[Identifying gaps between guidelines and clinical practice in Clostridium difficile infection]. / Diferencias entre las recomendaciones y la práctica clínica en la infección por Clostridium difficile.

OBJECTIVES: The first aim was to determine whether patients are being treated in accordance with the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA/SHEA) Clostridium difficile guidelines and whether adherence impacts patient outcomes. The second aim was to identify specific action items in the guidelines that are not being translated into clinical practice, for their subsequent implementation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective, descriptive study was conducted over a 36 month period, on patients with compatible clinical symptoms and positive test for C. difficile toxins A and/or B in stool samples, in an internal medicine department of a tertiary medical centre. Patient demographic and clinical data (outcomes, comorbidity, risk factors) and compliance with guidelines, were examined RESULTS: A total of 77 patients with C. difficile infection were identified (87 episodes). Stratified by disease severity criteria, 49.3% of patients were mild-moderate, 35.1% severe, and 15.6% severe-complicated. Full adherence with the guidelines was observed in only 40.2% of patients, and was significantly better for mild-moderate (71.0%), than in severe (7.4%) or severe-complicated patients (16.6%) (P<.003). Adherence was significantly associated with clinical cure (57% vs 42%), fewer recurrences (22.2% vs 77.7%), and mortality (25% vs 75%) (P<.01). The stratification of severity of the episode, and the adequacy of antibiotic to clinical severity, need improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Overall adherence with the guidelines for management of Clostridium difficile infection was poor, especially in severe and severe-complicated patients, being associated with worse clinical outcomes. Educational interventions aimed at improving guideline adherence are warranted.

[HIV seroprevalence in the population treated in a hospital emergency department: analysis by pooled batches of serum]. / Seroprevalencia del VIH en población atendida en un Servicio de Urgencias: análisis por lotes de sueros.

INTRODUCTION: The current number of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infected people is not known in Spain as there is no national registry. This study has aimed to estimate the prevalence of HIV infection in the population treated in a hospital emergency department (ER) as an epidemic and risk of exposure indicator during healthcare activity and to assess the differences observed regarding previous estimates. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of all the sera received in the ER anonymously. The final size of the pools was 5 sera. HIV antibody screening was performed using the 4th generation ELFA technique and confirmation was performed by Western Blot. RESULTS: Seven out of the 270 pools made from 1,347 sera obtained were reactive. The individualized analysis confirmed 6 sera to be positive and 1 serum to be false positive. The observed prevalence was 0.52% (95% CI 0.10-0.94). Prevalence fell 0.87% in comparison to the years 1990-1991, although this was not statistically significant (p = 0.08). DISCUSSION: The implementation of HIV antibodies detection through a system of pooled batches in samples collected in the ER make it possible to assess the prevalence of infection with this virus, decreasing costs with regard to individualized analysis of sera in both economic terms as well as samples handling.

[Use of a rapid method for detecting adenovirus in the feces of children]. / Utilidad de una técnica rápida para detección de adenovirus en heces de niños.

Adenovirus (ADV) and rotavirus (RV) were screened by latex aglutination (LA) in 772 fecal samples from hospitalized and non hospitalized children under 7 years of age, those included 55 control samples. Reactive samples were confirmed by electron microscopy (ME) and enzimoimmunoassay (EIA). ADV were found in 20 (2.6%) samples and RV in 25 (3.2%). Coinfection by both viruses was not demonstrated. The greatest percentage of findings was observed in watery (23% ADV and 25% RV) and almost watery stools (8% ADV and 25% RV). We did not find any of those viruses in samples from control children. Concordance between LA and confirmation methods used was excellent. Thus the LA tests could provide a simple tool for the diagnosis of non hospitalized patients, increasing the possibilities of a rapid ethiological diagnostic in infectious diarrhoeas.