Sex and Race Differences in Cardiac Sarcoidosis Presentation, Treatment and Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Although sex- and race-based patterns have been described in the extracardiac organ involvement of sarcoidosis, cardiac sarcoidosis (CS)-specific studies are lacking. METHODS: We studied CS presentation, treatment and outcomes based on sex and race in a tertiary-center cohort. Multivariable adjusted Cox proportional hazards and survival analyses were performed for primary composite outcomes (left ventricular assist device, heart transplantation, all-cause death) and for secondary outcomes (ventricular arrhythmia and all-cause death. RESULTS: We identified 252 patients with CS (108 female, 109 Black). At presentation with CS, females vs males (P = 0.001) and Black vs White individuals (P = 0.001) more commonly had symptomatic heart failure (HF), with HF most common in Black females (ANOVA P < 0.001). Treatment differences included more corticosteroid use (90% vs 79%; P = 0.020), higher 1-year prednisone dosage (13 vs 10 mg; P = 0.003) and less frequent early steroid-sparing agent use in males (29% vs 40%; P = 0.05). Black participants more frequently received a steroid-sparing agent (75% vs 60%; P = 0.023). Composite outcome-free survival did not differ by sex or race. Male sex had an adjusted hazard ratio of 2.34 (95% CI 1.13, 4.80; P = 0.021) for ventricular arrhythmia. CONCLUSION: CS course may differ by sex and race and may contribute to distinct clinical CS phenotypes.

Effect of Corticosteroids on Left Ventricular Function in Patients With Cardiac Sarcoidosis.

Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is an important cause of cardiomyopathy. The trajectory of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with CS undergoing treatment remains unclear. Patients with CS who were treated with corticosteroids and who underwent transthoracic echocardiography were studied. Baseline characteristics, treatment, echocardiographic data (including baseline to follow-up change in LVEF), and outcomes were retrospectively evaluated. Among 100 patients, 55 had baseline reduced LVEF (<50%), and 45 had preserved LVEF (≥50%). At follow-up, 82% of patients demonstrated stable or improved LVEF. Change in LVEF was significantly higher in the baseline reduced than in the preserved LVEF group (5% [interquartile range 0 to 15] vs 0% [interquartile range -10% to 5%], p = 0.001). There was no difference in corticosteroid exposure or use of heart failure guideline-directed medical therapy between patients who did experience improvement in LVEF and those who did not experience improvement in LVEF. On multivariable analysis, baseline reduced LVEF (Odds ratio 54.89, 95% confidence interval 3.84 to 785.09, p = 0.003) and complete heart block (Odds ratio 28.88, 95% confidence interval 2.17 to 383.74, p = 0.011) at presentation were significantly associated with reduced LVEF after treatment. In conclusion, most patients with CS treated with corticosteroids maintain or improve LV systolic function. Cardiac characteristics at presentation impact prognosis in CS, despite treatment.

Cardiac sarcoidosis outcome differences: A comparison of patients with de novo cardiac versus known extracardiac sarcoidosis at presentation.

BACKGROUND: Sarcoidosis is a systemic disease characterized by granulomatous inflammation. Cardiac involvement is associated with increased morbidity. However, differences in clinical characteristics and outcomes based on initial sarcoidosis organ manifestation in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) have not been described. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 252 patients with CS at an urban, quaternary medical center was studied. Presentation, treatment and outcomes of de novo CS and prior ECS groups were compared. Survival free of primary composite outcome (left ventricular assist device implantation, orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT), or death) was assessed. RESULTS: There were 124 de novo CS patients and 128 with prior ECS at time of CS diagnosis. De novo CS patients were younger at CS diagnosis (p = 0.020). De novo CS patients had a more advanced cardiac presentation: lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (p < 0.001), more frequent sustained ventricular arrhythmias (VA) (p = 0.001), and complete heart block (p = 0.001). During follow-up, new VA (p < 0.001), ventricular tachycardia ablation (p < 0.001), and OHT (p = 0.003) were more common in the de novo CS group. Outcome free survival was significantly shorter for de novo CS patients (p = 0.005), with increased hazard of primary composite outcome (p = 0.034) and development of new VA (p = 0.027) when compared to ECS patients. Overall mortality was similar between groups. CONCLUSION: Patients presenting with CS as their first recognized organ manifestation of sarcoidosis have an increased risk of adverse cardiac outcomes as compared to those with a prior history of ECS. Improved awareness and diagnosis of CS is warranted for earlier recognition.

Right ventricular longitudinal strain on CMR predicts ventricular arrhythmias and mortality in cardiac sarcoidosis.

