How Does the Severity of Neuroforaminal Compression in Cervical Radiculopathy Affect Outcomes of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: This study is a retrospective cohort study. PURPOSE: This study aims to determine whether preoperative neuroforaminal stenosis (FS) severity is associated with motor function patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Cervical FS can significantly contribute to patient symptoms. While magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been used to classify FS, there has been limited research into the impact of FS severity on patient outcomes. METHODS: Patients undergoing primary, elective 1-3 level ACDF for radiculopathy at a single academic center between 2015 and 2021 were identified retrospectively. Cervical FS was evaluated using axial T2-weighted MRI images via a validated grading scale. The maximum degree of stenosis was used for multilevel disease. Motor symptoms were classified using encounters at their final preoperative and first postoperative visits, with examinations ≤3/5 indicating weakness. PROMs were obtained preoperatively and at 1-year follow-up. Bivariate analysis was used to compare outcomes based on stenosis severity, followed by multivariable analysis. RESULTS: This study included 354 patients, 157 with moderate stenosis and 197 with severe stenosis. Overall, 58 patients (16.4%) presented with upper extremity weakness ≤3/5. A similar number of patients in both groups presented with baseline motor weakness (13.5% vs. 16.55, p =0.431). Postoperatively, 97.1% and 87.0% of patients with severe and moderate FS, respectively, experienced full motor recovery (p =0.134). At 1-year, patients with severe neuroforaminal stenosis presented with significantly worse 12-item Short Form Survey Physical Component Score (PCS-12) (33.3 vs. 37.3, p =0.049) but demonstrated a greater magnitude of improvement (Δ PCS-12: 5.43 vs. 0.87, p =0.048). Worse stenosis was independently associated with greater ΔPCS-12 at 1-year (ß =5.59, p =0.022). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with severe FS presented with worse preoperative physical health. While ACDF improved outcomes and conferred similar motor recovery in all patients, those with severe FS reported much better improvement in physical function.

Evaluating Dysphagia Duration and Severity After ACDF in Patients With Underlying Dysphagia - A Prospective, Multicenter Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective Cohort Study. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the impact of preoperative dysphagia on the postoperative incidence and severity of dysphagia in patients undergoing ACDF at multiple institutions. METHODS: After IRB approval, patients over 18 years of age who underwent an elective ACDF for degenerative conditions were prospectively enrolled at two academic centers from 2018 to 2021. Preoperative dysphagia was self-reported by patients through a pre-operative questionnaire on a binary basis. Patients completed dysphagia surveys (Bazaz, Dysphagia Short Questionnaire, 10-item Eating Assessment Tool) to assess dysphagia severity during their preoperative visit, and these dysphagia surveys were repeated immediately postoperatively, at two weeks and again at six, 12, and 24 weeks postoperatively. Patients were stratified into three subgroups based on dysphagia status preoperatively and immediately postoperatively and compared using ANOVA tests or Kruskal-Wallis tests for continuous variables and Pearson chi-square analysis or Fisher's Exact test for categorical variables. RESULTS: A total of 168 patients (23 with preoperative dysphagia, 145 without preoperative dysphagia) met study criteria and were enrolled in the study. Patients with preoperative dysphagia had less frequent alcohol consumption (23.8% vs 53.7%, P = .0210), and higher rates of dysphagia at 2-weeks (77.8% vs 38.7%, P = .004) and 24-weeks (43.8% vs 14.8%, P = .010) postoperatively. These patients also had higher severity scores for dysphagia on the Bazaz (P = .001), DSQ (P = .012), EAT10 (P = .022) questionnaires at the 2-week follow-up period, higher DSQ scores (P = .036) at the 6-week follow-up period, higher EAT-10 scores (P = .009) at the 12-week follow-up period, and higher Bazaz (P = .001), DSQ (P = .002), and EAT-10 (P = .005) scores at the 24-week follow-up period. There were no differences in demographic, medical history, surgical variables, rates of ENT consultation, length of stay, or other in-hospital events between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing ACDF who had preoperative dysphagia have prolonged postoperative dysphagia and greater dysphagia severity. Surgeons should be aware of the risk of prolonged dysphagia severity that may persist past 24 weeks after surgery when discussing clinical decisions with patients.

Institutional Experience With Cochlear Implants Falling Under the 2020 FDA Corrective Action.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the rate of device failure for those cochlear implants falling under the 2020 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) voluntary corrective action. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Tertiary otology-neurotology practice. PATIENTS: Those with cochlear implant failure falling under the FDA corrective action. INTERVENTIONS: Cochlear implant explant and reimplantation. OUTCOME MEASURES: Reason for cochlear implant failure, time to failure, symptoms of failure, and benefit from reimplantation. RESULTS: The overall failure rate was 20.0% (18 of 90 ears); of the failures, 15 of 18 (83.3%) were hard device failures, and 3 of 18 (16.7%) were medical or surgical failures. All hard device failures were confirmed with integrity testing as performed by the company. The average time to integrity testing was 38.0 months. Of the hard failures, 14 of 15 had successful initial activation and benefit. Lack of expected progress was seen in 7 of 15 and a sudden decline in function in 8 of 15. Electrodes 9 to 16 were most often defunct. Significant drops in speech perception were often seen in device failure cases. Three medical/surgical failures were explanted; one had migration of the receiver/stimulator causing discomfort, and the other two had electrode migration after partial insertion. Of the reimplanted patients, 11 of 12 are deriving benefit from their new devices. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of device failure for the cochlear implants of interest is significantly higher in our series than reported in the initial FDA voluntary field corrective action publication.

Evaluating the Effect of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease on Postoperative Dysphagia Following Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery-A Prospective, Multicenter Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the impact of a preoperative diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease on the incidence and severity of postoperative dysphagia in a multicenter population. METHODS: After Institutional Review Board approval, written informed consent was obtained from all participating patients. Patients over 18 years of age who underwent an elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for a degenerative condition were prospectively enrolled at two academic centers from the years 2018 to 2020. Patients were separated into two groups: those with and without a preoperative diagnosis of GERD. Continuous variables were assessed using either an independent t-test or Mann Whitney U-test for parametric and non-parametric data. All categorical variables were compared using a chi-square test. RESULTS: A total of 116 patients met study criteria and were subsequently enrolled. Overall rates of postoperative dysphagia increased to 47.3% (n = 53) at 2-weeks but eventually decreased towards the preoperative prevalence of 25.0% at the 24-week mark. Patients with preoperative diagnosis of GERD had lower dysphagia severity scores on a continuous variable analysis in both the DSQ and EAT-10 surveys at 2-week follow-up in addition to the Bazaz survey at 24-week follow-up. Our follow up at 24-weeks was 85.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that having a preoperative diagnosis of GERD has no significant effect on the incidence of dysphagia following ACDF. Nevertheless, having a preoperative diagnosis of GERD does seem to provide some protective effect on the severity of dysphagia that this patient population develops at multiple intervals over a 24-week postoperative period.

Cochlear Implantation in Adults With Single-Sided Deafness: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical outcomes of adult patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) undergoing ipsilateral cochlear implantation. DATA SOURCE: An electronic search of Medline and Embase articles. REVIEW METHODS: A systematic review was performed with a search strategy developed by a licensed librarian to identify studies of adult patients with SSD who underwent ipsilateral cochlear implantation. Articles were managed in Covidence and evaluated by 2 independent reviewers. Risk of bias was assessed and data were extracted, including patient demographics, etiology of deafness, duration of deafness, and postoperative change in speech recognition, tinnitus, sound localization, and quality of life (QoL). A meta-analysis was performed, and pooled mean differences were calculated for each outcome of interest via random effects models by each outcome, as well as subgroup analyses by the individual clinical score used. RESULTS: Of 2309 studies identified, 185 full texts were evaluated, and 50 were ultimately included involving 674 patients. Speech perception scores in quiet and noise, tinnitus control, sound localization, and QoL all significantly improved after implantation. Pooled outcomes demonstrated score improvements in speech perception (standardized mean difference [SMD], 2.8 [95% CI, 2.16-3.43]), QoL (SMD, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.45-0.91]), sound localization (SMD, -1.13 [95% CI, -1.68 to -0.57]), and tinnitus score reduction (SMD, -1.32 [95% CI, -1.85 to -0.80]). CONCLUSIONS: Cochlear implantation in adults with SSD results in significant improvements in speech perception, tinnitus control, sound localization, and QoL.

Does "Just in Time" teaching of ergonomic principles improve posture of trainees during otologic microscopic surgery?

PURPOSE: Musculoskeletal disorders are prevalent among otolaryngologists and otologists with symptoms starting during residency. Prior data suggested that high-risk joint angles were often adopted at procedure onset, suggesting a detrimental "natural" operating position. Despite its importance, dedicated ergonomic teaching is not systematically introduced into residency training. The objective of this study was to compare initial ergonomic positioning during microscopic temporal bone surgery between those who receive "Just in Time" ergonomic teaching prior to starting dissection with those who did not. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a pilot, prospective trial in which otolaryngology residents at an urban, multicenter tertiary care academic institution (n = 14) wore ergonomic sensors (inertial measurement units) during microscopic temporal bone lab drilling. Prior to recording, participants were randomized to receive an instructional presentation on ergonomic principles (n = 8, intervention group) or not (n = 6, control group). The inertial measurement units analyzed neck and back angles for the initial 5 min of drilling. RESULTS: Of 14 trainees, 78.6 % had prior experience with otologic microscopic cases and 14.3 % reported prior surgical ergonomic training or instruction. The groups were matched in trainee height (P = 0.54), handedness (P = 0.83), stage of otolaryngology training (P = 0.64), prior otologic microscopic surgery experience (P = 0.35), prior temporal bone drilling experience (P = 0.35), and prior teaching in ergonomic principles (P = 0.47). Junior trainees (PGY 1-3) who did not receive "Just in Time" teaching adopted a posture with significantly higher risk back flexion compared to junior trainees who received the training (25.3° vs. 5.7°, P = 0.04). There was no difference in back positioning among senior trainees (12.6° vs. -5.7°, P = 0.13). While there was a trend towards those in the intervention group adopting safer procedural posture, there was no significant difference in the overall cohort between the intervention and control groups in both neck positioning (-11.0° vs. -19.1°, P = 0.17) and back positioning (8.6° vs. 19.1°, P = 0.18). CONCLUSIONS: Musculoskeletal related pain is prevalent among otolaryngologists and otologists with data suggesting that symptoms begin during residency. Targeted "Just in Time" teaching of ergonomic principles is feasible and may be effective for development of healthy postural habits, especially among junior trainees.

Relevance of the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale to Urban Community-Dwelling Adults With Diagnosed Vestibular Dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine how relevant the items on the activities-specific balance confidence (ABC) scale are to patients living in an urban setting and to evaluate additional items relevant to urban populations but not included in the current version of the scale. DESIGN: Cross-sectional clinical survey. SETTING: Urban, tertiary vestibular rehabilitation clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Vestibular rehabilitation clinic outpatients (N=103). INTERVENTIONS: N/A. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Relevance of 16 day-to-day tasks on the ABC scale on a scale of 0 (not performed) to 10 (performed regularly); median relevancy score (MRS) for most relevant items. RESULTS: One hundred three participants (73.7% female, mean age 61.5± years) with vestibular disorders completed the survey. The items with the highest MRS were walking around a house (MRS=10), reaching for a shelved item eye level (MRS=9), taking the stairs (MRS=7), bending over and picking up a slipper (MRS=7), and stepping onto or off an escalator while holding the railing (MRS=7). Lowest MRS items to someone living in an urban environment included walking across a parking lot to the mall (MRS=0) and walking outside the house to a car parked in the driveway (MRS=0). The most common functional activities not addressed by ABC score included navigating the subway/public transit (35.9%) and walking through crowds (32.0%). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed insights about important activities of daily living for those in an urban setting. Results show that the ABC scale should be modified to better reflect the specific activities of urban dwellers.

