High Preoperative Serum D-dimer Predicts Unfavorable Survival Outcomes for Pancreatic Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Pancreatic cancer cells release certain tissue factors into the bloodstream. It is well known that pancreatic cancer progresses with thrombus formation. Because we routinely measure serum D-dimer levels in preoperative patients as a screening marker of deep venous thrombosis, we examined its association with high serum D-dimer in our cohort of pancreatic cancer resected cases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We examined 315 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who underwent surgical resection in our department from January 2012 to July 2021. All cases were divided into high D-dimer cases (n=118) and low D-dimer cases (n=197) using the cut-off value of 1.0 µg/ml, an institutional upper limit. Clinicohistological characteristics and postoperative survival outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: Preoperative high D-dimer cases showed significantly worse progression-free survival (PFS) (p=0.021) and overall survival (OS) (p=0.027) than low D-dimer cases; median PFS was 13.9 months versus 21.4 months, and that of OS was 33.4 months versus 68.0 months. Clinicohistological characteristics of high D-dimer cases were age over 70 years (p<0.001), pathological portal vein invasion (p=0.003), and initially borderline resectable or unresectable cases (p=0.027). Multivariate analysis indicated that preoperative high D-dimer was a significant prognostic factor of PFS (hazard ratio=1.42, p=0.025) and OS (hazard ratio=1.51, p=0.036). CONCLUSION: Preoperative high serum D-dimer over 1.0 µg/ml was associated with pathological portal vein invasion and could be an unfavorable prognostic marker of PFS and OS after surgery, typically due to distant metastasis.

Comparison Between FOLFIRINOX and nal-IRI/FL as Second-line Treatment After Gemcitabine Plus Nab-paclitaxel for Pancreatic Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The regimen of nanoliposomal irinotecan plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin (Nal-IRI/FL) was approved in Japan as second-line chemotherapy after gemcitabine-based treatment for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in 2020. We examined the difference in outcome between patients treated with second-line folinic acid, fluorouracil, irinotecan hydrochloride and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) and those treated with nal-IRI/FL after first-line gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (GnP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: The outcomes of 34 patients with PDAC who received second-line FOLFIRINOX (n=21) or nal-IRI/FL (n=13) after GnP at our Department from January 2016 to June 2021 were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: Patient backgrounds did not differ between the groups. Dose reduction was more frequently required for treatment with FOLFIRINOX than with nal-IRI/FL (86% vs. 46%, p=0.022). Pegfilgrastim and aprepitant were used more frequently in the FOLFIRINOX group (both p<0.01). Progression-free survival (5.9 vs. 8.3 months) and overall survival (9.1 vs. 11.2 months) did not differ significantly between the groups. The frequency of grade 3 (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) or higher adverse events was similar between the groups. All-grade peripheral neuropathy was more common in the FOLFIRINOX group (100% vs. 77%, p=0.048). CONCLUSION: FOLFIRINOX and nal-IRI/FL as second-line therapy after GnP provided similar prognoses, although supportive treatment and dose reduction were more frequently required for FOLFIRINOX.

Reduced-port endo-laparoscopic surgery using umbilical zigzag incision for concomitant operations: A case series.

INTRODUCTION: Recently, use of reduced-port surgery has become widespread; however, it is a difficult operation. Hachisuka et al. developed a method called the umbilical zigzag incision, which enlarges the fascial incision using only an umbilical skin incision. We believe this method will be feasible for concomitant laparoscopic surgery. We report our surgical techniques for concomitant laparoscopic surgery using an umbilical zigzag incision. METHODS: The patient who should receive more than 2 places of abdominal operation were indicated this procedure. In all cases, we made the zigzag incision in the umbilical region. After the linea alba and peritoneum were incised, the wound retractor was inserted through the incision, which enlarges the fascial opening. GelPoint was attached to the wound retractor and the operation was started. RESULTS: We could create a fascial opening of up to 6 cm with the umbilical zigzag incision, which improves the triangulation of forceps and reduces interference among the trocars. The trocars in the center of the abdomen could be utilized for almost all intraperitoneal operations. This procedure was especially useful in cases that included lymph node dissection because dissection of a malignant tumor is a delicate procedure. Furthermore, extraction of specimens and anastomosis went very smoothly because the fascial incision was large enough such that no extension of the incision was needed. No early or late postoperative complications occurred in any case. Postoperative wounds were clear and therefore patient satisfaction levels were high. CONCLUSION: Umbilical zigzag incision may be feasible especially in concomitant laparoscopic surgery.