RESUMEN
AIMS: To determine outcomes in atrial fibrillation patients undergoing percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) based on the underlying stroke risk (defined by the CHA2DS2-VASc score). METHODS AND RESULTS: Data were extracted from the National Inpatient Sample for calendar years 2016-20. Left atrial appendage occlusion implantations were identified on the basis of the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification code of 02L73DK. The study sample was stratified on the basis of the CHA2DS2-VASc score into three groups (scores of 3, 4, and ≥5). The outcomes assessed in our study included complications and resource utilization. A total of 73 795 LAAO device implantations were studied. Approximately 63% of LAAO device implantations occurred in patients with CHA2DS2-VASc scores of 4 and ≥5. The crude prevalence of pericardial effusion requiring intervention was higher with increased CHA2DS2-VASc score (1.4% in patients with a score of ≥5 vs. 1.1% in patients with a score of 4 vs. 0.8% in patients with a score of 3, P < 0.01). In the multivariable model adjusted for potential confounders, CHA2DS2-VASc scores of 4 and ≥5 were found to be independently associated with overall complications [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.18-1.35, and aOR 1.88, 95% CI 1.73-2.04, respectively] and prolonged length of stay (aOR 1.18, 95% CI 1.11-1.25, and aOR 1.54, 95% CI 1.44-1.66, respectively). CONCLUSION: A higher CHA2DS2-VASc score was associated with an increased risk of peri-procedural complications and resource utilization after LAAO. These findings highlight the importance of patient selection for the LAAO procedure and need validation in future studies.
Asunto(s)
Apéndice Atrial , Fibrilación Atrial , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Apéndice Atrial/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
Apéndice Atrial , Fibrilación Atrial , Obesidad Mórbida , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Enfermedades Vasculares , Humanos , Apéndice Atrial/cirugía , Obesidad Mórbida/complicaciones , Implantación de Prótesis/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Vasculares/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversosRESUMEN
AIMS: The safety and feasibility of combining percutaneous catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation with left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) as a single procedure in the USA have not been investigated. We analyzed the US National Readmission Database (NRD) to investigate the incidence of combined LAAO + CA and compare major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) with matched LAAO-only and CA-only patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this retrospective study from NRD data, we identified patients undergoing combined LAAO and CA procedures on the same day in the USA from 2016 to 2019. A 1:1 propensity score match was performed to identify patients undergoing LAAO-only and CA-only procedures. The number of LAAO + CA procedures increased from 28 (2016) to 119 (2019). LAAO + CA patients (n = 375, mean age 74 ± 9.2 years, 53.4% were males) had non-significant higher MACE (8.1%) when compared with LAAO-only (n = 407, 5.3%) or CA-only patients (n = 406, 7.4%), which was primarily driven by higher rate of pericardial effusion (4.3%). All-cause 30-day readmission rates among LAAO + CA patients (10.7%) were similar when compared with LAAO-only (12.7%) or CA-only (17.5%) patients. The most frequent primary reason for readmissions among LAAO + CA and LAAO-only cohorts was heart failure (24.6 and 31.5%, respectively), while among the CA-only cohort, it was paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (25.7%). CONCLUSION: We report an 63% annual growth (from 28 procedures) in combined LAAO and CA procedures in the USA. There were no significant difference in MACE and all-cause 30-day readmission rates among LAAO + CA patients compared with matched LAAO-only or CA-only patients.
Asunto(s)
Apéndice Atrial , Fibrilación Atrial , Ablación por Catéter , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Masculino , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Readmisión del Paciente , Apéndice Atrial/cirugía , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Ablación por Catéter/efectos adversos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Our objective is to assess whether the presence of myocardial viability is a predictor of mortality among patients undergoing coronary artery bypasss grafting (CABG) through a systematic review meta-analysis. METHODS: Comprehensive review of EMBASE and PubMed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, including studies of patients undergoing CABG with assessment of myocardial viability and recorded long-term mortality, age and sex. Studies were restricted to the last decade, and data were stratified by imaging modality (magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] or nuclear medicine). Random-effects model for assessing pooled effect, heterogeneity assessment using Chi-square and I2 statistics, publication bias assessed by funnel plots and Egger's test. RESULTS: Meta-analysis of contemporary data (January 2010 to October 2020) yielded 3,621 manuscripts of which 92 were relevant, and 6 appropriate for inclusion with 993 patients. Pooled analysis showed that patients with non-viable myocardium undergoing CABG are at 1.34 times the risk of mortality compared to those with viable myocardium (95% CI 1.01-1.79, p=0.05). Subgroup analysis of the MRI or nuclear medicine modalities was not statistically significant and there was no confounding by age or sex in meta-regression. There was significant heterogeneity in imaging modality and diagnostic criteria, but heterogeneity between study findings was low with an I2 statistic of 29%. The risk of publication bias was moderate on the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale), but not statistically significant (Egger's Test coefficient=1.3, 95%CI -0.35-2.61, p=0.10). CONCLUSIONS: There is a multitude of methods for assessing cardiac viability for coronary revascularisation surgery, making meta-analyses fraught with limitations. Our meta-analysis demonstrates that the finding of non-viable myocardium can not be used draw conclusions for risk assessment in coronary surgery.
Asunto(s)
Puente de Arteria Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Puente de Arteria Coronaria/métodos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/etiología , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Humanos , Miocardio , Medición de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) has emerged as an alternative strategy to oral anticoagulation for mitigating ischemic stroke risk in selected patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), but safety data in patients with significant kidney disease are limited. OBJECTIVE: To determine the association of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) with procedural complications and in-hospital outcomes after LAAO in AF patients. METHODS: Data were extracted from National Inpatient Sample for calendar years 2015-2018. Watchman implantations were identified on the basis of International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th Revision, Clinical Modification codes of 37.90 and 02L73DK. The outcomes assessed in our study included complications, inpatient mortality, and resource utilization with LAAO. RESULTS: A total of 36,065 Watchman recipients were included in the final analysis. CKD (9.8%, n = 3545) and ESRD (3%, n = 1155) were associated with a higher prevalence of major complications and mortality in crude analysis compared to no CKD. After multivariate adjustment for potential confounders, CKD was associated with length of stay (LOS) >1 day (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.355; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.234-1.488), median cost >$24,663 (aOR 1.267; 95% CI 1.176-1.365), and acute kidney injury (aOR 4.134; 95% CI 3.536-4.833), while ESRD was associated with in-patient mortality (aOR 7.156; 95% CI 3.294-15.544). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of CKD and ESRD was approximately 13% in AF patients undergoing Watchman LAAO implantations. CKD was independently associated with prolonged LOS, higher hospitalization costs, and acute kidney injury, while ESRD was independently associated with in-patient mortality.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) devices have become a favorable alternative option among nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with long-term contraindication to anticoagulation. Real-world experience with postprocedural readmission rates and predictors of readmission in LAAO patients is limited. OBJECTIVE: To assess all-cause 30-day readmission rate and predictors of readmission after LAAO procedure in the United States. METHOD: This retrospective observational study included all AF patients undergoing percutaneous LAAO procedures in the United States from January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2017, in the National Readmission Database. The primary outcome measure was all-cause 30-day readmission. A propensity score-matched analysis compared outcomes with a non-LAAO AF cohort. RESULT: Among 14 024 LAAO procedures (age: 76 ± 8 years; 60.5% males), 9.4% were readmitted within 30-days and, 0.2% died during their index hospitalization. The most frequent primary diagnosis during readmission among LAAO was gastrointestinal bleeding (12%). The incidence of LAAO procedures increased by 102%. In the multivariate model, gender and CHA2 DS2 -VASc failed to predict readmission. Age 55-64 years had lower odds (adjusted odds ratios [aOR]: 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.18-0.94), while drug abuse (aOR: 4.1; 95% CI: 1.34-12.54), and deficiency anemia (aOR: 1.88; 95% CI: 1.12-3.18) had higher odds of readmission. In propensity-matched cohort, compared to non-LAAO AF, LAAO patients had lower 30-day readmission (9.4% vs. 10.98%, p = .002) and all-cause in-hospital mortality (0.19% vs. 0.57%, p < .001). CONCLUSION: The readmission rate following the LAAO procedure is substantial (approximately 10%), and largely attributable to gastrointestinal bleeding. Factors such as drug abuse and anemia must be explored further to minimize readmission risk.
