Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Diabetes Obes Metab ; 18(5): 475-82, 2016 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26799540

RESUMEN

AIMS: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of once-weekly dulaglutide 1.5 mg, a long-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, compared with placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) on glimepiride monotherapy. METHODS: This phase III, randomized (4 : 1; dulaglutide:placebo), double-blind, placebo-controlled, 24-week study compared the safety and efficacy of once-weekly dulaglutide 1.5 mg with placebo in sulphonylurea-treated (≥half-maximal dose, stable ≥3 months) patients (N = 300) with T2D and inadequate glycaemic control [glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥7.5 and ≤9.5% (≥58 mmol/mol and ≤80 mmol/mol)]. Analysis was carried out according to intention-to-treat. RESULTS: At baseline, the mean participant age was 58 years; mean HbA1c was 8.4% (68 mmol/mol) and mean weight was 85.5 kg. Dulaglutide 1.5 mg was superior to placebo at 24 weeks for HbA1c reduction from baseline with a between-group HbA1c difference of -1.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) -1.6, -1.0] or -14 mmol/mol (95% CI -17, -11); p < 0.001. A greater proportion of participants in the dulaglutide group reached an HbA1c level of <7.0% (53 mmol/mol) compared with placebo (55.3% vs 18.9%; p < 0.001). Dulaglutide significantly decreased fasting serum glucose from baseline compared with placebo (between-group difference -1.86 mmol/l (95% CI -2.58, -1.14) or -33.54 mg/dl (95% CI -46.55, -20.53); p < 0.001. Weight was decreased significantly from baseline in the dulaglutide group (p < 0.001); the between-group difference was not significant. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events for dulaglutide 1.5 mg were gastrointestinal: nausea (10.5%), diarrhoea (8.4%) and eructation (5.9%). Total hypoglycaemia was higher with dulaglutide 1.5 mg vs placebo (2.37 and 0.07 events/participant/year, respectively; p = 0.025). No severe hypoglycaemia was reported. CONCLUSIONS: Once-weekly dulaglutide 1.5 mg had a favourable benefit/risk profile when added to glimepiride monotherapy.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Receptor del Péptido 1 Similar al Glucagón/agonistas , Péptidos Similares al Glucagón/análogos & derivados , Hiperglucemia/prevención & control , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Fragmentos Fc de Inmunoglobulinas/uso terapéutico , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Sulfonilurea/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/metabolismo , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Resistencia a Medicamentos , Quimioterapia Combinada/efectos adversos , Femenino , Receptor del Péptido 1 Similar al Glucagón/metabolismo , Péptidos Similares al Glucagón/administración & dosificación , Péptidos Similares al Glucagón/efectos adversos , Péptidos Similares al Glucagón/uso terapéutico , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Humanos , Hipoglucemia/inducido químicamente , Hipoglucemia/prevención & control , Hipoglucemiantes/administración & dosificación , Hipoglucemiantes/efectos adversos , Fragmentos Fc de Inmunoglobulinas/administración & dosificación , Fragmentos Fc de Inmunoglobulinas/efectos adversos , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Análisis de Intención de Tratar , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pacientes Desistentes del Tratamiento , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/administración & dosificación , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión/efectos adversos , Compuestos de Sulfonilurea/efectos adversos
2.
Osteoporos Int ; 16(10): 1210-4, 2005 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15731885

RESUMEN

The intravertebral vacuum cleft sign (VCS) is an uncommon radiological sign, characterized by a radiolucent zone in the vertebral body. It is composed of 95% nitrogen and small amounts of oxygen and carbon dioxide. Post-traumatic ischemic necrosis could be its physiopathological mechanism, along with other pathologies like osteoporosis, corticosteroid therapy, diabetes, arteriosclerosis, alcoholism, multiple myeloma, bone metastasis and osteomyelitis. The broad diagnosis is made by antero-posterior X-ray, but computed tomography scan (CT scan) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may help with the differential diagnosis. The aims of this paper are, on one hand, to communicate the clinical case of a 73-year-old osteoporotic woman with traumatic vertebral fractures who developed this sign in her radiological survey. On the other hand, its secondary aims are to review the medical literature about this sign and to show the clinical and radiological evolution after a percutaneous vertebroplasty.


Asunto(s)
Gases/análisis , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/complicaciones , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/etiología , Anciano , Densidad Ósea , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Femenino , Humanos , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Osteonecrosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Osteonecrosis/etiología , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/diagnóstico , Osteoporosis Posmenopáusica/diagnóstico por imagen , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA