Exacerbation of Portal Hypertensive Enteropathy after Endoscopic Injection Sclerotherapy for Esophageal Varices.

INTRODUCTION: Portal hypertensive enteropathy (PHE) is a well-known small-bowel lesion that occurs with liver cirrhosis (LC) and is associated with increased hepatic venous pressure. However, it is unclear how esophageal varices (EV) treatment actually affects PHE. We aimed to analyze the effects of EV treatment on PHE. METHODS: Among LC patients who underwent capsule endoscopy (CE) more than twice to confirm PHE at our hospital from February 2009 to September 2018, we targeted those with no change in the Child-Pugh classification after EV treatment for the prevention of bleeding. Patients were assigned to groups based on the EV treatment method (endoscopic injection sclerotherapy [EIS] group or endoscopic variceal ligation [EVL] group). We analyzed the PHE findings before and after treatment, and we investigated changes in the collateral vein using computed tomography imaging. RESULTS: We analyzed 42 LC patients (27 men; mean age, 65.3 years); 20 were in the EIS group and 22 were in the EVL group. Exacerbation of PHE was significantly prevalent in the EIS group (90%) compared to that in the EVL group (50%). CE of PHE showed significantly prevalent exacerbation of villous edema in the EIS group (65%) compared to that in the EVL group (23%). Stenosis or disappearance of the feeding vessel (55%) and exacerbation of the hepatofugal collateral vein (35%) were significantly prevalent in the EIS group. CONCLUSIONS: EIS exacerbates PHE, especially villous edema, in LC patients with changes in collateral circulation.

Diagnostic Yield of Colon Capsule Endoscopy in Detection of Superficial Colorectal Lesions.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of second-generation PillCam -COLON2 capsule endoscopy (CCE2) in detecting colorectal superficial lesions remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the diagnostic yield of CCE2 in the detection of colorectal superficial lesions. METHODS: We performed CCE2 in 60 consecutive patients between April 2011 and -December 2017. Lesions ≥6 mm in size were detected in 34 patients (25 males, average age: 60.5 years). We performed endoscopic resection and histopathological analysis of all resected lesions within 3 months after CCE2. We considered the optical colonoscopy (OC) findings as the gold standard and evaluated CCE2 sensitivity. RESULTS: Sixty-seven lesions (≥6 mm) were detected via OC, with 27 colorectal superficial lesions and 40 protruded lesions. CCE2 sensitivity for ≥6-mm-sized, superficial, and protruded lesions was 84, 78, and 88%, respectively. No significant intergroup differences were observed. CCE2 false-negative colorectal superficial lesions accounted for 31% of right-sided colon lesions and 50% of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps (SSA/Ps). The CCE2 false-negative protruded lesions accounted for 17% of right-sided colon lesions. CONCLUSION: CCE2 sensitivities for colorectal superficial and protruded lesions were not significantly different. However, flat-type SSA/Ps in the right colon, especially when the transit time is fast, have a risk of demonstrating CCE2 false-negative results.

Clinical Utility of Emergency Capsule Endoscopy for Diagnosing the Source and Nature of Ongoing Overt Obscure Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In patients with ongoing overt obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB), prompt detection of the bleeding source is crucial to treatment success. However, there is no consensus on the optimal timing of diagnostic capsule endoscopy (CE). We investigated the clinical utility of emergency CE for detecting the source of ongoing overt OGIB. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 146 consecutive patients who, between February 2009 and July 2018, underwent emergency CE at Hiroshima University Hospital to detect the source of ongoing overt OGIB. Patients with a bleeding source located outside the small bowel were excluded. The remaining 127 patients were stratified according to the timing of CE relative to the onset of bleeding: patients in group A (n = 15, 12 men; mean age: 75 years; age range: 62-83 years) underwent CE within 48 hours of bleeding onset, whereas patients in group B (n = 112, 73 men; mean age: 65 years; age range: 17-88 years) underwent CE at >48 hours after bleeding onset. All patients underwent double-balloon endoscopy, and the final diagnosis was compared against the CE findings. RESULTS: The CE lesion detection rate was significantly higher in group A (12/15 patients, 80%) than in group B (53/112 patients, 47%) (p = 0.0174). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the patients' background characteristics. Vascular lesions were the most frequent finding in both groups. The diagnostic concordance rate between emergency CE and double-balloon endoscopy was 100% in group A and 92.9% in group B. Rebleeding after endoscopic treatment was confirmed in only one patient in group B. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency CE represents a useful diagnostic modality in patients with ongoing overt OGIB, potentially improving detection rates and reducing rebleeding risk.

Experience with Balloon Dilatation in Crohn's and Non-Crohn's Benign Small-Bowel Strictures: Is There a Difference?

BACKGROUND/AIM: Endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD) has been effective for small-bowel strictures in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). However, its efficacy and indication for small-bowel strictures in non-CD patients have not been established. This study evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety of EBD for small-bowel strictures in non-CD patients compared with CD patients. METHODS: Ninety-eight consecutive patients (mean age, 53 years; average observation period, 45 months) with small-bowel strictures diagnosed by double-balloon endoscopy were retrospectively evaluated at Hiroshima University Hospital from August 2003 to April 2017. The average number of procedures, short-term and long-term EBD success rates, and safety profiles between the non-CD and CD groups were examined. RESULTS: Surgery was selected as the initial treatment in 44 cases (45%) (non-CD group, 27 (61%); CD group, 17 (39%)) as EBD is not indicated. Fourteen non-CD patients had strictures due to malignant tumors, while 13 patients had benign strictures. Twenty-three patients (non-CD, 12; CD, 11) underwent EBD. Forty-three EBD procedures were performed for 17 stricture sites (average: 2.5 procedures/site) in non-CD patients and 41 EBD procedures for 18 stricture sites (average: 2.3 procedures/site) in CD patients. The short-term success rate was 100% (23/23), whereas the long-term success rate was 92% (11/12) in non-CD patients and 82% (9/11) in CD patients. No significant differences in the surgery-free rate occurred between both groups. Furthermore, one adverse event, bleeding after EBD, was encountered in the non-CD group (8%, 1/12). CONCLUSION: EBD for small-bowel strictures demonstrated good clinical outcomes in non-CD patients.

The Clinical Usefulness of the PillCam Progress Indicator for Route Selection in Double Balloon Endoscopy.

Objective The utility of capsule endoscopy (CE) findings in the route selection for double balloon endoscopy (DBE) has not been adequately discussed. The PillCam Progress Indicator in the RAPID 6.5 software program graphically demonstrates the progress of the capsule endoscope through the small-bowel. This study aimed to clarify the usefulness of the PillCam Progress Indicator in choosing the initial DBE route. Methods We retrospectively examined 50 consecutive patients with 50 target lesions detected on both CE and DBE at Hiroshima University Hospital from January 2011 to February 2018. In this study, we selected antegrade DBE on the basis of % Capsule Progress <50% as a clinical trial. The association between the PillCam Progress Indicator data and the DBE route to the target lesion was analyzed. Results The target lesion was reached via the initial DBE route in 96% (48/50) of cases. The cutoff values for selecting an antegrade route for DBE were 50% for % Capsule Progress and 42% for % SB Time. At the cutoff value, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for route selection were 100%, 91%, 93%, and 100% for % Capsule Progress and 96%, 91%, 93%, and 95% for % SB Time. Conclusion The PillCam Progress Indicator was useful for determining the appropriate initial DBE route.

Management of occult obscure gastrointestinal bleeding patients based on long-term outcomes.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus regarding the management of occult obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) patients without a confirmed bleeding source. This study aimed to consider the management of occult OGIB patients based on their long-term outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 357 consecutive occult OGIB patients (203 men; mean age: 59.7 years) who underwent capsule endoscopy (CE) at Hiroshima University Hospital, Japan and were followed up for more than 12 months (mean follow-up period; 50.2 months). Patients were divided into three groups as follows: Group A consisted of 98 of 157 patients who had positive findings and indication for treatment, Group B consisted of 59 of 157 patients who had positive findings but no indication for treatment, and Group C consisted of 200 patients who had negative small-bowel findings. We examined the rate of positive CE findings, detection rate and details of bleeding sources, overt bleeding rate, the rate of anemia exacerbation, 5-year anemia exacerbation rate, and overall survival rate. RESULTS: The positive CE findings rate was 44% (157/357) and detection rate of bleeding source was 27% (98/357). The details of Group A were as follows: angioectasia (n = 61), nonspecific ulceration (n = 10), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced ulcer (n = 8), and others (n = 19). The details of Group B were as follows: erythema (n = 31), angioectasia (n = 25), and others (n = 3). There were no patients with overt bleeding in Group B. Although six patients had anemia exacerbation in Group B, they had angioectasia without a bleeding source. CONCLUSION: The long-term outcomes of occult OGIB patients were good. Occult OGIB patients without bleeding source lesions may not require follow-up CE.

Predictive Factors of Portal Hypertensive Enteropathy Exacerbation in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis: A Capsule Endoscopy Study.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The clinical course and exacerbation of portal hypertensive enteropathy (PHE) are yet to be fully clarified. This study aimed to identify factors related to PHE exacerbation in patients with liver cirrhosis (LC). METHODS: Fifty patients with LC (33 male; mean age, 67 years), who underwent capsule endoscopy (CE) at the Hiroshima University Hospital between February 2009 and September 2015, were followed up for >6 months. Exacerbation is defined as the appearance of new lesions or worsening of existing lesions. The association between PHE exacerbation and the clinical factors was evaluated. RESULTS: PHE exacerbation was identified in 24 out of 50 (48%) of cases: erythema (14 cases); angioectasia (11 cases); erosions (9 cases); villous edema (8 cases); and esophageal varices (EVs; 6 cases). The following factors were significantly associated with PHE exacerbation: portosystemic shunts, EVs and portal hypertensive gastropathy (PHG) exacerbation. After therapy, CE findings among the 24 cases were as follows: villous edema (19 cases); erythema (17 cases); angioectasia (16 cases); erosions (12 cases); and EVs (9 cases), and no observable abnormalities in 2 cases. On multivariate analysis, exacerbation of EVs and PHG were independent predictors of PHE exacerbation. CONCLUSION: EVs and PHG exacerbation may predict PHE exacerbation in patients with LC.