Asunto(s)
Apéndice Atrial , Fibrilación Atrial , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Apéndice Atrial/diagnóstico por imagen , Apéndice Atrial/cirugía , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Readmisión del Paciente , Puntaje de Propensión , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Left atrial appendage occlusion has shown promise in mitigating the risk of stroke in selected patients with atrial fibrillation. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the real-world prevalence and in-hospital outcomes in left atrial appendage occlusion (Watchman) recipients complicated by pericardial effusion requiring percutaneous drainage or open cardiac surgery-based intervention. METHODS: Data were derived from the National Inpatient Sample database from January 2015 to December 2017. The primary outcomes assessed were the prevalence of pericardial effusion requiring intervention and in-hospital outcomes including mortality, other major complications, hospital stay > 1 day, and hospitalization costs. Predictors of pericardial effusion requiring intervention were also analyzed. RESULTS: Pericardial effusion requiring intervention occurred in 220 total patients (1.24%). After multivariable adjustment, pericardial effusion requiring intervention was associated with in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 511.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] 122-2145.3), other Watchman-related major complications (aOR 1.35; 95% CI 0.83-2.19), length of stay > 1 day (aOR 17.64; 95% CI 12.56-24.77), and hospitalization cost above the median of $24,327 (aOR 3.58; 95% CI 2.61-4.91). Independent patient predictors of pericardial effusion requiring intervention from the procedure included advanced age (aOR 1.029 per 1-year increase; 95% CI 1.009-1.05 per 1-year increase), higher CHA2DS2-VASc score (aOR 1.221 per 1-point increase; 95% CI 1.083-1.377 per 1-point increase), and obesity (aOR 2.033; 95% CI 1.464-2.823). CONCLUSION: In a large, contemporary real-world cohort of Watchman recipients in US practice, the prevalence of pericardial effusion requiring intervention was 1.24%. Pericardial effusion requiring intervention was associated with several adverse events including increased in-hospital mortality, other major complications, prolonged hospital stay, and hospitalization costs.
Asunto(s)
Apéndice Atrial/cirugía , Fibrilación Atrial/complicaciones , Cateterismo Cardíaco/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Derrame Pericárdico/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Fibrilación Atrial/fisiopatología , Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Humanos , Incidencia , Tiempo de Internación/tendencias , Masculino , Derrame Pericárdico/epidemiología , Derrame Pericárdico/cirugía , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
[Figure: see text].
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial/terapia , Negro o Afroamericano , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/instrumentación , Hispánicos o Latinos , Hospitalización , Dispositivo Oclusor Septal , Población Blanca , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilación Atrial/etnología , Comorbilidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Factores Raciales , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In October 2010, the American Heart Association/Emergency Cardiovascular Care updated cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines. Its impact on the survival rate among out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients (OHCA) is not well studied. We sought to assess the survival trends in OHCA patients before and after the introduction of the 2010 American Heart Association cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines in the United States. METHODS: A retrospective observational study from the National Emergency Department (ED) Sample was designed to identify patients presenting to the ED primarily after an OHCA in the United States between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2015. The main outcome studied was the change in trends of ED survival and survival-to-discharge rates before and after guideline modification. RESULTS: Among 1 282 520 patients presenting to the ED after OHCA (mean [SD] age, 65.8 [17.2] years; 62% men), ED survival rate (23%) and survival-to-discharge rate (16%) trends showed significant improvement after implementation of the 2010 American Heart Association cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines, 1.25% ([95% CI, 0.72%-1.78%] P=0.001) and 0.89% ([95% CI, 0.35%-1.43%] P=0.006), respectively. Notably, among patients with nonshockable rhythm (change in ED survival rate trend, 1.3% [95% CI, 0.89%-1.74%]; P<0.001 and survival-to-discharge trend, 0.94% [95% CI, 0.42%-1.47%]; P=0.004). Among patients admitted to the presenting hospital (n=145 592), 46% were discharged alive, of which 49% were discharged home. Significant decrease in discharge to home was noted (-1.7% [95% CI, -3.18% to -0.22%]; P=0.03), while a significant increase in neurological complication (0.17% [95% CI, 0.06%-0.28%]; P=0.007) was noted with the guideline modification. CONCLUSIONS: The change in 2010 American Heart Association cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines was associated with only slight improvement in ED survival and survival-to-discharge trends among US OHCA patients and only 1 in 6 OHCA patients survival to discharge.
Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/normas , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/terapia , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Anciano , American Heart Association , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Patients eligible for primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy are faced with a complex decision that needs a clear understanding of the risks and benefits of such an intervention. In this study, our goal was to explore the documentation of primary prevention ICD discussions in the electronic medical records (EMRs) of eligible patients. METHODS: In 1523 patients who met criteria for primary prevention ICD therapy between 2013 and 2015, we reviewed patient charts for ICD-related documentation: "mention" by physicians or "discussion" with patient/family. The attitude of the physician and the patient/family toward ICD therapy during discussions was categorized into negative, neutral, or positive preference. Patients were followed to the end-point of ICD implantation. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up of 442 days, 486 patients (32%) received an ICD. ICD was mentioned in the charts of 1105 (73%) patients, and a discussion with the patient/family about the risks and benefits of ICD was documented in 706 (46%) charts. On multivariable analyses, positive cardiologist (hazard ratio [HR]: 7.9, 95% confidence of intervals [CI]: 1.0-59.7, P < .05), electrophysiologist (HR: 7.7, 95% CI: 1.9-31.7, P < .001), and patient/family (HR: 9.9, 95% CI: 6.2-15.7, P < .001) preferences toward ICD therapy during the first documented ICD discussion were independently associated with ICD implantation. CONCLUSIONS: In a large cohort of patients eligible for primary prevention ICD therapy, a discussion with the patient/family about the risks and benefits of ICD implantation was documented in less than 50% of the charts. More consistent documentation of the shared decision making around ICD therapy is needed.
Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones Conjunta , Desfibriladores Implantables , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Prevención Primaria , Anciano , Ecocardiografía , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , PennsylvaniaRESUMEN
Takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TCM) has gained global recognition as a unique cardiovascular disease that mimics acute myocardial infarction. Since its initial description, more than three decades ago, we have significantly advanced our understanding of diagnosing, treating, and prognosticating this reversible cardiovascular phenomenon. However, the pathophysiological explanation behind its selective involvement of the left ventricle (LV), predominantly the LV apex in poorly understood. In this brief review on differential distribution of the adrenergic nerve (AN) and cholinergic nerve (CN) in the normal human heart, we try to extrapolate an idea of poor CN distribution in the LV apex as an associated factor augmenting microcirculatory dysfunction due to an unopposed AN activity from the catecholamine surge, as a plausible explanation for this characteristic phenomenon.
RESUMEN
AIM: Association between survival rate and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI) among individuals suffering an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in the United States (US). METHODS: We utilized the US National Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) dataset to retrospectively identify individuals experiencing OHCA between January 1, 2006 to December 31, 2015; using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision-Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) and Tenth Revision-Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes. Logistic regression analysis with twenty-nine ECIs as predictor variables were performed to compute for odds ratio (OR), after controlling for age and gender. Linear regression analysis performed to assess survival trend after clustering based on ECI. We also assessed the association of ECI with survival rate after stratifying patients based on cardiac rhythm (shockable versus non-shockable). RESULTS: We identified 1,282,520 (16.4%, survived-to-discharge) weighted observations presenting primarily after OHCA in the US during the study period. Annual percentage change (APC) in survival rate among OHCA patients with no ECI and those with >3 ECI was -1.53% (95% CI: -1.98% to -1.09%, Ptrendâ¯<â¯0.001) and 1.2% (95% CI: 0.69%-1.7%, Ptrendâ¯=â¯0.001), respectively. Adjusted OR for ECI was 1.31 (95% CI: 1.3-1.31, Pâ¯<â¯0.001). Percentage change in the survival rate among shockable and non-shockable rhythm was 5.6% (95% CI: -3.9% to 15.13%, Ptrendâ¯=â¯0.127) and 1.04% (95% CI: 0.01%-2.07%, Ptrendâ¯=â¯0.05), respectively, with a unit increase in ECI. CONCLUSION: In the US, OHCA patients with higher ECI have greater survival-to-discharge rate, demonstrating "comorbidity paradox".
Asunto(s)
Comorbilidad , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/mortalidad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Conjuntos de Datos como Asunto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Background The incidence and 30-day readmission rates of patients with infective endocarditis (IE) are not fully determined. We used the United States Nationwide Readmission Database (NRD) to assess national trends and predictors of 30-day readmission. Methods We queried the NRD from 2010 to 2014 and identified patients with index hospitalizations primarily for IE. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify predictors of 30-day readmission. Results A total of 48,500 patients (mean age 58 ± 19 years; 38% women; 6.4% died during index hospitalization) were admitted for IE. There was an annual decrease in hospitalization rates by 1.5%. With an exception for 2014, subsequent 30-day readmission rates remained relatively unchanged. All-cause 30-day readmission occurred in 25.4% of patients, 21.8% of which were due to acute or subacute bacterial endocarditis. Leaving against medical advice (odds ratio (OR): 3.46, 95% CI: 3.12 - 3.84; P <0.001), history of drug abuse and a cardiac implantable electronic device in situ (OR: 2.17, 95% CI: 1.53 - 3.08; P <0.001), fungal IE (OR: 1.5, 95% CI: 1.28 - 1.76; P < 0.001), and uninsured patients (OR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.12 - 1.74, P <0.001) were the strongest independent predictors of 30-day readmission. Readmission cost ($58 million annually) accounted for 14% of the total hospitalization cost. Conclusions The annual incidence of IE in the US decreased slightly from 2010 to 2014, but the 30-day readmission rates remained relatively unchanged. Addressing modifiable predictors of readmission may reduce the financial burden of IE on health care.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Extramedullary haematopoiesis (EMH) within myocardium is a rare phenomenon, and its occurrence in left ventricle myocardium or apical thrombus of a young female has never been reported. CASE SUMMARY: A 23-year-old active female with progressive worsening of dyspnoea. A transthoracic echocardiogram demonstrated a left ventricular ejection fraction of 10-15% and apical thrombus. Bilateral upper extremity Doppler showed deep venous thrombus in the left arm and superficial vein thrombus in both arms. She had reduced activity of antithrombin III, deficiency of protein C and S. Computed tomography of the head showed right thalamic infarct. Having failed optimal medical therapy, rapidly worsening of symptoms (New York Heart Association Class IV and clinical Class C) and cardiogenic shock, she underwent HeartWare® left ventricular assist device (LVAD) placement as a bridge to heart transplant. Intraoperative apical thrombus was carefully extracted while maintaining adequate anticoagulation with heparin infusion. Pathology report of the excised apical myocardium and thrombus demonstrated haematopoietic cells. Twenty-six months since LVAD implantation, she remains active and Status 7 on transplant list (due to body mass index) without any further episodes of thromboembolic events. DISCUSSION: We report an unprecedented case of an active young female with EMH within left ventricular myocardium and apical thrombus. Although redirected differentiation and embolic haematopoietic cells seem to explain this phenomenon, the exact pathophysiology remains unknown. Despite having pre-existing apical thrombus and acute deep vein thrombus, the key towards success was meticulous extraction of apical thrombus while preserving inherent trabecular architecture and adequate anticoagulation.
RESUMEN
Background Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are indicated in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, but many eligible patients do not receive this therapy. In this cluster randomized trial, we investigated the impact of a best practice alert (BPA) through the electronic health records on the rates of electrophysiology referrals, ICD implantations, and all-cause mortality in severe cardiomyopathy patients. Methods and Results Providers in the Heart and Vascular Institute (n=106) and in General Internal Medicine (n=89) were randomized to receive or not receive a BPA recommending consideration for ICD implantation. Patients belonging to the BPA and no BPA groups of providers were followed to the end points of electrophysiology referrals, ICD implantations, and all-cause mortality. Between 2013 and 2015, patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction were managed by 93 providers in the BPA (n=997 patients) and 102 providers in the no BPA (n=909 patients) groups. Patients in the 2 groups had comparable baseline characteristics. After a median follow-up of 36 months, 638 (33%) patients were referred to electrophysiology, 536 (27%) received an ICD, and 445 (23%) died. Patients in the BPA group were more likely to be referred to electrophysiology (hazard ratio=1.23; P=0.026), to receive ICD therapy (hazard ratio=1.35; P=0.006), and exhibited a trend towards slightly lower mortality (hazard ratio=0.85; P=0.091). Conclusions Delivering a BPA through the electronic health record recommending to providers consideration of ICD implantation when the left ventricular ejection fraction is ≤35% improves the rates of electrophysiology referrals and ICD therapy in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction.
Asunto(s)
Cardiomiopatías/terapia , Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/prevención & control , Desfibriladores Implantables , Cardioversión Eléctrica/instrumentación , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Sistemas Recordatorios , Volumen Sistólico , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/terapia , Función Ventricular Izquierda , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cardiomiopatías/diagnóstico por imagen , Cardiomiopatías/mortalidad , Cardiomiopatías/fisiopatología , Causas de Muerte , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pennsylvania , Estudios Prospectivos , Derivación y Consulta , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/diagnóstico , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/mortalidad , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/fisiopatología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate inpatient trends in de novo complete cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) procedures and subsequent all-cause 30-day readmissions in the United States. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We accessed the National Readmission Database to identify CIED implantation-related hospitalizations between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2014, using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification procedure codes. In-hospital mortality and postprocedure all-cause 30-day readmissions were also analyzed. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 800,250 CIED implantation hospitalizations were identified across the United States, with an in-hospital mortality rate of 0.9% (7423 of 800,250) and a 29% decrease in CIED-related index hospitalizations (188,086 in 2010 vs 134,276 in 2014). The all-cause 30-day readmission rate for the entire cohort was 13% (106,505 of 800,250), decreasing from 14% (26,134 of 188,085) in 2010 to only 13% (17,154 of 134,276) by 2014. Dual-chamber pacemakers were the most frequently implanted in-hospital CIEDs (473,615 of 800,250 [59%]). The most common cause for readmission was heart failure exacerbation, which remained unchanged over the study period. CONCLUSION: Our data reveal a steady decline in overall in-hospital CIED implantations and only a modest decline in readmission rates. The cause for this decline may be an impact of medical and regulatory changes guiding CIED implantations, but it deserves further investigation.
Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Cardíaco/tendencias , Desfibriladores Implantables/estadística & datos numéricos , Marcapaso Artificial/estadística & datos numéricos , Admisión del Paciente/tendencias , Readmisión del Paciente/tendencias , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Hospitalización/tendencias , Humanos , Masculino , Factores de Riesgo , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation is a common technology of the modern era used as a bridge in severe refractory cardiac and respiratory failure until definitive management is planned. However, early recognition and management of one of the most challenging complications, intracardiac thrombus, continue to remain a conundrum. The incidence of the clinical scenario is very rare. Therefore, due to the lack of literature, there are no guidelines for risk stratification, prevention, or management of intracardiac thrombus. We describe a case of massive pulmonary embolism, who developed a sudden right sided intra-cardiac thrombosis while being optimally anticoagulated on VA ECMO. We also review the literature to describe the pathophysiology, risk stratification, prevention, and management of this rare entity.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is insufficient information about the long-term prognosis of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) survivors. We therefore derived a clinical score (Sudden Cardiac Arrest-mortality score, SCA-MS) that predicts long-term mortality in patients surviving to hospital discharge and validated it in an independent cohort of SCA survivors. METHODS: A total of 1433 SCA survivors data were collected, who were discharged from the hospitals of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center between 2002 and 2012. The overall cohort was randomly divided into two near equal cohorts used for the derivation and validation of the SCA-MS, respectively. RESULTS: The derivation cohort included 768 patients and identified serum potassium level>4.2 mg/dL at admission, the presence of atrial fibrillation at any time during the index hospitalization, and the presence of asystole or pulseless electrical activity as the initial documented rhythm as independent predictors of long-term mortality. Based on the multivariable modeling result, one point was assigned to each one of these variables to create the SCA-MS that ranged from 0 to 3. In the validation cohort, the SCA-MS was predictive of long-term mortality (hazards ratio = 1.69, 95% confidence interval 1.50-1.91, P < 0.001) per 1-point increment in the SCA-MS. CONCLUSIONS: We describe a new clinical score that predicts long-term survival after SCA based on serum potassium levels at the admission, presence of atrial fibrillation, and documented rhythm of SCA.
Asunto(s)
Paro Cardíaco/mortalidad , Potasio/sangre , Análisis de Supervivencia , Anciano , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Biomarcadores/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Distribución Aleatoria , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Guideline recommendations for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) for secondary prevention of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) have excluded patients with reversible causes. We previously demonstrated mortality benefit with the ICD in survivors of SCA associated with reversible causes other than myocardial infarction (MI) or ischemia treated with coronary revascularization. In the current study, we examined the incidence of ICD therapy in patients with SCA related to reversible causes. METHODS: Data were collected for all patients over the age of 18 years who had survived to hospital discharge after SCA between 2002 and 2012. ICD recipients with reversible causes were divided into 2 groups based on their reversible etiology of SCA: MI + ICD (n = 132) and non-MI + ICD (n = 75). Delivered ICD therapy was examined. RESULTS: Over a follow-up period of 3.8 ± 3.1 years, more patients without MI/ischemia who received an ICD experienced appropriate (adjusted HR, 3.96; 95% CI, 1.32-11.84) but not inappropriate (adjusted HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.14-2.97) ICD therapy compared with patients without MI/ischemia. The proportion of patients receiving appropriate (P = 0.012) but not inappropriate (P = 0.80) ICD therapy was also higher in the non-MI + ICD compared with the MI + ICD group. CONCLUSION: We show higher rates of appropriate ICD therapy in survivors of SCA associated with reversible causes other than MI/ischemia. This finding, in conjunction with the previously demonstrated lower all-cause mortality noted in the presence of an ICD in SCA survivors with reversible etiology other than MI/ischemia, further supports consideration of ICD implantation in this population.
Asunto(s)
Desfibriladores Implantables , Cardioversión Eléctrica/instrumentación , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Anciano , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas , Cardioversión Eléctrica/efectos adversos , Cardioversión Eléctrica/mortalidad , Femenino , Paro Cardíaco/diagnóstico , Paro Cardíaco/etiología , Paro Cardíaco/mortalidad , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Selección de Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although elevated body mass index (BMI) is a risk factor for cardiac disease, patients with elevated BMI have better survival in the context of severe illness, a phenomenon termed the "obesity paradox." HYPOTHESIS: Higher BMI is associated with lower mortality in sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) survivors. METHODS: Data were collected on 1433 post-SCA patients, discharged alive from the hospitals of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center between 2002 and 2012. Of those, 1298 patients with documented BMI during the index hospitalization and follow-up data constituted the study cohort. RESULTS: In the overall cohort, 30 patients were underweight (BMI <18.5 kg/m2 ), 312 had normal weight (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m2 ), 417 were overweight (BMI 25.0-29.9 kg/m2 ), and 539 were obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m2 ). As expected, the prevalence of coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension increased significantly with increasing BMI. Over a median follow-up of 3.6 years, 602 (46%) patients died. Despite higher prevalence of cardiovascular comorbidities in more obese patients, a higher BMI was associated with lower all-cause mortality on univariate analysis (hazard ratio: 0.86 per increase by 1 BMI category, 95% confidence interval: 0.78-0.94, P = 0.002) and multivariate analysis after adjusting for unbalanced baseline comorbidities (hazard ratio: 0.86 per increase by 1 BMI category, 95% confidence interval: 0.77-0.96, P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Higher BMI is associated with lower all-cause mortality in survivors of SCA, suggesting that the obesity paradox applies to the post-arrest population. Further investigation into its mechanisms may inform the management of post-SCA patients.