changing hospital environments, hospitals approach an efficient policy for LOS, to maintain their revenues and quality of assessment. If LOS is used as the indicator of treatment expenses, there is a need to tackle factors that influence the LOS of stroke patients for each disease group who are divided based on whether surgery is performed or not for the proper management of the LOS.

4.
J Formos Med Assoc ; 108(12): 912-20, 2009 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20040455

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The coverage of social health insurance has remained limited, despite it being compulsory in Korea. Accordingly, Koreans have come to rely upon supplementary private health insurance (PHI) to cover their medical costs. We examined the effects of supplementary PHI on physician visits in Korea. METHODS: This study used individual data from 11,043 respondents who participated in the Korean Labor and Income Panel Survey in 2001. We conducted a single probit model to identify the relationship between PHI and physician visits, with adjustment for the following covariates: demographic characteristics, socioeconomic status, health status, and health-related behavior. Finally, we performed a bivariate probit model to examine the true effect of PHI on physician visits, with adjustment for the above covariates plus unobservable covariates that might affect not only physician visit, but also the purchase of PHI. RESULTS: We found that about 38% of all respondents had one or more private health plans. Forty-five percent of all respondents visited one or more physicians, and 49% of those who were privately insured had physician visits compared with 42% of the uninsured. The single probit model showed that those with PHI were about 14 percentage points more likely to visit physicians than those who do not have PHI. However, this distinction disappears in the bivariate probit model. This result might have been a consequence of the nature of private health plans in Korea. Private insurance companies pay a fixed amount directly to their enrollees in case of illness/injury, and the individuals are responsible subsequently for purchasing their own healthcare services. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the potential of Korean PHI to address the problem of moral hazard. These results serve as a reference for policy makers when considering how to finance healthcare services, as well as to contain healthcare expenditure.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Cobertura del Seguro , Seguro de Salud , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Corea (Geográfico) , Masculino , Ahorros Médicos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sector Privado
5.
Tohoku J Exp Med ; 219(3): 223-30, 2009 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19851051

RESUMEN

Periodic health examinations (PHEs) are prevalent in Korea. While some people frequently use public PHEs, others use private PHEs with high fees. This study examined the determinants of the use of public and private PHEs using a multinomial logit model. We used the data from the Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging (KLoSA) Wave I conducted in 2006. The KLoSA was a national longitudinal study of a representative sample of individuals (n = 10,253) aged 45 years or older. The mean age of the sample was 61.6 years; 77.8% of subjects were married and 37.5% had at least a high school education. The most frequent type of PHE usage was public PHEs only (38.9%), followed by private PHEs only (7.3%) and both public and private PHEs (6.5%). This study found that subjects who lived in rural areas or who were employed were significantly more likely to use public PHEs because of many public health facilities in rural area and mandatory public PHEs for employees. Those who used private PHEs only were educated, wealthy, or unhealthy, because private PHEs required out-of-pocket payments and provided higher quality services. Those who used both types of PHE had a high socio-economic status or a bad health status. The authors suggest that policy makers pay attention to the use of public PHEs among populations with lower socio-economic status. As for the group of subjects who use both types of PHE, their overutilization of PHEs must be reduced through cooperation between the public and private PHEs.


Asunto(s)
Demografía , Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Examen Físico/estadística & datos numéricos , Sector Privado/estadística & datos numéricos , Sector Público/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis de Regresión , Factores Socioeconómicos
6.
Health Policy ; 87(1): 20-30, 2008 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18067988

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the association between patient age and cumulative resource use during a 1-year period among patients in a Japanese hospital, as well as the equality of resource distribution between age groups. METHODS: We analyzed the administrative data for 9695 patients 35 years or older at a tertiary hospital. Multiple linear regression models were used to identify factors associated with cumulative resource use, including total charges, diagnostic examination charges, and drug charges, during a 1-year period. Gini coefficients were estimated to examine equality of cumulative resource use between age groups. RESULTS: Multiple linear regression analyses revealed a quadratic relationship between age and cumulative charges for all fees, diagnostic examinations, and drugs among surviving patients. However, age did not significantly associate with cumulative resource use among non-surviving patients. On the other hand, the cumulative duration of hospitalization (natural log-transformed) was strongly associated with resource use among all patients, both surviving and non-surviving. Cumulative resource use for inpatients was substantially unequal, but these inequalities of resource use did not correspond to age divisions. CONCLUSIONS: No linear association was found between patient age and cumulative resource use during a 1-year period among either surviving or non-surviving patients on multivariate regression analyses and the inequality of resource use among non-surviving patients differed by age group.


