RESUMEN
Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has extended the survivability of critically ill patients beyond their unsupported prognosis and has widened the timeframe for making an informed decision about the goal of care. However, an extended time window for survival does not necessarily translate into a better outcome and the sustaining treatment is ultimately withdrawn in many patients. Emerging evidence has implicated the determining role of palliative care consult (PCC) in direction of the care that critically ill patients receive. Objective: To evaluate the impact of PCC in withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment (WOLST) among critically ill patients, who were placed on venovenous ECMO (VV-ECMO) at the intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary care hospital. Methods: In a retrospective observational study, electronic medical records of 750 patients admitted to the ICU of our hospital between January 1, 2015, and October 31, 2021, were reviewed. Data was collected for patients on VV-ECMO, for whom WOLST was withdrawn during the ICU stay. Clinical characteristics and the underlying reasons for WOLST were compared between those who received PCC (PCC group) and those who did not (non-PCC group). Results: A total of 95 patients were included in our analysis, 63 in the PCC group and 32 in the non-PCC group. The average age of the study population was 48.8 ± 12.6 years, and 64.2% were male. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of demographics or clinical characteristics at the time of ICU admission. The average duration of ICU stay and VV-ECMO were 14.1 ± 19.9 days and 9.4 ± 16.6 days, respectively. The number of PCC visits was correlated with the length of ICU stay. The average duration of ICU stay (40.3 ± 33.2 days vs 27.8 ± 19.3 days, P = .05) and ECMO treatment (31.9 ± 27 days vs 18.6 ± 16.1 days, P = .01) were significantly longer in patients receiving PCC than those not receiving PCC. However, the frequency of life sustaining measures or the underlying reasons for WOLST did not significantly differ between the two groups (P > .05). Conclusion: Among ICU patients requiring ECMO support, longer duration of ICU stay and treatment with a higher number of life-sustaining measures seemed to be correlated with the number of PCC visits. The underlying reasons for WOLST seem not to be affected by PCC.
Asunto(s)
Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Cuidados Paliativos , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Derivación y ConsultaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Guideline recommendations regarding the preferred preventive measures for postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) are unclear, nor have we found any review articles addressing the combination of amiodarone and beta-blockers for the prevention of POAF. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy and safety of combination beta-blockers and amiodarone in the prevention of POAF while also comparing the use of amiodarone and beta-blockers individually. METHODS: We used Pubmed as the primary resource. POAF incidence was the primary outcome of this study. The secondary outcomes were hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS, treatment-related drug discontinuation (TRDD), and mortality. The random-effects model assessed all pooled outcomes with 95% confidence intervals. Statistical significance was set at p≤0.05. RESULTS: The amiodarone subgroup of POAF incidence saw a Risk Ratio (RR) of 0.81 [0.63, 1.06], p=0.12, while the combination subgroup resulted in a RR of 0.63 [0.49, 0.80], p <0.001. TRDD for the amiodarone subgroup resulted in a RR of 0.68 [0.25, 1.82], p=0.44, while the combination subgroup saw a RR of 0.84 [0.57, 1.23], p=0.36. For mortality, the amiodarone subgroup resulted in a RR of 0.97 [0.48, 1.98], p=0.93, while the combination subgroup resulted in a RR of 1.04 [0.27, 4.05], p=0.96. Both hospital and ICU LOS saw no significant difference between treatment arms for both the combination subgroup and amiodarone alone. Except for the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) in the combination prophylaxis group, most of the measured outcomes did not meet the optimized information size (OIS) that was estimated. CONCLUSION: Combination prophylaxis with amiodarone and beta-blockers significantly lowered risks of POAF incidence in comparison to beta-blockers alone while also having comparative mortality and TRDD outcomes.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether dexmedetomidine (DEX), as adjunctive therapy to benzodiazepine (BZD), is superior to BZD alone in critically ill patients with alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS). DATA SOURCES: PubMed Central, Cochrane CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov and Google Scholar were used as search databases. Specific keywords and MeSH terms were "dexmedetomidine," "benzodiazepine," and "alcohol withdrawal syndrome." The last search was on September 16, 2022. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nonrandomized/cohort studies exploring the use of DEX in the management of AWS were included. A total of 12 studies were included in the systematic review and 7 in the meta-analysis. DATA SYNTHESIS: The intensive care unit length of stay (ICU LOS) was found to have a mean difference (MD) of 48.06 [37.48, 58.64], P = <0.001 for the cohort subgroup, significantly favoring the DEX arm, but, in contrast, pooled RCT data showed a result of -20.07 [-36.86, -3.28], P = 0.02, a shorter ICU LOS for the DEX arm. Bradycardia and hypotension incidence significantly favored the BZD arm in both subgroups. This study compares the effectiveness of adjunctive DEX in clinical practice and aims to help providers in critical decision-making by compiling and analyzing the best current available evidence of its use in AWS. CONCLUSIONS: Based on low to very low level of evidence, adjunctive DEX showed no significant difference for ICU LOS when compared with BZD alone. Pooled randomized trials potentially show a benefit but are similarly limited by their low quality of evidence.
Asunto(s)
Dexmedetomidina , Síndrome de Abstinencia a Sustancias , Humanos , Dexmedetomidina/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Síndrome de Abstinencia a Sustancias/tratamiento farmacológico , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Estudios de CohortesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may result in rapid onset of hypoxemic respiratory failure. This study aimed to characterize the factors and outcomes associated with prolonged hypoxia in patients with COVID-19. Prolonged severe hypoxia (PSH) was defined as hypoxia requiring ≥6 L/min of oxygen by nasal cannula or equivalent for more than 10 days. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This study was designed as a single-center retrospective analysis. Multivariable logistic regression was utilized to assess factors associated with PSH. RESULTS: The sample included 554 patients with 117 (21%) having PSH. Median length of stay of patients with PSH was significantly longer (median IQR: 18 days vs 6 days, p < 0.0001). Patients with PSH had significantly higher rates of venous thromboembolism (p < 0.0001) and major bleeding (p < 0.004). The presence of cirrhosis (OR 3.32, 95% CI [1.02 to 10.83]) and hypertension (OR 1.99, 95% CI [1.12 to 3.53]) were independently associated with PSH, while outpatient use of anti-platelet agents had an inverse association (OR 0.57, 95% CI [0.36 to 0.91]). CONCLUSION: PSH is associated with increased length of stay, morbidity, and mortality. Hypertension and liver cirrhosis were significantly associated with higher odds of PSH, while use of anti-platelet therapy had a protective effect.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Hipoxia , Humanos , COVID-19/complicaciones , Demografía , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Hipoxia/epidemiología , Hipoxia/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Background: Heart transplant (HTX) recipients are at a significantly higher risk of adverse clinical outcomes, due to chronic immunosuppression and co-existence of other chronic conditions, when contracting the SARS-CoV-2 infection. Although vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is currently the most promising measure for the prevention of severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) among solid organ transplant recipients, the extent of immune response and its protective efficacy among patients receiving HTX has not been sufficiently studied. Methods: We performed a systematic review of the literature by inquiring PubMed/Medline to identify original studies among HTX recipients, who had received at least one dose of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Data on the measured humoral or cellular immune response was collected from all the eligible studies. Factors associated with a poor immune response were further investigated within these studies. Results: A total of 12 studies comprising 563 HTX recipients were included. The average age of the study participants was 60.8 years. Sixty four percent of the study population were male. Ninety percent of the patients had received an mRNA vaccine (Pfizer/ BNT162b2 or Moderna/mRNA-1273). A positive immune response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccine was variably reported in 0% to 100% of the patients. Older age (> 65 years), vaccine dose (first, second, or third), time since HTX to the first dose of the vaccine, the time interval between the latest dose of the vaccine and measurement of the immune response, and the type of immunosuppressive regimen were all indicated as potential determinants of a robust immune response to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Conclusion: HTX recipients demonstrate a weaker immune response to the vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 compared to the general population. Older age, anti-metabolite agents such as mycophenolate mofetil, and vaccination during the first year following the HTX have been indicated as potential determinants of a poor immune response.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Current guidelines suggest the use of isotonic saline (IS) infusion as the preferred resuscitation fluid in the management of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). However, balanced electrolyte solutions (BES) have been proposed as an alternative due to a lower propensity to cause hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis. Evidence regarding the use of BES in DKA remains limited. OBJECTIVES: To determine if the use of BES in fluid resuscitation leads to faster resolution of DKA compared to IS. METHODS: The study involves a comprehensive search of literature from PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, Google Scholar, and Science Direct of clinical trials addressing the use of BES vs IS in fluid resuscitation in DKA. The time to resolution of DKA was examined as the primary endpoint. Pooled hazard ratios (HR) and Mean Difference (MD) in hours with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. RESULTS: The literature search included 464 studies that were screened individually. A total of 9 studies were identified but 6 studies were excluded due to irrelevance in the outcome of interest and target population. The pooled hazard ratio HR significantly revealed 1.46 [1.10 to 1.94] (p = 0.009) with 12% heterogeneity while MD was -3.02 (95% CI -6.78-0.74; p = 0.12) with heterogeneity of 85%. CONCLUSION: Considering the evidence from pooled small randomized trials with moderate overall certainty of evidence, the use of BES in DKA was associated with faster rates of DKA resolution compared to IS.
Asunto(s)
Acidosis , Diabetes Mellitus , Cetoacidosis Diabética , Acidosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Cetoacidosis Diabética/tratamiento farmacológico , Electrólitos , Fluidoterapia , Humanos , ResucitaciónRESUMEN
Background: Cardiac arrest is a critical condition with high clinical, economic, and emotional burden. The role of palliative medicine in the management of critical patients has grown and, in some areas, has shown reduced cost of stay. This study set out to examine the association of palliative care involvement in out of hospital post cardiac arrest patients and cost of stay. Methods: This is a single center retrospective analysis of all patients ≥18 years of age who were admitted at our institution from March 2018 to June 2019 with out of hospital cardiac arrest. Patients who immediately died in the emergency department were excluded. Patients were then classified according to whether palliative care was consulted. Total charges were obtained from the billing records and compared between those with palliative care compared to those without using Mann-Whitney U test. Results: A final sample of 98 patients that were included in the analysis. The mean age was 61.2 ± 17.3, 46% were female, and 61% were African American. Palliative care consultation was present in 27 (28%) of patients. There were no significant differences among age, gender, ethnicity, BMI, SOFA scores, and common comorbidities among those who did and did not have palliative care consultation. While there was a significantly longer ICU length of stay and mechanical ventilation days among patients with palliative care involvement P < .0001, the charges among patients with palliative care involvement were not statistically significantly different $59,245 ($3744-148,492) (median IQR) compared to those without palliative care $79,521 ($6540-157,952) P = .762. Conclusion: Length of stay increased with palliative care consultation which may relate more to the inherent clinical scenario. Cost of stay was not statistically significantly different.
