Evaluation of Sepsis-Related Medical Emergency Team (MET) Calls with Pharmacist Involvement and Time to Antimicrobial Administration.

Objective: To evaluate the difference in proportion of patients receiving antimicrobials within one hour of sepsis recognition at sepsis-related Medical Emergency Team (MET) calls, without or with a sepsis-credentialed pharmacist. Design: Retrospective pre and post-intervention study. Setting: Single centre tertiary referral hospital. Participants: Patients admitted to the General Medicine Unit who had a sepsis-related MET call 24 hrs per day, and all other units from 17:00-08:00 hrs from August 2019 to Jan 2020 in the pre-intervention cohort and Aug 2020 to Jan 2021 for the post-intervention cohort. Interventions: Pharmacists attended MET calls to assist selection of antimicrobials, collaboratively prescribe with the medical officers, ensure supply, provide advice on dosing calculations, reconstitution, and administration. The pre-intervention cohort (Aug 2019-Jan 2020) did not have credentialed pharmacists' involvement at MET calls. Outcome Measures: Proportion of patients who received antimicrobials within one hours of MET call. Results: There were 97 sepsis-related MET calls in the pre-intervention cohort and 110 sepsis-related MET calls in the post-intervention cohort. A significantly higher proportion of patients received antimicrobials within one hour with pharmacist involvement, compared to control (81.3% vs 59.7%, P = .0006). A reduction in median time to antimicrobial administration (43 min vs 54 min, P = .017) was observed. Conclusion: Sepsis-related MET calls with pharmacist involvement experienced a greater proportion of patients receiving antimicrobials within one hour of sepsis recognition, and a reduction in median time to antimicrobial administration. These results provide support for routine pharmacist involvement at MET calls to assist patients receiving medications in a timely and efficient manner.

Impact of antibiotic allergy labels on timely and appropriate antibiotics for sepsis in the emergency department.

Objectives: Time to initiation of effective antibiotic therapy is a strong predictor of survival for patients with sepsis presenting to the Emergency Department (ED). Antibiotic allergy labels (AALs) are a known barrier to timely sepsis management. The aim was to evaluate the influence of AALs on timely sepsis management for ED sepsis presentations in an Australian hospital. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted for ED presentations requiring direct ICU admission for suspected sepsis, comparing patients with and without an AAL using propensity scores. Results: Between November 2018 and June 2021, 377 patients were included. The prevalence of an AAL was 29.6% (86/377). The median time to antibiotic administration was similar in the AAL versus non-AAL groups (51 versus 60 min, P = 0.11); there was no difference in mortality (14.1% versus 14.0%, P = 0.98) and length of stay (9.21 versus 10.10 days). The median time to antibiotic administration was shorter in those with Emergency Medicine (EM) pharmacist attendance versus those without (50 versus 92 min, P = 0.0001). Appropriateness of antibiotic prescription was 91.0% (343/377) for the overall cohort and was not associated with AALs, possibly due to our clear antimicrobial sepsis guidelines; however, EM pharmacist involvement was associated with increased antibiotic appropriateness (97.3% versus 88.4%, P = 0.00048). Conclusions: In our Australian ED, AALs were not found to impact timeliness of antibiotic administration in patients with sepsis. EM pharmacist involvement was associated with improved timeliness and appropriateness of antibiotic selection in patients presenting with sepsis.

Epidemiology of in-hospital cardiac arrest patients admitted to the intensive care unit in Australia: a retrospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) affects approximately 3000 patients annually in Australia. Introduction of the National Standard for Deteriorating Patients in 2011 was associated with reduced IHCA-related intensive care unit (ICU) admissions and reduced in-hospital mortality of such patients. AIMS: To assess whether the reduction in IHCA-related ICU admissions from hospital wards seen following the implementation of the national standard (baseline period 2013-2014) was sustained over the follow-up period (2015-2019) in Australia. METHODS: A multi-centre retrospective cohort study to compare the characteristics and outcomes of IHCA admitted to the ICU between baseline and follow-up periods. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients admitted to ICU from the ward following IHCA. Secondary outcomes included ICU and hospital mortality of IHCA-related ICU admissions. Data were analysed using hierarchical multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: The proportion of cardiac arrest-related admissions from the ward was lower in the follow-up period when compared to baseline (4.1 vs 3.8%; P = 0.04). Such patients had lower illness severity and were more likely to have limitations of medical treatment at admission. However, after adjustment for severity of illness, the likelihood of being admitted to ICU following cardiac arrest on the ward increased in the follow-up period (odds ratio (OR) 1.13 (1.05-1.22); P = 0.001). Hospital mortality was lower in the follow-up period (50.3 vs 46.3%; P = 0.02), but after adjustment the likelihood of death did not differ between the periods (OR 1.0 (0.86-1.17); P = 0.98). CONCLUSION: After adjustment for the severity of illness, the likelihood of being admitted to ICU after IHCA slightly increased in the follow-up period.

