RESUMEN
Importance: It is unknown whether germline genetic factors influence in situ melanoma risk differently than invasive melanoma risk. Objective: To determine whether differences in risk of in situ melanoma and invasive melanoma are heritable. Design, Setting, and Participants: Three genome-wide association study meta-analyses were conducted of in situ melanoma vs controls, invasive melanoma vs controls, and in situ vs invasive melanoma (case-case) using 4 population-based genetic cohorts: the UK Biobank, the FinnGen cohort, the QSkin Sun and Health Study, and the Queensland Study of Melanoma: Environmental and Genetic Associations (Q-MEGA). Melanoma status was determined using International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems codes from cancer registry data. Data were collected from 1987 to 2022, and data were analyzed from September 2022 to June 2023. Exposure: In situ and invasive cutaneous melanoma. Main Outcomes and Measures: To test whether in situ and invasive melanoma have independent heritable components, genetic effect estimates were calculated for single-nucleotide variants (SNV; formerly single-nucleotide polymorphisms) throughout the genome for each melanoma. Then, SNV-based heritability was estimated, the genetic correlation between melanoma subtypes was assessed, and polygenic risk scores (PRS) were generated for in situ vs invasive status in Q-MEGA participants. Results: A total of 6 genome-wide significant loci associated with in situ melanoma and 18 loci with invasive melanoma were identified. A strong genetic correlation (genetic r = 0.96; 95% CI, 0.76-1.15) was observed between the 2 classifications. Notably, loci near IRF4, KLF4, and HULC had significantly larger effects for in situ melanoma compared with invasive melanoma, while MC1R had a significantly larger effect on invasive melanoma compared with in situ melanoma. Heritability estimates were consistent for both, with in situ melanoma heritability of 6.7% (95% CI, 4.1-9.3) and invasive melanoma heritability of 4.9% (95% CI, 2.8-7.2). Finally, a PRS, derived from comparing invasive melanoma with in situ melanoma genetic risk, was on average significantly higher in participants with invasive melanoma (odds ratio per 1-SD increase in PRS, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.16-1.77). Conclusions and Relevance: There is much shared genetic architecture between in situ melanoma and invasive melanoma. Despite indistinguishable heritability estimates between the melanoma classifications, PRS suggest germline genetics may influence whether a person gets in situ melanoma or invasive melanoma. PRS could potentially help stratify populations based on invasive melanoma risk, informing future screening programs without exacerbating the current burden of melanoma overdiagnosis.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the eighth most common cancer in women, with poor survival outcomes. Observational evidence suggests that nitrogen-based bisphosphonate (NBB) use may be associated with reduced risk of EOC, particularly the endometrioid and serous histotypes; however, confounding by indication is a concern. An alternative approach to investigate the chemo-preventive potential of NBBs is to emulate a target trial by identifying all women who initiate use of NBBs and investigate the risk of EOC for continued users compared with discontinued users. METHODS: Using population-based linked data, we identified all Australian women aged over 50 years who first used NBBs over 2004-12. We used the year after first use to define treatment for each woman as either continued or discontinued use. We emulated randomization using stabilized inverse probability weights to balance the treatment groups using covariates including age, comorbidities and socioeconomic status. We followed women from treatment assignment until EOC diagnosis, death or 31 December 2013. We assessed the risk of EOC (overall and by histotype) using flexible parametric time-to-event models allowing for time-varying effects, and produced time-varying coefficients. RESULTS: Of the 313â383 women in the study, 472 were diagnosed with EOC during follow-up (261 serous EOC), with an average age at diagnosis of 72 years. Continued use of NBBs was associated with reduced risk of EOC overall (HR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.69, 1.10), and serous EOC (HR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.53, 0.96), compared with discontinued treatment, with estimates remaining constant over the 9-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Results from our emulated trial suggest that in women who initiated NBB treatment, those who continued use had 13% and 29% lower hazards of being diagnosed with EOC overall and serous EOC, respectively, compared with women who discontinued use.