TECPR2-related hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy in two siblings from Palestine.

Due to the majority of currently available genome data deriving from individuals of European ancestry, the clinical interpretation of genomic variants in individuals from diverse ethnic backgrounds remains a major diagnostic challenge. Here, we investigated the genetic cause of a complex neurodevelopmental phenotype in two Palestinian siblings. Whole exome sequencing identified a homozygous missense TECPR2 variant (Chr14(GRCh38):g.102425085G>A; NM_014844.5:c.745G>A, p.(Gly249Arg)) absent in gnomAD, segregating appropriately with the inheritance pattern in the family. Variant assessment with in silico pathogenicity prediction and protein modeling tools alongside population database frequencies led to classification as a variant of uncertain significance. As pathogenic TECPR2 variants are associated with hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy with intellectual disability, we reviewed previously published candidate TECPR2 missense variants to clarify clinical outcomes and variant classification using current approved guidelines, classifying a number of published variants as of uncertain significance. This work highlights genomic healthcare inequalities and the challenges in interpreting rare genetic variants in populations underrepresented in genomic databases. It also improves understanding of the clinical and genetic spectrum of TECPR2-related neuropathy and contributes to addressing genomic data disparity and inequalities of the genomic architecture in Palestinian populations.

Recommendations for laboratory workflow that better support centralised amalgamation of genomic variant data: findings from CanVIG-UK national molecular laboratory survey.

BACKGROUND: National and international amalgamation of genomic data offers opportunity for research and audit, including analyses enabling improved classification of variants of uncertain significance. Review of individual-level data from National Health Service (NHS) testing of cancer susceptibility genes (2002-2023) submitted to the National Disease Registration Service revealed heterogeneity across participating laboratories regarding (1) the structure, quality and completeness of submitted data, and (2) the ease with which that data could be assembled locally for submission. METHODS: In May 2023, we undertook a closed online survey of 51 clinical scientists who provided consensus responses representing all 17 of 17 NHS molecular genetic laboratories in England and Wales which undertake NHS diagnostic analyses of cancer susceptibility genes. The survey included 18 questions relating to 'next-generation sequencing workflow' (11), 'variant classification' (3) and 'phenotypical context' (4). RESULTS: Widely differing processes were reported for transfer of variant data into their local LIMS (Laboratory Information Management System), for the formatting in which the variants are stored in the LIMS and which classes of variants are retained in the local LIMS. Differing local provisions and workflow for variant classifications were also reported, including the resources provided and the mechanisms by which classifications are stored. CONCLUSION: The survey responses illustrate heterogeneous laboratory workflow for preparation of genomic variant data from local LIMS for centralised submission. Workflow is often labour-intensive and inefficient, involving multiple manual steps which introduce opportunities for error. These survey findings and adoption of the concomitant recommendations may support improvement in laboratory dataflows, better facilitating submission of data for central amalgamation.

Assessing the clinical utility of protein structural analysis in genomic variant classification: experiences from a diagnostic laboratory.

BACKGROUND: The widespread clinical application of genome-wide sequencing has resulted in many new diagnoses for rare genetic conditions, but testing regularly identifies variants of uncertain significance (VUS). The remarkable rise in the amount of genomic data has been paralleled by a rise in the number of protein structures that are now publicly available, which may have clinical utility for the interpretation of missense and in-frame insertions or deletions. METHODS: Within a UK National Health Service genomic medicine diagnostic laboratory, we investigated the number of VUS over a 5-year period that were evaluated using protein structural analysis and how often this analysis aided variant classification. RESULTS: We found 99 novel missense and in-frame variants across 67 genes that were initially classified as VUS by our diagnostic laboratory using standard variant classification guidelines and for which further analysis of protein structure was requested. Evidence from protein structural analysis was used in the re-assessment of 64 variants, of which 47 were subsequently reclassified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic and 17 remained as VUS. We identified several case studies where protein structural analysis aided variant interpretation by predicting disease mechanisms that were consistent with the observed phenotypes, including loss-of-function through thermodynamic destabilisation or disruption of ligand binding, and gain-of-function through de-repression or escape from proteasomal degradation. CONCLUSIONS: We have shown that using in silico protein structural analysis can aid classification of VUS and give insights into the mechanisms of pathogenicity. Based on our experience, we propose a generic evidence-based workflow for incorporating protein structural information into diagnostic practice to facilitate variant classification.

A practical guide to genetic testing in endocrinology.