Asunto(s)
Enfermería de Cuidados Paliativos al Final de la Vida , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuidados Paliativos , Derivación y Consulta , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Given the heterogeneity of etiologies, pathophysiology, and presentation of angioedema, variations in clinical outcomes, such as intubation and hospital readmissions, need further clarification. OBJECTIVE: To determine the factors associated with intubation and hospital readmissions in patients with angioedema. METHODS: Retrospective study of patients evaluated with a diagnosis of angioedema in a 6-year period. Demographic and clinical data, such as medication use, family history, comorbidities, and symptoms, were recorded. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze factors associated with intubation, whereas Cox regression was used to analyze readmissions. RESULTS: Of 636 patients, the most common cause of angioedema was that induced by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) at 58%. The overall mortality was 0.5%. After adjusting for sex, race, comorbidities, and type of angioedema, smoking (odds ratio [OR], 1.79; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-2.93; P = .02), calcium channel blocker therapy (OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.18-3.10; P = .009), histaminergic symptoms (OR, 3.21; 95% CI, 1.93-5.33; P < .001), and age (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.00-1.04; P = .02) were independently associated with increased odds of intubation. Involvement of either the pharynx, larynx, or tongue was associated with higher odds of intubation (OR, 20.96; 95% CI, 10.63-41.33; P < .001). A total of 10% of the patients had a readmission for angioedema within 90 days, and 75% occurred within 30 days. After multivariable Cox regression analysis, only chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma (OR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.12-4.07; P = .02) and ACEI-related angioedema (OR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.33-6.47; P = .008) were significantly associated with readmissions. CONCLUSION: Smoking, calcium channel blocker use, histaminergic symptoms, age, and upper airway involvement were markedly associated with intubation. The presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma and ACEI-related angioedema were independently associated with increased odds of readmission.
Asunto(s)
Angioedema , Asma , Intubación Intratraqueal/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Angioedema/epidemiología , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/efectos adversos , Asma/epidemiología , Bloqueadores de los Canales de Calcio , Humanos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Introduction While Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) specific treatments have been instituted, overall mortality rates among hospitalized patients remain significant. Our study aimed to evaluate patient clinical characteristics and outcomes comparing the different COVID-19 infection peak periods. Methods This is a retrospective study of all adult patients hospitalized with a confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 between March 1 to April 24, 2020 and November 1 to December 31, 2020, which corresponded to the first and second waves of COVID-19 infection in our institution, respectively. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients were compared and used for propensity matching. Clinical outcomes, such as need for intubation, renal replacement therapy and inpatient mortality were subsequently compared between the two groups. Results Patients in the second COVID-19 wave had a significantly higher body mass index (32.58 vs 29.83, p <0.001), as well as prevalence of asthma (14% vs 8%, p=0.019) and chronic kidney disease (42% vs 18%, p <0.001). Almost all patients in the second COVID-19 wave received corticosteroid treatment (99% vs 30%, p <0.001), and significantly more patients received remdesivir (43% vs 2%, p <0.001). Meanwhile, none of the patients in the second COVID-19 wave were treated with tocilizumab or hydroxychloroquine. Differences in clinical outcomes, such as need for renal replacement therapy or intubation, and median length of stay were not statistically significant. Inpatient mortality remained largely unchanged between the two COVID-19 peak periods. Discussion/ Conclusion In our institution, after propensity matched analysis, clinical outcomes such as need for renal replacement therapy, intubation and inpatient mortality remained unchanged between the two COVID-19 peak periods.
RESUMEN
Identify factors associated with readmission after an index hospital admission for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection in a single center serving an underserved and predominantly minority population. This retrospective descriptive study included 275 patients who tested COVID-19 positive via reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay at our institution and who survived the index hospitalization. The main outcomes were 1- and 6-month readmission rates after an index hospitalization for COVID-19. The mortality rate among the readmitted patients was also determined. Factors independently associated with readmission were investigated using multivariable logistic regression. A final sample of 275 patients was included. The mean age was 64.69 ± 14.64 (SD), 133 (48%) were female and 194 (70%) were African American. Their chronic medical conditions included hypertension 203 (74%) and diabetes mellitus 121 (44%). After the hospitalization, 1-month readmission rate was 7.6%, while 6-month readmission rate was 24%. Nine percent of patients who were readmitted subsequently died. Coronary artery disease (CAD) was significantly associated with 6-month readmission odds ratio (OR), 2.15 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-4.44; p = 0.039) after adjustment for age, gender, ethnicity, and comorbidities. Readmissions were due to cardiac, respiratory, and musculoskeletal symptoms. Hispanic ethnicity was associated with increased readmission OR, 3.16 (95% CI: 1.01-9.88; p = 0.048). No significant difference was found between inflammatory markers or clinical outcomes during the index hospitalization among patients who were readmitted compared to those who were not. A significant number of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 may be readmitted. The presence of CAD is independently associated with high rates of 6-month readmission.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/terapia , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , SARS-CoV-2 , Anciano , COVID-19/mortalidad , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Pennsylvania/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is reported in up to 27% of patients with COVID-19 due to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Dysregulated systemic inflammation and various patient traits are presumed to underlie this anomaly. Optimal VTE prophylaxis in COVID-19 patients has not been established due to a lack of validated models for predicting VTE in this population. Our study aims to address this deficiency by identifying demographic and clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients associated with increased VTE risk. METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of all adult patients (final sample, n = 355) hospitalized with confirmed COVID-19 at Einstein Medical Center Philadelphia between March 1 and April 24, 2020. Demographic and clinical patient data were collected and factors associated with VTE were identified and analyzed using t-tests, multivariable logistic regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: Thirty patients (8.5%) developed VTE. Patients with VTE had significantly higher D-dimer levels on admission (P = 0.045) and peak D-dimer levels (P < 0.0001), in addition to higher rates of vasopressor requirements (P = 0.038), intubation (P = 0.003), and death (P = 0.023). Age (OR 1.042), obstructive sleep apnea (OR 5.107), and need for intubation (OR 3.796) were associated with significantly increased odds of VTE. Peak D-dimer level was a good predictor of VTE (AUC 0.806, P < 0.0001) and a D-dimer cutoff of >6640 ng/mL had high (>70%) sensitivity and specificity for VTE. CONCLUSION: Peak D-dimer level may be the most reliable clinical marker in COVID-19 patients for predicting VTE and future prospective studies should attempt to further validate this.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Tromboembolia Venosa , Adulto , Biomarcadores , Productos de Degradación de Fibrina-Fibrinógeno , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Población Urbana , Tromboembolia Venosa/diagnóstico , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 is now a critical threat to global public health. Although the majority of patients present with respiratory illness, several studies have described multiorgan involvement. This study evaluated the prevailing patterns of liver enzymes in COVID-19 patients on admission and their association with clinical outcomes. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective analysis of all inpatients with COVID-19. Demographic and clinical factors, and liver enzyme tests, including aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT), were noted on admission. The association of liver enzyme elevation with outcomes such as inpatient death, need for intubation, and vasopressor use was determined using the chi-square test and multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: Among 200 patients, AST and ALT elevation was seen in 55% and 20%, respectively. Alkaline phosphatase elevation was seen in 28%. AST elevation was associated with inpatient death (odds ratio [OR] 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.05; P=0.035), need for vasopressors (OR 1.034, 95%CI 1.015-1.055; P=0.001), and intubation (OR 1.03, 95%CI 1.01-1.05; P=0.002). An AST/ALT ratio of 2 or more was seen in 34% of patients and was associated with need for intubation (OR 2.678, 95%CI 1.202-5.963; P=0.016), and need for vasopressors (OR 3.352, 95%CI 1.495-7.514; P=0.003). CONCLUSION: Serum aminotransferase levels are useful markers of hepatocellular injury. Patients with elevated AST or AST/ALT ratio are at higher risk of severe disease, as evidenced by intubation, vasopressor use, and inpatient death. These patients should be monitored closely given their propensity for severe disease.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) infection is associated with an uncontrolled systemic inflammatory response. Statins, given their anti-inflammatory properties, may reduce the associated morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to determine the association between statin use prior to hospitalization and in-hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients. METHODS: In this retrospective study, clinical data were collected from the electronic medical records of patients admitted to the hospital with confirmed COVID-19 infection from March 1, 2020 to April 24, 2020. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to study the association of pre-admission statin use with in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Of 255 patients, 116 (45.5%) patients were on statins prior to admission and 139 (54.5%) were not. The statin group had a higher proportion of end stage renal disease (ESRD) (13.8% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.001), diabetes mellitus (63.8% vs. 35.2%, p<0.001), hypertension (87.9% vs. 61.1%, p < 0.001) and coronary artery disease (CAD) (33.6% vs. 5%, p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, we found a statistically significant decrease in the odds of in-hospital mortality in patients on statins before admission (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.03- 0.61, p = 0.008). In the subgroup analysis, statins were associated with a decrease in mortality in those with CAD (OR 0.02, 95% CI 0.0003-0.92 p = 0.045) and those without CAD (OR 0.05, 95% CI 0.005-0.43, p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that statins are associated with reduced in-hospital mortality among patients with COVID-19, regardless of CAD status. More comprehensive epidemiological and molecular studies are needed to establish the role of statins in COVID-19.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Dislipidemias , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Antiinflamatorios/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/mortalidad , COVID-19/terapia , Comorbilidad , Dislipidemias/tratamiento farmacológico , Dislipidemias/epidemiología , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Mortalidad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaAsunto(s)
