Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Stud Health Technol Inform ; 310: 374-378, 2024 Jan 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38269828

RESUMEN

Collaboration across disciplinary boundaries is vital to address the complex challenges and opportunities in Digital Health. We present findings and experiences of applying the principles of Team Science to a digital health research project called 'The Wearable Clinic'. Challenges faced were a lack of shared understanding of key terminology and concepts, and differences in publication cultures between disciplines. We also encountered more profound discrepancies, relating to definitions of "success" in a research project. We recommend that collaborative digital health research projects select a formal Team Science methodology from the outset.


Asunto(s)
Salud Digital , Dispositivos Electrónicos Vestibles , Investigación Interdisciplinaria , Aprendizaje , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria
2.
JMIR Form Res ; 5(5): e23461, 2021 May 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33999832

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Governments promote behavioral policies such as social distancing and phased reopening to control the spread of COVID-19. Digital phenotyping helps promote the compliance with these policies through the personalized behavioral knowledge it produces. OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the value of smartphone-derived digital phenotypes in (1) analyzing individuals' compliance with COVID-19 policies through behavioral responses and (2) suggesting ways to personalize communication through those policies. METHODS: We conducted longitudinal experiments that started before the outbreak of COVID-19 and continued during the pandemic. A total of 16 participants were recruited before the pandemic, and a smartphone sensing app was installed for each of them. We then assessed individual compliance with COVID-19 policies and their impact on habitual behaviors. RESULTS: Our results show a significant change in people's mobility (P<.001) as a result of COVID-19 regulations, from an average of 10 visited places every week to approximately 2 places a week. We also discussed our results within the context of nudges used by the National Health Service in the United Kingdom to promote COVID-19 regulations. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that digital phenotyping has substantial value in understanding people's behavior during a pandemic. Behavioral features extracted from digital phenotypes can facilitate the personalization of and compliance with behavioral policies. A rule-based messaging system can be implemented to deliver nudges on the basis of digital phenotyping.

3.
J Autom Reason ; 60(4): 385-419, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30069069

RESUMEN

Reasoning with SROIQ(D) , the logic that underpins the popular Web Ontology Language (OWL), has a high worst case complexity (N2Exptime). Decomposing the ontology into modules prior to classification, and then classifying the composites one-by-one, has been suggested as a way to mitigate this complexity in practice. Modular reasoning is currently motivated by the potential for reducing the hardness of subsumption tests, reducing the number of necessary subsumption tests and integrating efficient delegate reasoners. To date, we have only a limited idea of what we can expect from modularity as an optimisation technique. We present sound evidence that, while the impact of subsumption testing is significant only for a small number of ontologies across a popular collection of 330 ontologies (BioPortal), modularity has a generally positive effect on subsumption test hardness (2-fold mean reduction in our sample). More than 50% of the tests did not change in hardness at all, however, and we observed large differences across reasoners. We conclude (1) that, in general, optimisations targeting subsumption test hardness need to be well motivated because of their comparatively modest overall impact on classification time and (2) that employing modularity for optimisation should not be motivated by beneficial effects on subsumption test hardness alone.

4.
J Autom Reason ; 59(4): 455-482, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30069067

RESUMEN

The OWL Reasoner Evaluation competition is an annual competition (with an associated workshop) that pits OWL 2 compliant reasoners against each other on various standard reasoning tasks over naturally occurring problems. The 2015 competition was the third of its sort and had 14 reasoners competing in six tracks comprising three tasks (consistency, classification, and realisation) over two profiles (OWL 2 DL and EL). In this paper, we discuss the design, execution and results of the 2015 competition with particular attention to lessons learned for benchmarking, comparative experiments, and future competitions.

5.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc ; 2014: 671-80, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25954373

RESUMEN

The World Health Organisation is using OWL as a key technology to develop ICD-11 - the next version of the well-known International Classification of Diseases. Besides providing better opportunities for data integration and linkages to other well-known ontologies such as SNOMED-CT, one of the main promises of using OWL is that it will enable various forms of automated error checking. In this paper we investigate how automated OWL reasoning, along with a Justification Finding Service can be used as a Quality Assurance technique for the development of large and complex ontologies such as ICD-11. Using the International Classification of Traditional Medicine (ICTM) - Chapter 24 of ICD-11 - as a case study, and an expert panel of knowledge engineers, we reveal the kinds of problems that can occur, how they can be detected, and how they can be fixed. Specifically, we found that a logically inconsistent version of the ICTM ontology could be repaired using justifications (minimal entailing subsets of an ontology). Although over 600 justifications for the inconsistency were initially computed, we found that there were three main manageable patterns or categories of justifications involving TBox and ABox axioms. These categories represented meaningful domain errors to an expert panel of ICTM project knowledge engineers, who were able to use them to successfully determine the axioms that needed to be revised in order to fix the problem. All members of the expert panel agreed that the approach was useful for debugging and ensuring the quality of ICTM.


Asunto(s)
Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , Vocabulario Controlado , Lenguajes de Programación
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA