CAF-associated genes putatively representing distinct prognosis by in silico landscape of stromal components of colon cancer.

Comprehensive understanding prognostic relevance of distinct tumor microenvironment (TME) remained elusive in colon cancer. In this study, we performed in silico analysis of the stromal components of primary colon cancer, with a focus on the markers of cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF) and tumor-associated endothelia (TAE), as well as immunological infiltrates like tumor-associated myeloid cells (TAMC) and cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL). The relevant CAF-associated genes (CAFG)(representing R index = 0.9 or beyond with SPARC) were selected based on stroma specificity (cancer stroma/epithelia, cS/E = 10 or beyond) and expression amounts, which were largely exhibited negative prognostic impacts. CAFG were partially shared with TAE-associated genes (TAEG)(PLAT, ANXA1, and PTRF) and TAMC-associated genes (TAMCG)(NNMT), but not with CTL-associated genes (CTLG). Intriguingly, CAFG were prognostically subclassified in order of fibrosis (representing COL5A2, COL5A1, and COL12A1) followed by exclusive TAEG and TAMCG. Prognosis was independently stratified by CD8A, a CTL marker, in the context of low expression of the strongest negative prognostic CAFG, COL8A1. CTLG were comprehensively identified as IFNG, B2M, and TLR4, in the group of low S/E, representing good prognosis. Our current in silico analysis of the micro-dissected stromal gene signatures with prognostic relevance clarified comprehensive understanding of clinical features of the TME and provides deep insights of the landscape.

Less demand on stem cell marker-positive cancer cells may characterize metastasis of colon cancer.

BACKGROUND: CD44 and CD133 are stem cell markers in colorectal cancer (CRC). CD44 has distinctive isoforms with different oncological properties like total CD44 (CD44T) and variant CD44 (CD44V). Clinical significance of such markers remains elusive. METHODS: Sixty colon cancer were examined for CD44T/CD44V and CD133 at mRNA level in a quantitative PCR, and clarified for their association with clinicopathological factors. RESULTS: (1) Both CD44T and CD44V showed higher expression in primary colon tumors than in non-cancerous mucosas (p<0.0001), while CD133 was expressed even in non-cancerous mucosa and rather decreased in the tumors (p = 0.048). (2) CD44V expression was significantly associated with CD44T expression (R = 0.62, p<0.0001), while they were not correlated to CD133 at all in the primary tumors. (3) CD44V/CD44T expressions were significantly higher in right colon cancer than in left colon cancer (p = 0.035/p = 0.012, respectively), while CD133 expression were not (p = 0.20). (4) In primary tumors, unexpectedly, CD44V/CD44T/CD133 mRNA expressions were not correlated with aggressive phenotypes, but CD44V/CD44T rather significantly with less aggressive lymph node metastasis/distant metastasis (p = 0.040/p = 0.039, respectively). Moreover, both CD44V and CD133 expressions were significantly decreased in liver metastasis as compared to primary tumors (p = 0.0005 and p = 0.0006, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our transcript expression analysis of cancer stem cell markers did not conclude that their expression could represent aggressive phenotypes of primary and metastatic tumors, and rather represented less demand on stem cell marker-positive cancer cells.