Background: Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) are associated with ventricular arrhythmias (VA) and mortality in cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). However, image resolution limits the detection of RV LGE. Global longitudinal RV strain (RVS) correlates to RV scar on electroanatomical mapping and RV function. Objective: We evaluated the association between RVS on CMR and VA/death (combined-primary-endpoint (CPE)) in patients with CS. Methods: RVS and RV LGE on MRI were retrospectively compared to variables known to predict outcomes in 66 patients with CS. Outcomes were obtained from electronic medical records and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) interrogations over median [IQR] 3.7[1.7, 6.3] years. Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate survival. Harrell's C-statistic was used to compare variables in risk prediction models. Results: 62.1 % of patients were male, with a mean age [SD] of 52.3 [9.6] years and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 51.1[17.5]%. 9 patients with the primary endpoint were more likely to be Caucasian (p = 0.01) with prior VAs (p = 0.002), be on anti-arrhythmic drugs (p = 0.001) with an ICD (p = 0.002). In multivariable analyses adjusted for age, race, and history of VA, RVS (1.18 [1.05-1.31], p = 0.004), RV EDVI (1.08[1.01, 1.14], p = 0.02), and LV LGE (1.07[1.00, 1.13], p = 0.04) predicted the CPE. Risk prediction models including RVS (Cstatistic 0.94), outperformed those including RV and LV LGE (0.89-0.92). Conclusion: RVS on CMR was the best predictor of VA and mortality in CS.

Spatial dispersion analysis of LGE-CMR for prediction of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) are at increased risk of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias (VA). Current approaches to risk stratification have limited predictive value. OBJECTIVES: To assess the utility of spatial dispersion analysis of late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR), as a quantitative measure of myocardial tissue heterogeneity, in risk stratifying patients with CS for VA and death. METHODS: Sixty two patients with CS underwent LGE-CMR. LGE images were segmented and dispersion maps of the left and right ventricles were generated as follows. Based on signal intensity (SI), each pixel was categorized as abnormal (SI ≥3SD above the mean), intermediate (SI 1-3 SD above the mean) or normal (SI <1SD above the mean); and each pixel was then assigned a value of 0 to 8 based on the number of adjacent pixels of a different category. Average dispersion score was calculated for each patient. The primary endpoint was VA during follow up. The composite of VA or death was assessed as a secondary endpoint. RESULTS: During 4.7 ± 3.5 years of follow up, six patients had VA, and five without documented VA died. Average dispersion score was significantly higher in patients with VA versus those without (0.87 ± 0.08 vs. 0.71 ± 0.16; p = .002) and in patients with events versus those without (0.83 ± 0.08 vs. 0.70 ± 0.16; p = .003). Patients at higher tertiles of dispersion score had a higher incidence of VA (p = .03) and the composite of VA or death (p = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Increased substrate heterogeneity, quantified by spatial dispersion analysis of LGE-CMR, may be helpful in risk-stratifying patients with CS for adverse events, including life-threatening arrhythmias.

Predicting risk of sudden cardiac death in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis using multimodality imaging and personalized heart modeling in a multivariable classifier.

Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS), an inflammatory disease characterized by formation of granulomas in the heart, is associated with high risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) from ventricular arrhythmias. Current "one-size-fits-all" guidelines for SCD risk assessment in CS result in insufficient appropriate primary prevention. Here, we present a two-step precision risk prediction technology for patients with CS. First, a patient's arrhythmogenic propensity arising from heterogeneous CS-induced ventricular remodeling is assessed using a novel personalized magnetic-resonance imaging and positron-emission tomography fusion mechanistic model. The resulting simulations of arrhythmogenesis are fed, together with a set of imaging and clinical biomarkers, into a supervised classifier. In a retrospective study of 45 patients, the technology achieved testing results of 60% sensitivity [95% confidence interval (CI): 57-63%], 72% specificity [95% CI: 70-74%], and 0.754 area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [95% CI: 0.710-0.797]. It outperformed clinical metrics, highlighting its potential to transform CS risk stratification.

Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis Using Mycophenolate Mofetil as a Steroid-Sparing Agent.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with systemic sarcoidosis. Steroid-sparing agents are increasingly used, despite a lack of randomized trials or published guidelines to direct treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS: This retrospective study included 77 patients with CS treated with prednisone monotherapy (n = 32) or a combination with mycophenolate mofetil (n = 45) between 2003 and 2018. Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were evaluated. The mean patient age was 53 ± 11 years at CS diagnosis, 66.2% were male, and 35.1% were Black. The total exposure to maximum prednisone dose (initial prednisone dose × days at dose) was lower in the combination therapy group (1440 mg [interquartile range (IQR), 1200-2760 mg] vs 2710 mg [IQR, 1200-5080 mg]; P = .06). On 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scans, both groups demonstrated a significant decrease in the cardiac maximum standardized uptake value after treatment: a median decrease of 3.9 (IQR 2.7-9.0, P = .002) and 2.9 (IQR 0-5.0, P = .001) for prednisone monotherapy and combination therapy, respectively. Most patients experienced improvement or complete resolution in qualitative cardiac 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake (92.3% and 70.4% for the prednisone and combination therapy groups, respectively). Mycophenolate mofetil was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Mycophenolate mofetil in combination with prednisone for the treatment of CS may minimize corticosteroid exposure and decrease cardiac inflammation without significant adverse effects.

Incidence and Predictors of Sudden Cardiac Arrest in Sarcoidosis: A Nationwide Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to identify electrocardiographic (ECG) and clinical predictors of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) in sarcoidosis. BACKGROUND: Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is the leading cause of death in cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) and may be the earliest manifestation of disease. Widespread or repeated advanced imaging is a challenging solution to this problem. ECG is an affordable and widely accessible modality that could help guide diagnostic approaches and risk stratification. METHODS: Data were obtained from the National Inpatient Sample (2005-2017) using International Classification of Diseases-9th Revision and -10th Revision-Clinical Modification. The primary outcome was to identify predictors of SCA, whereas predictors of SCA in young individuals and those with normal ventricular function served as secondary measures. Furthermore, temporal trends in sarcoidosis as well as SCA were also analyzed. Logistic regression analysis was used to calculate odds ratios, following which a multivariable regression was used to adjust for potential confounders. RESULTS: Electrocardiographic markers of AV node dysfunction or bundle branch block are associated with substantially increased risk of SCA in a limited proportion of patients (8.6%). This association is also observed among younger patients (<40 years) and those with normal ventricular function. CONCLUSIONS: ECG evidence of AV nodal dysfunction or distal conduction disease should raise suspicion for cardiac involvement in patients with sarcoidosis and are associated with increased risk of SCA. ECG markers could help identify patients who would benefit from advanced imaging. The sensitivity of ECGs is, however, limited and presence of a normal ECG does not reflect a low risk of SCA.

Arrhythmias in Cardiac Sarcoidosis Bench to Bedside: A Case-Based Review.

Cardiac sarcoidosis is a component of an often multiorgan granulomatous disease of still uncertain cause. It is being recognized with increasing frequency, mainly as the result of heightened awareness and new diagnostic tests, specifically cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scans. The purpose of this case-based review is to highlight the potentially life-saving importance of making the early diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis using these new tools and to provide a framework for the optimal care of patients with this disease. We will review disease mechanisms as currently understood, associated arrhythmias including conduction abnormalities, and atrial and ventricular tachyarrhythmias, guideline-directed diagnostic criteria, screening of patients with extracardiac sarcoidosis, and the use of pacemakers and defibrillators in this setting. Treatment options, including those related to heart failure, and those which may help clarify disease mechanisms are included.

Clinical and Imaging Response to Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Inhibitors in Treatment of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Multicenter Experience.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is an increasingly recognized cause of cardiomyopathy; however, data on immunosuppressive strategies are limited. Treatment with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha inhibitors is not well described; moreover, there may be heart failure-related safety concerns. METHODS: Retrospective multicenter study of patients with CS treated with TNF alpha inhibitors. Baseline characteristics, treatments, and outcomes were adjudicated. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients with CS (mean age 49.9 years, 42% women, 53% African American) were treated with TNF alpha inhibitor (30 infliximab, 8 adalimumab). Prednisone dose decreased from time of TNF alpha inhibitor initiation (21.7 ± 17.5 mg) to 6 months (10.4 ± 6.1 mg, P = .001) and 12 months (7.3 ± 7.3 mg, P = .002) after treatment. On pre-TNF alpha inhibitor treatment positron emission tomography with 18-flourodoxyglucose (FDG-PET), 84% of patients had cardiac FDG uptake. After treatment, there was a significant decrease in number of segments involved (3.5 ± 3.8 to 1.0 ± 2.5, P = .008) and maximum standardized uptake value (3.59 ± 3.70 to 0.57 ± 1.60, P = .0005), with 73% of patients demonstrating complete resolution or improvement of cardiac FDG uptake. The left ventricular ejection fraction remained stable (45.0 ± 16.5% to 47.0 ± 15.0%, P = .10). Four patients required inpatient heart failure treatment, and 8 had infections; 2 required treatment cessation. CONCLUSIONS: TNF alpha inhibitor treatment guided by FDG-PET imaging may minimize corticosteroid use and effectively reduce cardiac inflammation without significant adverse effect on cardiac function. However, infections were common, some of which were serious, and therefore patients require close monitoring for both infection and cardiac symptoms.