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario , Difosfonatos , Neoplasias Ováricas , Humanos , Femenino , Carcinoma Epitelial de Ovario/epidemiología , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Australia/epidemiología , Difosfonatos/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Ováricas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/efectos adversos , Nitrógeno , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cutaneous melanoma incidence varies consistently across body sites between men and women, but the underlying causes of the differences remain unclear. To date, no prospective studies have examined risk factors for melanoma separately for men and women according to body site. METHODS: We compared the association between constitutional, genetic and environmental risk factors for invasive melanoma on different body sites separately for men and women in a population-based prospective cohort study of 17,774 men and 21,070 women aged between 40 and 69 years and residents of Queensland, Australia at baseline in 2011. Participants were followed until December 2021.We examined risk factors including hair colour, tanning ability, naevus density, and proxies for high cumulative sun exposure, all self-reported at baseline. We also examined polygenic risk score (PRS) derived from summary statistics from a melanoma genome-wide association study meta-analysis. RESULTS: During a median 10.4 years of follow-up, 455 men and 331 women developed an incident invasive melanoma; the mean age at diagnosis was lower in women than in men (62.6 vs. 65.0, respectively). The most common body site was the trunk in men (45.1%), and the upper (36.8%) and lower limbs (27.4%) in women. High naevus density and proxy measures of high cumulative sun exposure were similarly associated with melanoma at all sites in men and women. In both sexes, high genetic risk was associated with melanoma on all body sites except the head and neck. We observed differences between men and women in the association between PRS and melanoma of the trunk (highest vs. lowest tertile of PRS: HR 2.78, 95% CI 1.64-4.69 for men; 1.55, 95% CI 0.63-3.80 for women), and non-significant but large differences for the lower limbs (HR 5.25, 95% CI 1.80-15.27 for men; 1.75, 95% CI 0.88-3.47 for women). CONCLUSIONS: While there are a number of potential explanations for these findings, this raises the possibility that genetic factors other than those related to pigmentation and naevus phenotypes may play a role in the predilection for melanoma to arise on different sites between the sexes.
RESUMEN
The incidence and distribution of cutaneous melanoma differ between the sexes, but it is unclear whether these differences have been constant through time or across generations. We compared incidence trends by age, sex, and anatomic site by analyzing long-term melanoma data (1982-2018) in 3 populations residing at high-, moderate-, and low-ambient sun exposure: Queensland, Australia; United States White; and Scotland. We fit age-period-cohort models and compared trends in the male-to-female incidence rate ratio by site and sex. In men, melanoma incidence was always highest on the trunk; in women, incidence was historically highest on limbs, but there have been recent increases in truncal melanoma among females in all populations. The incidence rate ratio showed excess melanoma on the lower limb in females in most age groups in all populations. In contrast, there was a male excess of melanoma on the trunk (from about age 25 years) and head/neck (from about age 40 years), which increased with age. Birth cohort analyses identified turning points in incidence from high to low incidence among recent birth cohorts, which differed by population and site. Changing exposure to UVR is implicated, possibly superimposed upon innate differences between the sexes in site-specific susceptibility.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To examine recent changes in the numbers of Medicare-subsidised keratinocyte cancer excisions, particularly for younger people exposed to primary prevention campaigns since the early 1980s. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study; analysis of administrative data. SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: Analysis of Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) claims data for procedures related to the diagnosis and treatment of keratinocyte cancer in Australia, 2012-2021. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Age-standardised rates for MBS-subsidised claims for first surgical squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and basal cell carcinoma (BCC) excisions, Mohs surgery, surgical excisions of benign lesions, skin biopsies, and cryotherapy or serial curettage of premalignant and malignant lesions, overall, and by sex, state/territory, and age group; average annual percentage change in rate for time intervals determined by joinpoint regression. RESULTS: In men, the age-standardised rate of BCC/SCC excisions increased by 1.