Partial Breast Reconstruction with Lateral Chest Wall Perforator Flap to Facilitate Breast Conservation in Breast Cancer: First 100 Cases with Cancer Outcomes at 8 Years Follow-Up and the Lessons Learned.

BACKGROUND: This is a prospective cohort study of partial breast reconstruction (PBR) with a lateral chest wall perforator flap (LCWPF) to facilitate breast conservation surgery (BCS) for women undergoing surgery for breast cancer. The study was undertaken to study the clinical and cancer outcomes. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or breast cancer who consented to undergo BCS with PBR with LCWPF were included in the study. A prospective database has been maintained to collect information on clinico-pathological features, complications, and follow-up. Patients were asked to complete an anonymised PROM questionnaire over the years. The hospital electronic records were interrogated for women who have completed 5 years follow-up to assess for development of recurrence/events. RESULTS: A total of 105 patients underwent PBR with LCWPFs between 2011 and 2018. Of these, 74% underwent cancer resection and PBR as one operation whilst 26% underwent PBR as a two-stage approach. The median tumor size on pre-op imaging was 30 mm for the one-stage approach and 39.5 mm for the two-stage approach (p-value=0.003). The complication rates were low and the re-operation rate for close margins was 10%, with 4% eventually requiring mastectomy. Good-to-excellent esthetic outcomes were reported in more than 80% of cases by patients and clinicians. The local recurrence rate (LR) was 2%, distant recurrence rate 10.5%, disease free survival (DFS) 86%, distant disease-free survival (DDFS) 89% and overall survival (OS) 94.8% at 4.5 years median follow-up. This procedure provides an effective oncological approach, avoiding mastectomy with a good-to-excellent cosmetic outcome. The follow-up data establishes the safety of this approach. DISCUSSION: This is the first published series of recurrence and survival data in patients undergoing PBR. We intend to continue with data collection to assess long-term outcomes beyond 10 years. The authors would recommend consideration of this technique to facilitate BCS and avoid mastectomy. REGISTRATION: Not applicable.

Extreme oncoplasty for centrally located breast cancer in small non-ptotic breasts: extending the indications of chest wall perforator flaps with areolar reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancers located centrally require excision of nipple-areola complex. A simple central wide excision is a safe option but results in suboptimal aesthetic outcome. An oncoplastic option involves therapeutic mammoplasty with or without areolar reconstruction, limited to moderate and large ptotic breasts. For small non-ptotic breasts, most surgeons would resort to mastectomy with/without reconstruction. METHODS: Lateral chest wall perforator flap (CWPF) is an option for partial breast reconstruction in small to moderate sized, non-ptotic breasts for laterally located tumours. We have extended the application of CWPF for central tumours to avoid mastectomy in selected patients. RESULTS: We here present a case series of four patients with small to medium-sized non-ptotic breasts, who had centrally located breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS). Three patients had single stage CWPF reconstruction, and one had central excision with immediate reconstruction following a failed attempt at therapeutic mammoplasty. All had the areola reconstructed using flap skin; one patient had simultaneous nipple reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: CWPF is an option for treatment of centrally located breast cancers/DCIS needing nipple-areola complex excision for patients wishing to avoid mastectomy. Patients with small to medium-sized non-ptotic breasts are suitable, and need to be carefully selected.

The Results of Surveillance Imaging After Breast Conservation Surgery and Partial Breast Reconstruction With Chest Wall Perforator Flaps; A Qualitative Analysis Compared With Standard Breast-Conserving Surgery for Breast Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Partial breast reconstruction (PBR) using chest wall perforator flaps (CWPF) allows for excision of tumors in the outer quadrant of the breast in women with small to moderate non-ptotic breasts resulting in a good aesthetic outcome. There are limited data available in the literature regarding long-term follow-up and the effect of CWPF on subsequent surveillance mammographic interpretation and recall rates. A retrospective audit with qualitative analysis of initial mammograms was performed to assess this. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database included all consecutive patients who underwent either PBR with CWPF or wide local excision (WLE) between January 2013 and December 2014 by a single surgeon in a tertiary referral center. Qualitative analysis of the postoperative mammograms was performed after review by 2 blinded radiologists. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were included in the study, 18 in each arm. The CWPF group was younger and had larger tumor size anticipated on preoperative imaging, which correlated with larger specimens excised. Both groups were comparable with respect to tumor pathological characteristics. Comparing the first postoperative mammograms, both groups were similar in features reported such as calcifications, fat necrosis, volume loss, and radiotherapy changes. During the follow-up period (median 4 years), 138 surveillance mammograms were performed. One patient was recalled for further imaging in the CWPF group. There was no significant difference in the need for diagnostic imaging and biopsy between the groups. CONCLUSION: Patients who underwent PBR using CWPF had similar features on postoperative surveillance mammograms compared with that post WLE.

Slip imaging: reducing ambiguity in breast lesion assessment.

Ultrasound elasticity imaging (elastography) is gaining popularity as an adjunct to B-mode ultrasound for breast cancer diagnosis. Cancerous masses are usually stiffer than normal tissue, hence, using elasticity imaging should lead to better differentiation between benign and malignant masses than using B-mode alone. Clinicians assess the mobility of masses on palpation; cancers usually being less mobile. We introduce a method to estimate mobility, called slip imaging and combine it with conventional B-mode and elasticity data. In the reported evaluation on 70 women recalled to a breast assessment clinic, images were scored by three breast radiologists independently. Diagnostic accuracy increased from 75.7% with B-mode alone, to 78.1% when including elasticity imaging, to 80.0% when further including slip imaging. Specificity increased (74.6%:75.4%:82.5% respectively), with an apparent trade-off in sensitivity (77.1%:81.3%:77.1%). We conclude that Slip imaging is potentially a useful adjunct to B-mode and elasticity imaging and should undergo further research and development.

Radiologic characteristics and management of screen-detected metastatic carcinoid tumor of the breast: a case report.

Carcinoid tumors are known to metastasize to the breast, but their appearance can mimic a primary breast carcinoma, making biopsy essential in order to give the correct preoperative diagnosis. It has been suggested that core biopsy might precipitate a carcinoid crisis and should be avoided. We describe a case of screen-detected carcinoid tumor metastasis in the breast safely diagnosed by core biopsy and present the imaging findings, including magnetic resonance imaging and elastography. This case illustrates the importance of preoperative histologic diagnosis in enabling the appropriate surgical or medical management of these patients. Review of the literature also supports the policy that biopsy of nonhormonally active tumors may be safely performed.