Achieving a Textbook Outcome in Colon Cancer Surgery Is Associated with Improved Long-Term Survival.

BACKGROUND: Colon cancer surgery is a complex clinical pathway and traditional quality metrics may exhibit significant variability between hospitals and healthcare providers. The Textbook Outcome (TO) is a composite quality marker capturing the fraction of patients, in whom all desired short-term outcomes of care are realised. The aim of the present study was to assess the TO in a series of non-metastatic colon cancer patients treated with curative intent, with emphasis on long-term survival. METHODS: Stage I-III colon cancer patients, who underwent curative colectomy following the Complete Mesocolic Excision principles, were retrospectively identified from the institutional database. TO was defined as (i) hospital survival, (ii) radical resection, (iii) no major complications, (iv) no reintervention, (v) no unplanned stoma and (vi) no prolonged hospital stay or readmission. RESULTS: In total, 128 patients (male 61%, female 39%, mean age 70.7 ± 11.4 years) were included in the final analysis. Overall, 60.2% achieved a TO. The highest rates were observed for "hospital survival" and "no unplanned stoma" (96.9% and 97.7%), while the lowest rates were for "no major complications" and "no prolonged hospital stay" (69.5% and 75%). Older age, left-sided resections and pT4 tumours were factors limiting the chances of a TO. The 5-year overall and 5-year cancer-specific survival were significantly better in the TO versus non-TO subgroup (81% vs. 59%, p = 0.009, and 86% vs. 65%, p = 0.02, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Outcomes in colon cancer surgery may be affected by patient-, doctor- and hospital-related factors. TO represents those patients who achieve the optimal perioperative results, and is furthermore associated with improved long-term cancer survival.

Elective surgery for conservatively treated acute uncomplicated diverticulitis: a systematic review of postoperative outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Elective surgery has been proposed, after at least two episodes of acute diverticulitis, initially treated conservatively, in order to prevent further episodes or chronic complaints. However, prophylactic surgery has been questioned, due to the associated risks of postoperative mortality and morbidity, as well as the risk of recurrent diverticulitis. This systematic review attempts to assess the role of prophylactic left colonic resection, after episodes of uncomplicated acute diverticulitis treated either conservatively with antibiotics and/or other supportive measures. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic search was performed using Medline, Embase, Ovid, and Cochrane databases for studies reporting on the treatment of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis (Hinchey I). The main endpoint was treatment failure, defined as persistent/recurrent symptoms or need for readmission and/or reintervention. Secondary endpoints were the immediate postoperative outcomes. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: In total, 24 studies with 2855 patients were included in the analysis. Intra- and postoperative complications rate were 5% and 16%, respectively. Anastomotic leak was 1.3% and emergency reoperation was 2.4%. Long-term symptomatic resolve was reported at 91%. Persistent or recurrent symptoms were observed in 5.4% of cases. Meta-analysis showed no significant difference in recurrence rates between surgical and conservative management. CONCLUSIONS: Elective surgery to prevent recurrent diverticulitis is not recommended, irrespective of the number of previous episodes. Generally, elective sigmoidectomy should not be recommended to patients with ongoing atypical lower abdominal symptoms after acute diverticulitis, but should aim primarily at improving quality of life. It should be offered to patients with ongoing inflammation, or diverticular complications.

Ventral Prosthesis Rectopexy for obstructed defaecation syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Obstructed Defecation Syndrome (ODS) is a rather complex entity concerning mainly females and causing primarily constipation. Surgical treatment in the form of Ventral Prosthesis Rectopexy (VPR) has been proposed and seems to have the best outcomes. However, the selection criteria of patients to undergo this kind of operation are not clear and the reported outcomes are mainly short-term and data on long-term outcomes is scarce. This study assesses new evidence on the efficacy of VPR for the treatment of ODS, specifically focusing on inclusion criteria for surgery and the long-term outcomes. A search was performed of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Ovid and Cochrane databases on all studies reporting on VPR for ODS from 2000 to March 2020. No language restrictions were made. All studies on VPR were reviewed systematically. The main outcomes were intra-operative complications, conversion, procedure duration, short-term mortality and morbidity, length of stay, faecal incontinence and constipation, quality of life (QoL) score and patient satisfaction. Quality assessment and data extraction were performed independently by three observers. Fourteen studies including 963 patients were eligible for analysis. The immediate postoperative morbidity rate was 8.9%. A significant improvement in constipation symptoms was observed in the 12-month postoperative period for ODS (p < 0.0001). Current evidence shows that VPR offers symptomatic relief to the majority of patients with ODS, improving both constipation-like symptoms and faecal incontinence for at least 1-2 years postoperatively. Some studies report on functional results after longer follow-up, showing sustainable improvement, although in a lesser extent.