Rapid advances in sequencing technology have led to significant improvements in genomic analysis, resulting in increased understanding of the molecular basis of many endocrine conditions. Genomic testing for rare disease is being integrated into everyday clinical practice, as the importance of confirming a genetic diagnosis earlier in a patient's pathway helps direct their clinical care and specialized management. In England, the new nationally commissioned Genomic Medicine Service has started to deliver testing for rare and inherited disease and cancer somatic tissue via seven Genomic Laboratory Hubs. The range of genetic tests, technology employed and eligibility criteria for patient testing are all defined in the National Genomic Test Directory. This review provides practical guidance on how to access genomic testing for endocrine disease, how to interpret and relay results, and details how genetic counselling can help integrate results into ongoing care of the individual and their family. This article discusses general principles as well as specifics related to the process of genomic testing in England. We illustrate mainstream genetic testing with a clinical scenario involving an individual with inherited endocrine neoplasia, followed by a generic description of the different steps involved, including informed consent to proceed to diagnostic testing. Most genetic tests analyse multiple genes simultaneously by next-generation sequencing, and variant interpretation may yield not only pathogenic explanatory results, but also ambiguous outcomes, with variants of unknown significance or incidental findings. Delivery of results and posttest genetic counselling are therefore key components of integrating genetic testing into routine endocrine care.

Diagnostic RET genetic testing in 1,058 index patients: A UK centre perspective.

OBJECTIVE: Diagnostic germline RET analysis is offered to all patients with a diagnosis of medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC), or other conditions associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 (MEN2) in the United Kingdom. Here, we report the experience of a single centre's germline RET analysis over a 21-year period. DESIGN: Retrospective case-note review. PATIENTS: All index patients referred to the Exeter Genomics Laboratory for diagnostic germline RET analysis between 1997 and 2018, and unaffected family members, undergoing predictive testing. MEASUREMENTS: The rate and nature of pathogenic variant detection were recorded, as well as the indication for testing. RESULTS: 1,058 index patients and 551 unaffected family members were tested. The overall rate of pathogenic variant detection was 10.2% amongst index patients and 29% amongst unaffected family members. The commonest indication was isolated MTC, and amongst the 690 patients with isolated MTC, 68 (9.9%) were found to harbour a RET pathogenic variant. Of those with presumed sporadic MTC, 8.5% were found to harbour germline RET pathogenic variants, compared with 36.4% of those with a family history of MEN2-associated conditions. Pathogenic variants were identified in 3.6% and 0% of patients with isolated phaeochromocytoma and primary hyperparathyroidism, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although the detection rate of RET germline pathogenic variants in patients with presumed sporadic MTC was significant, the overall detection rate in those with MTC was lower than expected in this series. Advances in RET analysis in response to reports of new variants over the last two decades are likely to have improved the pick-up rate in recent years.

AIP variant causing familial prolactinoma.

Pathogenic variants in the aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein (AIP) gene are increasingly recognised as a cause of familial isolated pituitary adenoma. AIP-associated tumours are most commonly growth hormone (GH) producing. In our cohort of 175 AIP mutation positive patients representing 93 kindreds, 139 (79%) have GH excess, 19 have prolactinoma (17 familial and 2 sporadic cases) and out of the 17 clinically non-functioning tumours 4 were subsequently operated and found to be GH or GH & prolactin immunopositive adenoma. Here we report a family with an AIP variant, in which multiple family members are affected by prolactinoma, but none with GH excess. To our knowledge this is the first reported family with an AIP pathogenic variant to be affected solely by prolactinoma. These data suggest that prolactinoma families represent a small subset of AIP mutation positive kindreds, and similar to young-onset sporadic prolactinomas, AIP screening would be indicated.

Using Structural Analysis In Silico to Assess the Impact of Missense Variants in MEN1.

Despite the rapid expansion in recent years of databases reporting either benign or pathogenic genetic variations, the interpretation of novel missense variants remains challenging, particularly for clinical or genetic testing laboratories where functional analysis is often unfeasible. Previous studies have shown that thermodynamic analysis of protein structure in silico can discriminate between groups of benign and pathogenic missense variants. However, although structures exist for many human disease‒associated proteins, such analysis remains largely unexploited in clinical laboratories. Here, we analyzed the predicted effect of 338 known missense variants on the structure of menin, the MEN1 gene product. Results provided strong discrimination between pathogenic and benign variants, with a threshold of >4 kcal/mol for the predicted change in stability, providing a strong indicator of pathogenicity. Subsequent analysis of seven novel missense variants identified during clinical testing of patients with MEN1 showed that all seven were predicted to destabilize menin by >4 kcal/mol. We conclude that structural analysis provides a useful tool in understanding the effect of missense variants in MEN1 and that integration of proteomic with genomic data could potentially contribute to the classification of novel variants in this disease.