Medication-related Medical Emergency Team activations: a case review study of frequency and preventability.

OBJECTIVES: Despite recognition of clinical deterioration and medication-related harm as patient safety risks, the frequency of medication-related Rapid Response System activations is undefined. We aimed to estimate the incidence and preventability of medication-related Medical Emergency Team (MET) activations and describe the associated adverse medication events. METHODS: A case review study of consecutive MET activations at two acute, academic teaching hospitals in Melbourne, Australia with mature Rapid Response Systems was conducted. All MET activations during a 3-week study period were assessed for a medication cause including identification of the contributing adverse medication event and its preventability, using validated tools and recognised classification systems. RESULTS: There were 9439 admissions and 628 MET activations during the study period. Of these, 146 (23.2%) MET activations were medication related: an incidence of 15.5 medication-related MET activation per 1000 admissions. Medication-related MET activations occurred a median of 46.6 hours earlier (IQR 22-165) in an admission than non-medication-related activations (p=0.001). Furthermore, this group also had more repeat MET activations during their admission (p=0.021, OR=1.68, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.59). A total of 92 of 146 (63%) medication-related MET activations were potentially preventable. Tachycardia due to omission of beta-blocking agents (10.9%, n=10 of 92) and hypotension due to cumulative toxicity (9.8%, n=9 of 92) or inappropriate use (10.9%, n=10 of 92) of antihypertensives were the most common adverse medication events leading to potentially preventable medication-related MET activations. CONCLUSIONS: Medications contributed to almost a quarter of MET activations, often early in a patient's admission. One in seven MET activations were due to potentially preventable adverse medication events. The most common of these were omission of beta-blockers and clinically inappropriate antihypertensive use. Strategies to prevent these events would increase patient safety and reduce burden on the MET.

Staff experiences, perceptions of care, and communication in the intensive care unit during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia.

BACKGROUND: In 2020, during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia, hospital intensive care units (ICUs) revised patient care practices, curtailed visiting, and augmented the use of personal protective equipment to protect patients, staff, and the community from viral transmission. AIM: The aim was to explore ICU staff experiences and perceptions of care and communication with patients during the COVID-19 pandemic to understand how alternative ways of working have influenced work processes, relationships, and staff morale. METHODS: This was a qualitative exploratory design study using audio-recorded and transcribed interviews with 20 ICU staff members. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. FINDINGS: Four major themes were derived from the data: (i) Communication and connection, (ii) Psychological casualties, (iii) Caring for our patients, and (iv) Overcoming challenges. Patient care was affected by diminished numbers of critical care qualified staff, limited staff entry to isolation rooms, and needing to use alternative techniques for some practices. The importance of effective communication from the organisation and between clinicians, families, and staff members was emphasised. personal protective equipment hindered communication between patients and staff and inhibited nonverbal and verbal cues conveying empathy in therapeutic interactions. Communication with families by phone or videoconference was less satisfying than in-person encounters. Some staff members suffered psychological distress, especially those working with COVID-19 patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Moral injury occurred when staff members were required to deny family access to patients. Workload intensified with increased patient admissions, additional infection control requirements, and the need to communicate with families using alternative methods. CONCLUSION: The results of this study reflect the difficulties in communication during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic. Communication between staff members and families may be improved using a more structured approach. Staff reported experiencing psychological stress when separating families and patients or working in isolation rooms for prolonged periods. A flexible, compassionate response to family presence in the ICU is essential to maintain patient- and family-centred care.

Survival and left ventricular dysfunction post lung transplantation for pulmonary arterial hypertension.

PURPOSE: Bilateral lung transplantation for end-stage pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is traditionally associated with higher early post-transplant mortality when compared with other indications. Changes in perioperative management, including the growing use of perioperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and an increased awareness of postoperative left ventricular dysfunction (LVD), have resulted in outcomes that are uncertain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a single-center, retrospective observational study at a lung transplantation center in Melbourne, Australia, from 2006 to 2019. ECMO use was categorized as preoperative, prophylactic, or rescue. Postoperative LVD was defined as a reduction in left ventricular function on echocardiography or using strict clinical criteria. RESULTS: 50 patients underwent lung transplantation for PAH. 12-month survival was 48/50 (96%). ECMO was used in 26 (52%) patients, and the use of prophylactic VA-ECMO increased over the study period. Postoperative LVD was diagnosed in 21 (42%) patients. 12-month survival and left ventricular function was no different between LVD and non-LVD groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that high survival rates can be achieved following lung transplantation for PAH. We found that ECMO utilization was common, and indications have changed over time. LVD was common but did not impact 12-month survival.

Intensive care admissions following rapid response team reviews in patients with COVID-19 in Australia.

Objectives: To evaluate the epidemiology of rapid response team (RRT) reviews that led to intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, and to evaluate the frequency of in-hospital cardiac arrests (IHCAs) among ICU patients with confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Australia. Design: Multicentre, retrospective cohort study. Setting: 48 public and private ICUs in Australia. Participants: All adults (aged ≥ 16 years) with confirmed COVID-19 admitted to participating ICUs between 25 January and 31 October 2020, as part of SPRINT-SARI (Short PeRiod IncideNce sTudy of Severe Acute Respiratory Infection) Australia, which were linked with ICUs contributing to the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Adult Patient Database (ANZICS APD). Main outcome measures and results: Of the 413 critically ill patients with COVID-19 who were analysed, 48.2% (199/413) were admitted from the ward and 30.5% (126/413) were admitted to the ICU following an RRT review. Patients admitted following an RRT review had higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) scores, fewer days from symptom onset to hospitalisation (median, 5.4 [interquartile range (IQR), 3.2-7.6] v 7.1 days [IQR, 4.1-9.8]; P < 0.001) and longer hospitalisations (median, 18 [IQR, 11-33] v 13 days [IQR, 7-24]; P < 0.001) compared with those not admitted via an RRT review. Admissions following RRT review comprised 60.3% (120/199) of all ward-based admissions. Overall, IHCA occurred in 1.9% (8/413) of ICU patients with COVID-19, and most IHCAs (6/8, 75%) occurred during ICU admission. There were no differences in IHCA rates or in ICU or hospital mortality rates based on whether a patient had a prior RRT review or not. Conclusions: This study found that RRT reviews were a common way for deteriorating ward patients with COVID-19 to be admitted to the ICU, and that IHCA was rare among ICU patients with COVID-19.

Evaluation of medical emergency team medication management practices in acute hospitals: A multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: Medical emergency teams use medications to rescue deteriorating patients. Medication management is the system of steps and processes, including prescribing, distribution, administration, and monitoring, to achieve the best outcomes from medication use. Systems or standards for medication management by medical emergency teams have not been defined. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to propose potential solutions to improve medical emergency team medication management by evaluating medication supply and related medication management practices during medical emergency team activations and understanding clinicians' perceptions about medical emergency team medication management in acute hospitals. METHODS: A prospective multicentre audit of intensive care unit-equipped hospitals in Victoria, Australia, was conducted. After advertisement and invitation via scheduled email newsletters to hospitals, a representative of the medical emergency team from each hospital self-administered an online audit tool during December 2019 and January 2020. Audit data were analysed descriptively, and perceptions were analysed using content analysis. RESULTS: Responses were received from 32 of the 44 (72.7%) eligible hospitals. At 17 of the 32 (53.1%) hospitals, arrest trolleys provided medications for medical emergency team activations, in addition to arrest calls. At 15 of the 32 (46.9%) hospitals, separate, dedicated medical emergency team medication supplies were used to care for deteriorating patients. Dedicated medical emergency team supplies contained a median of 20 (range = 8-37) medications, predominantly cardiovascular (median = 8, mode = 7, range = 4-16) and neurological medications (median and mode = 6, range = 0-11). Variation was observed in all storage and other supply-related medication management practices studied. The four most frequent categories of clinicians' perceptions described systematic challenges with availability of the right medication in the right place at the right time. CONCLUSIONS: Current supply and related medication management practices and clinicians' perceptions demonstrated further development is necessary for medication management to meet the needs of medical emergency team clinicians and their patients.

A preliminary study of intensivist-performed DVT ultrasound screening in trauma ICU patients (APSIT Study).

BACKGROUND: Multiple screening Duplex ultrasound scans (DUS) are performed in trauma patients at high risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the intensive care unit (ICU). Intensive care physician performed compression ultrasound (IP-CUS) has shown promise as a diagnostic test for DVT in a non-trauma setting. Whether IP-CUS can be used as a screening test in trauma patients is unknown. Our study aimed to assess the agreement between IP-CUS and vascular sonographer performed DUS for proximal lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (PLEDVT) screening in high-risk trauma patients in ICU. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted at the ICU of Alfred Hospital, a major trauma center in Melbourne, Australia, between Feb and Nov 2015. All adult major trauma patients admitted with high risk for DVT were eligible for inclusion. IP-CUS was performed immediately before or after DUS for PLEDVT screening. The paired studies were repeated twice weekly until the DVT diagnosis, death or ICU discharge. Written informed consent from the patient, or person responsible, or procedural authorisation, was obtained. The individuals performing the scans were blinded to the others' results. The agreement analysis was performed using Cohen's Kappa statistics and intraclass correlation coefficient for repeated binary measurements. RESULTS: During the study period, 117 patients had 193 pairs of scans, and 45 (39%) patients had more than one pair of scans. The median age (IQR) was 47 (28-68) years with 77% males, mean (SD) injury severity score 27.5 (9.53), and a median (IQR) ICU length of stay 7 (3.2-11.6) days. There were 16 cases (13.6%) of PLEDVT with an incidence rate of 2.6 (1.6-4.2) cases per 100 patient-days in ICU. The overall agreement was 96.7% (95% CI 94.15-99.33). The Cohen's Kappa between the IP-CUS and DUS was 0.77 (95% CI 0.59-0.95), and the intraclass correlation coefficient for repeated binary measures was 0.75 (95% CI 0.67-0.81). CONCLUSIONS: There is a substantial agreement between IP-CUS and DUS for PLEDVT screening in trauma patients in ICU with high risk for DVT. Large multicentre studies are needed to confirm this finding.

Unplanned ICU Admission From Hospital Wards After Rapid Response Team Review in Australia and New Zealand.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate what proportion of unplanned ICU admissions from hospital wards occurred after rapid response team review and compare baseline characteristics and outcomes of patients admitted after rapid response team review with non-rapid response team-related admissions. DESIGN: Multicenter binational retrospective cohort study. SETTING: One-hundred seventy-eight ICUs across Australia and New Zealand. PATIENTS: All adults (≥ 17 yr) in the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society Adult Patient Database between 2012 and 2017. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among 97,181 unplanned ICU admissions from the ward, prior rapid response team review occurred in 55,084 cases (56.7%). Rapid response team patients were slightly older (65.4 [16.9] vs 63.3 [18]), had a higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score (64.6 [27.1] vs 54.7 [25.3]) and more frequently had limitations of medical treatment (13.1% vs 8.5%) compared with patients with no rapid response team review. The strongest independent associations with ICU admission following rapid response team review included age, ICU admission diagnosis (especially sepsis-, neurologic-, respiratory-, and cardiovascular-related), tertiary ICU status, and presence of limitations of medical treatment (p < 0.0001 all comparisons). Rapid response team-related ICU admissions had a longer median ICU (2.4 d [1.2-4.6 d] vs 2.1 d [1.0-4.2 d]) and hospital (12.8 d [7.0-23.6 d] vs 10.8 d [5.9-20.3 d]) length of stay, and were more likely to die in the ICU (12.3% vs 7.5%) and in-hospital (20.8% vs 13.5%) (p < 0.0001). After adjusting for illness severity and institution, patients admitted following rapid response team review stayed longer in hospital but were not at increased risk of dying in-hospital (adjusted odds ratio, 1.03; 0.98-1.07). CONCLUSIONS: In Australia and New Zealand, hospital ward patients admitted to ICU following rapid response team review represent the majority of ward-based ICU admissions, are more chronically and acutely ill, and more frequently have sepsis than those admitted from the ward without rapid response team review. Their unadjusted outcomes are worse, but after adjustment their mortality is similar.

Effect of Vitamin C, Hydrocortisone, and Thiamine vs Hydrocortisone Alone on Time Alive and Free of Vasopressor Support Among Patients With Septic Shock: The VITAMINS Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: It is unclear whether vitamin C, hydrocortisone, and thiamine are more effective than hydrocortisone alone in expediting resolution of septic shock. Objective: To determine whether the combination of vitamin C, hydrocortisone, and thiamine, compared with hydrocortisone alone, improves the duration of time alive and free of vasopressor administration in patients with septic shock. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter, open-label, randomized clinical trial conducted in 10 intensive care units in Australia, New Zealand, and Brazil that recruited 216 patients fulfilling the Sepsis-3 definition of septic shock. The first patient was enrolled on May 8, 2018, and the last on July 9, 2019. The final date of follow-up was October 6, 2019. Interventions: Patients were randomized to the intervention group (n = 109), consisting of intravenous vitamin C (1.5 g every 6 hours), hydrocortisone (50 mg every 6 hours), and thiamine (200 mg every 12 hours), or to the control group (n = 107), consisting of intravenous hydrocortisone (50 mg every 6 hours) alone until shock resolution or up to 10 days. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary trial outcome was duration of time alive and free of vasopressor administration up to day 7. Ten secondary outcomes were prespecified, including 90-day mortality. Results: Among 216 patients who were randomized, 211 provided consent and completed the primary outcome measurement (mean age, 61.7 years [SD, 15.0]; 133 men [63%]). Time alive and vasopressor free up to day 7 was 122.1 hours (interquartile range [IQR], 76.3-145.4 hours) in the intervention group and 124.6 hours (IQR, 82.1-147.0 hours) in the control group; the median of all paired differences was -0.6 hours (95% CI, -8.3 to 7.2 hours; P = .83). Of 10 prespecified secondary outcomes, 9 showed no statistically significant difference. Ninety-day mortality was 30/105 (28.6%) in the intervention group and 25/102 (24.5%) in the control group (hazard ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.69-2.00). No serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions and Relevance: In patients with septic shock, treatment with intravenous vitamin C, hydrocortisone, and thiamine, compared with intravenous hydrocortisone alone, did not significantly improve the duration of time alive and free of vasopressor administration over 7 days. The finding suggests that treatment with intravenous vitamin C, hydrocortisone, and thiamine does not lead to a more rapid resolution of septic shock compared with intravenous hydrocortisone alone. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03333278.

Improving sepsis care for hospital inpatients using existing medical emergency response systems.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis is a medical emergency; timely management has been shown to reduce mortality. We aimed to improve the care of inpatients who developed sepsis after hospital admission by integrating a sepsis bundle with an existing medical emergency team (MET). METHODS: We performed a before-and-after study at an Australian institution. A multimodal intervention was implemented including formation of a working group, development of a guideline, standard documentation, education, audit and feedback. The primary outcome was the proportion of MET calls where there was compliance with the sepsis resuscitation bundle within one hour of MET call. RESULTS: There was an improvement in completion of the entire resuscitation bundle (OR 2.33, 95%, CI: 1.23 - 4.41) and lactate measurement (OR 2.72, CI: 1.53, 4.84) within one hour of MET call. There was a non-significant reduction in the median time to antibiotic administration in patients where antibiotics were initiated or changed at the MET call (60 mins vs. 44 mins, p = 0.8). In hospital mortality was observed to fall from 22.1% to 11.4%, but after adjusting for age and baseline illness severity this differences was not statistically significant (OR 0.52, CI: 0.23, 1.19, p = 0.12). CONCLUSION: The implementation of a multimodal sepsis bundle and the utilisation of an existing MET call system demonstrated an increase in the overall uptake of a sepsis bundle. This was associated with an observed reduction in all-cause in-hospital mortality, although this difference was not statistically significant after adjustment for confounders. Further interventions with a focus on nursing education and engagement may improve timely antibiotic administration.

The frequency and nature of clinician identified medication-related rapid response system calls.