Management of the adenocarcinoma of the upper rectum: a reappraisal.

The present review attempts to assess whether upper rectal cancer (URC) should be treated either as colon cancer or as rectal one, namely to be managed with upfront surgery without neo-adjuvant treatment and partial mesorectal excision (PME), or with neo-adjuvant short course radiotherapy (SCRT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) as indicated, followed by surgery with total mesorectal excision. Reports from current evidence including studies, reviews and various guidelines are conflicting. Main reasons for inability to reach safe conclusions are (i) the various anatomical definitions of the rectum and its upper part, (ii) the inadequate preoperative local staging,(iii) the heterogeneity of selection criteria for the neo-adjuvant treatment,(iv) the different neo-adjuvant treatment regimens, and(v) the variety in the extent of surgical resection, among the studies. Although not adequately supported, locally advanced URC can be treated with neo-adjuvant CRT provided the lesion is within the radiation field of safety, and a PME if the lower border of the tumour is located above the anterior peritoneal reflection. There is evidence that adjuvant chemotherapy is of benefit in high-risk stage II and stage III lesions.

Primary curative surgery and preemptive or adjuvant hyperthermic peritoneal chemotherapy in colorectal cancer patients at high risk to develop peritoneal carcinomatosis. A systematic review.

PURPOSE: Τo evaluate all available data on the effect of preemptive intervention in patients who have curative surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC) and are at high risk to develop peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). METHODS: The authors conducted a systematic review of all published studies from January 2000 to July 2016. Twelve studies were eventually considered for analysis, and were divided in four categories, according to different approaches for adjuvant intra-peritoneal chemotherapy: a) hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), during primary surgery for CRC; b) early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC), after primary surgery for CRC; c) early re-intervention (laparotomy or laparoscopy) and HIPEC; and d) as second look laparotomy and HIPEC + cytoreductive surgery (CRS), several months after primary surgery. RESULTS: Considering prophylactic HIPEC during primary surgery, the studies that were analysed showed a peritoneal recurrence rate of 0-12.9%, a 3- and 5-year disease free survival (DFS) of 67-97.5% and 54.8-84% respectively, and a 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) of 67-100% and 84%, respectively. These oncological results are probably better than what is expected in patients at high risk to develop PC and have only adjuvant systemic chemotherapy. Because of the great heterogeneity in inclusion criteria (risk factors for PC) and methodology of intra-peritoneal chemotherapy (different timing, different techniques, different agents), a meta-analysis was not performed. CONCLUSIONS: At present and because of the insufficient available evidence, preemptive intervention at the immediate postoperative adjuvant setting is recommended only in the setting of a registered clinical trial.

Clinical practice guidelines for the management of metastatic colorectal cancer: a consensus statement of the Hellenic Society of Medical Oncologists (HeSMO).

There is discrepancy and failure to adhere to current international guidelines for the management of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) in hospitals in Greece and Cyprus. The aim of the present document is to provide a consensus on the multidisciplinary management of metastastic CRC, considering both special characteristics of our Healthcare System and international guidelines. Following discussion and online communication among the members of an executive team chosen by the Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology (HeSMO), a consensus for metastastic CRC disease was developed. Statements were subjected to the Delphi methodology on two voting rounds by invited multidisciplinary international experts on CRC. Statements reaching level of agreement by ≥80% were considered as having achieved large consensus, whereas statements reaching 60-80% moderate consensus. One hundred and nine statements were developed. Ninety experts voted for those statements. The median rate of abstain per statement was 18.5% (range: 0-54%). In the end of the process, all statements achieved a large consensus. The importance of centralization, care by a multidisciplinary team, adherence to guidelines, and personalization is emphasized. R0 resection is the only intervention that may offer substantial improvement in the oncological outcomes.

Clinical practice guidelines for the surgical treatment of rectal cancer: a consensus statement of the Hellenic Society of Medical Oncologists (HeSMO).

