Effectiveness of New Tools to Define an Up-to-Date Patient Safety Risk Map: A Primary Care Study Protocol.

BACKGROUND: Reducing incidents related to health care interventions to improve patient safety is a health policy priority. To strengthen a culture of safety, reporting incidents is essential. This study aims to define a patient safety risk map using the description and analysis of incidents within a primary care region with a prior patient safety improvement strategy organisationally developed and promoted. METHODS: The study will be conducted in two phases: (1) a cross-sectional descriptive observational study to describe reported incidents; and (2) a quasi-experimental study to compare reported incidents. The study will take place in the Camp de Tarragona Primary Care Management (Catalan Institute of Health). In Phase 1, all reactive notifications collected within one year (2018) will be analysed; during Phase 2, all proactive notifications of the second and third weeks of June 2019 will be analysed. Adverse events will also be assessed. Phases 1 and 2 will use a digital platform and the proactive tool proSP to notify and analyse incidents related to patient safety. EXPECTED RESULTS: To obtain an up-to-date, primary care patient safety risk map to prioritise strategies that result in safer practices.

[Coverage and association with clinical variables of antipneumococcal vaccination of the population over 65 years old in Tarragona-Valls]. / Cobertura y asociación con variables clínicas de la vacunación antineumocócica en la población mayor de 65 anos de Tarragona-Valls.

BACKGROUND: In Catalonia, a polyanccharide pneumococcal vaccine (PPV) programme which includes subjects over 65 years old, was started in 1999. Three years later, we study the vaccine cover in relation to the presence of risk factors for pneumonia. METHODS: Cross-sectional observational study conducted in 8 Basic Health Areas (BHA) of Tarragona. All the subjects over 65 years old and assigned to one of the 8 basic health areas participating in the study were included (n=11241). Using computerized clinical records and vaccination records we evaluated whether each patient had received PPV before January 2002, and the presence of disease or risk factors for pneumonia. RESULTS: Global vaccination coverage was 44.4% (37.1% in 65-74 years, 53.9% in 75-84 and 51.5% in 85-99 years). The greatest coverage was recorded in subjects with active neoplasm (56.7%), chronic necropathy (55.3%). chronic lung disease (54.2%) and chronic cardiopathy (53.5%). The least coverage was recorded in smokers (38.9%), alcoholic patients (43.6%) and chronic liver disease (46.5%). AVP coverage was 38.9% (CI 95%: 37.6-40.2) in subjects without any risk factors, 47.7% (CI 95%: 46.1-49.4) in those with one factor, and 52.7% (CI 95%: 52.6-54.8) in those with two or more factors. CONCLUSIONS: In spite of an acceptable global coverage, there are large subgroups of high risk patients who have not received PPV. The results suggest that, in an attempt to achieve extended global coverage, the presence of risk factors is largely ignored when deciding whether to prescribe PPV or not.