Asunto(s)
Factores de Edad , Gastos en Salud/tendencias , Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización , Hospitales de Enseñanza , Pacientes , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Precios de Hospital/tendencias , Humanos , Japón , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
7.
Qual Saf Health Care ; 16(2): 101-4, 2007 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17403754

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Delays and underreporting limit the success of hospital incident reporting systems, but little is known about the causes or implications of delayed reporting. SETTING AND METHODS: The authors examined 6880 incident reports filed by physicians and nurses for three years at a national university hospital in Japan and evaluated the lag time between each incident and the submission of a report. RESULTS: Although physicians and nurses reported nearly equal numbers of events resulting in major injury (32 v 31), physicians reported far fewer minor incidents (430 v 6387) and far fewer incidents overall (462 v 6418). In univariate analyses, lag time was significantly longer for physicians than nurses (3.79 v 2.20 days; p<0.001). In multivariate analysis, physicians had adjusted reporting lag time 75% longer than nurses (p<0.001) and lag time for major injuries was 18% shorter than for minor injuries (p = 0.011). Adjusted lag time in 2002 and 2004 were 34% longer than in 2003 (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Physicians report fewer incidents than nurses and take longer to report them. Quantitative evaluation of lag time may facilitate improvements in incident reporting systems by distinguishing institutional obstacles to physician reporting from physicians' lesser willingness to report.


Asunto(s)
Errores Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Gestión de Riesgos , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Análisis de Varianza , Recolección de Datos , Documentación/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Universitarios/organización & administración , Humanos , Japón , Errores Médicos/prevención & control , Distribución de Poisson , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , Seguridad , Factores de Tiempo
8.
Health Econ ; 16(4): 347-59, 2007 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17031780

RESUMEN

Though risk adjustment is necessary in order to make equitable comparisons of resource utilization in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction patients, there is little in the literature that can be practically applied without access to clinical records or specialized registries. The aim of this study is to show that effective models of resource utilization can be developed based on administrative data, and to demonstrate a practical application of the same models by comparing the risk-adjusted performance of the hospitals in our dataset. The study sample included 1748 AMI cases discharged from 10 large, private teaching hospitals in Japan, between 10 April 2001 and 30 June 2004. Explanatory variables included procedures (CABG and PCI), length of stay, outcome, patient demographics, diagnosis and comorbidity status. Multiple linear regression models constructed for the study were able to account for 66.5, 27.7, and 58.4% of observed variation in total charges, length of stay and charges per day, respectively. The performance of models constructed for this study was comparable to or better than performance reported by other studies that made use of explanatory variables extracted from clinical data. The use of administrative data in risk adjustment makes broad scale application of risk adjustment feasible.


Asunto(s)
Recursos en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Registros de Hospitales , Hospitales Privados/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales de Enseñanza/estadística & datos numéricos , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Ajuste de Riesgo , Enfermedad Aguda , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Recursos en Salud/organización & administración , Precios de Hospital , Hospitales Privados/economía , Hospitales de Enseñanza/economía , Humanos , Japón , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino
9.
Int J Evid Based Healthc ; 5(3): 296-304, 2007 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21631793