Clinical significance of small-bowel villous edema in patients with liver cirrhosis: A capsule endoscopy study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The relationship between the presence of villous edema (VE) in portal hypertensive enteropathy and clinical factors remains unclear. The aim of this study was to reveal the clinical factors related to VE in patients with liver cirrhosis (LC), and investigate the clinical significance of VE. METHODS: Between February 2009 and September 2016, 363 consecutive patients with LC underwent capsule endoscopy for diagnosing portal hypertensive enteropathy at Hiroshima University Hospital. We evaluated the relationship between the presence of VE and patients' clinical characteristics, findings of esophagogastroduodenoscopy and computed tomography, and survival time. RESULTS: Villous edema was observed in 131 patients (36%), and severe lesions were found in 71 (20%). The presence of VE was significantly greater in patients with Child-Pugh classification B or C, esophageal varices, portal hypertensive gastropathy (PHG), ascites, portal vein thrombosis (PVT), and splenomegaly. In multivariate analysis, Child-Pugh class B or C, esophageal varices, PVT, and splenomegaly were significant predictive factors for the presence of VE. Severe VE was significantly greater in patients with Child-Pugh class B or C, serum albumin level ≤ 3.2 mg/dL, PHG, and PVT. In multivariate analysis, PHG, Child-Pugh class B or C, PVT, were significant predictive factors for severe VE. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical factors related to portal hypertension were significantly correlated with VE. In particular PVT was correlated with the appearance and exacerbation of VE. Periodic capsule endoscopy in LC patients may lead to early detection of portal hypertension and PVT.

Evaluation for the Clinical Efficacy of Colon Capsule Endoscopy in the Detection of Laterally Spreading Tumors.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The manner in which colorectal lesions are being detected with PillCam COLON2 capsule endoscopy (CCE2) has markedly improved in recent days. However, limited data are available on CCE2 for detecting laterally spreading tumors (LSTs). The aim of this study was to compare CCE2 with optical colonoscopy (OC), which is currently the gold standard used in the detection of LSTs. METHODS: We performed a prospective, single-academic center study comparing CCE2 with OC in patients with LSTs diagnosed using OC, which was performed during the 3-month period prior to CCE2. We focused on the sensitivity and specificity of CCE2 for detecting LSTs. LSTs were classified into the LST-granular type (LST-G) or the LST-non-granular type (LST-NG). RESULTS: Thirty patients (mean age 59.5 years) were enrolled. Of them, 21 LSTs (7 LST-Gs and 14 LST-NGs) were evaluated in this study. The mean diameter of the LSTs was 27 ± 15 mm (range 10-60 mm). Histopathological diagnoses of the LSTs were as follows: tubular adenoma, 12 cases (57%); sessile serrated adenoma/polyp (SSA/P), 4 cases (19%); Tis carcinoma, 1 case (5%); and T1 carcinoma, 4 cases (19 LSTs were found in the following locations: cecum, 1 case (5%); ascending colon, 6 cases (29%); transverse colon, 6 cases, (29%); descending colon, 1 case (5%); sigmoid colon, 3 cases (13%); and rectum, 4 cases (19%). The colon cleansing level was adequate in all cases. The sensitivity and specificity of CCE2 for detecting LSTs were 81 and 100% respectively. For detecting LST-Gs and LST-NGs, the sensitivity and specificity were 71 and 100%, and 86 and 100%, respectively. There were 4 false-negative cases (LST-G (18 mm), cecum; LST-G (20 mm), sigmoid colon; LST-NG (25 mm), transverse colon; LST-NG (20 mm), transverse colon). CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity for detecting LSTs is lower with CCE2 than it is with OC, especially for LSTs located on the right colon or for SSA/P.

Third-Generation Capsule Endoscopy Outperforms Second-Generation Based on the Detectability of Esophageal Varices.

Background and Aim. The third-generation capsule endoscopy (SB3) was shown to have better image resolution than that of SB2. The aim of this study was to compare SB2 and SB3 regarding detectability of esophageal varices (EVs). Methods. Seventy-six consecutive liver cirrhosis patients (42 men; mean age: 67 years) received SB3, and 99 (58 men; mean age, 67 years old) received SB2. All patients underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy within 1 month prior to capsule endoscopy as gold standard for diagnosis. The diagnosis using SB3 and SB2 for EVs was evaluated regarding form (F0-F3), location (Ls, Lm, and Li), and the red color (RC) sign of EVs. Results. SB2 and SB3 did not significantly differ on overall diagnostic rates for EV. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of SB2/SB3 for EV diagnosis were, respectively, 65%/81%, 100%/100%, 100%/100%, and 70%/62%. However, the diagnostic rates for EV form F1 were 81% using SB3 and 52% using SB2 (P = 0.009). Further, the diagnostic rates for Ls/Lm varices were 79% using SB3 and 81% using SB2, and, for Li, varices were 84% using SB3 and 52% using SB2 (P = 0.02). Conclusion. SB3 significantly improved the detectability of EVs compared with SB2.