RESUMEN
Background: There is a paucity of aggregate data documenting mid- to long-term outcomes of patients after hip arthroscopy with labral reconstruction. Purpose: To report mid- to long-term outcomes in patients after undergoing either primary or revision hip arthroscopy with labral reconstruction for the treatment of irreparable labral tears. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic review of the PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus databases in May 2022 was conducted with the following keywords: "hip arthroscopy,""labral reconstruction,""irreparable,""labrum,""reconstruction,""five-year,""midterm,""5 year,""long-term,""10 year," ten-year," and "femoroacetabular impingement" using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses criteria. Midterm was defined as mean 5-year follow-up, and long-term was defined as mean 10-year or longer follow-up. For each included article, the demographic, radiographic, intraoperative, and surgical variables, as well as patient-reported outcomes (PROs), psychometric thresholds, and secondary surgeries were recorded. Forest plots were created for PROs that were reported in ≥3 studies; heterogeneity was assessed using I2 values. Results: Out of 463 initial articles, 5 studies including 178 hips with primary and 41 hips with revision surgeries were included. One study had an average 5-year follow-up, three studies had a minimum 5-year follow-up and one study had a minimum 10-year follow-up. The most common indications for hip arthroscopy with labral reconstruction were irreparable labral tears. The most common PRO was the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), which was reported in all 5 studies. The mean preoperative mHHS ranged from 58.9 to 66, and the mean postoperative mHHS at minimum 5-year follow-up ranged from 80.2 to 89. The preoperative and postoperative mHHSs for the single long-term follow-up study were 60 and 82, respectively. All 5 studies demonstrated significant improvements in reported PROs. All 5 studies reported secondary surgery rates, with 1 study reporting rates at both 5- and 10-year follow-up. Conversion to total hip arthroplasty ranged from 0% to 27%, while overall secondary surgery rates ranged from 0% to 36%. Conclusion: Findings demonstrated that patients undergoing primary and revision hip arthroscopy with labral reconstruction experienced favorable outcomes and high rates of clinical benefit and survivorship at mid- to long-term follow-up.
RESUMEN
Tears of the gluteus medius and minimus have emerged as significant contributors to lateral hip pain and functional impairment. Surgical intervention reliably delivers pain alleviation and ability to return to activities. Nevertheless, conventional open procedures entail substantial incisions, extensive tissue damage, and protracted recovery. Endoscopic approaches have provided minimally invasive alternative strategies. This Technical Note details a method for addressing partial gluteus medius tears by recreating the hip abductor tendon insertion footprint and employing a bioinductive patch to promote wound healing.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To systematically investigate the outcomes of patients who underwent autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) during hip arthroscopy for the treatment of acetabular chondral lesions due to femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. METHODS: PubMed and Cochrane were queried in June 2022 to conduct this systematic review using the following keywords: "femoroacetabular impingement," "arthroscopy," "microfracture," and "autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis." Articles were included if they reported on patient-reported outcomes of AMIC during hip arthroscopy to treat chondral lesions of the hip. The review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses criteria. Each study was queried for demographics, lesion classification, surgical treatment, patient-reported outcome scores, revision arthroscopy, and conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA). A qualitative subanalysis was performed to compare patients undergoing AMIC to patients undergoing microfracture alone if included studies also assessed results of microfracture alone. RESULTS: Four studies met inclusion criteria and assessed 209 hips undergoing AMIC. The included studies consisted of 99 male and 110 female patients. Mean postoperative follow-up ranged from 1 to 8 years, and mean patient age ranged from 34.3 to 45 years. Three of the 4 included studies reported the modified Harris Hip Score, and all 3 of these studies reported statistically significant improvement in the modified Harris Hip Score at final follow-up (P < .001) with mean preoperative values ranging from 44.5 to 62.8 and mean postoperative values ranging from 78.8 to 95.8. Two of the 4 studies compared patients treated with AMIC to microfracture alone. In these 2 studies, the AMIC groups reported 0 patients converting to THA while the microfracture-alone groups reported a highly variable rate of conversion to THA (2%-32.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent hip arthroscopy and AMIC for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and acetabular chondral lesions demonstrated improved patient-reported outcomes and low rates of secondary surgeries at short-term follow-up. STUDY DESIGN: Level IV, systematic review of Level III and IV studies.
RESUMEN
Avascular necrosis of the femoral head is a debilitating condition that can lead to femoral head collapse. Core decompression with adjuvant cellular therapies, such as bone marrow aspirate concentrate, delays disease progression and improves outcomes. However, inconsistent results in the literature may be due to limitations in surgical technique and difficulty in targeting the necrotic lesions. Here, we present a surgical technique utilizing computed tomography-based three-dimensional modeling and instrument tracking to guide the therapy to the center of the lesion. This method minimizes the number of attempts to reach the lesion and confirms the three-dimensional positioning of the instrumentation within the lesion. Our technique may improve the outcomes of core decompression and adjuvant therapy and prevent or delay hip collapse in patients with femoral head avascular necrosis.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To review patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and survivorship in patients undergoing osteochondral autograft or allograft transplantation (OAT) of the femoral head. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Center for Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus databases were searched in November 2022 with an updated search extending to December 2023 using criteria from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and the following keywords: (hip OR femoral head) AND (mosaicplasty OR osteochondral allograft OR osteochondral autograft OR osteochondral lesion). Articles were included if they evaluated postoperative PROs in patients who underwent OAT of the femoral head and had a study size of 5 or more hips (n ≥ 5). Survivorship was defined as freedom from conversion to total hip arthroplasty. For PROs evaluated in 3 studies or more, forest plots were created and I2 was calculated. RESULTS: Twelve studies were included in this review, with a total of 156 hips and a mean follow-up time ranging between 16.8 and 222 months. In total, 104 (66.7%) hips were male while 52 (33.3%) were female. Age of patients ranged from 17.0 to 35.4 years, while body mass index ranged from 23.3 to 28.1. Eight studies reported on osteochondral autograft transplantation and 4 studies on osteochondral allograft transplantation. Three studies reported significant improvement in at least 1 PRO. Survivorship ranged from 61.5% to 96% at minimum 2-year follow-up and from 57.1% to 91% at minimum 5-year follow-up. At a follow-up of less than 5 years, osteochondral allograft transplantation studies showed 70% to 87.5% survivorship, while autograft varied from 61.54% to 96%. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with osteochondral lesions of the femoral head who underwent osteochondral autograft or allograft transplantation demonstrated improved PROs but variable survivorship rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level IV studies.
RESUMEN
Background: Optimal management after posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) injury remains an active area of research, as reconstruction is technically challenging and poses unique risks in the posterior knee. Studies have reported variable rates of complications. Purpose: To describe the rates of readmission, emergency department (ED) visits, and postoperative complications within 90 days of isolated PCL reconstruction (PCLR) in a large, national cohort to better understand the perioperative variables that influence a practitioner's decision of whether to pursue operative versus nonoperative management. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiology study. Methods: PCLRs from January 1, 2010, through August 31, 2020, were identified in PearlDiver, a national administrative database. Patients with concomitant ligament surgery and those with fewer than 90 days of postoperative database activity were excluded. Deep vein thromboses, pulmonary embolisms, surgical site infections, compartment syndrome, and vascular events within 90 days of surgery were identified, as were 90-day readmissions and ED visits. Logistic regression models were built in PearlDiver to calculate odds ratios (ORs) for ED utilization. Results: The final cohort consisted of 1154 patients with isolated PCLR (mean age, 34 ± 16 years; 62% male). Most patients were located in the Southern United States (n = 417; 36.1%), and most had commercial insurance (n = 992; 86%). The 90-day rates of adverse events were as follows: deep vein thrombosis (13; 1.1%), pulmonary embolism (19; 1.6%), surgical site infection (<11; <1%), compartment syndrome (<11; <1%), vascular event (<11; <1%), readmission (13, 1.1%), and ED utilization (99; 8.6%). The majority of emergency department visits (52%) occurred in the first 2 weeks postoperatively. Predictive factors for ED utilization included Elixhauser Comorbidity Index score (OR = 1.31 per 2-point increase) and Medicaid insurance (OR = 2.03 relative to commercial insurance). Conclusion: The current study reported rates of adverse events after isolated PCLR in a large, national cohort. The results provide important context for decisions about optimal management of PCL injury.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To review current literature evaluating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and survivorship in patients undergoing revision hip arthroscopy with labral reconstruction or augmentation. METHODS: A systematic review was performed with the following key words: (revision) AND (hip OR femoroacetabular impingement) AND (arthroscopy OR arthroscopic) AND (reconstruction OR augmentation OR irreparable). PubMed, Cochrane Trials, and Scopus were queried in October 2022 using the criteria established in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. Studies were included if they involved patients undergoing revision hip arthroscopy with labral reconstruction or augmentation and reported preoperative and postoperative PROs at minimum 2-year follow-up. Only original research articles were included. Survivorship was defined as a nonconversion to total hip arthroplasty. Outcomes present in 3 or more studies underwent further statistical analysis with forest plots. Heterogeneity of studies was evaluated using the I2 statistic. RESULTS: Five studies were reviewed, including 359 revision hip arthroscopies (335 with complete follow-up) with a follow-up that ranged from 2.2 to 5.2 years. Four studies reported on outcomes after revision labral reconstruction and 1 study reported on labral augmentation. Two out of 5 included studies evaluated for statistical significance between preoperative and postoperative outcomes. Three out of 5 studies reported a rate of at least 70% for achieving minimal clinically important difference in at least 1 PRO. At minimum 2-year follow-up, survivorship ranged from 93.5% to 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Patients that underwent revision hip arthroscopy with labral reconstruction or augmentation demonstrated improvement in PROs with mixed rates of achieving clinical benefit and rates of survivorship at minimum 2-year follow-up ranging from 93.5% to 100%. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of level III to IV studies.
Asunto(s)
Artroscopía , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Reoperación , Humanos , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Artroscopía/métodos , Pinzamiento Femoroacetabular/cirugía , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Articulación de la Cadera/cirugíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Although the use of venous thromboembolism (VTE) chemoprophylaxis has markedly reduced VTE rates after hip fracture surgery, few studies have directly compared the efficacy of different anticoagulant agents in this setting. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of Lovenox, Eliquis, or Coumadin as VTE prophylaxis after hip fracture surgery. METHODS: The PearlDiver MHip national database was queried for patients older than 60 years undergoing first-time hip fracture surgery with no concurrent pelvic or distal femoral fractures. Prescriptions for Lovenox, Eliquis, or Coumadin were identified. Univariate and multivariate analyses of patient characteristics, 90-day incidences of VTE, adverse events, and readmissions were compared. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated, and significance was set at P < 0.01 based on Bonferroni adjustment. RESULTS: A total of 11,384 patients were identified, with the Lovenox used for 6835 patients (60.0%), Eliquis for 1092 patients (9.6%), and Coumadin for 3457 patients (30.4%). The prevalence of 90-day VTE in the Lovenox, Eliquis, and Coumadin groups was 3.1%, 3.8%, and 5.0%, respectively (P < 0.001). Multivariate analyses adjusting for demographic and comorbidity profiles were conducted with Lovenox as the referent. Those on Eliquis had significantly lower transfusions (OR 0.52, P = 0.005), but similar rates of other outcomes including VTE (P > 0.01). Conversely, patients on Coumadin had significantly greater odds of any adverse event (OR 1.18, P < 0.001) and VTE (OR 1.58, P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: In evaluating Lovenox, Eliquis, and Coumadin as VTE chemoprophylactic agents after hip fracture surgery in anticoagulant-naïve patients, Lovenox and Eliquis had similar 90-day VTE, whereas patients on Coumadin had greater odds of 90-day VTE. Interestingly, patients on Eliquis had nearly two-fold lower odds of transfusions compared with patients on Lovenox. Although consensus on the optimal VTE prophylactic agent after hip fracture surgery does not exist, Eliquis and Lovenox may be comparable options and seem to be more effective than Coumadin.
Asunto(s)
Fracturas de Cadera , Tromboembolia Venosa , Humanos , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiología , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiología , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevención & control , Enoxaparina/uso terapéutico , Warfarina/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Fracturas de Cadera/cirugía , Fracturas de Cadera/complicaciones , Fracturas de Cadera/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Necrotic tissue generated by a thermal injury is typically removed via surgical debridement. However, this procedure is commonly associated with blood loss and the removal of viable healthy tissue. For some patients and contexts such as extended care on the battlefield, it would be preferable to remove devitalized tissue with a nonsurgical debridement agent. In this paper, a proprietary debridement gel (SN514) was evaluated for the ability to debride both deep-partial thickness (DPT) and full-thickness burn wounds using an established porcine thermal injury model. Burn wounds were treated daily for 4 days and visualized with both digital imaging and laser speckle imaging. Strip biopsies were taken at the end of the procedure. Histological analyses confirmed a greater debridement of the porcine burn wounds by SN514 than the vehicle-treated controls. Laser speckle imaging detected significant increases in the perfusion status after 4 days of SN514 treatment on DPT wounds. Importantly, histological analyses and clinical observations suggest that SN514 gel treatment did not damage uninjured tissue as no edema, erythema, or inflammation was observed on intact skin surrounding the treated wounds. A blinded evaluation of the digital images by a burn surgeon indicated that SN514 debrided more necrotic tissue than the control groups after 1, 2, and 3 days of treatment. Additionally, SN514 gel was evaluated using an in vitro burn model that used human discarded skin. Treatment of human burned tissue with SN514 gel resulted in greater than 80% weight reduction compared with untreated samples. Together, these data demonstrate that SN514 gel is capable of debriding necrotic tissue and suggest that SN514 gel could be a useful option for austere conditions, such as military multi-domain operations and prolonged field care scenarios.