Initial Experience With Two Active Transcutaneous Bone-Anchored Hearing Implants.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze our institutional experience with two active transcutaneous bone-anchored hearing aids. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary academic otology-neurotology practice. PATIENTS: Patients with conductive or mixed hearing losses meeting criteria to receive active transcutaneous bone-anchored hearing aids. INTERVENTIONS: Implantation with one of two active transcutaneous bone-anchored hearing aids. OUTCOME MEASURES: Operative time, dural exposure and decompression, use of lifts, implant position, ease of use, qualitative patient satisfaction, complication rates. RESULTS: Ten patients received Implant 1 and 11 patients received Implant 2. The most common underlying etiologies of hearing loss were chronic suppurative otitis media in 33.3%, atresia/microtia in 23.8%, and cholesteatoma in 23.8%. Average operative times were 99.3 minutes for Implant 1 and 80.9 minutes for Implant 2 ( p = 0.263). Implant 1 required lifts in 60%, dural exposure in 50%, and dural compression in 30%. Overall, placement was difficult in 47.6% of cases. There were no intraoperative complications. There were higher rates of issues with sound quality (27.3% versus 0.0%, p = 0.123) and poor cosmesis (36.4% versus 10.0%, p = 0.360) with Implant 2. Functional gain was not recorded, but all patients derived qualitative benefit from their implant. Three patients had local wound complications that self-resolved or were treated with antibiotics. One patient implanted at an outside institution required explant because of multiple infections. CONCLUSIONS: There were no statistically significant differences in outcomes comparing Implants 1 and 2; however, Implant 2 had much higher rates of issues with audio quality and poor cosmesis. Placing Implant 1 often required special techniques.

Utilization fraction of rhinoplasty instrument sets: Model for efficient use of surgical instruments.

OBJECTIVES: Recognize the avoidable costs incurred due to overpacking of rhinoplasty instrument trays. Reduce rhinoplasty instrument trays by including only instruments used frequently. Establish methods to reduce trays prepared for other otolaryngologic procedures. METHODS: This is a prospective study. The study evaluates the specific use of instruments opened for rhinoplasty procedures at the New York Eye & Ear Infirmary of Mount Sinai. Instruments were counted in 10 rhinoplasty cases. Usage rate was calculated for each instrument. Additionally, all instruments used in at least 20% of cases were noted. This "20%" threshold was used to create new rhinoplasty tray inventories more reflective of actual instrument usage. Some instruments above the 20% threshold were included in multiples (i.e. two Adson Brown forceps vs. one curved iris scissor). RESULTS: 189 instruments were opened, and 32 instruments were used on average in each rhinoplasty. 55 instruments were used in at least 20% of cases. The 55 "high usage" instruments were used to create new, reduced rhinoplasty tray inventory lists. Based on our analysis, a new rhinoplasty tray inventory was created comprised of 68 instruments, a 64% reduction from 189. CONCLUSION: Instruments are sterilized and packed in gross excess for rhinoplasty procedures. Previously published figures estimate re-sterilization costs of $0.51 to $0.77 per instrument. Reduction in instruments opened from 189 to 68 is expected to lead to cost savings ranging from $62 to $93 per case, yielding a savings between $6200 and $9300 per 100 cases performed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-3.

Efficacy of Ketamine in Pediatric Sedation Dentistry: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Ketamine has been used as a safe and effective sedative to treat adults and children exhibiting high levels of anxiety or fear during dental treatment. Pediatric dentistry often involves patients with high levels of anxiety and fear and possibly few positive dental experiences. Patient management can involve behavioral approaches, as well as the use of sedation or general anesthesia with a variety of agents, including midazolam, diazepam, hydroxyzine, meperidine, and ketamine. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical efficacy of ketamine use in pediatric sedation dentistry through systematic review and analysis. METHODS: A systematic review of publications between 1990 and 2015 was conducted using PubMed and MEDLINE databases maintained by the US National Library of Medicine and the National Institutes of Health. The keywords used were (ketamine) AND (dental OR dentistry) AND (sedation). The abstract and title of all potential publications were then screened for clinical trials and to remove non-English articles, non-human or animal trials, and other non-dental or non-relevant studies. RESULTS: A total of 1,657 citations were initially identified, reviewed, and screened, eventually resulting in inclusion of 25 clinical trials in this systematic review. Nineteen studies evaluated ketamine effects in pediatric dental sedation using oral (non-invasive) administration, three involved subcutaneous or intramuscular injection, and three were completed intravenously. Evidence analysis of these trials revealed the majority (n = 22/25) provided strong, positive evidence for the use of ketamine (alone or in combination) to reduce dental anxiety and behavioral non-compliance with the remainder suggesting equivocal results. Additional endpoints evaluated in some studies involved dosage, as well as time to achieve sedation effect. CONCLUSION: The use of ketamine (alone or in combination) can provide safe, effective, and timely sedation in pediatric patients regardless of the route of administration.