Utility of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography for Risk Stratification for Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients With Cardiac Sarcoidosis.

Abnormalities on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and positron emission tomography (PET) predict ventricular arrhythmias (VA) in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). Little is known whether concurrent abnormalities on CMR and PET increases the risk of developing VA. Our aim was to compare the additive utility of CMR and PET in predicting VA in patients with CS. We included all patients treated at our institution from 2000 to 2018 who (1) had probable or definite CS and (2) had undergone both CMR and PET. The primary endpoint was VA at follow up, which was defined as sustained ventricular tachycardia, sudden cardiac death, or any appropriate device tachytherapy. Fifty patients were included, 88% of whom had a left ventricular ejection fraction >35%. During a mean follow-up 4.1 years, 7/50 (14%) patients had VA. The negative predictive value of LGE for VA was 100% and the negative predictive value of FDG for VA was 79%. Among groups, VA occurred in 4/21 (19%) subjects in the LGE+/FDG+ group, 3/14 (21%) in the LGE+/FDG- group, and 0/15 (0%) in the FDG+/LGE- group. There were no LGE-/FDG- patients. In conclusion, CMR may be the preferred initial clinical risk stratification tool in patients with CS. FDG uptake without LGE on initial imaging may not add additional prognostic information regarding VA risk.

Substrate Spatial Complexity Analysis for the Prediction of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Transition zones between healthy myocardium and scar form a spatially complex substrate that may give rise to reentrant ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). We sought to assess the utility of a novel machine learning approach for quantifying 3-dimensional spatial complexity of grayscale patterns on late gadolinium enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance images to predict VAs in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. METHODS: One hundred twenty-two consecutive ischemic cardiomyopathy patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% without prior history of VAs underwent late gadolinium enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance images. From raw grayscale data, we generated graphs encoding the 3-dimensional geometry of the left ventricle. A novel technique, adapted to these graphs, assessed global regularity of signal intensity patterns using Fourier-like analysis and generated a substrate spatial complexity profile for each patient. A machine learning statistical algorithm was employed to discern which substrate spatial complexity profiles correlated with VA events (appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator firings and arrhythmic sudden cardiac death) at 5 years of follow-up. From the statistical machine learning results, a complexity score ranging from 0 to 1 was calculated for each patient and tested using multivariable Cox regression models. RESULTS: At 5 years of follow-up, 40 patients had VA events. The machine learning algorithm classified with 81% overall accuracy and correctly classified 86% of those without VAs. Overall negative predictive value was 91%. Average complexity score was significantly higher in patients with VA events versus those without (0.5±0.5 versus 0.1±0.2; P<0.0001) and was independently associated with VA events in a multivariable model (hazard ratio, 1.5 [1.2-2.0]; P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Substrate spatial complexity analysis of late gadolinium enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance images may be helpful in refining VA risk in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, particularly to identify low-risk patients who may not benefit from prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy. Visual Overview: A visual overview is available for this article.

Diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis: an era of paradigm shift.

Cardiac sarcoidosis is a granulomatous disease that may affect any organ, including the heart. Diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis is challenging, given the varied and non-specific clinical presentation and limited sensitivity and specificity of available diagnostic tests. With the growing interest and developments in imaging techniques, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) and positron emission tomography (PET) have emerged as important tools in the diagnostic evaluation of patients with suspected cardiac sarcoidosis. These modalities have been given increasing emphasis in successive published diagnostic guidelines for CS. This review will provide an update on the recent paradigm shift in diagnostic guidelines for cardiac sarcoidosis, with a focus on the advanced cardiac imaging modalities and their developed role in clinical practice.

Applications of Cardiac MR Imaging in Electrophysiology: Current Status and Future Needs.

The potential role of cardiac MR imaging in the diagnosis, risk-stratification, and treatment of patients with cardiac arrhythmias is rapidly evolving. Beyond substrate identification and characterization, it is now feasible to perform MR imaging-based noninvasive virtual programmed stimulation to identify potential ablation targets. The next phase of MR imaging-guided electrophysiology may involve intraprocedural guidance of electrophysiologic interventions using real-time MR imaging. This review discusses the spectrum of MR imaging applications in electrophysiology ranging from those that are established in clinical practice to those that are in the experimental phase of development.