In rectal cancer management, accurate staging by magnetic resonance imaging, neo-adjuvant treatment with the use of radiotherapy, and total mesorectal excision have resulted in remarkable improvement in the oncological outcomes. However, there is substantial discrepancy in the therapeutic approach and failure to adhere to international guidelines among different Greek-Cypriot hospitals. The present guidelines aim to aid the multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer, considering both the local special characteristics of our healthcare system and the international relevant agreements (ESMO, EURECCA). Following background discussion and online communication sessions for feedback among the members of an executive team, a consensus rectal cancer management was obtained. Statements were subjected to the Delphi methodology voting system on two rounds to achieve further consensus by invited multidisciplinary international experts on colorectal cancer. Statements were considered of high, moderate or low consensus if they were voted by ≥80%, 60-80%, or <60%, respectively; those obtaining a low consensus level after both voting rounds were rejected. One hundred and two statements were developed and voted by 100 experts. The mean rate of abstention per statement was 12.5% (range: 2-45%). In the end of the process, all statements achieved a high consensus. Guidelines and algorithms of diagnosis and treatment were proposed. The importance of centralization, care by a multidisciplinary team, adherence to guidelines, and personalization is emphasized.

Quality of surgery for rectal carcinoma: comparison between open and laparoscopic approaches.

BACKGROUND: Macroscopic evaluation of a tumor specimen is an independent prognostic factor of oncologic outcome after total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer. This study aimed to assess macroscopic quality of specimens acquired after laparoscopic versus open TME in patients with low rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-two patients with low rectal cancer underwent TME either by open (n = 39) or laparoscopic (n = 33) approach. In all specimens, the cut edge of the peritoneal reflection at the anterior mid-rectum, the Denonvillier's fascia, the visceral fascia covering the mesorectum both posteriorly and laterally, and the bowel wall below the mesorectum were macroscopically assessed. RESULTS: Colorectal anastomoses were located significantly lower in the laparoscopic than in the open group (P < .001). The Denonvillier's fascia was violated in 7 patients after open surgery (P = .01). A significantly more complete TME with intact visceral pelvic fascia was performed after laparoscopy compared with open surgery (P = .025). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy offers a macroscopically more complete specimen after TME for rectal cancer than the open approach because it offers a better view in the pelvis.

Laparoscopic or open surgery for the cancer of the middle and lower rectum short-term outcomes of a comparative non-randomised study.

INTRODUCTION: The study compares the short-term results of the laparoscopic and open approach for the surgical treatment of rectal cancer. Consecutive cases with rectal cancer operated upon with laparoscopy from 2004 to 2007 were compared to open rectal cancer cases. Total mesorectal excision (TME) was attempted in all cases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-two cases were included in the OPEN and 45 in the LAP group and were matched for age, gender, disease stage and operation type. SURGICAL PROCEDURE: Duration of surgery was longer and blood transfusion requirements were less in the LAP group. Higher blood loss was observed in patients with neoadjuvant treatment in both groups. Patients with neoadjuvant treatment in the OPEN group had higher operation time, but that was not the case in the LAP group. There were three conversions (7%). RESULTS: Overall morbidity was higher in the OPEN group. LAP group patients were found to recover faster. R0 resection was achieved in 88% in the OPEN and 94% in the LAP group. DISCUSSION: Less morbidity and faster recovery is offered after laparoscopic TME. Quality of surgery assessed by histopathology is similar between the approaches. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation seems to have significant impact on blood loss but results in longer operation times of the OPEN group.

Patterns of esophageal acid exposure after laparoscopic Heller's myotomy and Dor's fundoplication for esophageal achalasia.

