Inhibition of the bone morphogenetic protein pathway suppresses tumor growth through downregulation of epidermal growth factor receptor in MEK/ERK-dependent colorectal cancer.

The bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) pathway promotes differentiation and induces apoptosis in normal colorectal epithelial cells. However, its role in colorectal cancer (CRC) is controversial, where it can act as context-dependent tumor promoter or tumor suppressor. Here we have found that CRC cells reside in a BMP-rich environment based on curation of two publicly available RNA-sequencing databases. Suppression of BMP using a specific BMP inhibitor, LDN193189, suppresses the growth of select CRC organoids. Colorectal cancer organoids treated with LDN193189 showed a decrease in epidermal growth factor receptor, which was mediated by protein degradation induced by leucine-rich repeats and immunoglobulin-like domains protein 1 (LRIG1) expression. Among 18 molecularly characterized CRC organoids, suppression of growth by BMP inhibition correlated with induction of LRIG1 gene expression. Notably, knockdown of LRIG1 in organoids diminished the growth-suppressive effect of LDN193189. Furthermore, in CRC organoids, which are susceptible to growth suppression by LDN193189, simultaneous treatment with LDN193189 and trametinib, an FDA-approved MEK inhibitor, resulted in cooperative growth inhibition both in vitro and in vivo. Taken together, the simultaneous inhibition of BMP and MEK could be a novel treatment option in CRC cases, and evaluating in vitro growth suppression and LRIG1 induction by BMP inhibition using patient-derived organoids could offer functional biomarkers for predicting potential responders to this regimen.

Morphological Differences between Liquid-Based Cytology and Conventional Preparation in Endometrial Endometrioid Carcinoma Grade 1 and Grade 3, and the Differentiation of Grades in Each Method.

INTRODUCTION: Direct smearing preparation (conventional preparation [CP]) has been widely used for endometrial cytology in Japan. In CP, sampling and screening errors are problematic. In liquid-based cytology preparation (LBC), the problems of CP can be solved. But there is a problem that cytological findings of LBC are different from those of CP. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the differences of morphological findings of endometrial cytology between LBC and CP, and the usefulness of the endometrial LBC to differentiate endometrioid carcinoma grade 1 (G1) from grade 3 (G3). METHODS: Thirteen cases of endometrioid carcinoma G1, and 5 cases of G3 collected by the Softcyte device and prepared by LBC and CP (split specimen) were used. We focused on the following items: (1) the number of clusters per cm2, (2) the number of layers of clusters, (3) area of clusters, (4) perimeter of clusters, (5) roundness of clusters, (6) complexity of clusters, (7) area of nucleus, (8) perimeter of nucleus, (9) roundness of nucleus, (10) complexity of nucleus, (11) area of nucleolus, and (12) nucleolus-nucleus ratio (N/N). RESULTS: Compared with CP, the number of clusters and layers of the clusters in LBC were significantly larger in G1. The area and perimeters of the clusters and the nucleus were significant smaller, and the N/N ratio was greater in LBC than that in CP in both G1 and G3. Regarding morphological differences between G1 and G3 in LBC and CP, the number of layers was significantly larger in G1 than in G3 in LBC and CP. The area of the clusters in LBC was significantly larger in G1 than in G3. The area and perimeters of the nucleus in CP and the area of the nucleolus and N/N ratio in LBC and CP were significantly smaller in G1 than in G3. CONCLUSION: In the endometrial cytology, it became clear that the cell image was different between LBC and CP and between G1 and G3. By microscopic examination understanding the characteristics of the cell image in LBC, endometrial LBC could be useful to diagnose endometrial carcinoma.