RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Diuretic renography is crucial in evaluation of paediatric hydronephrosis. Furosemide is conventionally given 15-20 min after radiolabelled tracer (F+15/F+20 protocol), however this is equivocal in around 15% of patients. Giving furosemide 15 min prior to tracer (F-15 MAG3 protocol) has been suggested as an additional tool in the investigation of patients with suspected upper urinary tract obstruction. However, the role of this method in assessment and management of paediatric hydronephrosis is not widely reported. OBJECTIVE: To investigate utility of F-15 renograms in children with hydronephrosis being assessed for Pelvi-Ureteric Junction Obstruction (PUJO). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of patients <16 years old undergoing F-15 MAG3 renogram between 2018 and 2021 in our tertiary paediatric surgical centre. Data collected included patient demographics, mode of presentation, investigations, management and outcomes. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were included. Median age at F-15 renogram was 7.3 years. Eleven patients presented with antenatal hydronephrosis, 5 with symptoms in childhood and 2 with incidental hydronephrosis on trauma imaging. Fourteen patients were symptomatic. Ten had a prior non-obstructed F+20 renogram but persisting symptoms suggestive of PUJO. Seven had previous equivocal F+20 renograms. One symptomatic patient directly underwent an F-15 renogram. A conclusive result was obtained in 16/18 (89%); 11 patients had obstructed curves and 5 non-obstructed. Two asymptomatic patients' scans were inconclusive. All symptomatic patients had conclusive scans. Of 11 patients with an obstructed F-15, 9 have undergone pyeloplasty to date. All have had post-operative resolution in symptoms and static or improved post-operative ultrasound. One patient with an inconclusive scan underwent pyeloplasty due to persisting hydronephrosis and parent preference. Three patients with non-obstructed F-15 renograms have been discharged. One symptomatic patient with a non-obstructive F-15 had a ureteric stent inserted due to persistent flank pain; 1 continues under surveillance. DISCUSSION: It is known that conventional F+20 MAG3 renograms can give equivocal results. Published experience suggests that F-15 renograms are conclusive in the majority of patients. Routine primary use is, however, discouraged as they can 'over diagnose' obstruction and limit the study of tracer transit under physiological flow rates. This study indicates that the F-15 renogram is a useful adjunct in the assessment of patients with symptoms suggestive of PUJO who have previously had an equivocal or a non-obstructed F+20 renogram. CONCLUSION: F-15 renogram was conclusive in 89% of patients. We recommend using F-15 renograms to aid surgical decision-making in children with equivocal F+20 renograms, especially in the presence of symptoms.