Influence of Neoadjuvant Therapy on Success of Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy in Anastomotic Leakage after Rectal Resection Because of Rectal Cancer.

Background: For locally advanced rectal cancer, neoadjuvant therapy (NT) is an established element of therapy. Endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) has been a relevant treatment option for anastomotic leakage after rectal resection since 2008. The aim was to evaluate the influence of NT on the duration and success of EVT in anastomotic leakage after rectal resection for rectal cancer. Methods: This was a monocentric, retrospective cohort study including patients who underwent rectal resection with primary anastomosis because of histologically proven carcinoma of the rectum in the Department for General and Visceral Surgery of Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin over a period of ten years (2012 to 2022). Results: Overall, 243 patients were included, of which 47 patients (19.3%) suffered from anastomotic leakage grade B with consecutive EVT. A total of 29 (61.7%) patients received NT and 18 patients (38.3%) did not. The median duration of EVT until the removal of the sponge did not differ between patients with and without NT: 24.0 days (95% CI 6.44-41.56) versus 20.0 days (95% CI 17.03-22.97); p = 0.273. The median duration from insertion of EVT until complete healing was 74.0 days with NT (95% CI 10.07-137.93) versus 62.0 days without NT (95% CI 45.99-78.01); p = 0.490. Treatment failure-including early persistence and late onset of recurrent anastomotic leakage-was evident in 27.6% of patients with NT versus 27.8% without NT; p = 0.989. Ostomy was reversed in 19 patients (79.2%) with NT compared to 11 patients (68.8%) without NT; p = 0.456. Overall, continuity was restored in 75% of patients in the long term after EVT. Conclusion: This trial comprised-to our knowledge-the largest study cohort to analyze the outcome of EVT in anastomotic leakage after rectal resection for rectal cancer. We conclude that neoadjuvant therapy neither prolongs EVT nor the time to healing from anastomotic leakage. The rates of treatment failure of EVT and permanent ostomy were not higher when neoadjuvant therapy was used.

Sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence and constipation in adult patients with anorectal malformation--a feasibility study in patients with or without sacral dysgenesis.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate both the feasibility and effectiveness of sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence and constipation in adult patients who had undergone surgical repair of anorectal malformations (ARM). METHODS: Patients with ARM with or without sacral dysgenesis who presented with fecal incontinence, constipation, or combined symptoms were treated with sacral nerve stimulation (SNS). Success of SNS was assessed by scores preoperatively and after a 3-week test period: Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score (CCI), Surgical Working Group for Coloproctology (CACP) continence score, German version of the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale, and Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score (CCCS). The follow-up results of the patients who received a definitive pacemaker were used to evaluate the long-term effect of SNS in patients with ARM. RESULTS: Four patients with fecal incontinence and one patient with constipation (two males, three females; median age 24 years [13; 31]) were treated with SNS between May 2012 and May 2013. Four patients had a normal sacrum; one patient had a sacral dysgenesis. Preoperatively and after the test phase, median CACP continence scores were 8 [1; 10] and 11.5 [3; 16], median CCI 14 [12; 19] and 13 [11; 17], and median Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale improved in all categories. For constipation, CCCSs were 16 and 7. CONCLUSION: Sacral neuromodulation is a feasible treatment modality for adult patients with ARM with a normally developed sacrum. Patients with sacrum dysgenesis are not suited for SNS because a definitive quadripolar electrode could not be anchored in the absence of a sacral bone.

Repeatability of anorectal manometry in healthy volunteers and patients.

BACKGROUND: Anorectal manometry is used extensively in the assessment of patients with disorders of the pelvic floor. The present study investigated the repeatability of anorectal manometry in healthy volunteers and patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 30 healthy volunteers (15 men and 15 women) and 10 patients with fecal incontinence (4 men and 6 women) underwent perfusion manometry and volumetry. Intraindividual variability was evaluated using the intraindividual correlation coefficient (ICC). Interindividual variability was expressed as the standard deviation from the calculated mean values. RESULTS: We found a high intraindividual correlation for the squeezing pressure (ICC 0.75-0.95), vector volume (ICC 0.88-0.97), and rectal perception (ICC 0.82-0.98). The anal resting pressure showed moderate repeatability (ICC 0.60-0.72). However, with regard to sphincter asymmetry, rectal compliance, and the rectoanal inhibitory reflex, a wide range of variability was found. In the female volunteers, the squeezing pressure and vector volume were lower than in those in the male volunteers. The anal pressure, vector volume, thresholds for urgency, and the maximum tolerable volume were lower in the incontinent patients than in the healthy volunteers. CONCLUSIONS: The squeezing pressure, vector volume, and rectal perception allow a reliable analysis of anal sphincter function. Sphincter asymmetry, rectal compliance, and the rectoanal inhibitory reflex were of limited diagnostic value.