BACKGROUND: Heller's myotomy for esophageal achalasia is associated with less esophageal acid gastroesophageal reflux when combined a Dor's fundoplication. The Aim of the study was to assess the incidence of postoperative esophageal acid exposure after laparoscopic Heller's myotomy and Dor's fundoplication (HM-DF). METHODS: Seventy six patients (37 males) with esophageal achalasia were prospectively followed-up by clinical interview and laboratory tests before and after laparoscopic HM-DF. A symptom score was used for clinical assessment. Laboratory assessment included esophageal standard manometry, esophagogram and esophageal pH 24-hour monitoring before and 1- and 5-years after surgery. RESULTS: Symptom score improved at 1-year after surgery (P < 0.001). Heartburn was only reported by 5 patients, dysphagia or/and regurgitation by 28 and substernal pain by 12. 91% of patients had satisfactory functional results. Pathological esophageal exposure to acid was seen in 21% of the cases. Pathological acid events showed the features of pseudoreflux in 66%t and those of true GER in 34%. Pathologically increased esophageal exposure to acid was more commonly detected in patients with a pseudodiverticulum (P = 0.001) and was related to the diameter of distal esophagus and symptom score (P < 0.001). There was no reduction in esophageal acid exposure after treatment with proton pump inhibitors in 16 patients. Neither the symptom score nor esophageal acid exposure at esophageal pH monitoring changed significantly at the 5-year follow-up in 35 patients. Esophageal configuration remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Increased esophageal exposure to acid after laparoscopic HM-DF for esophageal achalasia i) is detected in 21% of patients, and is rather the result of food stagnation than of true GER, ii) is more commonly seen in cases with pseudodiverticulum, iii) is related to the diameter of distal esophagus, iv) does not respond to antisecretory treatment and v) does not deteriorate by time.

Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) to reverse the anatomic disorders of pelvic floor dyssynergia.

Anterior rectocele and rectoanal intussusception are anatomic disorders related to excessive straining during defecation that usually manifest with symptoms of obstructive defecation. Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR), a newly described surgical method for correcting these disorders, is considered a good alternative to the traditional transrectal approaches. The aim of the present study was to assess the early postoperative functional results of STARR. A total of 16 patients (13 female) were subjected to the STARR procedure during a period of 12 months. The presence of anatomic disorders of the anorectum was verified by dynamic defecography. Preoperative assessment also included colonic transit time, anal sphincter ultrasonography, and anorectal stationary manometry. Postoperative assessment included the same battery of tests. Altogether, 12 patients had rectoanal intussusception of > 2 cm and rectocele. In eight of them the anterior component of the rectocele was 2 to 4 cm, and in four it was > 4 cm. Four patients had a 1- to 2-cm internal intussusception and a rectocele of < 2 cm. All of them reported evacuation difficulties, but none had significant incontinence. Preoperative endoscopy did not reveal the presence of a solitary ulcer in any of the patients. All females had had normal vaginal deliveries, and four of them were multiparous. No complications were encountered postoperatively, and the need for analgesics was minimal. At defecography, rectoanal anatomy was seen to be restored in all patients. Obstructive defecation symptoms remained rather unaffected in seven, disappeared in three, and improved significantly in the remaining six patients. The seven failures showed anismus at manometry and had biofeedback treatment with satisfactory results in five of them. Failure of the operation and biofeedback sessions to treat symptoms in those two cases was attributed to coexisting enterocele, which had been missed preoperatively. Immediately after surgery, most of the patients complained of urgency and frequent small motions that resolved spontaneously within 3 to 5 weeks in all but two cases. STARR is a safe, well tolerated surgical procedure that effectively restores anatomy and function of the anorectum in patients with anterior mucosal prolapse and rectoanal intussusception. Additional biofeedback treatment is usually necessary for further functional improvement. Failure may be the result of other coexisting anatomic and functional abnormalities of the pelvic floor.

Lymph node clearance after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: laparoscopic versus open approach.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic resection of the rectum is still under scrutiny for its adequacy of oncological clearance. AIM: To assess lymph node yield after laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer as compared to the open approach. METHODS: 74 patients with middle and low rectal cancer were prospectively randomized in two groups. Group A included 39 patients who had an open TME (35 with low anterior resection of the rectum (LARR) and 4 with abdominoperineal resection of the rectum (APR)). In group B, there were 34 patients who had a laparoscopic TME (27 with LARR and 7 with APR). 10 of the LARR patients in group A and 14 of the LARR patients in group B had a defunctioning ileostomy. All operations were performed by one surgeon or under his supervision. RESULTS: Gender and age distribution were similar for both groups (group A: 23 males; mean age 69 (41-85); group B: 20 males; mean age 72 (31-84)). The mean distance of the tumor from the dentate line was 7.6 cm (1-12 cm) for group A and 6.1 cm (1-12 cm) for group B. Anastomosis was formed at a mean distance of 5.5 cm (1.5-8.5 cm) from the dentate line in group A and 3.5 cm (1-4.5 cm) in group B. At histology, in group A there were 5 T4 tumors, 9 T3, 10 T3+ (<1 mm distance from the circumferential resection margin), 13 T2 and 2 T1. In group B, there were 3 T4 tumors, 14 T3, 8 T3+, 7 T2 and 2 T1. Differences between groups were not significant. The mean number of lymph nodes retrieved in group A specimens was 19.2 (5-45) and in group B 19.2 (8-41) (p = 0.2). In group A, 3.9 (1-9) regional, 13.9 (3-34) intermediate and 1.5 (1-3) apical lymph nodes were retrieved. The respective values in group B were 3.7 (3-7), 14.4 (4-33) and 1.3 (1-3). Differences between groups were not significant. Also, the incidence of lymph node involvement by the tumor was not significantly different between groups (group A: 23; group B: 19). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic resection of the rectum can achieve similar lymph node clearance to the open approach. Also, distribution of the lymph nodes along the resected specimens is similar between the two approaches.