Angioedema/inducido químicamente , Angioedema/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/efectos adversos , Antifibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Lisinopril/efectos adversos , Ácido Tranexámico/uso terapéutico , Administración Intravenosa , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 outbreak in the United States has disproportionately affected Black individuals, but little is known about the factors that underlie this observation. Herein, we describe these associations with mortality in a largely minority underserved population. METHODS: This single-center retrospective observational study included all adult subjects with laboratory-confirmed SARS-Cov-2 treated in our ICU between March 15 and May 10, 2020. RESULTS: 128 critically ill adult subjects were included in the study (median age 68 y [interquartile range 61-76], 45% female, and 64% Black); 124 (97%) required intubation. Eighty (63%) subjects died during their in-patient stay, which did not differ by race/ethnicity. Compared with other racial/ethnic groups, Blacks had a greater proportion of women (52% vs 30%, P = .02) and subjects with hypertension (91% vs 78%, P = .035). Asthma (P = .03) was associated with lower in-patient death, primarily among Black subjects (P = .02). Among Black subjects, increased age (odds ratio 1.06 [95% CI 1.05-1.22] per year), positive fluid balance (odds ratio 1.06 [95% CI 1.01-1.11] per 100 mL), and treatment with tocilizumab (odds ratio 25.0 [95% CI 3.5-180]) were independently associated with in-patient death, while higher platelets (odds ratio 0.65 [95% CI 0.47-0.89] per 50 × 103/mL) and treatment with intermediate dose anticoagulants (odds ratio 0.08 [95% CI 0.02-0.43]) were protective. Among other race/ethnic groups, higher total bilirubin (odds ratio 1.75 [95% CI 0.94-3.25] per 0.2 mg/dL) and higher maximum lactate (odds ratio 1.43 [95% CI 0.96-2.13] per mmol/L) were marginally associated with increased death, while tocilizumab treatment was marginally protective (odds ratio 0.24 [95% CI 0.05-1.25]). During first 72 h of ventilation, those who died had less increase in [Formula: see text] (P = .046) and less reduction in PEEP (P = .01) and [Formula: see text] requirement (P = .002); these patterns did not differ by race/ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: Black and other race/ethnicity subjects had similar mortality rates due to COVID-19 but differed in factors that were associated with increased risk of death. In both groups, subjects who died were older, had a positive fluid balance, and less improvement in [Formula: see text], PEEP, and [Formula: see text] requirement on ventilation.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedad Crítica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Mecánica Respiratoria , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Población Urbana , Poblaciones VulnerablesRESUMEN
AIMS: Coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) has become a pandemic. Diabetic patients tend to have poorer outcomes and more severe disease (Kumar et al. in Diabetes Metab Syndr 14(4):535-545, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2020.04.044 ). However, the vast majority of studies are representative of Asian and Caucasian population and fewer represent an African-American population. METHODS: In this single-center, retrospective observational study, we included all adult patients (> 18 years old) admitted to Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, with a diagnosis of COVID-19. Patients were classified according to having a known diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Demographic and clinical data, comorbidities, outcomes and laboratory findings were obtained. RESULTS: Our sample included a total of 355 patients. 70% were African-American, and 47% had diabetes. Patients with diabetes had higher peak inflammatory markers like CRP 184 (111-258) versus 142 (65-229) p = 0.012 and peak LDH 560 (384-758) versus 499 (324-655) p = 0.017. The need for RRT/HD was significantly higher in patients with diabetes (21% vs 11% p = 0.013) as well as the need for vasopressors (28% vs 18% p = 0.023). Only age was found to be an independent predictor of mortality. We found no significant differences in inpatient mortality p = 0.856, need for RRT/HD p = 0.429, need for intubation p = 1.000 and need for vasopressors p = 0.471 in African-Americans with diabetes when compared to non-African-Americans. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that patients with COVID-19 and diabetes tend to have more severe disease and poorer clinical outcomes. African-American patients with diabetes did not differ in outcomes or disease severity when compared to non-African-American patients.
Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus , Anciano , COVID-19/mortalidad , COVID-19/terapia , Comorbilidad , Diabetes Mellitus/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Mortalidad/etnología , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Philadelphia/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
Bacterial coinfection is associated with poor outcomes in patients with viral pneumonia, but data on its role in the mortality of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is limited. This is a single-center retrospective analysis of 242 patients with confirmed COVID-19 admitted to both intensive care and non-intensive care settings. Bacterial coinfection was determined by the presence of characteristic clinical features and positive culture results. Multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze the association of concomitant bacterial infection with inpatient death after adjusting for demographic factors and comorbidities. Antibiotic use pattern was also determined. Bacterial coinfection was detected in 46 (19%) patients. Genitourinary source was the most frequent, representing 57% of all coinfections. The overall mortality rate was 21%. Concomitant bacterial infections were independently associated with increased inpatient mortality (OR, 5.838; 95% CI, 2.647-12.876). Patients with bacterial coinfection were relatively older (71.35 ± 11.20 vs 64.78 ± 15.23; P = .006). A total of 67% of patients received antibiotic therapy, yet 72% did not have an obvious source of bacterial infection. There was a significantly higher rate of inpatient mortality in patients who received antibiotics compared to those who did not (30% vs 5%; P < .0001). Bacterial coinfection in COVID-19 is associated with increased mortality.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Bacterianas/complicaciones , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/mortalidad , Coinfección/mortalidad , Anciano , Infecciones Bacterianas/mortalidad , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Recent studies have reported evidence that coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has disproportionately affected patients with underlying comorbidities. Our study aims to evaluate the impact of both cardiac and noncardiac comorbidities on a high-risk population with COVID-19 infection and coronary artery disease (CAD) compared to those without CAD. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of patients who tested COVID-19 positive via reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR) assay. We compared the characteristics and outcomes of patients with and without CAD. Population demographics, comorbidities and clinical outcomes were collected and analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with inpatient mortality. RESULTS: A final sample population of 355 patients was identified, 77 of which had a known diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Our study population had a higher proportion of females, and those with CAD were significantly older. The rates of cardiovascular risk factors including hypertension, diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease, as well as heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were significantly higher in the CAD population. Lactate dehydrogenase was the only inflammatory marker significantly lower in the CAD group, while troponin and brain natriuretic peptide were significantly higher in this population. Patients with CAD also had significantly higher inpatient mortality (31% vs 20%, P = 0.046) and need for renal replacement therapy (33% vs 11%, P < 0.0001) compared to the non-CAD group. However, only age [odds ratio 1.041 (1.017-1.066), P = 0.001] was significantly associated with mortality in the overall population after adjusting for demographics and comorbidities, while the presence of CAD was not independently associated with mortality. CONCLUSION: Patients with CAD and COVID-19 have higher rates of comorbidities, inpatient mortality and need for renal replacement therapy compared to their non-CAD counterparts. However, CAD in itself was not associated with mortality after adjusting for other covariates, suggesting that other factors may play a larger role in the increased mortality and poor outcomes in these patients.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/mortalidad , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/mortalidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/terapia , Prueba de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19 , Comorbilidad , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Philadelphia , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the role for intravenous fluid (IVF) resuscitation in the postarrest state. Primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge and 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were associations with amount of vasopressor use and mechanical ventilation days. DESIGN: Retrospective study design. SETTING: Single-center tertiary hospital in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. PATIENTS: All patients admitted to the intensive care unit between 2018 and 2019. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were divided into two groups based on amount of IVF received within 24âh <30âmL/kg (restricted) and over 30âmL/kg (liberal). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 264 patients were included in the study, with 200 included in the restrictive (<30âmL/kg) group and 64 included in the liberal (>30âmg/kg) group. There was no difference in 30-day mortality between the two groups with 146 (73%) deaths in the restrictive groups and 44 (69%) deaths in the liberal group (Pâ=â0.53). There was also no significant difference between those who survived to hospital discharge in the liberal and restrictive groups on Kaplan-Meier analysis (Log-rankâ=â1.476 Pâ=â0.224). However, there was a significant difference between restrictive and liberal groups with the duration of mechanical ventilation (4â±â6 days vs. 6â±â9 days; Pâ=â0.03) and in the rates of two or more vasopressor use (38% vs. 59%; Pâ=â0.002). End-stage renal disease (ESRD) (ORâ=â2.39; Pâ=â0.03) and volume of fluids in mL/kg/24âh (ORâ=â1.025; Pâ<â0.0001) were independently associated with higher vasopressor need. Volume of fluid in mL/kg/24âh (Pâ=â0.01), ESRD (Pâ=â0.015), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Pâ=â0.04) were significantly associated with duration of mechanical ventilation, even after adjusting for demographic factors, comorbidities, and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: A liberal strategy of IVF used in resuscitation after cardiac arrest is not associated with higher mortality. However, it predicts higher vasopressor use and duration of mechanical ventilation.
Asunto(s)
Fluidoterapia/métodos , Paro Cardíaco/mortalidad , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Resucitación/métodos , Administración Intravenosa , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Respiración Artificial , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vasoconstrictores/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
There is limited information describing the characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients infected with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) especially those in underserved urban area with minority population in the United States. This is a retrospective single-center study for patients who were admitted with COVID-19 infection. Data collection was from 1 March through 24 April 2020. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and treatment data were presented using descriptive statistics and frequencies. The χ2 test and multivariate logistic regression were used to determine association of risk factors and clinical outcomes. A total of 242 inpatients were included with a mean age of 66 ± 14.75 (±standard deviation). A total of 50% were female and 70% were African American. Comorbidities included hypertension (74%), diabetes mellitus (49%), and 19% had either COPD or asthma. Older age was associated with higher risk of inpatient death odds ratio (OR): 1.056 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.023-1.090; P = .001). Inpatient mortality occurred in 70% who needed mechanical ventilation (OR: 29.51; 95% CI: 13.28-65.60; P < .0001), 58% who required continuous renal replacement therapy/hemodialysis (CRRT/HD) (OR: 6.63; 95% CI: 2.74-16.05; P < .0001), and 69% who needed vasopressors (OR: 30.64; 95% CI: 13.56-69.20; P < .0001). Amongst biomarkers of disease severity, only baseline CRP levels (145 ± 116 mg/L) were associated with mortality OR: 1.008 (95% CI: 1.003-1.012; P = .002). Majority of hospitalized patients had hypertension and diabetes. Older age was an independent risk factor for inpatient mortality. Requirement of mechanical ventilation, vasopressor use, and CRRT/HD was associated significantly with inpatient mortality. Higher baseline CRP was significantly associated with inpatient death.