WDR26 Haploinsufficiency Causes a Recognizable Syndrome of Intellectual Disability, Seizures, Abnormal Gait, and Distinctive Facial Features.

We report 15 individuals with de novo pathogenic variants in WDR26. Eleven of the individuals carry loss-of-function mutations, and four harbor missense substitutions. These 15 individuals comprise ten females and five males, and all have intellectual disability with delayed speech, a history of febrile and/or non-febrile seizures, and a wide-based, spastic, and/or stiff-legged gait. These subjects share a set of common facial features that include a prominent maxilla and upper lip that readily reveal the upper gingiva, widely spaced teeth, and a broad nasal tip. Together, these features comprise a recognizable facial phenotype. We compared these features with those of chromosome 1q41q42 microdeletion syndrome, which typically contains WDR26, and noted that clinical features are consistent between the two subsets, suggesting that haploinsufficiency of WDR26 contributes to the pathology of 1q41q42 microdeletion syndrome. Consistent with this, WDR26 loss-of-function single-nucleotide mutations identified in these subjects lead to nonsense-mediated decay with subsequent reduction of RNA expression and protein levels. We derived a structural model of WDR26 and note that missense variants identified in these individuals localize to highly conserved residues of this WD-40-repeat-containing protein. Given that WDR26 mutations have been identified in ∼1 in 2,000 of subjects in our clinical cohorts and that WDR26 might be poorly annotated in exome variant-interpretation pipelines, we would anticipate that this disorder could be more common than currently appreciated.

Novel LMNA mutations cause an aggressive atypical neonatal progeria without progerin accumulation.

BACKGROUND: Progeroid syndromes are genetic disorders that recapitulate some phenotypes of physiological ageing. Classical progerias, such as Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome (HGPS), are generally caused by mutations in LMNA leading to accumulation of the toxic protein progerin and consequently, to nuclear envelope alterations. In this work, we describe a novel phenotypic feature of the progeria spectrum affecting three unrelated newborns and identify its genetic cause. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients reported herein present an extremely homogeneous phenotype that somewhat recapitulates those of patients with HGPS and mandibuloacral dysplasia. However, pathological signs appear earlier, are more aggressive and present distinctive features including episodes of severe upper airway obstruction. Exome and Sanger sequencing allowed the identification of heterozygous de novo c.163G>A, p.E55K and c.164A>G, p.E55G mutations in LMNA as the alterations responsible for this disorder. Functional analyses demonstrated that fibroblasts from these patients suffer important dysfunctions in nuclear lamina, which generate profound nuclear envelope abnormalities but without progerin accumulation. These nuclear alterations found in patients' dermal fibroblasts were also induced by ectopic expression of the corresponding site-specific LMNA mutants in control human fibroblasts. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate the causal role of p.E55K and p.E55G lamin A mutations in a disorder which manifests novel phenotypic features of the progeria spectrum characterised by neonatal presentation and aggressive clinical evolution, despite being caused by lamin A/C missense mutations with effective prelamin A processing.

Pitfalls of haplotype phasing from amplicon-based long-read sequencing.

The long-read sequencers from Pacific Bioscience (PacBio) and Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) offer the opportunity to phase mutations multiple kilobases apart directly from sequencing reads. In this study, we used long-range PCR with ONT and PacBio sequencing to phase two variants 9 kb apart in the RET gene. We also re-analysed data from a recent paper which had apparently successfully used ONT to phase clinically important haplotypes at the CYP2D6 and HLA loci. From these analyses, we demonstrate PCR-chimera formation during PCR amplification and reference alignment bias are pitfalls that need to be considered when attempting to phase variants using amplicon-based long-read sequencing technologies. These methodological pitfalls need to be avoided if the opportunities provided by long-read sequencers are to be fully exploited.

SOS1 frameshift mutations cause pure mucosal neuroma syndrome, a clinical phenotype distinct from multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2B.

BACKGROUND: Mucosal neuromas, thickened corneal nerves and marfanoid body habitus are characteristic phenotypic features of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2B (MEN2B) and often provide an early clue to the diagnosis of the syndrome. Rarely, patients present with typical physical features of MEN2B but without associated endocrinopathies (medullary thyroid carcinoma or pheochromocytoma) or a RET gene mutation; this clinical presentation is thought to represent a distinct condition termed 'pure mucosal neuroma syndrome'. METHODS: Exome sequencing was performed in two unrelated probands with mucosal neuromas, thickened corneal nerves and marfanoid body habitus, but no MEN2B-associated endocrinopathy or RET gene mutation. Sanger sequencing was performed to confirm mutations detected by exome sequencing and to test in family members and 3 additional unrelated index patients with mucosal neuromas or thickened corneal nerves. RESULTS: A heterozygous SOS1 gene frameshift mutation (c.3266dup or c.3248dup) was identified in each proband. Sanger sequencing showed that proband 1 inherited the c.3266dup mutation from his affected mother, while the c.3248dup mutation had arisen de novo in proband 2. Sanger sequencing also identified one further novel SOS1 mutation (c.3254dup) in one of the 3 additional index patients. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate the existence of pure mucosal neuroma syndrome as a clinical entity distinct from MEN2B that can now be diagnosed by genetic testing.

Heterogeneous genetic background of the association of pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma and pituitary adenoma: results from a large patient cohort.

CONTEXT: Pituitary adenomas and pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas (pheo/PGL) can occur in the same patient or in the same family. Coexistence of the two diseases could be due to either a common pathogenic mechanism or a coincidence. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the investigation was to study the possible coexistence of pituitary adenoma and pheo/PGL. DESIGN: Thirty-nine cases of sporadic or familial pheo/PGL and pituitary adenomas were investigated. Known pheo/PGL genes (SDHA-D, SDHAF2, RET, VHL, TMEM127, MAX, FH) and pituitary adenoma genes (MEN1, AIP, CDKN1B) were sequenced using next generation or Sanger sequencing. Loss of heterozygosity study and pathological studies were performed on the available tumor samples. SETTING: The study was conducted at university hospitals. PATIENTS: Thirty-nine patients with sporadic of familial pituitary adenoma and pheo/PGL participated in the study. OUTCOME: Outcomes included genetic screening and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Eleven germline mutations (five SDHB, one SDHC, one SDHD, two VHL, and two MEN1) and four variants of unknown significance (two SDHA, one SDHB, and one SDHAF2) were identified in the studied genes in our patient cohort. Tumor tissue analysis identified LOH at the SDHB locus in three pituitary adenomas and loss of heterozygosity at the MEN1 locus in two pheochromocytomas. All the pituitary adenomas of patients affected by SDHX alterations have a unique histological feature not previously described in this context. CONCLUSIONS: Mutations in the genes known to cause pheo/PGL can rarely be associated with pituitary adenomas, whereas mutation in a gene predisposing to pituitary adenomas (MEN1) can be associated with pheo/PGL. Our findings suggest that genetic testing should be considered in all patients or families with the constellation of pheo/PGL and a pituitary adenoma.

A comparison of methods for EGFR mutation testing in non-small cell lung cancer.

EGFR mutation testing of tumor samples is routinely performed to predict sensitivity to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors for patients with non-small cell lung cancer. At least 9 different methodologies are employed in UK laboratories, and the aim of this study was to compare the sensitivity of different methods for the detection of EGFR mutations. Participating laboratories were sent coded samples with varying mutation loads (from 0% to 15%) to be tested for the p.Leu858Arg (p.L858R) missense mutation and c.2235_2249del exon 19 deletion. The p.L858R mutation and deletions within exon 19 of the EGFR gene account for ∼90% of mutation-positive cases. The 11 laboratories used their standard testing method(s) and submitted 15 sets of results for the p.L858R samples and 10 for the exon 19 deletion. The p.Leu858Arg (p.L858R) mutation was detected at levels between 1% and 7.5% by Sanger sequencing, pyrosequencing, real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), amplification refractory mutation system, and capillary electrophoresis single-strand conformation analysis. The c.2235_2249del mutation was detected at 1% to 5% by fragment size analysis, Sanger sequencing or real-time PCR. A mutation was detected in 24/25 (96%) of the samples tested which contained 5% mutated DNA. The 1% sensitivity claimed for commercial real-time PCR-targeted EGFR tests was achieved and our results show greater sensitivity for the Sanger sequencing and pyrosequencing screening methods compared to the 10% to 20% detection levels cited on clinical diagnostic reports. We conclude that multiple methodologies are suitable for the detection of acquired EGFR mutations.

A prospective study of brachytelephalangic chondrodysplasia punctata: identification of arylsulfatase E mutations, functional analysis of novel missense alleles, and determination of potential phenocopies.

PURPOSE: The only known genetic cause of brachytelephalangic chondrodysplasia punctata is X-linked chondrodysplasia punctata 1 (CDPX1), which results from a deficiency of arylsulfatase E (ARSE). Historically, ARSE mutations have been identified in only 50% of male patients, and it was proposed that the remainder might represent phenocopies due to maternal-fetal vitamin K deficiency and maternal autoimmune diseases. METHODS: To further evaluate causes of brachytelephalangic chondrodysplasia punctata, we established a Collaboration Education and Test Translation program for CDPX1 from 2008 to 2010. Of the 29 male probands identified, 17 had ARSE mutations that included 10 novel missense alleles and one single-codon deletion. To determine pathogenicity of these and additional missense alleles, we transiently expressed them in COS cells and measured arylsulfatase E activity using the artificial substrate, 4-methylumbelliferyl sulfate. In addition, clinical data were collected to investigate maternal effects and genotype-phenotype correlations. RESULTS: In this study, 58% of males had ARSE mutations. All mutant alleles had negligible arylsulfatase E activity. There were no obvious genotype-phenotype correlations. Maternal etiologies were not reported in most patients. CONCLUSION: CDPX1 is caused by loss of arylsulfatase E activity. Around 40% of male patients with brachytelephalangic chondrodysplasia punctata do not have detectable ARSE mutations or known maternal etiological factors. Improved understanding of arylsulfatase E function is predicted to illuminate other etiologies for brachytelephalangic chondrodysplasia punctata.

Hepatocyte nuclear factor-1beta gene deletions--a common cause of renal disease.

BACKGROUND: Hepatocyte nuclear factor-1beta (HNF-1beta) is a critical transcription factor in pancreatic and renal development. Our previous report identified HNF-1beta mutations in 23/160 patients with unexplained renal disease. The most common phenotype is renal cysts, which is frequently associated with early-onset diabetes in the renal cysts and diabetes (RCAD) syndrome. HNF-1beta gene deletions have recently been shown to cause renal malformations and early-onset diabetes. METHODS: We developed a multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) assay for HNF-1beta gene dosage analysis and tested patients with unexplained renal disease in whom mutations had not been found by sequencing. RESULTS: Whole HNF-1beta gene deletions were detected in 15/133 probands. Renal cysts were present in 13/15, including three with glomerulocystic kidney disease and one with cystic renal dysplasia. Renal function ranged from normal to transplantation aged 3 years. Ten probands had diabetes (nine having RCAD). In addition, four had abnormal liver function tests, two showed pancreatic atrophy and 3/10 female probands had uterine malformations. Whole HNF-1beta gene deletions are a common cause of developmental renal disease, particularly renal cystic disease with or without diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: The phenotype associated with deletions or coding region/splicing mutations is very similar suggesting that haploinsufficiency is the underlying mechanism. Patients with features suggestive of the HNF-1beta clinical phenotype should be tested for mutations both by sequence and dosage analysis.

Analysis of gross deletions in the MEN1 gene in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1.

BACKGROUND: Mutation analysis with direct DNA sequencing is commonly used for the molecular diagnosis of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). However, a significant number of patients, despite clinical features of MEN1, do not show MEN1 mutations on direct DNA sequencing. Some of these patients may have gross gene deletions not detected by direct DNA sequencing or mutations in the noncoding regions of the gene not examined routinely. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of gross deletions in MEN1 in a large cohort of MEN1 patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During 1997-2006, we screened MEN1 mutations by direct DNA sequencing in 368 probands referred to our diagnostic molecular genetic laboratory. Of these, 101 probands (23 familial, 78 sporadic) fulfilled the clinical criteria for MEN1 (presence of at least two of the parathyroid, pancreatic or pituitary tumours) but were negative for mutations on DNA sequencing. Their DNA samples were examined for gross deletions of one or more exons of MEN1 by using multiple ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) and long-range polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification. We also sequenced the minimal promoter region of MEN1 for mutations in the familial cases. RESULTS: We identified a gross deletion involving exons 5 and 6 of MEN1 in one proband (prevalence rate 1%). The sequencing of the minimal promoter region in the familial cases revealed no mutations. CONCLUSION: Gross deletion in the MEN1 gene is an uncommon cause of MEN1 and should be tested for in patients with a high clinical suspicion but without mutations on direct DNA sequencing.