Outcomes of a Modified Technique for Deflation of Distal Radial Artery Occlusion Device on Radial Artery Patency After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Objective: This study aimed to compare two protocols of deflation with increased intervals versus late deflation with smaller intervals for distal radial artery occlusion device (DROAD) removal to assess for radial artery occlusion (RAO). Methods: All patients who underwent PCI with distal radial access were enrolled in the study. The DROAD was applied using an occlusive hemostasis method. Patients were assigned to either protocol 1 or protocol 2 at the primary physician's discretion. Protocol 1 involved the removal of 2 ml of air starting 1 h after the sheath removal and then the removal of 2 ml every 30 min until the band came off. Protocol 2 involved the removal of 4 ml of air 2 h after the sheath removal and then a further 4 ml of air every 15 min until the band came off. Results: A total of 446 patients were enrolled in this study (mean age; 61 ± 6 (Group 1) and 60 ± 5 (Group 2); females 45.83% (Group 1) and 46.34% (Group 2)). The baseline characteristics were the same, including mean hemostasis time (256 ± 25 min (Group 1) and 254 ± 28 min (Group 2), P-value = 0.611). Primary and secondary endpoints did not reach significance in either group (RAO; 21 (8.71) Group 1 and 18 (8.78) Group 2 (P-value = 0.932)). Age (OR (95%CI): 1.07 (0.57-1.45); P-value = 0.031), female gender (OR (95%CI): 1.42 (0.93-1.74); P-value = 0.012), distal artery diameter (OR (95%CI): 0.57 (0.21-0.93); P-value = 0.005), procedure time (OR (95%CI): 2.64 (0.95-4.32); P-value = 0.001), and sheath size (OR (95%CI): 2.47 (1.43-3.76); P-value = 0.044) were predictors of RAO in our cohort. Conclusion: This investigation shows no difference in the incidence of RAO with the standard versus accelerated deflation protocol after PCI. However, local vascular complications, including hematoma were increased with the accelerated protocol.

Delayed Ventricular Septal Rupture Repair After Myocardial Infarction: An Updated Review.

Ventricular septal rupture (VSR) is a rare but serious complication that can occur after myocardial infarction (MI) and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The optimal management approach for VSR remains a topic of debate, with considerations including early versus delayed surgery, risk stratification, pharmacological interventions, minimally invasive techniques, and tissue engineering. The pathophysiology of VSR involves myocardial necrosis, inflammatory response, and enzymatic degradation of the extracellular matrix (ECM), particularly mediated by matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). These processes lead to structural weakening and subsequent rupture of the ventricular septum. Hemodynamically, VSR results in left-to-right shunting, increased pulmonary blood flow, and potentially hemodynamic instability. The early surgical repair offers the advantages of immediate closure of the defect, prevention of complications, and potentially improved outcomes. However, it is associated with higher surgical risk and limited myocardial recovery potential during the waiting period. In contrast, delayed surgery allows for a period of myocardial recovery, risk stratification, and optimization of surgical outcomes. However, it carries the risk of ongoing complications and progression of ventricular remodeling. Risk stratification plays a crucial role in determining the optimal timing for surgery and tailoring treatment plans. Various clinical factors, imaging assessments, scoring systems, biomarkers, and hemodynamic parameters aid in risk assessment and guide decision-making. Pharmacological interventions, including vasopressors, diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, beta-blockers, antiplatelet agents, and antiarrhythmic drugs, are employed to stabilize hemodynamics, prevent complications, promote myocardial healing, and improve outcomes in VSR patients. Advancements in minimally invasive techniques, such as percutaneous device closure, and tissue engineering hold promise for less invasive interventions and better outcomes. These approaches aim to minimize surgical morbidity, optimize healing, and enhance patient recovery. In conclusion, the management of VSR after MI requires a multidimensional approach that considers various aspects, including risk stratification, surgical timing, pharmacological interventions, minimally invasive techniques, and tissue engineering.

Association Between Levels of Pre-operative Glycosylated Hemoglobin and Post-operative Surgical Site Infections After Elective Surgery in a Low-Income Country.

INTRODUCTION: Diabetic patients undergoing surgery are more susceptible to hospital-acquired infection, particularly surgical site infection (SSI). Good glycemic control in preoperative patients significantly decreases the risk of SSI. There is a scarcity of data from low-income countries studying the relation between perioperative glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels and postoperative SSI. We aim to establish statistical relation between HbA1c and SSI which will help decrease post-operative infections and morbidity. METHODS: This study was conducted in the surgical unit of Jinnah Sindh Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan, from August 2020 to April 2022. Patients who underwent elective surgical procedures (n= 1024) were included in the study and divided into two groups based on their HbA1c levels. Patients with HbA1c levels higher than 6.5% were classified as group A and those with HbA1c less than 6.5% belonged to group B. For statistical analysis, IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24.0 (Released 2016; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States) was used. RESULTS: Group A comprised 579 (56.5%) patients. The presence of SSI in participants with HbA1c >6.5% was statistically significant (p-value: 0.011). Genderwise comparison with the presence of SSI was found to be insignificant (p-value: 0.28). Smoking was positively correlated with the absence of SSI. No significance in terms of presence or absence of SSI was found in the comparison of the type of wounds (p-value: 0.25). CONCLUSION:  There is a positive relationship between raised HbA1c levels and the development of SSI. Our study emphasizes the importance of the use of HbA1c levels as a more accurate predictor of glycemic control in pre-operative patients rather than blood glucose levels. It is imperative that surgeons must check HbA1c levels before selecting patients for elective surgeries, especially in low-income countries where the healthcare burden is already huge.