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-2.4%) per year during 2012-2019 (from 2931 to 3371 per 100 000 men) and then declined by 3.8% (95% CI, 0.5-7.0%) per year during 2019-2021 (to 3152 per 100 000). In women, the age-standardised rate increased by 2.2% (95% CI, 1.7-2.8%) per year during 2012-2019 (from 1798 to 2093 per 100 000 women); the decline to 1967 excisions per 100 000 women in 2021 was not statistically significant. BCC/SCC excision rates declined for men under 55 years of age (by 1.0-3.4% per year) and women under 45 years of age (by 1.7-2.3% per year). Age-standardised biopsy rates increased during 2012-2021 in all age groups (by 2.8-6.9% per year). CONCLUSIONS: Rates of MBS-subsidised treatment for keratinocyte cancers increased during 2012-2019, but BCC/SCC treatment rates declined among younger Australians, who have probably been exposed to less sunlight than earlier generations because of public health interventions and population-wide lifestyle changes related to technology use.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Basocelular , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/cirugía , Neoplasias Cutáneas/terapia , Femenino , Australia/epidemiología , Carcinoma Basocelular/epidemiología , Carcinoma Basocelular/terapia , Carcinoma Basocelular/patología , Carcinoma Basocelular/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/epidemiología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Anciano , Adulto , Queratinocitos/patología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cirugía de Mohs/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven , Crioterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de EdadRESUMEN
The relationship between body mass index (BMI) and melanoma and other skin cancers remains unclear. The objective of this study was to employ the Mendelian randomization (MR) approach to evaluate the effects of genetically predicted childhood adiposity on the risk of developing skin cancer later in life. Two-sample MR analyses were conducted using summary data from genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analyses of childhood BMI, melanoma, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC), and basal cell carcinoma (BCC). We used the inverse-variance-weighted (IVW) methods to obtain a pooled estimate across all genetic variants for childhood BMI. We performed multiple sensitivity analyses to evaluate the potential influence of various assumptions on our findings. We found no evidence that genetically predicted childhood BMI was associated with risks of developing melanoma, cSCC, or BCC in adulthood (OR, 95% CI: melanoma: 1.02 (0.93-1.13), cSCC 0.94 (0.79-1.11), BCC 0.97 (0.84-1.12)). Our findings do not support the conclusions from observational studies that childhood BMI is associated with increased risks of melanoma, cSCC, or BCC in adulthood. Intervening on childhood adiposity will not reduce the risk of common skin cancers later in life.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Basocelular , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Melanoma , Obesidad Infantil , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Niño , Neoplasias Cutáneas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/genética , Neoplasias Cutáneas/complicaciones , Melanoma/etiología , Melanoma/genética , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Obesidad Infantil/complicaciones , Obesidad Infantil/genética , Estudio de Asociación del Genoma Completo , Carcinoma Basocelular/epidemiología , Carcinoma Basocelular/genética , Índice de Masa Corporal , Análisis de la Aleatorización Mendeliana , Predisposición Genética a la Enfermedad , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido SimpleRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIM: People with new-onset diabetes mellitus (diabetes) could be a possible target population for pancreatic cancer surveillance. However, distinguishing diabetes caused by pancreatic cancer from type 2 diabetes remains challenging. We aimed to develop and validate a model to predict pancreatic cancer among women with new-onset diabetes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study among Australian women newly diagnosed with diabetes, using first prescription of anti-diabetic medications, sourced from administrative data, as a surrogate for the diagnosis of diabetes. The outcome was a diagnosis of pancreatic cancer within 3 years of diabetes diagnosis. We used prescription medications, severity of diabetes (i.e., change/addition of medication within 2 months after first medication), and age at diabetes diagnosis as potential predictors of pancreatic cancer. RESULTS: Among 99 687 women aged ≥ 50 years with new-onset diabetes, 602 (0.6%) were diagnosed with pancreatic cancer within 3 years. The area under the receiver operating curve for the risk prediction model was 0.73. Age and diabetes severity were the two most influential predictors followed by beta-blockers, acid disorder drugs, and lipid-modifying agents. Using a risk threshold of 50%, sensitivity and specificity were 69% and the positive predictive value (PPV) was 1.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Our model doubled the PPV of pancreatic cancer in women with new-onset diabetes from 0.6% to 1.3%. Age and rapid progression of diabetes were important risk factors, and pancreatic cancer occurred more commonly in women without typical risk factors for type 2 diabetes. This model could prove valuable as an initial screening tool, especially as new biomarkers emerge.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/etiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios de Cohortes , Australia/epidemiología , Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) and melanoma have different associations with sun exposure. OBJECTIVES: To compare trends in the incidence rates of cSCC and melanoma, to provide insight into changing patterns of exposure to ultraviolet radiation (UVR). METHODS: We compared trends in the incidence of cSCC and melanoma in seven susceptible populations residing at mid-to-high latitudes: Finland, Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Scotland, the Netherlands and Tasmania (Australia). We fitted Joinpoint models to describe trends in age-standardized incidence rates for melanoma and cSCC and calculated the average annual percentage rate of change for the period 1989-2020 (1989-2018 for Tasmania). We calculated the incident rate ratio (IRR) as the ratio of the age-standardized rates (European Standard Population) for cSCC to melanoma and conducted age-period-cohort modelling to compare age, period and cohort effects. RESULTS: The ratio of cSCC-to-melanoma incidence increased with proximity to the equator and over time. In the most recent time period, the incidence of cSCC was higher than the incidence of melanoma for men and women in all seven populations. While the ratio of cSCC-to-melanoma incidence was higher for men vs. women, in most countries the cSCC-to-melanoma IRR increased over time to a greater extent in women than in men. Melanoma incidence was higher among younger people and cSCC incidence was higher among older people; the age at which the incidence of cSCC overtook the incidence of melanoma was progressively younger with proximity to the equator. CONCLUSIONS: Despite concerted international efforts to preserve the ozone layer over the past four decades resulting in significant reductions in surface ultraviolet B at mid-latitudes, the incidence of skin cancer, particularly cSCC, continues to rise in those regions. Our findings are consistent with a stronger association with age-associated cumulative sun exposure for cSCC vs. melanoma and suggest that women are currently receiving greater UV radiation exposure than in the past.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Melanoma , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Melanoma/epidemiología , Melanoma/complicaciones , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Incidencia , Rayos Ultravioleta/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Deterioration of glycaemic control in people with long-standing diabetes mellitus (diabetes) may be a possible indicator of pancreatic cancer. However, the magnitude of the association between diabetes deterioration and pancreatic cancer has received little attention. METHODS: We conducted a matched cohort study, nested within a population-based cohort of Australian women with diabetes. Women with unstable diabetes, defined as a change in medication after a 2-year period of stable medication use, were matched by birth year to those with stable diabetes, in a 1:4 ratio. We used flexible parametric survival models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: We included 134,954 and 539,789 women in the unstable and stable diabetes cohorts, respectively (mean age 68 years). In total, 1,315 pancreatic cancers were diagnosed. Deterioration of stable diabetes was associated with a 2.5-fold increased risk of pancreatic cancer (HR 2.55; 95% CI 2.29-2.85). The risk was particularly high within the first year after diabetes deteriorated. HRs at 3 months, 6 months and 1 year were: 5.76 (95% CI 4.72-7.04); 4.56 (95% CI 3.81-5.46); and 3.33 (95% CI 2.86-3.89), respectively. The risk was no longer significantly different after 7 years. CONCLUSIONS: Deterioration in glycaemic control in people with previously stable diabetes may be an indicator of pancreatic cancer, suggesting investigations of the pancreas may be appropriate. The weaker longer-term (3-7 years) association between diabetes deterioration and pancreatic cancer may indicate that poor glycaemic control can be a risk factor for pancreatic cancer.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Diabetes Mellitus , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Femenino , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Australia/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/etiología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnósticoRESUMEN
Observational studies have suggested that smoking may increase the risk of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) while decreasing the risks of basal cell carcinoma (BCC), and melanoma. However, it remains possible that confounding by other factors may explain these associations. The aim of this investigation was to use Mendelian randomization (MR) to test whether smoking is associated with skin cancer, independently of other factors. Two-sample MR analyses were conducted to determine the causal effect of smoking measures on skin cancer risk using genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics. We used the inverse-variance-weighted estimator to derive separate risk estimates across genetic instruments for all smoking measures. A genetic predisposition to smoking initiation was associated with lower risks of all skin cancer types, although none of the effect estimates reached statistical significance (OR 95% CI BCC 0.91, 0.82-1.01; cSCC 0.82, 0.66-1.01; melanoma 0.91, 0.82-1.01). Results for other measures were similar to smoking initiation with the exception of smoking intensity which was associated with a significantly reduced risk of melanoma (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.51-0.89). Our findings support the findings of observational studies linking smoking to lower risks of melanoma and BCC. However, we found no evidence that smoking is associated with an elevated risk of cSCC; indeed, our results are most consistent with a decreased risk, similar to BCC and melanoma.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Basocelular , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Melanoma , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/etiología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/genética , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Fumar/efectos adversos , Estudio de Asociación del Genoma Completo , Carcinoma Basocelular/etiología , Carcinoma Basocelular/genética , Melanoma/etiología , Melanoma/genética , Análisis de la Aleatorización Mendeliana , Factores de Riesgo , Polimorfismo de Nucleótido SimpleRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Skin screening is associated with higher melanoma detection rates, a potential indicator of overdiagnosis, but it remains possible that this effect is due to confounding by genetic risk. OBJECTIVES: To compare melanoma incidence among screened vs. unscreened participants within tertiles of genetic risk. METHODS: We investigated melanoma incidence in the QSkin study, a prospective cohort study which for this analysis comprised 15 283 participants aged 40-69â years with genotype data and no prior history of melanoma. We calculated a polygenic score (PGS) for melanoma. We first calculated the age-standardized rate (ASR) of melanoma within PGS tertiles, and then measured the association between skin examination and melanoma detection by calculating the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI), overall and within PGS tertiles. RESULTS: Melanoma incidence increased with PGS (ASR per 100 000 per year): tertile 1 = 442; tertile 2 = 519; tertile 3 = 871. We found that the HRs for all melanomas (i.e. in situ and invasive) associated with skin examination differed slightly across PGS tertiles [age- and sex-adjusted tertile 1 HR 1.88 (95% CI 1.26-2.81); tertile 2 HR 1.70 (95% CI 1.20-2.41); tertile 3 HR 1.96 (95% CI 1.43-2.70); fully adjusted tertile 1 HR 1.14 (95% CI 0.74-1.75); tertile 2 HR 1.21 (95% CI 0.82-1.78); tertile 3 HR 1.41 (95% CI 1.00-1.98)], but these differences were not statistically significant. HRs for in situ melanoma associated with skin examination were similar across PGS tertiles. For invasive melanomas, the point estimates appeared to be highest in PGS tertile 3 in both the minimally adjusted (age, sex) and fully adjusted models; however, these apparent differences were also not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Genetic risk predicts subsequent melanoma incidence, and is weakly associated with screening behaviour, but it does not explain the higher rate of melanoma detection between screened and unscreened people.
Asunto(s)
Melanoma , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Melanoma/diagnóstico , Melanoma/epidemiología , Melanoma/genética , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/genética , Factores de Riesgo , Tamizaje MasivoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) has few modifiable risk factors. There is evidence that some antihypertensive medicines may have cancer preventive and/or therapeutic actions; therefore, we assessed the associations between use of different antihypertensive medicines and risk of specific EOC histotypes. METHODS: Our nested case-control study of linked administrative health data included 6070 Australian women aged over 50 years diagnosed with EOC from 2004 to 2013, and 30,337 matched controls. We used multivariable conditional logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between ever use of each antihypertensive medicine group, including beta-adrenergic blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers, diuretics, and alpha blockers, and the risk of EOC overall and separately for the serous, endometrioid, mucinous, clear cell and other histotypes. RESULTS: We found that most antihypertensive medicines were not associated with risk of EOC. However, women who used calcium channel blockers had a reduced risk of serous EOC (OR= 0.89, 95 % CI:0.81,0.98) and use of combination thiazide and potassium-sparing diuretics was associated with an increased risk of endometroid EOC (OR= 2.09, 95 % CI:1.15,3.82). CONCLUSION: Our results provide little support for a chemo-preventive role for most antihypertensives, however, the histotype-specific associations we found warrant further investigation.
RESUMEN
Importance: The extent to which major high-risk features of squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) in organ transplant recipients (OTRs) differ from SCCs in the general population is not known. Objective: To quantify the relative frequency of perineural invasion, invasion below the dermis, lack of cellular differentiation, and tumor diameter greater than 20 mm in SCCs in OTRs and the general population, by anatomic site. Design, Setting, and Participants: This dual-cohort study in Queensland, Australia, included a cohort of OTRs at high risk of skin cancer ascertained from 2012 to 2015 (Skin Tumours in Allograft Recipients [STAR] study) and a population-based cohort ascertained from 2011 (QSkin Sun and Health Study). The STAR study comprised population-based lung transplant recipients and kidney and liver transplant recipients at high risk of skin cancer recruited from tertiary centers and diagnosed with histopathologically confirmed SCC from 2012 to 2015. The QSkin participants were recruited from Queensland's general adult population, and primary SCCs diagnosed from 2012 to 2015 were ascertained through Medicare (national health insurance scheme) and linked with histopathology records. Data analysis was performed from July 2022 to April 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: Prevalence ratio (PR) of head/neck location, perineural invasion, tumor invasion to/beyond subcutaneous fat, poor cellular differentiation, and tumor diameter greater than 20 mm among SCCs in OTRs vs the general population. Results: There were 741 SCCs excised from 191 OTRs (median [IQR] age, 62.7 [56.7-67.1] years; 149 [78.0%] male) and 2558 SCCs from 1507 persons in the general population (median [IQR] age, 63.7 [58.0-68.8] years; 955 [63.4%] male). The SCCs developed most frequently on the head/neck in OTRs (285, 38.6%), but on arms/hands in the general population (896, 35.2%) (P < .001). After adjusting for age and sex, perineural invasion was more than twice as common in OTRs as in population cases (PR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.70-3.30), as was invasion to/beyond subcutaneous fat (PR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.78-3.14). Poorly vs well-differentiated SCCs were more than 3-fold more common in OTRs (PR, 3.45; 95% CI, 2.53-4.71), and prevalence of tumors greater than 20 mm vs 20 mm or smaller was moderately higher in OTRs (PR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.08-2.12). Conclusions and Relevance: In this dual-cohort study, SCCs in OTRs had significantly worse prognostic features than SCCs in the general population, reinforcing the necessity of early diagnosis and definitive management of SCCs in OTRs.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Trasplante de Órganos , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Estudios de Cohortes , Pronóstico , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/epidemiología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Trasplante de Órganos/efectos adversos , Receptores de TrasplantesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To determine the proportions of newly diagnosed melanomas treated by different medical specialist types, to describe the types of excisions performed, and to investigate factors associated with treating practitioner specialty and excision type. DESIGN, SETTING: Prospective cohort study; analysis of linked data: baseline surveys, hospital, pathology, Queensland Cancer Register, and Medical Benefits Schedule databases. PARTICIPANTS: Random sample of 43 764 Queensland residents aged 40-69 years recruited during 2011, with initial diagnoses of in situ or invasive melanoma diagnosed to 31 December 2019. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Treating practitioner type and treatment modality for first incident melanoma; second and subsequent treatment events for the primary melanoma. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 8.4 years (interquartile range, 8.3-8.8 years), 1683 eligible participants (720 women, 963 men) developed at least one primary melanoma (in situ melanoma, 1125; invasive melanoma, 558), 1296 of which (77.1%) were initially managed in primary care; 248 were diagnosed by dermatologists (14.8%), 83 by plastic surgeons (4.9%), 43 by general surgeons (2.6%), and ten by other specialists (0.6%). The most frequent initial procedures leading to histologically confirmed melanoma diagnosis were first excision (854, 50.7%), shave biopsy (549, 32.6%), and punch biopsy (178, 10.6%); 1339 melanomas (79.6%) required two procedures, 187 (11.1%) three. Larger proportions of melanomas diagnosed by dermatologists (87%) or plastic surgeons (71%) were in people living in urban areas than of those diagnosed in primary care (63%); larger proportions of melanomas diagnosed by dermatologists or plastic surgeons than of those diagnosed in primary care were in people with university degrees (45%, 42% v 23%) or upper quartile clinical risk scores (63%, 59% v 47%). CONCLUSIONS: Most incident melanomas in Queensland are diagnosed in primary care, and nearly half are initially managed by partial excision (shave or punch biopsy). Second or third, wider excisions are undertaken in about 90% of cases.
Asunto(s)
Melanoma , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios Prospectivos , Melanoma/diagnóstico , Melanoma/epidemiología , Melanoma/terapia , Neoplasias Cutáneas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Cutáneas/terapia , Australia/epidemiología , Melanoma Cutáneo MalignoAsunto(s)
Colesterol , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo , Neoplasias Cutáneas/genéticaRESUMEN
Importance: An increasing number of people develop more than 1 primary melanoma, yet to date, no population-based prospective cohort studies have reported on risk factors for developing first vs second primary melanomas. Objective: To compare the clinical characteristics of first and second melanomas and then to estimate the relative risks of developing 1 vs multiple melanomas associated with demographic, phenotypic, sun exposure, and genetic factors. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based prospective cohort study included men and women aged 40 to 69 years recruited in 2011 and followed up until December 2018 in Queensland, Australia. Data analysis was performed from February to July 2022. Exposures: Self-reported information about demographic, phenotypic, and sun exposure measures captured using a survey completed at baseline, and polygenic risk score for melanoma. Main Outcomes and Measures: Incident first or second primary melanoma diagnosis, and histologic and clinical characteristics thereof. The Wei-Lin-Weissfeld model for recurrent events was used to estimate the association of each factor with the risks of first and second primary melanoma. Results: A total of 38â¯845 patients (mean [SD] age at baseline, 56.1 [8.2] years; 17â¯775 men and 21â¯070 women) were included in the study. During a median follow-up period of 7.4 years, 1212 (3.1%) participants had a single primary melanoma diagnosis, and 245 (0.6%) had a second primary melanoma diagnosis. Second melanomas were more likely than first melanomas to be in situ; for invasive tumors, second melanomas were more likely to be thin (ie, ≤1 mm) than first melanomas. Having many moles at age 21 years (self-reported using visual scoring tool) was more strongly associated with second (hazard ratio [HR], 6.36; 95% CI, 3.77-10.75) than first primary melanoma (HR, 3.46; 95% CI, 2.72-4.40) (P value for difference between the HRs = .01). A high genetic predisposition (ie, polygenic risk score in tertile 3) was also more strongly associated with second (HR, 3.28; 95% CI, 2.06-5.23) than first melanoma (HR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.71-2.49; P = .03). Second melanomas were more strongly associated with a history of multiple skin cancer excisions (HR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.80-3.83) than first melanomas (HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.61-2.16; P = .05). For all other phenotypic characteristics and sun exposure measures, similarly elevated associations with first vs second melanomas were observed. Conclusions and Relevance: Findings of this cohort study suggest that within the general population, the presence of many nevi and having a high genetic predisposition to melanoma were associated with the highest risks of developing second primary melanomas.