Asunto(s)
Quemaduras/terapia , Desbridamiento/métodos , Metaloproteasas/uso terapéutico , Animales , Quemaduras/patología , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Femenino , Hidrogeles , Porcinos , Cicatrización de HeridasRESUMEN
There is a need to develop more animal species for assessing toxicity in marine environments. Cyst-based toxicity tests using invertebrates are especially fast, technically simple, cost-effective, and sensitive to a variety of toxicants. Over the past 30 years, a variety of toxicity endpoints have been measured using the marine rotifer Brachionus plicatilis hatched from cysts, including mortality, reproduction, ingestion, swimming, enzyme activity, and gene expression. A consensus has developed that the most ecologically relevant toxicity measurements should be made using more than one species. Furthermore, it has been noted that the rotifer species toxicant sensitivity distribution is much broader than which endpoint is measured. This implies that toxicity should be measured with the simplest, fastest, least expensive test available on as many species as feasible. If a battery of test species is to be used to estimate toxicity, diapause egg-based toxicity tests that do not require culturing of test animals will be key. In this paper, we describe how diapause eggs of a new marine rotifer, Proales similis, can be produced, stored and hatched under controlled conditions to produce animals for toxicity tests. Methods are described for quantifying the toxicity of copper, mercury and cadmium based on mortality, ingestion, reproduction, and diapause egg hatching endpoints. We found that reproduction and ingestion endpoints were generally more sensitive to the metals than mortality or diapause egg hatching. When the copper sensitivity of P. similis was compared to Brachionus manjavacas and B. plicatilis using an ingestion test, similar EC50s were observed. In contrast, the B. rotundiformis ingestion EC50 for copper was about 4× more sensitive. Although diapause egg hatching was not the most sensitive endpoint, it is the most ecologically relevant for assessing sediment toxicity. Our discovery of diapausing eggs in the P. similis life cycle has created a conundrum. We have not observed males or sex in P. similis populations, which is a direct contradiction to the orthodox view of the monogonont rotifer life cycle. Work is needed to clarify how diapause egg production is accomplished by P. similis and whether sexual reproduction is involved.
Asunto(s)
Monitoreo del Ambiente/métodos , Metales Pesados/toxicidad , Rotíferos/efectos de los fármacos , Agua de Mar/química , Contaminantes Químicos del Agua/toxicidad , Animales , Estadios del Ciclo de Vida/efectos de los fármacos , Reproducción/efectos de los fármacos , Especificidad de la Especie , Pruebas de ToxicidadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Early enteral nutrition has been shown to decrease complications and improve patient outcomes. Post pyloric feeding is recommended for patients with gastric intolerance or at high risk for aspiration. Feeding tube placement can be challenging and pose risk of pulmonary complications. Reliance on radiographic confirmation for feeding tube placement exposes the patient to radiation. Electromagnetic placement device (EMPD) may offer a method to minimize pulmonary complications, increase successful placement, and decrease radiation exposure to the patient. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of using EMPD verification, instead of routine abdominal radiographic confirmation, for small-bore feeding tube placement. RESULTS: Variables evaluated were adverse events, utilization of radiographs for confirmation, and success rate of feeding tube placement in the ordered location. Two time frames were reviewed. In a 1-year period, 3754 small-bore feeding tubes were placed using EMPD, with zero adverse events noted. Radiographic confirmation was utilized in 0%-29.2% of the EMPD placed tubes. Successful placement of feeding tubes using EMPD ranged from 94%-99.6%. During a 5-year period, 7081 EMPD feeding tubes were evaluated. One adverse event, pneumothorax, occurred during the placement of these 7081 tubes, for a rate of 0.014%. CONCLUSION: Feeding tube placement confirmation is safe and efficacious via EMPD providing an effective method of feeding tube placement with a success rate >94% into the desired location. EMPD is an accurate verification method of distal tip location, eliminating the need for routine abdominal radiographic confirmation.