Electrophysiology study for risk stratification in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis and abnormal cardiac imaging.

BACKGROUND: Abnormalities on cardiac imaging (cardiac magnetic resonance imaging [CMR] or positron emission tomography [PET]), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and electrophysiology study (EPS) all predict ventricular arrhythmias (VA) in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS). We sought to assess the utility of EPS in patients with CS and abnormal cardiac imaging, focusing on those with LVEF >35%. METHODS: We identified all patients treated at our institution from 2000 to 2017 who: 1.) had probable or definite CS; 2.) had either late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on CMR or abnormal 18-flourodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake on PET, and 3.) had undergone EPS. The primary endpoint was VA during follow up. RESULTS: Twenty five patients were included, of whom 10 (40%) had positive EPS. During a mean follow-up of 4.8 +/- 3.4 years, 11 (44%) patients had VA. The positive predictive value (PPV) of EPS for VA was 100% and the negative predictive value (NPV) of EPS for VA was 93%. Among 12 patients with LVEF >35% and no prior VA, the PPV of EPS for VA was 100% and the NPV of EPS for VA was 90%. CONCLUSION: EPS may help with risk stratification in patients with CS and abnormal imaging, especially those without conventional indications for ICD placement. Among patients with LVEF >35% and no history of prior VA, a negative EPS has good positive and negative predictive value for future VA events.

Regional abnormalities on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and arrhythmic events in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) may present with arrhythmic events (AE): atrioventricular block (AVB) and/ or ventricular arrhythmias (VA). We sought to: (a) use regional analysis of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) to describe anatomic and functional phenotypes of patients with CS and AE; (b) Assess the association of regional CMR abnormalities with the combined endpoint of death, heart transplantation (HT) and AE; and (c) use machine learning (ML) to predict the combined endpoint based on CMR features. METHODS: we included 76 patients with CS and CMR. We analyzed cine images to determine regional longitudinal (LS) and radial strain (RS); and late gadolinium enhancement imaging to determine regional scar burden (%scar). RESULTS: Patients with AVB (n = 7), compared with those without, had higher %scar in the anterior (21.8 ± 27.4 vs 5.1 ± 8.9; P = 0.0005) and anteroseptal (19.3 ± 24.5 vs 3.5 ± 5.5; P < .0001) walls. Patients with VA (n = 12), compared with those without, had higher %scar in the basal inferoseptum (20.4 ± 30.8 vs 8.3 ± 13.4; P = .03). During mean follow-up of 4.4 ± 3.3 years, four patients died or underwent HT; eight had VA; and zero developed AVB. Multiple regional abnormalities were associated with the combined endpoint, including scar in the anteroseptal wall (HR 1.06 [1.02-1.09] per 1%scar increase, P = .002). The ML algorithm predicted the combined endpoint with a C-statistic of 0.91. CONCLUSION: Regional CMR abnormalities are associated with AE in patients with CS.

Cardiac sympathetic denervation for refractory ventricular arrhythmias in patients with structural heart disease: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac sympathetic denervation (CSD) is an important adjunctive option for patients with refractory ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). Reports of efficacy of CSD in patients with structural heart disease (SHD) and refractory VA vary widely in literature. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review of arrhythmic outcomes and complications in patients with SHD who underwent CSD due to recurrent VAs. METHODS: Electronic databases (Google Scholar and PubMed) were searched to identify reports on CSD in SHD using appropriate medical subject terms. No sample size restriction was applied. All patients with known channelopathies were excluded. Baseline demographic and surgical data, arrhythmic outcomes, and procedural complications were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 13 studies and 173 patients were included. Of the 173 patients (121 [70%] male); pooled mean age 54.6 [95% confidence interval 52.6-56.7] years), 48 (28%) had ischemic cardiomyopathy, and 141 (82%) underwent bilateral CSD. Overall freedom from events ranged from 58% to 100%. Complications were reported in 49 patients(28%). Transient hypotension (9%), pneumothorax (5%), neuropathic pain (skin sensitivity) (4%), Horner syndrome (3%), sweating pattern changes (3%), and hemothorax (2%) were the most common complications. No procedure-related deaths were reported. CONCLUSION: CSD reduced the number of VA events in patients with SHD, and the benefit from the intervention seemed to be independent of the underlying SHD. Although overall rate of postprocedural complications was high, most of the complications were temporary. Major postprocedural complications after CSD were infrequent.