RESUMEN

Objective To compare clinical outcomes among patients receiving drug-eluting stents, bare metal stents, or coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG) to treat coronary artery disease. Data sources Randomised controlled trials were systematically selected from electronic database for head-to-head comparisons. The results from these head-to-head comparisons were used for an adjusted indirect comparison. Methods Published randomised controlled trials were reviewed for outcome data in patients treated for coronary artery disease with drug-eluting stents, bare metal stents, or CABG. Head-to-head comparisons were conducted for drug-eluting stents versus bare metal stents and for CABG versus bare metal stents. Adjusted indirect comparison was used to compare drug-eluting stents and CABG. Mid-term clinical outcomes (range: 6-12 months) were investigated and included rates of mortality, myocardial infarction, thrombosis, target lesion revascularisation, target vessel revascularisation, restenosis and major adverse cardiac events. Results Systematic literature search identified 23 randomised controlled trials (15 for drug-eluting stents vs. bare metal stents, 8 for CABG vs. bare metal stents). Head-to-head comparisons for both single and multiple vessel disease demonstrated that compared with bare metal stents, drug-eluting stents had better outcomes for target lesion revascularisation, target vessel revascularisation, restenosis and major adverse cardiac events. Except target lesion revascularisation, data were similarly favourable for CABG when compared with bare metal stents. Adjusted indirect comparison between drug-eluting stents and CABG in single vessel disease failed to detect significant differences in any of the measured outcomes. Multiple vessel disease data analysis demonstrated that target vessel revascularisation (odds ratio 3.41 [95% CI 2.29-5.08]) and major adverse cardiac events (1.89 [1.28-2.79]) were superior to drug-eluting stents in patients undergoing CABG. Conclusions Drug-eluting stents and CABG were superior to bare metal stents in terms of target lesion revascularisation (drug-eluting stents only), target vessel revascularisation, restenosis and major adverse cardiac events. There was no difference in clinical outcomes when comparing CABG and drug-eluting stents in patients with single vessel disease, and CABG may be superior to drug-eluting stents for target vessel revascularisation and major adverse cardiac events in patients with multiple vessel disease. However, results may vary between subpopulations with different clinical or socioeconomic differences.

10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15736517

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to explain factors influential to the diffusion of computed tomography (CTs) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRIs). METHODS: Variables were identified from a review of the literature on the diffusion of health technologies. A formal process was applied to build a conceptual model of the mechanism that drives technology diffusion. Variables for the analysis were classified as predisposing, enabling, or reinforcing factors, in keeping with a model commonly used to explain the diffusion of health behaviors. Multiple regression analysis was conducted using year 2000 OECD data. RESULTS: The results of this study showed that total health expenditure per capita (p < .01, both CTs and MRIs) and flexible payment methods to hospitals (p < .05, both CTs and MRIs) were significantly associated with the diffusion of CTs and MRIs (adjusted R2 = 0.477, 0.656, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study presents a systematically developed model of the mechanism governing technology diffusion. Important findings from the study show that purchasing power, represented by total health expenditure per capita and economic incentives to hospitals in the form of flexible payment methods, were positively correlated with diffusion. Another important achievement of our model is that it accounts for all thirty OECD member countries without excluding any as outliers. This study shows that variation across countries in the diffusion of medical technology can be explained well by a logical model with multiple variables, the results of which hold profound implications for health policy regarding the adoption of innovations.


Asunto(s)
Difusión de Innovaciones , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/estadística & datos numéricos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/economía , Modelos Teóricos , Análisis de Regresión , Evaluación de la Tecnología Biomédica , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/economía
11.
World J Surg ; 29(4): 429-35; discussion 436, 2005 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15770381

RESUMEN

Over the last decade in Japan, laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has replaced traditional open cholecystectomy as the standard of elective surgery for cholelithiasis. The laparoscopic approach has a clinical course relatively easier to standardize among the different types of intraabdominal surgery. However, significant practice variation is suspected in Japan, but there has been little demonstration or discussion based on empirical data. Through the analysis of 1589 elective LC cases from four leading teaching hospitals in Japan between 1996 and 2000, this study aims to demonstrate the surgical variations and to investigate their determinants regarding the length of hospital stay and the health care charge. Substantially and significantly large variation existed among the hospitals in terms of the length of hospital stay and the total health care charge, even after the differences in patient factors were adjusted. Particularly, the combined drug and exam charge per day was strikingly different among the four hospitals, which indicated that the daily process also varied widely, as did the total course of inpatient care. In addition, intra-hospital variation was also remained very large even after adjusting for all the potential correlates studied. This study alarmingly points out great room for improvement in the efficiency of health care resource use and potentially in the quality of care through standardization of LC. It has serious implications for the national policy and individual providers under the on-going health care reforms directed toward higher efficiency and quality.


Asunto(s)
Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/normas , Anciano , Femenino , Hospitales de Enseñanza , Humanos , Japón , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de la Atención de Salud
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA