Suicide and dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence and risk factors.

Dementia is a global health concern with increasing numbers of people living long enough to develop dementia. People with dementia (PwD) may be particularly vulnerable to suicidality. However, suicide in PwD has not been thoroughly explored. The objective of this review was to determine the prevalence and risk factors of suicide in PwD. Five databases were searched from inception to July 2023. Peer-reviewed publications reporting prevalence, risk factors or quantitative summary data for suicide outcomes in PwD were included. Random effects models were used to calculate the pooled prevalence and effect sizes. 54 studies met inclusion criteria. In PwD, the point prevalence of suicidal ideation was 10 % (95 %CI=6 %;16 %), 2-year period prevalence of suicide attempts was 0.8 % (95 %CI=0.3 %;2 %), 10-year period prevalence of suicide attempts was 8.7 % (95 %CI=6.0 %%;12.7 %) and the incidence of death by suicide 0.1 % (95 %CI=0.1 %;0.2 %). Compared to not having dementia, a diagnosis of dementia increased risk of suicidal ideation (OR=1.62[95 %CI=1.17;2.24]) but not risk of suicide attempt (OR=1.77 [95 %CI=0.85;3.69]) or death by suicide (OR=1.30 [95 %CI=0.81;2.10]). People with moderate dementia had significantly increased risk of suicidal ideation than those with mild dementia (OR=1.59[95 %CI=1.11;2.28]), younger PwD were at increased risk of dying by suicide (OR=2.82[95 %CI=2.16;3.68]) and men with dementia were more likely to attempt (OR=1.28[95 %CI=1.25;1.31]) and die by suicide (OR=2.88[95 %CI=1.54;5.39]) than women with dementia. This review emphasises the need for mental health support and suicide prevention in dementia care, emphasising tailored approaches based on age, symptoms, and being male.

University students' access to mental health services: A qualitative study of the experiences of health service professionals through the lens of candidacy in England.

OBJECTIVES: In order to develop a better understanding of students' access to mental health services, we explored the experiences of health care professionals interacting with university students with mental health problems. METHODS: We interviewed 23 professionals working across university advice and counselling services, NHS general practice, crisis, and psychological services in North and East London between June 2022 and January 2023. Our approach drew on reflexive thematic analysis and the principles of abductive analysis. The notion of candidacy - that is, how different needs are deemed deserving of health service attention - was particularly helpful to our understanding of the ongoing phenomenon of interest in the data. RESULTS: Each student's access to mental health support was highly contingent on the student's dynamic social context and the pressures and organisation of the local health system. Professionals described how different students viewed different needs as deserving of health service attention. Which students reached the professional's service depended on the resources and relationships a student could draw upon, and the service's relative permeability. Once there, what action professionals took was strongly influenced by the professional's service expertise, resource constraints, the relationships the professional's service had with other organisations, the students' wishes, and whether students regarded treatment offers as acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: Candidacy offers a useful lens to view university students' access to mental health support. Access appears to be an increasingly intricate task for students, given the fragmented service landscape, surging demand for mental health care and challenges of emerging adulthood. Our findings suggest that policy goals to increase use of mental health services are unlikely to improve outcomes for students without policy makers and health systems giving holistic consideration of inter-service relationships and available resources.