Long-term functional results after laparoscopic surgery for esophageal achalasia.

BACKGROUND: Evidence on the long-term outcome of laparoscopic Heller-Dor surgery is limited. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term outcome of achalasic patients after surgery, particularly in relation to the radiologic preoperative stage of the disease. METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with achalasia were assessed clinically and by esophageal radiology, manometry, and 24-hour ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring before and at 3 months, 1, 1 to 3, 3 to 5, and 5 to 8 years after a laparoscopic Heller-Dor procedure. RESULTS: At 1 year after surgery the symptom score was significantly lower than the preoperative score (P < .001), and a satisfactory clinical outcome was seen in more than 90% of the patients with stage I, II, and III disease at the preoperative radiologic assessment. Only 50% of stage IV patients reported satisfactory results. An adequate opening of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and LES resting pressure of less than 8 mm Hg was achieved in all patients, and esophageal emptying was accelerated significantly (P < .001). At the consecutive follow-up evaluation (1-8 y), a satisfactory outcome was maintained in all stage I, II, and III responders. Stage IV patients with initially unsatisfactory results reported a worsening of symptoms (P < .02). Patients with pseudodiverticulum had a higher symptom score (P < .01). LES opening and resting pressure remained at levels of the 1-year follow-up evaluation. Esophageal emptying remained satisfactory in stage I, II, and III responders, but deteriorated in stage IV nonresponders and in 6 of the 10 patients with a pseudodiverticulum. CONCLUSIONS: A satisfactory outcome of the laparoscopic Heller-Dor procedure in stage I, II, and III achalasic patients seems to last. Stage IV nonresponders tend to deteriorate over time. The development of pseudodiverticulum is associated with an increased symptom score.

Rectoanal intussusception: presentation of the disorder and late results of resection rectopexy.

BACKGROUND: Rectoanal intussusception may cause symptoms of obstructed defecation, and functional results of prosthesis rectopexy are usually not satisfactory. The aim of this study was to assess several parameters of the disorder and to evaluate the outcome of resection rectopexy. METHODS: During a 10-year period, 27 female patients with symptomatic large rectoanal intussusception had resection rectopexy (23 laparoscopy; 4 laparotomy). Conservative treatment, including biofeedback treatment in 22 patients, had failed in all cases. Preoperative and postoperative evaluation included clinical assessment, anorectal manometry, evacuation defecography, and colon transit studies. Follow-up ranged between one and five years. RESULTS: Length of intussusception was 2 to 4.9 cm and was significantly related to pelvic floor descent (P = 0.003) and inversely related to resting anal pressures (P < 0.001). Eleven patients had undergone a previous hysterectomy, 9 had enterocele-sigmoidocele, 7 had incontinence of varying severity, and 8 had a solitary rectal ulcer. Colon transit was abnormal in all but five cases. Immediate functional results were bad in two-thirds of the cases; tenesmus, urge to defecate, and frequent stools were the main complaints. By the time these symptoms had subsided, and one year after surgery, all but two patients were satisfied with the outcome. Intussusception was reduced in all cases, anal sphincter tone recovered (P = 0.002), perineal descent decreased (P < 0.001), and colonic transit was accelerated (P < 0.001). Patients available at five-year follow-up had no or only minor defecatory problems. CONCLUSION: Resection rectopexy improves symptoms of obstructed defecation attributed to large rectoanal intussusception.

The effect of total and anterior partial fundoplication on antireflux mechanisms of the gastroesophageal junction.

BACKGROUND: The effect of total (Nissen) and anterior partial fundoplication (APF) for the surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) on the motor behavior of the esophagogastric axis has not been fully assessed. The purpose of this study was to assess any alterations in lower esophageal sphincter (LES) and gastric fundus motor parameters in GERD patients after Nissen or APF fundoplication. METHODS: Twenty four patients with documented GERD underwent either laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication (n = 12) or laparoscopic APF (n = 12). Preoperative and postoperative stationary esophageal manometry included assessment of LES resting and postdeglutition relaxation pressures, intragastric pressure, and LES transient relaxations in the left lateral and upright positions and after gastric distension. RESULTS: Both types of fundoplication resulted in significant increases in LES resting (P <0.001) and postdeglutition relaxation pressure (P <0.001) in both positions and after gastric distention. Intragastric pressure increased only after Nissen fundoplication in the postgastric distention state (P = 0.01). Transient LES relaxations were equally abolished after both procedures. All postoperative changes were to a similar level after either procedure with the exception of intragastric pressure after gastric distention, which was significantly higher after total than after partial fundoplication (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Both procedures equally increase LES resting and postdeglutition relaxation pressures and abolish transient LES relaxations at all states. The significantly higher intragastric pressure at the postgastric distention state after Nissen fundoplication could possibly explain the higher incidence of epigastric fullness and discomfort after this type of antireflux surgery.

Gastric electrical activity in patients with cholelithiasis undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective controlled study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of gallstone disease (GD) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy on gastric electrical activity of slow waves, which was recorded via transcutaneous electrogastrography (EGG). METHODS: Twenty-one consecutive patients (M/F: 12/9, 52.7 +/- 15 years old) with GD and no previous history of abdominal operations or known disease affecting gastrointestinal motility were studied. The EGG was performed for 30 min prior to and 90 min after a standard meal, during a 4-6 month period prior to and after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The percentile proportion of the three spectra of gastric slow waves frequency was studied, defined as follows: bradygastria, 1-2.1 cycles per min (c.p.m.); normogastria, 2.2-3.9 c.p.m.; and tachygastria, 4-9 c.p.m. The findings were compared to those of nine healthy subjects (M/F: 5/4, 49.5 +/- 14.8 years old). RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found in percentile distribution of bradygastria, normogastria and tachygastria, pre- or post-prandially, neither before or after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, nor between patients and controls. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with GD do not exhibit differences in gastric electrical activity of slow waves in comparison to normal subjects and laparoscopic cholecystectomy does not alter gastric electrical activity. These findings suggest that cholelithiasis does not seem to cause dyspeptic symptoms due to gastric dysrythmias.

Factors affecting esophageal motility in gastroesophageal reflux disease.

BACKGROUND: There are conflicting data concerning the effect of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) on esophageal motor function. HYPOTHESIS: Duration of GERD might affect severity of symptoms, grade of esophageal mucosal injury, and esophageal motor behavior. DESIGN: Retrospective study of a defined cohort. SETTINGS: Two referral centers, one of them academic, for esophageal gastrointestinal motility disorders. PATIENTS: One hundred forty-seven patients with documented GERD. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Symptoms, grade of mucosal injury on esophagoscopy, esophageal manometry, ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring, and esophagogram. RESULTS: Patients with GERD had significantly decreased lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure (P =.02), lower amplitude of esophageal peristalsis at all levels of measurement (P<.001), and more delayed esophageal transit (P =.007) compared with control subjects. Patients with dysphagia, severe esophagitis, and Barrett esophagus presented with a longer history of the disease, significantly worse esophageal motor function (P<.01), and more prolonged esophageal transit than patients without the above features of the disease. Impairment of esophageal peristalsis and lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure were significantly inversely related to the duration of the disease (P<.001). Also, delay of esophageal transit was significantly related to the duration of the disease (P =.002) and inversely related to the amplitude of esophageal peristalsis (P<.001). Unlike the manometric variables, the extent of reflux, as assessed by ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring, was not related to the duration of the disease. CONCLUSION: A long history of GERD is more commonly associated with presence of dysphagia, delayed esophageal transit, severe esophagitis, presence of Barrett esophagus, and impaired esophageal motility.