AIM: The contribution of adverse medication events to clinical deterioration is unknown. This study aimed to determine the frequency and nature of rapid response system (RRS) calls that clinicians perceived were medication-related using RRS quality arm data. METHODS: Analysis of routine data prospectively collected by clinicians responding to RRS calls in an Australian acute tertiary academic hospital. RESULTS: Between January 2013 and June 2017, 12,221 adult patients triggered the RRS for 25,906 medical emergency team (MET) and 512 code blue calls. Clinicians identified 433 medication-related RRS calls (1.6%) involving 406 patients (3.3%). These included 418 MET calls (1.3 medication-related MET calls per 1000 admissions) and 15 code blue calls (0.045 medication-related code blue calls per 1000 admissions). Medication-related calls occurred earlier in the admission (p = 0.002) and were more common for patients triggering multiple calls during the same admission (p < 0.001), compared to non-medication-related calls. Medication-related calls most commonly were triggered by low blood pressure (38.3%) and involved cardiovascular (43.0%) and nervous system medications (36.0%). Dose-related toxicity (n = 178) was the most frequent adverse medication event contributing to medication-related calls. CONCLUSION: One in 30 patients triggering a RRS call experienced medication-related clinical deterioration, most often due to dose related toxicity of cardiovascular system medications. The perceived frequency and potential preventability of this medication-related harm suggest further research is required to increase recognition of medication-related RRS calls by responding clinicians and to reduce the incidence.

Avoiding adult in-hospital cardiac arrest: A retrospective cohort study to determine preventability.

INTRODUCTION: This study had three main aims. Develop a methodology for reviewing in-hospital cardiac arrests (IHCA). Assess appropriateness and potential preventability of IHCAs. Identify areas for improvement within the rapid response system (RRS). DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study of IHCA identified from an existing organisational electronic database of medical emergency (MET) and Code Blue team activation. Potential preventability of IHCA and Code Blue team activation were established by an expert panel based on a standardised case review process with descriptive and content analyses for each IHCA event. SETTING: A university affiliated tertiary referral hospital with an established two-tier RRS in Melbourne, Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Same day and multi-day stay patients identified from an existing database as having an IHCA defined as attempted resuscitation with chest compressions, defibrillation, or both from January 2014 to December 2015. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures were: number of Code Blue activations; potential preventability of Code Blue activations and potential preventability of the IHCA event. RESULTS: A total of 120 IHCA events equating to 0.58 per 1000 total admissions occurred. 11 (9%) of IHCA were determined to be potentially preventable due to a failure to escalate, medication errors and inappropriate management. 39 (33%) of 120 Code Blue team activations were determined to be potentially preventable. These were typically due to lack of identification and documentation for end of life (EOL) care in 16 (62%) cases and inappropriate resuscitation when limitations of care were already in place in 10 (38%) cases. CONCLUSIONS: The study centre has a comparably low rate of preventable IHCA which could be reduced further through improvements in documentation and handover process. A focus on improved communication, recognition and earlier instigation of appropriate EOL care will reduce this rate further.

Designing a more efficient, effective and safe Medical Emergency Team (MET) service using data analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Hospitals have seen a rise in Medical Emergency Team (MET) reviews. We hypothesised that the commonest MET calls result in similar treatments. Our aim was to design a pre-emptive management algorithm that allowed direct institution of treatment to patients without having to wait for attendance of the MET team and to model its potential impact on MET call incidence and patient outcomes. METHODS: Data was extracted for all MET calls from the hospital database. Association rule data mining techniques were used to identify the most common combinations of MET call causes, outcomes and therapies. RESULTS: There were 13,656 MET calls during the 34-month study period in 7936 patients. The most common MET call was for hypotension [31%, (2459/7936)]. These MET calls were strongly associated with the immediate administration of intra-venous fluid (70% [1714/2459] v 13% [739/5477] p<0.001), unless the patient was located on a respiratory ward (adjusted OR 0.41 [95%CI 0.25-0.67] p<0.001), had a cardiac cause for admission (adjusted OR 0.61 [95%CI 0.50-0.75] p<0.001) or was under the care of the heart failure team (adjusted OR 0.29 [95%CI 0.19-0.42] p<0.001). Modelling the effect of a pre-emptive management algorithm for immediate fluid administration without MET activation on data from a test period of 24 months following the study period, suggested it would lead to a 68.7% (2541/3697) reduction in MET calls for hypotension and a 19.6% (2541/12938) reduction in total METs without adverse effects on patients. CONCLUSION: Routinely collected data and analytic techniques can be used to develop a pre-emptive management algorithm to administer intravenous fluid therapy to a specific group of hypotensive patients without the need to initiate a MET call. This could both lead to earlier treatment for the patient and less total MET calls.